Posted by ros [ros] on March 31, 1999 at 12:31:50 {ohFII14TUcAPLKlRwd1.7/SY5I9NtE}:
There have been claims that the advancement of bloodless medical treatment is credited to Jehovah's Witnesses refusing blood transfusions; that this has essentially been a driving force for the medical community to research alternative medical treatment.
Is there any basis for this claim other than propaganda from the Watchtower Society? Its my understanding that disease transmission (such as Hepatitis and AIDS) is essentially what has driven the medical community to seek safe and viable alternatives for bloodless surgery. (A separate issue from sudden loss of blood in an emergency situation.) While it is quite likely and JW patients--among others--may have provided human guinea pigs for developing bloodless procedures and techniques, it is highly doubtful imo that any significant effort in this area of medicine is being prompted primarily by the Watchtower's doctrine. For just one example, it is well known that there is significant research to find alternatives for insulin injection for diabetics. Medical research is in the business of researching every kind of treatment to minimize risk.
Is there any credible evidence or references to support the claim that medical advancement in the area of blood alternatives is driven by the Watchtower religion? Or this just another indulgence in self flattery to boost confidence in their flock?
Ros