A Few Sentences about the Latin Mass
Who is a Jew? Who is a Christian? Who are you?
by joseph_sixpack
TOC
Index
Abstract: Joe gets help in understanding the Tridentine
Mass. cd=Count Dracula, js=joseph_sixpack
cd: Greetings...
js: Hah! i knew it! Now i am catching on to you!
cd: What do you mean?
js: Well, as soon as i start doing something holy you show
up.
cd: I think the better word would be 'dangerous' and not
'holy'.
The Vulture sees food put there by nature, and the hyena
smells the food. Man alone stares at the ground and tries
to grow his own food, eventually ruining the very earth that
tries to feed him. Therefore, I too, appear where the
prospect of food occurs... and there is an abundance...
js: Yikes! am i food?
cd: in a sense, a case could be made for that...
(smiling) We do serve humans after all...
js: (nervously) Look, all i was doing was rewriting, no,
not even that. I was just breaking into sentences a
translation of a memo from the pope.
cd: That was a joke twinky.
js: Oh...
cd: Your memo is called a Motu Proprio! dumkopf, and not a
memo.
js: Well, it seems like a memo to me...
cd: no doubt. I suspect that a Vermeer canvas would seem
like a tablecloth to you as well.
js: Well, look here anyway, here is what i have got so far:
MOTU PROPRIO
"SUMMORUM PONTIFICUM"
VATICAN CITY, JUL 7, 2007 (VIS) -
Given below is a non-official English language
translation of the Apostolic Letter "Motu Proprio data"
of Pope Benedict XVI, "Summorum Pontificum," concerning
the use of the Roman liturgy prior to the reform of 1970.
The original text is written in Latin.
Up to our own times, it has been the constant concern of
supreme pontiffs to ensure that the Church of Christ
offers a worthy ritual to the Divine Majesty, 'to the
praise and glory of His name,' and 'to the benefit of all
His Holy Church.'
Since time immemorial it has been necessary - as it is
also for the future - to maintain the principle according
to which 'each particular Church must concur with the
universal Church, not only as regards the doctrine of the
faith and the sacramental signs, but also as regards the
usages universally accepted by uninterrupted apostolic
tradition, which must be observed not only to avoid
errors but also to transmit the integrity of the faith,
because the Church's law of prayer corresponds to her law
of faith.' (see fn 1.)
"Among the pontiffs who showed that requisite concern,
particularly outstanding is the name of St. Gregory the
Great, who made every effort to ensure that the new
peoples of Europe received both the Catholic faith and
the treasures of worship and culture that had been
accumulated by the Romans in preceding centuries.
He commanded that the form of the sacred liturgy as
celebrated in Rome (concerning both the Sacrifice of Mass
and the Divine Office) be conserved.
He took great concern to ensure the dissemination of
monks and nuns who, following the Rule of St. Benedict,
together with the announcement of the Gospel illustrated
with their lives the wise provision of their Rule that
'nothing should be placed before the work of God.'
In this way the sacred liturgy, celebrated according to
the Roman use, enriched not only the faith and piety but
also the culture of many peoples.
It is known, in fact, that the Latin liturgy of the
Church in its various forms, in each century of the
Christian era, has been a spur to the spiritual life of
many saints, has reinforced many peoples in the virtue of
religion and fecundated their piety.
Many other Roman pontiffs, in the course of the
centuries, showed particular solicitude in ensuring that
the sacred liturgy accomplished this task more
effectively. Outstanding among them is St. Pius V who,
sustained by great pastoral zeal and following the
exhortations of the Council of Trent, renewed the entire
liturgy of the Church, oversaw the publication of
liturgical books amended and 'renewed in accordance with
the norms of the Fathers,' and provided them for the use
of the Latin Church.
One of the liturgical books of the Roman rite is the
Roman Missal, which developed in the city of Rome and,
with the passing of the centuries, little by little took
forms very similar to that it has had in recent times.
