Posted by J.H. [JH] on March 29, 1999 at 09:09:08 {HR5JhS9/hcdHZSOKyIbAMWsHSG.vl05do}:
In Reply to: **Micro & Macro - letter to ed. posted by Tallyman on March 29, 1999 at 08:09:20:
TT,
: Hey everyone, please go to the link Jan provided and scroll down and read the critical comments from people who have recently read Denton's book... and try to interpret the reviews as concluding that Denton had fully accepted macro-evolution.
Tom, one of your own fellow-cretinists writes:
I was excited to see that Michael Denton had two new books: NATURE"S DESTINY and a 1996 Second Edition of EVOLUTION: A THEORY IN CRISIS. At last, I could update my antievolution arsenal from the man who showed me the fallacy of evolution. However, the book EVOLUTION:A THEORY IN CRISIS was simply are reprinting of the old, outdated 1986 version. Oh well, there was still NATURE'S DESTINY. Not really. Denton has completely "turned" and now holds evolution to be true, disregarding all of the arguments he made in his earlier work. I was very disappointed with the work
I'm also a Dyed-In-The-Wool-Fanatical-Spherical-Earther.
Your point is?
There is only one type of people who reject evolution, namely religious fanatics who can't reconcile the
fact of evolution with their superstitions. If it wasn't for the power and irrationality of religion, evolution would be 100% uncontroversial, or at least not more controversial than relativity.