A Few Sentences about the Latin Mass

Who is a Jew? Who is a Christian? Who are you?

by joseph_sixpack

TOC
Index
Abstract:  Joe gets help in understanding the Tridentine
           Mass.  cd=Count Dracula, js=joseph_sixpack

cd:  Greetings...

js:  Hah!  i knew it!  Now i am catching on to you!

cd:  What do you mean?

js:  Well, as soon as i start doing something holy you show
     up.

cd:  I think the better word would be 'dangerous' and not
     'holy'.

The Vulture sees food put there by nature, and the hyena 
smells the food.  Man alone stares at the ground and tries 
to grow his own food, eventually ruining the very earth that 
tries to feed him.  Therefore, I too, appear where the 
prospect of food occurs...  and there is an abundance...

js:  Yikes!  am i food?

cd:  in a sense, a case could be made for that...
     (smiling)  We do serve humans after all...

js:  (nervously) Look, all i was doing was rewriting, no,
     not even that.  I was just breaking into sentences a
     translation of a memo from the pope.
     
cd:  That was a joke twinky.

js:  Oh...

cd:  Your memo is called a Motu Proprio!  dumkopf, and not a
     memo.

js:  Well, it seems like a memo to me...

cd:  no doubt.  I suspect that a Vermeer canvas would seem 
like a tablecloth to you as well.

js:  Well, look here anyway, here is what i have got so far:


