SAQ1-1
- Pick three definitions of ethics from
those given and give your own example of each.
- Ethics focuses on the care
for the soul.
This is a narrower definition
of ethics and the focus is religious or spiritual. Unlawful,
unethical and immoral acts and forbearances are considered as
elements of sins that contaminate the otherwise virtuous soul.
Example:
John and James logged onto computer
chat rooms and believed that they were exchanging messages of
an explicit nature with 13-14 year old girls. The fact is that
they were chatting with law enforcement officials who were patrolling
the internet posing as teenage girls. As a result, John and James
were charged with felony offenses. John was charged with child
solicitation and James with child exploitation.
The two law enforcement officials
were involved in internet policing efforts. In John’s case,
one of the law enforcement official logged onto Yahoo Messenger
using an undercover screen name and posted a photograph he borrowed
from a female police officer when she was 13 years old. He received
an instant message from John about sexual topics, exposed himself
on his webcam and performed a sexual act.
The other law enforcement
official logged onto an AOL chat room where pornographic images
of young boys are frequently exchanged and received a photographic
image of a nude young male from James. A search warrant was
served to John and James and desktop computers were taken as
evidenced by police. A forensic examination of the computers
revealed pornographic images of children.
The acts of John and James, i.e.
child solicitation and child exploitation on the internet are
unethical that contaminate the virtuous souls of children and/or
teenagers.
- Ethics is the study and philosophy
of human conduct with emphasis on the determination of
right and wrong.
Human conduct manifested through
human actions may either be right/ethical or wrong/unethical.
Example:
Cristine, a computer instructor,
uses her account to acquire the cumulative grade point average
of one of her students. She got the password for this restricted
information from someone in the Records Office who erroneously
thought that Cristine was the student's advisor.
Cristine acted wrongly, since
the only person who is entitled to this information is the student
and his/her advisor. The question here is why would the instructor
wanted the information. If Cristine wanted it to be sure that
her grading of the student was consistent with the student's
overall academic performance record, then such use was acceptable.
The person in the Record’s
Office who gave the restricted password acted wrongly because
he/she should have verified if Cristine is really the advisor
of the student.
- Ethics as a concept suggests
the notion of correct or incorrect practices relative
to various concerns or fields of study.
There is a growing need to address
moral issues and unethical practices within the boundaries of
various areas of study. While there is no universal definition
of ethics, a relative perception of what is correct or not, right
or wrong, is usually adopted and used to guide people’s
actions in various human concerns – Applied Ethics.
Example:
Yvonne, a computer programmer,
found out that one of the programs that she has written is
already being implemented and/or operational. She has just
discovered that there is a bug in the code that she has written.
It is one of a stupid error that will cost a lot of time to
fix and has a good chance that the code with the bug will not
ever be run by an average user. Ethically and in compliance
to her field of study, Yvonne has to fix the bug even if she
is behind on other projects and probably has to report it to
her superior. Unethical if she will not fix the bug and just
wait and see if the users notice it.
2.
Pick one area of applied ethics (e.g. nursing ethics), study
some of its concerns, and summarize what you find out.
SUMMARY OF MEDICAL ETHICS
Medical Ethics in general is
the obligations of a moral nature which govern the practice of
medicine. It is a systematic effort to illumine the ethos and
to elaborate the perspective and norms of the medical profession.
It intends to strengthen the morality, the moral discernment
and decisions of the physicians and patient. One cannot expect
that every single concrete moral issue will be immediately resolved
by reference to a medical ethics text book. There are certain
situations with clear moral answers and conflict situations with
no clear-cut answers. A doctor, consultant or nurse has to act
in accordance with one’s conscience; a conscience well
formed by the principles of Medical Ethics – going on the
fact at one’s disposal. There can even be cases where a
Christian health professional will ask the Lord for guidance
in prayer and leave things in God’s hands, commending both
his successes and failures to the Lord’s mercy.
