Posted by Moderator 52 [Neighbor] on March 27, 1999 at 05:37:04 {wX7CJhorlMhpqHJTiPD6MWSdrpa5PWFPA}:
In Reply to: ******FORBIDDEN Watchtower document posted by J.H. on March 27, 1999 at 02:07:00:
J.H.
You said:
The expression "links in violation" is different than saying "links to material that violates". To justify, the link itself must violate copyright. It's hard to imagine any link that does, but whatever the case, it doesn't refer to links to material some see as copyright violations.
What I don�t get is how you apparently understand my expressions on this thread as opposed to what you say above. Just where have I said that a link to material violating copyright laws constitutes a violation of the FPP? On that subject all I did was quote the FPP followed by my opinion that what constitutes international copyright violations is debatable. Where do you and I differ in this?
Moderator 52