MOTU PROPRIO "SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM" VATICAN CITY, JUL 7, 2007 (VIS) - Given below is a non-official English language translation of the Apostolic Letter "Motu Proprio data" of Pope Benedict XVI, "Summorum Pontificum," concerning the use of the Roman liturgy prior to the reform of 1970. The original text is written in Latin. Up to our own times, it has been the constant concern of supreme pontiffs to ensure that the Church of Christ offers a worthy ritual to the Divine Majesty, 'to the praise and glory of His name,' and 'to the benefit of all His Holy Church.' Since time immemorial it has been necessary - as it is also for the future - to maintain the principle according to which 'each particular Church must concur with the universal Church, not only as regards the doctrine of the faith and the sacramental signs, but also as regards the usages universally accepted by uninterrupted apostolic tradition, which must be observed not only to avoid errors but also to transmit the integrity of the faith, because the Church's law of prayer corresponds to her law of faith.' (see fn 1.) "Among the pontiffs who showed that requisite concern, particularly outstanding is the name of St. Gregory the Great, who made every effort to ensure that the new peoples of Europe received both the Catholic faith and the treasures of worship and culture that had been accumulated by the Romans in preceding centuries. He commanded that the form of the sacred liturgy as celebrated in Rome (concerning both the Sacrifice of Mass and the Divine Office) be conserved. He took great concern to ensure the dissemination of monks and nuns who, following the Rule of St. Benedict, together with the announcement of the Gospel illustrated with their lives the wise provision of their Rule that 'nothing should be placed before the work of God.' In this way the sacred liturgy, celebrated according to the Roman use, enriched not only the faith and piety but also the culture of many peoples. It is known, in fact, that the Latin liturgy of the Church in its various forms, in each century of the Christian era, has been a spur to the spiritual life of many saints, has reinforced many peoples in the virtue of religion and fecundated their piety. Many other Roman pontiffs, in the course of the centuries, showed particular solicitude in ensuring that the sacred liturgy accomplished this task more effectively. Outstanding among them is St. Pius V who, sustained by great pastoral zeal and following the exhortations of the Council of Trent, renewed the entire liturgy of the Church, oversaw the publication of liturgical books amended and 'renewed in accordance with the norms of the Fathers,' and provided them for the use of the Latin Church. One of the liturgical books of the Roman rite is the Roman Missal, which developed in the city of Rome and, with the passing of the centuries, little by little took forms very similar to that it has had in recent times. It was towards this same goal that succeeding Roman Pontiffs directed their energies during the subsequent centuries in order to ensure that the rites and liturgical books were brought up to date and when necessary clarified. From the beginning of this century they undertook a more general reform. (see fn 2) Thus our predecessors Clement VIII, Urban VIII, St. Pius X, Benedict XV, Pius XII and Blessed John XXIII all played a part. (see fn 2) In more recent times, Vatican Council II expressed a desire that the respectful reverence due to divine worship should be renewed and adapted to the needs of our time. Moved by this desire our predecessor, the Supreme Pontiff Paul VI, approved, in 1970, reformed and partly renewed liturgical books for the Latin Church. These, translated into the various languages of the world, were willingly accepted by bishops, priests and faithful. John Paul II amended the third typical edition of the Roman Missal. Thus Roman pontiffs have operated to ensure that 'this kind of liturgical edifice ... should again appear resplendent for its dignity and harmony. (see fn 4) But in some regions, no small numbers of faithful adhered and continue to adhere with great love and affection to the earlier liturgical forms. These had so deeply marked their culture and their spirit that in 1984 the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II, moved by a concern for the pastoral care of these faithful, with the special indult 'Quattuor abhinc anno," issued by the Congregation for Divine Worship, granted permission to use the Roman Missal published by Blessed John XXIII in the year 1962. Later, in the year 1988, John Paul II with the Apostolic Letter given as Motu Proprio, 'Ecclesia Dei,' exhorted bishops to make generous use of this power in favor of all the faithful who so desired. Following the insistent prayers of these faithful, long deliberated upon by our predecessor John Paul II, and after having listened to the views of the Cardinal Fathers of the Consistory of 22 March 2006, having reflected deeply upon all aspects of the question, invoked the Holy Spirit and trusting in the help of God, with these Apostolic Letters we establish the following: Art 1. The Roman Missal promulgated by Paul VI is the ordinary expression of the 'Lex orandi' (Law of prayer) of the Catholic Church of the Latin rite. Nonetheless, the Roman Missal promulgated by St. Pius V and reissued by Bl. John XXIII is to be considered as an extraordinary expression of that same 'Lex orandi,' and must be given due honour for its venerable and ancient usage. These two expressions of the Church's Lex orandi will in no any way lead to a division in the Church's 'Lex credendi' (Law of belief). They are, in fact two usages of the one Roman rite. It is, therefore, permissible to celebrate the Sacrifice of the Mass following the typical edition of the Roman Missal promulgated by Bl. John XXIII in 1962 and never abrogated, as an extraordinary form of the Liturgy of the Church. The conditions for the use of this Missal as laid down by earlier documents 'Quattuor abhinc annis' and 'Ecclesia Dei,' are substituted as follows: Art. 2. In Masses celebrated without the people, each Catholic priest of the Latin rite, whether secular or regular, may use the Roman Missal published by Bl. Pope John XXIII in 1962, or the Roman Missal promulgated by Pope Paul VI in 1970, and may do so on any day with the exception of the Easter Triduum. For such celebrations, with either one Missal or the other, the priest has no need for permission from the Apostolic See or from his Ordinary. Art. 3. Communities of Institutes of consecrated life and of Societies of apostolic life, of either pontifical or diocesan right, wishing to celebrate Mass in accordance with the edition of the Roman Missal promulgated in 1962, for conventual or "community" celebration in their oratories, may do so. If an individual community or an entire Institute or Society wishes to undertake such celebrations often, habitually or permanently, the decision must be taken by the Superiors Major, in accordance with the law and following their own specific decrees and statues. Art. 4. Celebrations of Mass as mentioned above in art. 2 may - observing all the norms of law - also be attended by faithful who, of their own free will, ask to be admitted. Art. 5. 