TOC
Index
Intuitive Hypotheses concerning Sunspots,
the Maunder Minimum, the Butterfly Effect
in our sun & in ALL sized stars, cosmos wide.
Abstract: A variation of radiated temperatures and size
from whatever sized celestial bodies, might be attributed to
a variation in orbit periods of the internal layers of the
plasma within the rotating star mass. These internal
plasmatic scrubbing layers upon one another within the star
acting upon or against one another may be the probable cause
of periodic sunspots which appear to end up as highly
gaussed magnetic vortexes.
So, our sun has a temperature and size variation and sun
spots and occasionally, the absense of sunspots.
What causes all the variation?
Our earth may also have an internal temperature variation
depending upon the various velocities of the internal magma
under rotational stress, generating similarly sourced but
much lesser effects due to earth's minimal mass in
comparision to our sun.
Massive gaseous planets may have a similar status as would
ANY star of ANY size; even those approaching a gravitational
status that would generate an escape velocity of approaching
c.
Now upon reaching a "c" escape velocity, things change a
bit. The previous sunspots and their effects no longer
effect the outside of the event horizon to transmit a
variation of heat and radiation content, but are contained
within it.
All ejectiva of any type are all dealt with internally,
possibly even acerbating rotational velocities internally
even further with their collective physical properties.
Now we would expect a highly spinning supermassive black
hole to exhibit or contain similiar variations and
properties within the layers of the internal rotational
velocities which might even occasionally measure out as a
"maunder minimum" and issue forth similar phenomenon as the
smaller blue stars of our own type but perhaps on a
different scale due to the higher velocities and densities
involved.
Collapse?
Well, what about when the star, because of its solar mass
number and pressures related, collapsed to neutron star
status, ala the 1939 paper of Oppenheimer and Snyder, which
dealt with expired fuels, if i remember correctly (i rarely
do...)
Now we have a presumably very fast, albeit collapsed,
spinning object, perhaps somewhat more oblate than a normal
stars ratio. Would the internal masses generate any vortex
activity upon the surface?
Two answers:
Number 1: No reason to think it wouldn't
Number 2: No reason to think is should?
Number 3: Internal mass orbiting velocities would
probably vary to an unknown extent and would
therefore generate "something"...
but what?
Number 4: Who knows?
In any event, rotational generated vortexes within spinning
masses are probably as common as cosmic fleas. The real
conundrum is why do they go away for a while? (maunder
minimum) something must happen internally...
How big is big?
Well, would we see similar effects in the major men on
campus? That is in or within Solar masses of 50 quadrillion
and even higher.
anyhow, that's it from Joseph_Sixpacks intuitive theoretical
treatment of the source of sunspots.
Now the only problem is what happens when the sunspots stop?
Well, when the sunspots stop in our sun, scientists say the
sun has increased its diameter an arc second. That is, it
has lost some of it gravitation and expanded a bit as well
as slowed down. Emitting less radiation, the earth gets a
tad colder. When size and rotational velocities return to
normal things heat up again.
more later... maybe...
i am sort of running out of gas on this subject.
TOP
TOC
Index