It was towards this same goal that succeeding Roman
Pontiffs directed their energies during the subsequent
centuries in order to ensure that the rites and
liturgical books were brought up to date and when
necessary clarified.
From the beginning of this century they undertook a more
general reform. (see fn 2)
Thus our predecessors Clement VIII, Urban VIII,
St. Pius X, Benedict XV, Pius XII and Blessed John XXIII
all played a part. (see fn 2)
In more recent times, Vatican Council II expressed a
desire that the respectful reverence due to divine
worship should be renewed and adapted to the needs of our
time.
Moved by this desire our predecessor, the Supreme Pontiff
Paul VI, approved, in 1970, reformed and partly renewed
liturgical books for the Latin Church.
These, translated into the various languages of the
world, were willingly accepted by bishops, priests and
faithful.
John Paul II amended the third typical edition of the
Roman Missal.
Thus Roman pontiffs have operated to ensure that 'this
kind of liturgical edifice ... should again appear
resplendent for its dignity and harmony. (see fn 4)
But in some regions, no small numbers of faithful adhered
and continue to adhere with great love and affection to
the earlier liturgical forms.
These had so deeply marked their culture and their spirit
that in 1984 the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II, moved by a
concern for the pastoral care of these faithful, with the
special indult 'Quattuor abhinc anno," issued by the
Congregation for Divine Worship, granted permission to
use the Roman Missal published by Blessed John XXIII in
the year 1962.
Later, in the year 1988, John Paul II with the Apostolic
Letter given as Motu Proprio, 'Ecclesia Dei,' exhorted
bishops to make generous use of this power in favor of
all the faithful who so desired.
Following the insistent prayers of these faithful, long
deliberated upon by our predecessor John Paul II, and
after having listened to the views of the Cardinal
Fathers of the Consistory of 22 March 2006, having
reflected deeply upon all aspects of the question,
invoked the Holy Spirit and trusting in the help of God,
with these Apostolic Letters we establish the following:
Art 1.
The Roman Missal promulgated by Paul VI is the ordinary
expression of the 'Lex orandi' (Law of prayer) of the
Catholic Church of the Latin rite.
Nonetheless, the Roman Missal promulgated by St. Pius V
and reissued by Bl. John XXIII is to be considered as an
extraordinary expression of that same 'Lex orandi,' and
must be given due honour for its venerable and ancient
usage.
These two expressions of the Church's Lex orandi will in
no any way lead to a division in the Church's 'Lex
credendi' (Law of belief).
They are, in fact two usages of the one Roman rite.
It is, therefore, permissible to celebrate the Sacrifice
of the Mass following the typical edition of the Roman
Missal promulgated by Bl. John XXIII in 1962 and never
abrogated, as an extraordinary form of the Liturgy of the
Church.
The conditions for the use of this Missal as laid down by
earlier documents 'Quattuor abhinc annis' and 'Ecclesia
Dei,' are substituted as follows:
Art. 2.
In Masses celebrated without the people, each Catholic
priest of the Latin rite, whether secular or regular, may
use the Roman Missal published by Bl. Pope John XXIII in
1962, or the Roman Missal promulgated by Pope Paul VI in
1970, and may do so on any day with the exception of the
Easter Triduum.
For such celebrations, with either one Missal or the
other, the priest has no need for permission from the
Apostolic See or from his Ordinary.
Art. 3.
Communities of Institutes of consecrated life and of
Societies of apostolic life, of either pontifical or
diocesan right, wishing to celebrate Mass in accordance
with the edition of the Roman Missal promulgated in 1962,
for conventual or "community" celebration in their
oratories, may do so.
If an individual community or an entire Institute or
Society wishes to undertake such celebrations often,
habitually or permanently, the decision must be taken by
the Superiors Major, in accordance with the law and
following their own specific decrees and statues.
Art. 4.
