Dear Friends,

When we last left our intrepid theoretical cosmologist 
Joseph Sixpack he was trying to insert rectal thermometers 
into mass/energy which was passing by in space going at high 
velocity.  The mass/energy was traveling at high velocity, 
and not Joe with the thermometer.

The theory was, that IF there was an underlayer of massless 
"polar buttons" (gravitrons) of well less than an angstrom, 
or some quantum distance that was responsible for the field 
effects of tranmitting gravity, radiation, magnetism and 
other as yet unknown fields, THEN any mass/energy traveling 
through the underlayer might heat up due to a possible 
"induction effect"  (not to be confused with electromagnetic 
induction, but quite similar in effect) causing electrons to 
jump orbit and do other heaty things.

The current party line wags all chirped up simultaneously of 
course, of the Michelson-Morley experiment which was 
supposed to put the "ether" theory to rest and straighten 
the bed for the warped space-timers and their symbol-minded 
cohorts.

Joe, ever ignoring reality dreamt up yet another attempt to 
show that fields are the result of this massless medium on 
the basis of some currently known by him facts.

Joe doesn't know too many facts so perhaps the warped space- 
timers are right after all, but that is another subject and 
of no interest to Joe...

The test is this, but first the "facts":
The more mass/energy, the more the "field of gravity" is 
generated.  If the earth had more mass, we would weigh more.  
Actually Joe is glad it doesn't as he weighs quite enough 
now, thank you.

Now our own little sun has a LOT of mass/energy so it has a 
LOT more gravity than earth.  Joe suspects that he would 
weigh more on the sun, well, at least for a short time.  
Anyhow, the suspicion is that the increased weight of all 
the mass/energy compresses the little quantum gravitational 
causing doohickeys and pushes them closer together and in so 
doing, increases the inductive transporting/transmitting 
effect to the underlayer.

That is to say, the stuff inside the sun gets hotter because 
of its greater mass and it is this heat or resonant string 
movement "induction effect" upon the underlayer that creates 
the fields of gravity, radiation (heat, light) and magnetism 
as well as other as yet unknown fields. (might as well 
cma...)

Which implies by the way, that gravitation itself is a 
"resonant" field, pulsing in and out at a lambda of 
something less than an angstrom somewhat like alternating 
current does and it is these two resonant fields interacting 
with one another that are responsible for the "gravity" 
between objects.

Okay, so far so good.  well, sort of...

The experiment is this:  if string movement within 
mass/energy (velocity) is responsible for inductive field 
generation, then what would happen if we focused, oh, say 
four or more highly powerful light sources (high energy 
lasers) upon a single x,y,z,t point in space?  The four 
intersecting high energy laser beams would certainly heat up 
the intersecting area.  if a underlayer were present would 
it reveal itself by an increased field (gravitational or 
other) anomaly?

The issue is: will photons do the job?  or do we need actual 
mass/energy to generate a field?  what kind of necessary 
temperatures are we talking about?

Well, okay then, how about a hot directed mass/energy 
plasma? wold that generate a gravitational field?

Now, lets assume (an assumption indeed) that our experiment 
is a rousing success.  Then we can just focus more powerful 
beams at a point gravitationally midway (zero/equal) between 
earth and the moon and start to generate a gravitational 
field to start the moon and earth on a very slow journey 
closer together.  neat huh?  or is that a bad idea?

At this point, Joe Sixpack wanders off scratching his head 
repeatedly dropping a small plastic spoon between his hands
wondering what causes the spoon to drop and what are 
the "mechanics" of the causation.