1. In parishes, where there is a stable group of faithful who adhere to the earlier liturgical tradition, the pastor should willingly accept their requests to celebrate the Mass according to the rite of the Roman Missal published in 1962, and ensure that the welfare of these faithful harmonises with the ordinary pastoral care of the parish, under the guidance of the bishop in accordance with canon 392, avoiding discord and favouring the unity of the whole Church. 2. Celebration in accordance with the Missal of Bl. John XXIII may take place on working days; while on Sundays and feast days one such celebration may also be held. 3. For faithful and priests who request it, the pastor should also allow celebrations in this extraordinary form for special circumstances such as marriages, funerals or occasional celebrations, e.g. pilgrimages. 4. Priests who use the Missal of Bl. John XXIII must be qualified to do so and not (be) juridically impeded. 5. In churches that are not parish or conventual churches, it is the duty of the Rector of the church to grant the above permission. Art. 6. In Masses celebrated in the presence of the people in accordance with the Missal of Bl. John XXIII, the readings may be given in the vernacular, using editions recognised by the Apostolic See. Art. 7. If a group of lay faithful, as mentioned in art. 5 1, has not obtained satisfaction to their requests from the pastor, they should inform the diocesan bishop. The bishop is strongly requested to satisfy their wishes. If he cannot arrange for such celebration to take place, the matter should be referred to the Pontifical Commission "Ecclesia Dei". Art. 8. A bishop who, desirous of satisfying such requests, but who for various reasons is unable to do so, may refer the problem to the Commission "Ecclesia Dei" to obtain counsel and assistance. Art. 9. 1. The pastor, having attentively examined all aspects, may also grant permission to use the earlier ritual for the administration of the Sacraments of Baptism, Marriage, Penance, and the Anointing of the Sick, if the good of souls would seem to require it. 2. Ordinaries are given the right to celebrate the Sacrament of Confirmation using the earlier Roman Pontifical, if the good of souls would seem to require it. 3. Clerics ordained "in sacris constitutis" may use the Roman Breviary promulgated by Bl. John XXIII in 1962. Art. 10. The ordinary of a particular place, if he feels it appropriate, may erect a personal parish in accordance with can. 518 for celebrations following the ancient form of the Roman rite, or appoint a chaplain, while observing all the norms of law. Art. 11. The Pontifical Commission "Ecclesia Dei", erected by John Paul II in 1988 (5), continues to exercise its function. Said Commission will have the form, duties and norms that the Roman Pontiff wishes to assign it. Art. 12. This Commission, apart from the powers it enjoys, will exercise the authority of the Holy See, supervising the observance and application of these dispositions. We order that everything We have established with these Apostolic Letters issued as Motu Proprio be considered as "established and decreed", and to be observed from 14 September of this year, Feast of the Exaltation of the Cross, whatever there may be to the contrary. From Rome, at St. Peter's, 7 July 2007, third year of Our Pontificate." -------------------- (1) General Instruction of the Roman Missal, 3rd ed., 2002, no. 397. (2) John Paul II, Apostolic Letter "Vicesimus quintus annus," 4 December 1988, 3: AAS 81 (1989), 899. (3) Ibid. (4) St. Pius X, Apostolic Letter Motu propio data, "Abhinc duos annos," 23 October 1913: AAS 5 (1913), 449- 450; cf John Paul II, Apostolic Letter "Vicesimus quintus annus," no. 3: AAS 81 (1989), 899. (5) Cf John Paul II, Apostolic Letter Motu proprio data "Ecclesia Dei," 2 July 1988, 6: AAS 80 (1988), 1498. BXVI-MP/.../SUMMORUM PONTIFICUMVIS 070707 (1900)
js: How does that look? a lot easier to read isn't it? cd: I would recommend you correct the errors. js: What errors? It is just a translation by ??? Oh Christ! i forgot his name already... cd: sigh... Twinky... you certainly do not lack for temerity. js: Well, gee whiz... What's so wrong? Look, all he has really said is: Hey! What's the problem with the Latin Mass? It's okay. Go for it, if you want. No problemo... learn Latin. cd: Do you even understand what you are reading? js: Well, that is why i made it easier to read for me by breaking it down into simple sentences sort of. That Vatican speak is a hard nut for joe's to crack and the jewish defense league is raising cain about something or other... Anyhow, i got the whole thing down to a couple of understandable english sentences, right? cd: hmmmm... wellll... let's see... ummm... the Good Friday Tridentine... Let me begin by saying, When the church announces, thru its Latin Mass, that it is praying for the Jews, it is, in effect really praying for itself, and its members, to undergo and accept, and live, the mysteries of the Life of Christ - The pure doctrine of the Church. These Mysteries are emblazoned upon the walls of every Catholic Church in existence. They are called, "The Stations of the Cross." js: (slightly exasperated) i know that! cd: But the reference to the Salvation of the Jews in the Latin Mass has no application to those misinformed neighbors and upset people of the neighboring cities or temples or Samaritians close to the eternal Jerusalem on earth who deny the New Testament of Christ as Savior. The past has sufficiently proven that God's Church or the temple, if you prefer, cannot long stand on a corrupt earth, without the sacrifical ministrations of God's only son, this Jesus character, that they crucify. Gleefully, I might add, where there is no divine government (Jesus crucified), there is societal destruction. No God, no culture. The earth becomes just a two-legged dinosaur world, that chews upon one another and all its resources, to everyone's eventual demise. For us, God's intervention has always been a big pain, and interferes with our