The Murder of the Tsar
In 1922, Metropolitan Anthony (Khrapovitsky) wrote: "If the
[1917-18] Council was at fault in anything, it was, perhaps, in failing to
express, with sufficient force, its condemnation of the revolution and the
overthrow of his Majesty. Who will be able to deny that the February revolution
was as God-hating as it was anti-monarchist? Who can condemn the Bolshevik
revolution and, at the same time, approve of the Provisional government?"
The Provisional government was hardly
less guilty than the Bolsheviks, because it was they who overthrew the Tsar,
which led to the overthrow of everything else. For, as St.�John Maximovich
said: "It cannot be otherwise. He was overthrown who united everything,
standing in defence of the Truth." In fact, according to the profound consciousness
of the Church, the murder of the Tsar and his family, on July 4/17, 1918,
was not the responsibility of the Bolsheviks only, but of the whole people
who, directly or indirectly, connived at it. As St.�John explained: "All
the regicides in Russia's history were committed by some clique, not by the
people. When Paul�I was murdered, the people were not even aware of it,
and when they found out, they brought their condolences and prayers to his
grave for many years afterward. Alexander�II's murder unleashed a storm
of indignation in Russia, which helped strengthen the moral fibre of the
people, as became evident during the reign of Alexander�III. The people were
innocent of the Tsar-Liberator's blood. But here the people, the entire
Russian nation, is guilty of the spilled blood of their Tsar. Some partook
in the murder, others, just as blameworthy, approved of it, while still others
did nothing to interfere. All are guilty, and truly we must say: 'His blood
be on us, and on our children' (Matthew�27.25)�"
On hearing the news, the patriarch immediately condemned
the murder. He had already angered the government by sending the Tsar his
blessing in prison; and he now celebrated a pannikhida �for him, blessing the archpastors and pastors to do
the same. Then he announced in the Kazan cathedral: "We, in obedience to
the teaching of the Word of God, must condemn this deed, otherwise the blood
of the shot man will fall also on us, and not only on those who committed
the crime�"
At one point shortly after the murder of the Tsar, some member
of the Council suggested to the Patriarch that he take refuge abroad, so
that he not share in the fate of the Tsar. "The flight of the Patriarch,"
replied his Holiness, "would play into the hands of the enemies of the Church.
Let them do with me what they want."
On July�26�/�August�8, in an address "to all the faithful
children of the Russian Orthodox Church," the Patriarch said: "Sin has fanned
everywhere the flame of the passions, enmity and wrath; brother has risen
up against brother; the prisons are filled with captives; the earth is soaked
in innocent blood, shed by a brother's hand; it is defiled by violence, pillaging,
fornication and every uncleanness. From this same poisonous source of sin
has issued the great deception of material earthly goods, by which our people
is enticed, forgetting the one thing necessary. We have not rejected this
temptation, as the Saviour Christ rejected it in the wilderness. We have
wanted to create a paradise on earth, but without God and His holy commandments.
God is not mocked. And so we hunger and thirst and are naked upon the earth,
blessed with an abundance of nature's gifts, and the seal of the curse has
fallen on the very work of the people and on all the undertakings of our
hands. Sin, heavy and unrepented of, has summoned Satan from the abyss,
and he is now bellowing his slander against the Lord and against His Christ,
and is raising an open persecution against the Church."
This address characterized Socialism in similar terms to
those used by Dostoyevsky's Grand Inquisitor, as the temptation to create
bread out of stones which Christ rejected in the wilderness. Rather than
seeking paradise in heaven and with God through the fulfillment of His commandments,
the Socialists "have wanted to create a paradise on earth, but without God
and His holy commandments." The result has been hell in this life and (to
quote from the anathema) "the fire of Gehenna in the life to come."
This went some of the way to meeting the criticisms leveled
against the Patriarch and the Council by Count Olsuphyev and Protopriest
Vladimir Vostokov, that the essence of Socialism as an antichristian heresy
had been hardly touched upon. As Fr.�Vladimir said: "From this platform,
before the enlightener of Russia, the holy Prince Vladimir, I witness to
my priestly conscience that the Russian people is being deceived, and that
up to this time no one has told them the whole truth. So much has been said
here about the terrors brought upon the country by Bolshevism. But what
is Bolshevism? - the natural and logical development of Socialism. And Socialism
is - that antichristian movement which in the final analysis produces Bolshevism
as its highest development and which engenders those phenomena completely
contrary to the principles of Christian asceticism that we are living through
now.
"Unfortunately, many of our professors and writers have arrayed
Socialism in beautiful clothes, calling it similar to Christianity, and thereby
they together with the agitators of revolution have led the uneducated people
into error. Fathers and brothers! What fruits did we expect of Socialism,
when we not only did not fight against it, but also defended it at times,
or almost always were shyly silent before its contagion? We must serve the
Church by faith, and save the country from destructive tendencies, and for
that it is necessary to speak the truth to the people without delay, telling
them what Socialism consists of and what it leads to.
"We all, beginning with Your Holiness and ending with myself,
the last member of the Council, must bow the knee before God, and beseech
Him to forgive us for allowing the growth in the country of evil teachings
and violence. Only after sincere repentance by the whole people will the
country be pacified and regenerated. And God will bestow upon us His mercy
and grace. But, if we continue only to anathematize without repenting, without
declaring the truth to the people, then they will with just cause say to
us: You, too, are guilty that the country has been reduced to this crime,
for which the anathema now sounds out; you by your pusillanimity have allowed
the development of evil and have been slow to call the facts and phenomena
of state life by their real names!
"We all must unite into one Christian family under the banner
of the Holy and Life-Creating Cross and under the leadership of his Holiness
the Patriarch, to say that Socialism, which calls people as if to brotherhood,
is an openly anti-christian and evil phenomenon�"
The essential incompatibility between Socialism and Christianity
was never doubted by the apostles of Socialism. Religion was called "opium
for the people" by Marx, and by Lenin - "spiritual vodka". Again, Lenin
wrote that "every religious idea, every idea of a god, even flirting with
the idea of God, is unutterable vileness of the most dangerous kind." And,
in 1918, he said to Krasin: "Electricity will take the place of God. Let
the peasant pray to electricity; he's going to feel the power of the central
authorities more than that of heaven." For, as Alexander Solzhenitsyn says:
"Within the philosophical system of Marx and Lenin, and at the heart of their
psychology, hatred of God is the principal driving force, more fundamental
than all their political and economic pretensions. Militant atheism is not
merely incidental or marginal to Communist policy. It is not a side-effect,
but the central pivot�"
That militant atheism was the central pivot of Marxism-Leninism
was to become abundantly evident in the next seventy years. However, it
was already clearly manifest in the murder of the Tsar and his family. For
by his abdication in favour of himself and his son, the Tsar had already
renounced all claims to power, so his murder had no political advantage in
view, but was an act of pure malice. It was a trampling on the symbol of
the old theocracy by the representatives of the new satanocracy, and an important
signal from the new authorities to the people - a signal that there was no
turning back. And just as the whole tragedy of the Russian people in the
years that lay ahead lay in the fact that they had paved the way for this
satanic act, the destruction of the Russian theocracy, and cooperated with
it, so the only real hope of their regeneration now lies in their repentance
of it