- What is the cause of, or the reason for the man's blindness: as implied in the disciples' question (see also
Exodus 20:5; 34:7)?
Sin (v2). The verses in Exodus show the belief that it could be a sin from a previous generation.
as expressed by Jesus?
Jesus makes it clear that sin is not the reason. Jesus simply sees a chance to display the work of God (v3).
as inferred from the Jews' remarks (v 34)?
The Jews seem to believe the verses in Exodus.
- What do you understand to be the relationship between sin and illness (or specifically blindness)?
Sin is not the reason for illness.
What did Jesus mean by, "neither this man nor his parents sinned"? Were they in fact sinless? Aren't we all sinners?
Jesus was setting the belief that sin causes illness straight.
No one is without sin. (
John 8:1-11 Woman caught in adultery)
Why do "some of the Pharisees" accuse Jesus of being a sinner? "But others" describe the healing as being what?
The Pharisees chose not to believe that Jesus was the Messiah - or that He was from God.
Others were not as sure, how could a sinner heal? (v16)
In the end, is the verdict unanimous? Does God "not listen" to sinners? If not, where does that put us?
The Pharisees and others were divided (v16). God does listen to sinners - no one is without sin.
- Read
Light Up Your Life. Jesus twice says, "I am the light of the world". Why intoduce the healing with such a statement? What expressions does John use for the restoration of sight?
Jesus was the only way that the man born blind could possibly be healed and see.
Jesus is also the only way we can "see" spiritually.
Without Jesus or light we would be surrounded by darkness.
Other expressions for restoration of sight are: "eyes opened" (v10), "received sight" (v15).
- Is the healing accomplished solely by Jesus? (Note: it was about 1/2 mile from the temple grounds (John 8:59) to the Pool of Siloam (on the southern tip of Jerusalem)- not a simple journey for a blind man with mud on his eyes.) From the blind man's own witness, "now I see" (v 15), who was involved in the healing? Is this always the case?
The man born blind had a part in his own healing - he obeyed Jesus even though it was not easy.
We've seen other accounts where the person needing healing didn't need to do anything.
- Were faith and love demonstrated in the restoration of the man's sight, if so how?
Faith was demonstrated by the man born blind - he obeyed Jesus and wanted to believe.
- In comparison with Jesus' first meeting with the blind man which was more or less accidental ("As he went along, he saw ..."), his second encounter was intentional ("... when he found him ..."). Are there any indication(s) as to why Jesus sought out the formerly blind man?
(v35-38)Jesus sought the man out to make sure he knew who Jesus was. In (v 38) the man says "I believe" - he believed Jesus was the Messiah.
It's probably no coincidence that the second encounter took place after the man took a stand and was thrown out of the synagogue. (v33-34)
- Do you see a gradual progression in the man's perception of who Jesus is? What did the man say? What gives you the clue that more than physical healing of blindness is involved in this account?
After the man was healed he really didn't know who Jesus was, he thought maybe He was a prophet (v17).
All he knew for sure was that he was blind and now could see (v25).
After several questionings the man does take a stand saying "If this man were not from God, he could do nothing." (v33)
After the man's second encounter with Jesus (v35-38) he does seem to know more who Jesus is. (v38) "I believe" shows a spiritual awareness or "healing".
- What lesson(s) have you learned about healing from this account? Read    
I am the Good Shepherd
Sin is not always the sole reason for illness.
No one is without sin. (
John 8:1-11 Woman caught in adultery)
Jesus is also the only way we can "see" spiritually.
Without Jesus or light we would be surrounded by darkness.