Clones vs Compatibles


Should you purchase a "clone" or a "compatible"? First let's define these terms.

A "clone" is a duplicate of the original IBM classic "AT" hardware design.

A "compatible" is a computer which is of proprietary design.

Clone manufacturers continue to support the industry standard design specifications which assume that their computer will work with components from other manufacturers in both fit and function.

Compatible manufacturers deliberately create hardware differences in the design of their computers. As a result, the consumer must often return to them or their authorized agents for repairs and upgrades.

The degree of independence the consumer can exercise regarding upgrades and repair is proportionate to the degree of independence the manufacturer has exercised in his hardware design.

Most of the systems manufactured by IBM, Compaq, Acer, Packard Bell, Gateway 2000, AST, ALR, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, and other recognizable brands, fall into the "compatible" category.
Legitimate manufacturers whose names you might not recognize, produce FCC and UL approved systems which are considered true "clones". Some Industry assembled clones are usually not
FCC or UL approved and are sometimes assembled with inferior parts. Consider these and the following points when deciding your next computer purchase.

    More clones are sold by computer professionals to businesses and individuals for both server and desktop use than any name brand compatible.

    Clones and compatibles experience the same average rate of failure, and suffer the same effects of sloppy or inspired design and manufacture.

    Clone and compatible pricing is comparable and dependent upon quality. (Though 'compatible' replacement parts are often more expensive)