work of damnation. The Church in the Heavens may have other time proven requirements and offspring to ameliorate these and other of our happy and bellicose effects, but those, if they exist at all, are not understood by mere earthbound mortals, such as a joseph_sixpack class of persons. js: i admit prayer is more comforting than understanding. i read once somewhere that, Wisdom is a woman and cannot save. cd: Very good Twinky! So those "jews" happily pissed off by thinking the reference in the Latin Mass refers to them, can rest at ease. They are not the that class of jews that are referenced in the Latin Mass. In fact, biblically speaking, they are not jews at all but just religious neighbors of the head honcho temple. Mary, who was told to take her child and flee into Egypt, the mother of Christ, did not exist within their realm. Many of the temple children's parents were not granted such advice. The Latin Mass is referring to its own jews thruout time that are the sinful members of the Eternal Type of Jewish Temple in the bible, which is the main temple today and thruout time and countries, with its high priests, scribes and pharisees, court of the women, valley of the cheesemakers, and etc. Let me refer you to, one of our favorites, the wedding in the land of Cana... The bible is a timeless instrument of human social organizations, their thought, their foibles, their activities, in their attempt at promoting a functional, and stable, yet earthly culture. From time to time, Unhappily, to the lament of all, God steps in to correct our orchestrated abuses... In its exhortations, the Church is simply praying for its own. It is NOT castigating its hapless neighbors, who have not thru continued trial and error over the centuries, hit upon a method to keep the Ark of the Covenant, pure, without defilement, and in one piece. The Church recognizes the immediate and urgent need to concern itself about the sin and the sins of its own members, regretfully, from our point of view, of trying to get to God. The perfidious jews mentioned, again, are simply a reference to its own members who are too dense to accept Christ as a way of life. Happily, there is plenty of sin and abundant perfidiousness down thru time, contained within the pilgrim church, on earth, to content us. The Church that prays for the jews, is on earth, where it belongs, as an aspirant, looking up to the heavens, and not in the Heavens, looking down upon the earth. There are not enought Buicks to go around for both institutions. Earth gets the toys, the Heavens get the responsibility. js: Is that where the word 'heave' came from? cd: very perceptive Twinky... Again, the Tridentine and all other Sacraments points the way to its frail members, of the mysteries of God, and of approaching God, that exist upon its walls, and in its prayers and sacraments. Some (a kind amount), gifted with limited imagination and intellect, take the excoriation of the Latin Mass directed at them and happily, wrongly apply it to the innocent others, who are not in fact, referenced. Fulfilling that which is written about them, "They have eyes, but cannot see, ears but cannot hear." They are sternly adamant in their sin, to our great glee. We can always use the additional manpower and womanpower. That is perhaps the best reason why the church's neighbors should continually cast a suspicious eye upon sentences within the Temple's services which can, and often are, misinterpreted by its more truculent members, determined to ignore the message of God's son, thinking they have already been saved, and are now in authority, unknowingly and steadfastly taking on God's name in vain, a very fatal error to one's soul. Again, we welcome all with open arms, ...and spiritual chains. So you see, the churches neighbors are not without legitimacy in their concern for the words that exist within the main temple's services that fall upon the ears of some of its agressive 'alpha' members. They have a pleasant surprise coming... Do you remember in times past, when I was mocking one such soul, fresh to damnation, repeating his war cry, "kill the infidels!"? Do you remember what he said? js: yes... yes... i do... He was quite crushed and replied very slowly and in a tired voice, "yes. that's what i thought." i remember now. it was quite disturbing for me as that was the level of my zeal too at the time. Boy! it sure took the wind out of my sails. cd: Twinky, your eternal mystical Church has a sufficient and quite adequate supply of sinners within its own to continually populate our premises. We are all, in fact, awaiting your own arrival. js: (weakly) me?... cd: The activity of concerning itself about the contemporary unbelievers mislead sensitivities over that which is NOT a reference to them, is always a happy issue for us, and which, needs our continued attention, as well as our continued encouragement, from our point of view. We love enmity. It is so pleasant and proves our point to the alternate institution. For your further enlightenment Twinky, the I AM WHO AM should never be confused with the i am who am. Flee your divine aspirations Twinky, and don't touch God with a ten foot pole. Thieves are not divine. Thieves are ours. We are not divine. Ach! I have wasted far too much of my time. Good bye for now. See you soon, no doubt, during your next holiness 'attack'.
With that final admonishment, the Count, as usual, just vanished into thin air. i never could figure out how he did that... Oh, before i forget. The Count told me he was not a count. The hapless Vlad was just an occupied soul whose mortal sins were extreme 'spiritual' ambition. The subject came up when i mentioned that he could not have ever been at the Last Supper as Dracula came into history well after the events in Christ's life. With dripping sarcasm, he told me that, "He was there, he has been there, he will always be there." Then told me that i knew nothing about the Last Supper. I have never seen him more disgusted. The look in his eyes were, well... Well beyond any discription of contempt. If you run into any of these people, you have to be careful how you talk to them... And more importantly, there is this final matter. i could never figure out whether i should believe a single word he said. After all, i think he comes from the land of lies. Can anyone deduce truth from such a flood of possible lies? sigh... Well, anyhow, it is a God of Perfect Love, Perfect Mercy, and Perfect Justice we try to worship... no others need apply. No one need take offense. Just keep praying to have your own soul saved. That is problem enough for any of us.
TOP
TOC
Index
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1