Celebrations of Mass as mentioned above in art. 2
may - observing all the norms of law - also be attended
by faithful who, of their own free will, ask to be
admitted.
Art. 5.
1. In parishes, where there is a stable group of
faithful who adhere to the earlier liturgical tradition,
the pastor should willingly accept their requests to
celebrate the Mass according to the rite of the Roman
Missal published in 1962, and ensure that the welfare of
these faithful harmonises with the ordinary pastoral care
of the parish, under the guidance of the bishop in
accordance with canon 392, avoiding discord and favouring
the unity of the whole Church.
2. Celebration in accordance with the Missal of Bl. John
XXIII may take place on working days; while on Sundays
and feast days one such celebration may also be held.
3. For faithful and priests who request it, the pastor
should also allow celebrations in this extraordinary form
for special circumstances such as marriages, funerals or
occasional celebrations, e.g. pilgrimages.
4. Priests who use the Missal of Bl. John XXIII must be
qualified to do so and not (be) juridically impeded.
5. In churches that are not parish or conventual
churches, it is the duty of the Rector of the church to
grant the above permission.
Art. 6.
In Masses celebrated in the presence of the people in
accordance with the Missal of Bl. John XXIII, the
readings may be given in the vernacular, using editions
recognised by the Apostolic See.
Art. 7.
If a group of lay faithful, as mentioned in art. 5 1, has
not obtained satisfaction to their requests from the
pastor, they should inform the diocesan bishop.
The bishop is strongly requested to satisfy their wishes.
If he cannot arrange for such celebration to take place,
the matter should be referred to the Pontifical
Commission "Ecclesia Dei".
Art. 8.
A bishop who, desirous of satisfying such requests, but
who for various reasons is unable to do so, may refer the
problem to the Commission "Ecclesia Dei" to obtain
counsel and assistance.
Art. 9.
1. The pastor, having attentively examined all aspects,
may also grant permission to use the earlier ritual for
the administration of the Sacraments of Baptism,
Marriage, Penance, and the Anointing of the Sick, if the
good of souls would seem to require it.
2. Ordinaries are given the right to celebrate the
Sacrament of Confirmation using the earlier Roman
Pontifical, if the good of souls would seem to require
it.
3. Clerics ordained "in sacris constitutis" may use the
Roman Breviary promulgated by Bl. John XXIII in 1962.
Art. 10.
The ordinary of a particular place, if he feels it
appropriate, may erect a personal parish in accordance
with can. 518 for celebrations following the ancient form
of the Roman rite, or appoint a chaplain, while observing
all the norms of law.
Art. 11.
The Pontifical Commission "Ecclesia Dei", erected by John
Paul II in 1988 (5), continues to exercise its function.
Said Commission will have the form, duties and norms that
the Roman Pontiff wishes to assign it.
Art. 12.
This Commission, apart from the powers it enjoys, will
exercise the authority of the Holy See, supervising the
observance and application of these dispositions.
We order that everything We have established with these
Apostolic Letters issued as Motu Proprio be considered as
"established and decreed", and to be observed from 14
September of this year, Feast of the Exaltation of the
Cross, whatever there may be to the contrary.
From Rome, at St. Peter's, 7 July 2007, third year of Our
Pontificate."
--------------------
(1) General Instruction of the Roman Missal, 3rd ed.,
2002, no. 397.
(2) John Paul II, Apostolic Letter "Vicesimus quintus
annus," 4 December 1988, 3: AAS 81 (1989), 899.
(3) Ibid.
(4) St. Pius X, Apostolic Letter Motu propio data,
"Abhinc duos annos," 23 October 1913: AAS 5 (1913), 449-
450; cf John Paul II, Apostolic Letter "Vicesimus quintus
annus," no. 3: AAS 81 (1989), 899.
(5) Cf John Paul II, Apostolic Letter Motu proprio data
"Ecclesia Dei," 2 July 1988, 6: AAS 80 (1988), 1498.
