*Micro & Macro - letter to ed.


[ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ HOURGLASS2 ARCHIVES ]

Posted by J.H. [JH] on March 28, 1999 at 22:12:34 {HR5JhS9/hcFUHCa6lzc2MWsHSG.vl05do}:

In Reply to: Micro & Macro - letter to ed. posted by Tallyman on March 28, 1999 at 13:37:53:

TT

: Research such as published in the non-creationist Michael Denton's "Evolution: A Theory In Crisis" is increasingly proving the impossibility of "macro" evolution.

You obviously ignore the fact that in his next book, Denton proved he fully accepted macro-evolution. He also proved that calling him a "non-creationist" is a truth with massive modification, since his basic argument is that nature reveals "design", ie. that a Designer (avoiding word "God") somehow put evolution on its tracks. So, even Denton himself fully ignores and implicitly refutes the arguments he made in "crisis".

I am waiting for the new book: "Denton, a creationist in crisis"

Btw, the "by design" argument was refuted by David Hume, and amazingly, his refutation needs little update after all these years.



Follow Ups:

  • **Micro & Macro - letter to ed. Tallyman 08:09:20 3/29/99 (4)
  • ***Micro & Macro - letter to ed. J.H. 09:09:08 3/29/99 (3)
  • ****Micro & Macro - letter to ed. Tallyman 09:49:36 3/29/99 (2)
  • *****Micro & Macro - letter to ed. J.H. 11:20:58 3/29/99 (1)
  • ******Micro & Macro - letter to ed. Tallyman 11:40:06 3/29/99 (0)

    [ HOURGLASS2 OUTPOST ] [ HOURGLASS2 ARCHIVES ]

    Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

    1