Yikes!

                     
Negative Energy!

Well... Things keep getting worse on the intuitive front.  

Remember in the SNOT Standard Model how we intuitively 
introduced the repulsive end of gravitation under ultra high 
pressure?  

And in DARK MATTER we reduced the energy of the resonance of the 
field (waveform) energy to zero and Mass disappeared?  Well, it 
actually went to "NoneMass", sort of a dark matterlike state.  
Talk about "massless particles"...

Well, listen to this one...

The back end of the gravitron (gravalump) is, or amounts to 
"negative" gravity.  Sort of like the negative end of a bar 
magnet.  Can we use the term, "anti-gravity"? for the 
reverse additive field of gravitation?

Now, here comes the fun part.  We (i) have read that every 
"particle" can be considered a field of some sort of 
waveform or resonant gooey stuff (mass)... That makes a lot of 
different or distinct theoretical fields out there all with anti- 
field generating properties.

Each generated theoretical field might have a "back end" 
that may or may not be additive in the gravitational or 
magnetic sense but nontheless may be considered as a 
negative of the field being generated.  So the negative of 
magnetism or gravity could be considered the repulsive end 
of the bar magnet or the repulsive end of the additive 
gravalump (gravatron) which is responsible for warping the 
rubber bedsheet...   ...er, spacetime.

Now, lets call the negative end of all these new theoretical 
fields, the "anti" of whatever field we have under 
consideration.  So then, there is anti-this and anti-that, 
all just the other end of whatever field is being generated 
by whatever particle.

Now the question becomes:  do anti-particles have an anti- 
backend to them as well?  or are they already the backends 
of some field or another?

Under these field considerations, is would be easy to see 
why matter and "anti"-matter would not annihilate one 
another since they are just the backends of one another.

Spin may determine whether a field is anti or otherwise.

So the question of where all the anti-matter went may be 
somewhat off the mark.  "may be" i didn't say it was...

Somewhere in the fogbanks of my memory i remember reading 
that the great equation e=mc^2 is really e= +/- mc^2.

The original equation may give more meaning to the back end 
of fields (particles) and probably should not be arbitrarily 
discarded as being meaningless. 

This is just a suggestion, but all the minus stuff might 
have been out there all the time as just the other end of 
the various spherical and cubic generated fields that are 
called "particles" by us.

What can mankind do with all the anti (negative fields) 
stuff if in fact the hypothesis has any merit whatsoever?   

Anyhow, that is where it is at now, more later if i ever 
understand spin and other lead shields armoring particle 
physics concepts. 

tiny brain is making noise like a bowl of Rice Krispies now, 
so i'll sign off for now and go back to doing the gw-basic 
side of this site.

Intuition certainly does have its limits.

my best to you, dear reader.

joe