BXVI-MP/.../SUMMORUM PONTIFICUMVIS 070707 (1900)
js: How does that look? a lot easier to read isn't it?
cd: I would recommend you correct the errors.
js: What errors? It is just a translation by ???
Oh Christ! i forgot his name already...
cd: sigh...
Twinky... you certainly do not lack for temerity.
js: Well, gee whiz... What's so wrong?
Look, all he has really said is: Hey! What's the
problem with the Latin Mass? It's okay. Go for it,
if you want. No problemo... learn Latin.
cd: Do you even understand what you are reading?
js: Well, that is why i made it easier to read for me by
breaking it down into simple sentences sort of. That
Vatican speak is a hard nut for joe's to crack and the
jewish defense league is raising cain about something
or other... Anyhow, i got the whole thing down to a
couple of understandable english sentences, right?
cd: hmmmm... wellll... let's see... ummm... the Good
Friday Tridentine...
Let me begin by saying, When the church announces, thru its
Latin Mass, that it is praying for the Jews, it is, in
effect really praying for itself, and its members, to
undergo and accept, and live, the mysteries of the Life of
Christ - The pure doctrine of the Church. These Mysteries
are emblazoned upon the walls of every Catholic Church in
existence.
They are called, "The Stations of the Cross."
js: (slightly exasperated) i know that!
cd: But the reference to the Salvation of the Jews in the
Latin Mass has no application to those misinformed neighbors
and upset people of the neighboring cities or temples or
Samaritians close to the eternal Jerusalem on earth who deny
the New Testament of Christ as Savior.
The past has sufficiently proven that God's Church or the
temple, if you prefer, cannot long stand on a corrupt earth,
without the sacrifical ministrations of God's only son, this
Jesus character, that they crucify.
Gleefully, I might add, where there is no divine government
(Jesus crucified), there is societal destruction. No God,
no culture.
The earth becomes just a two-legged dinosaur world, that
chews upon one another and all its resources, to everyone's
eventual demise. For us, God's intervention has always been
a big pain, and interferes with our work of damnation.
The Church in the Heavens may have other time proven
requirements and offspring to ameliorate these and other of
our happy and bellicose effects, but those, if they exist at
all, are not understood by mere earthbound mortals, such as
a joseph_sixpack class of persons.
js: i admit prayer is more comforting than understanding.
i read once somewhere that, Wisdom is a woman and
cannot save.
cd: Very good Twinky!
So those "jews" happily pissed off by thinking the reference
in the Latin Mass refers to them, can rest at ease. They
are not the that class of jews that are referenced in the
Latin Mass. In fact, biblically speaking, they are not jews
at all but just religious neighbors of the head honcho
temple. Mary, who was told to take her child and flee into
Egypt, the mother of Christ, did not exist within their
realm. Many of the temple children's parents were not
granted such advice.
The Latin Mass is referring to its own jews thruout time
that are the sinful members of the Eternal Type of Jewish
Temple in the bible, which is the main temple today and
thruout time and countries, with its high priests, scribes
and pharisees, court of the women, valley of the
cheesemakers, and etc. Let me refer you to, one of our
favorites, the wedding in the land of Cana...
The bible is a timeless instrument of human social
organizations, their thought, their foibles, their
activities, in their attempt at promoting a functional, and
stable, yet earthly culture. From time to time, Unhappily,
to the lament of all, God steps in to correct our
orchestrated abuses...
In its exhortations, the Church is simply praying for its
own. It is NOT castigating its hapless neighbors, who have
not thru continued trial and error over the centuries, hit
upon a method to keep the Ark of the Covenant, pure, without
defilement, and in one piece.
The Church recognizes the immediate and urgent need to
concern itself about the sin and the sins of its own
members, regretfully, from our point of view, of trying to
get to God. The perfidious jews mentioned, again, are
simply a reference to its own members who are too dense to
accept Christ as a way of life. Happily, there is plenty of
sin and abundant perfidiousness down thru time, contained
within the pilgrim church, on earth, to content us.
