FOREWORD

The author, who was unanimously acquitted by Jury, from malicious charges, made by Police Officers, now realizes his folly in single handedly taking on one of Her Majesty's Circuit Judges' who had presided at his trial and in so doing, having to contend with the Lord Chancellor's Department and the Treasury Solicitor's Office and then to expect justice to be done.

The Lord Chancellor's Department who, the author believes, must have been made aware of Judge Alan Simpson's and Sheila Margaret West's corruption, are responsible for the running of the Courts
and in that circumstance, it was too much to expect the Department to willingly allow the civil litigation against Judge Simpson and Mrs. West to proceed and to be tried on its merits, for if
the allegations against them were to be proved, or liability admitted, the implications would be enormous and would, inevitably, open a can of worms.

The scales of justice are not always finely balanced at the start of proceedings, because that, it can be argued, depends on who the defendants are.

The author's credibility is and has been at stake, from the time that, he made it known to his Solicitor and to the Chancellor's Department tha,t transcripts, purported to be the evidence given
by witnesses' out of a trial before Judge Simpson, had been fabricated, but he freely admits that his credibility must be suspect, albeit only to the extent that, he seemingly, mistakenly, believed that justice is for all and that justice would prevail; that even a Judge must answer for corrupt acts despite there being no record of a superior court Judge ever having been successfully sued.

If readers believe that a successful litigation against a Judge, or an admission of liability from one would damage the image of of the English Justice System, it is worth considering the reverse,
on balance, how much more respect it would command, by removing a bad apple from the barrel?

It must be in the public interest for them to know that, if a bad apple is found within the system, it is removed; for only then, can the system itself be beyond reproach, only then, can the public
have complete faith in it.

The author hereby defies anyone named herein, to take libel action against him, if they disagree with any of the known facts, or if they take umbrage at the allegations levelled in their direction,
for only in that way, it appears, will the matter come before a Jury, but of course, neither Judge Simpson, nor Mrs. West, being aware of their guilt, will accept the invitation to defend
their reputations and in that even,t the only honourable thing for His Honour to do is to admit liability, but will he?

Contents

Chapter One .....................Judge Simpson's criminal weakness
Chapter Two ....................My loss of faith
Chapter Three ..................I did all that I could
Chapter Four ....................Trial that never was
Chapter Five .....................Lord Chancellor's Department
Chapter Six .......................District Judge Weston
Chapter Seven ...................Re-Hearing
Chapter Eight .....................Mrs. Justice Smith
Chapter Nine  ....................Alice in wonderland
Chapter Ten ......................H.O.J.R Shepheard
Chapter Eleven...................No leave to appeal
Chapter Twelve ..................Police investigation
Chapter Thirteen .................Proceedings against Mrs. West
Chapter Fourteen ................District Judge R. N. Hill & Mr. Justice Moses
Chapter Fifteen....................Some Undertaking & Some Skulduggery
Chapter Sixteen ..................Bankruptcy
Chapter Seventeen..............Insidious Government Censorship
Chapter Eighteen.................The Court Services & Mr. Huebner
Chapter Nineteen ................Face the facts you plonkers
Chapter Twenty...................Libellous Mr. Marshall Rice