There is a widespread tendency
nowadays to avoid systematic moral reasoning and resort to Situation
Ethic, a mere subjectivity, i.e. “Do whatever you think
is right in the circumstances. You have to make up your own mind
about ethical issues”. This attitude may be grounded in
a moral agnosticism (non-belief), but the lack of any moral or
ethical ground rules is unhelpful to someone facing crucial moral
choices especially in life and death situation.
Not all has been progress
because even the technological power of modern medicine brings
regrettable tendency to treat human beings as merely a physical
organism or interesting pathological specimen, without much
regard for his spiritual and social well-being. The holistic
dimension of aiming to heal the spirit and personality as well
as the body has frequently been neglected in an eagerness to
cure the physical ailment. Modern medicine is more powerful
and specialized than before but sometimes lacks an overall
vision of the human personality. Medical Ethics situate medical
expertise with the overall perspective of what is good for
the human person. It aims to humanize medicine, helps to right
the balance between the physical and technical on one side
and the spiritual, social and psychological dimensions of the
human personality on the other.
The Code of Medical Ethics enables
the doctor and other healthcare professionals understand how
systematic knowledge and technical skills and training are to
be used in the service of others and how they should not be abused.
Healthcare professionals have the responsibility to be competent,
skilled and updated in their specialty, as well as having a clear
perception of valid moral principles founded upon human nature
and purpose of human life.
3.
Rona belongs to community A where no law prohibits the reproduction
(without the permission of the owner) and trading of intellectual
property like computer software, and the like. Jojo, on the other
hand, belongs to community B where a law on infringement of intellectual
property rights is being enforced. One day, Rona visits Jojo
in his home. Unaware of community B’s law on intellectual
property, Rona copies computer software designed by Jojo
without the latter’s consent and even reproduces the
same in voluminous quantity (with the intention to sell the
material in community A). As expected, Jojo gets angry with
Rona and files a case against her for transgressing the law
of community B. The case is to be tried on neutral territory,
with you assigned as a judge. What would be your judgment?
Support your position using any of the definitions of ethics
discussed in this module.
What would be your judgment?
Rona is guilty of transgressing
the law of community B.
Supporting Details:
Definition of Ethics: Ethics
is the study and philosophy of human conduct with emphasis on
the determination of right and wrong.
Explanations: Rona failed to
abide by the provisions of this code of ethics, her act of transgression
will be considered unethical. The right human conduct is for
Rona to ask permission from Jojo that she wanted to copy and
reproduce his computer software. With this act, she will then
know that a law on infringement of intellectual property rights
is being enforced in Jojo’s community.
4.
Ethical Norms.
In your opinion, when does an
act become ethical or unethical?
In my opinion, an act becomes
ethical or unethical when it elicits a positive or negative response
to all applicable primary questions (is the act honorable, honest,
avoid conflict of interest, fair, considerate and others) and
a negative/positive response to clarifications (will the act
do harm to an individual, group of persons, community or society)
depending on the situation or circumstance.
Explanations. We cannot totally
rely on Standard of Ethics/Professional Conduct because not all
can be legislated or defined. Education must also be relied upon
to improve human behavior. An action might be prudent and legal
but may well be unethical in some respect. Thus, it is still
necessary that vital questions be answered depending on the given
situation or circumstance for an act to become ethical or unethical.
Example:
A software company is working
on an integrated inventory control system for a garment manufacturer.
The system will gather sales information daily from garment stores
nationwide. The information will be used by the accounting, shipping,
and ordering departments to control all of the functions of the
manufacturer. The inventory functions are critical to the smooth
operation of this system.
Julie, a quality assurance engineer
with the software company, suspects that the inventory functions
of the system are not sufficiently tested, although it passed
all their contracted tests. She is being pressured by her
employers to sign off on the software.
On legal grounds, she is only
required to perform the tests which had been agreed to in the
original contract. However, her extensive experience in software
testing has led her to be concerned over risks of the system. Her
employers say they will go out of business if they do not deliver
the software on time. Julie contends if the inventory subsystem
fails, it will significantly harm their client and its employees. If
the potential failure were to threaten lives, it would be clear
to Julie that she should refuse to sign off. But since the degree
of threatened harm is less, Julie is faced by a difficult moral/ethical
decision.
|