The Church that prays for the jews, is on earth, where it
belongs, as an aspirant, looking up to the heavens, and not
in the Heavens, looking down upon the earth. There are not
enought Buicks to go around for both institutions. Earth
gets the toys, the Heavens get the responsibility.
js: Is that where the word 'heave' came from?
cd: very perceptive Twinky...
Again, the Tridentine and all other Sacraments points the
way to its frail members, of the mysteries of God, and of
approaching God, that exist upon its walls, and in its
prayers and sacraments.
Some (a kind amount), gifted with limited imagination and
intellect, take the excoriation of the Latin Mass directed
at them and happily, wrongly apply it to the innocent
others, who are not in fact, referenced. Fulfilling that
which is written about them, "They have eyes, but cannot
see, ears but cannot hear."
They are sternly adamant in their sin, to our great glee.
We can always use the additional manpower and womanpower.
That is perhaps the best reason why the church's neighbors
should continually cast a suspicious eye upon sentences
within the Temple's services which can, and often are,
misinterpreted by its more truculent members, determined to
ignore the message of God's son, thinking they have already
been saved, and are now in authority, unknowingly and
steadfastly taking on God's name in vain, a very fatal error
to one's soul. Again, we welcome all with open arms, ...and
spiritual chains.
So you see, the churches neighbors are not without
legitimacy in their concern for the words that exist within
the main temple's services that fall upon the ears of some
of its agressive 'alpha' members. They have a pleasant
surprise coming...
Do you remember in times past, when I was mocking one such
soul, fresh to damnation, repeating his war cry, "kill the
infidels!"? Do you remember what he said?
js: yes... yes... i do...
He was quite crushed and replied very slowly and in a
tired voice, "yes. that's what i thought."
i remember now. it was quite disturbing for me as that
was the level of my zeal too at the time.
Boy! it sure took the wind out of my sails.
cd: Twinky, your eternal mystical Church has a sufficient
and quite adequate supply of sinners within its own to
continually populate our premises. We are all, in fact,
awaiting your own arrival.
js: (weakly) me?...
cd: The activity of concerning itself about the
contemporary unbelievers mislead sensitivities over that
which is NOT a reference to them, is always a happy issue
for us, and which, needs our continued attention, as well as
our continued encouragement, from our point of view. We
love enmity. It is so pleasant and proves our point to the
alternate institution.
For your further enlightenment Twinky, the I AM WHO AM
should never be confused with the i am who am. Flee your
divine aspirations Twinky, and don't touch God with a ten
foot pole. Thieves are not divine. Thieves are ours. We
are not divine.
Ach! I have wasted far too much of my time. Good bye for
now. See you soon, no doubt, during your next holiness
'attack'.
With that final admonishment, the Count, as usual, just
vanished into thin air. i never could figure out how he did
that...
Oh, before i forget. The Count told me he was not a count.
The hapless Vlad was just an occupied soul whose mortal sins
were extreme 'spiritual' ambition.
The subject came up when i mentioned that he could not have
ever been at the Last Supper as Dracula came into history
well after the events in Christ's life.
With dripping sarcasm, he told me that, "He was there, he
has been there, he will always be there." Then told me that
i knew nothing about the Last Supper. I have never seen him
more disgusted. The look in his eyes were, well...
Well beyond any discription of contempt.
If you run into any of these people, you have to be careful
how you talk to them...
And more importantly, there is this final matter. i could
never figure out whether i should believe a single word he
said.
After all, i think he comes from the land of lies. Can
anyone deduce truth from such a flood of possible lies?
sigh...
Well, anyhow, it is a God of Perfect Love, Perfect Mercy,
and Perfect Justice we try to worship... no others need
apply.
No one need take offense.
Just keep praying to have your own soul saved.
That is problem enough for any of us.
TOP
TOC
Index