TOC Index

Intuitive Hypotheses concerning Sunspots,

the Maunder Minimum, the Butterfly Effect

in our sun & in ALL sized stars, cosmos wide.

Abstract:  A variation of radiated temperatures and size 
from whatever sized celestial bodies, might be attributed to 
a variation in orbit periods of the internal layers of the 
plasma within the  rotating star mass.  These internal 
plasmatic scrubbing layers upon one another within the star 
acting upon or against one another may be the probable cause 
of periodic sunspots which appear to end up as highly 
gaussed magnetic vortexes.  

So, our sun has a temperature and size variation and sun 
spots and occasionally, the absense of sunspots.

What causes all the variation?

Our earth may also have an internal temperature variation 
depending upon the various velocities of the internal magma 
under rotational stress, generating similarly sourced but 
much lesser effects due to earth's minimal mass in 
comparision to our sun.

Massive gaseous planets may have a similar status as would 
ANY star of ANY size; even those approaching a gravitational 
status that would generate an escape velocity of approaching 
c.

Now upon reaching a "c" escape velocity, things change a 
bit.  The previous sunspots and their effects no longer 
effect the outside of the event horizon to transmit a 
variation of heat and radiation content, but are contained 
within it.

All ejectiva of any type are all dealt with internally, 
possibly even acerbating rotational velocities internally 
even further with their collective physical properties.

Now we would expect a highly spinning supermassive black 
hole to exhibit or contain similiar variations and 
properties within the layers of the internal rotational 
velocities which might even occasionally measure out as a 
"maunder minimum" and issue forth similar phenomenon as the 
smaller blue stars of our own type but perhaps on a 
different scale due to the higher velocities and densities 
involved.

                         Collapse?

Well, what about when the star, because of its solar mass 
number and pressures related, collapsed to neutron star 
status, ala the 1939 paper of Oppenheimer and Snyder, which 
dealt with expired fuels, if i remember correctly (i rarely 
do...)

Now we have a presumably very fast, albeit collapsed,  
spinning object, perhaps somewhat more oblate than a normal 
stars ratio.  Would the internal masses generate any vortex 
activity upon the surface?

Two answers:
     Number 1:  No reason to think it wouldn't
     Number 2:  No reason to think is should?
     Number 3:  Internal mass orbiting velocities would
                probably vary to an unknown extent and would
                therefore generate "something"...
                but what?
     Number 4:  Who knows?

In any event, rotational generated vortexes within spinning 
masses are probably as common as cosmic fleas.  The real 
conundrum is why do they go away for a while?  (maunder 
minimum) something must happen internally...


How big is big? Well, would we see similar effects in the major men on campus? That is in or within Solar masses of 50 quadrillion and even higher.
anyhow, that's it from Joseph_Sixpacks intuitive theoretical treatment of the source of sunspots. Now the only problem is what happens when the sunspots stop? Well, when the sunspots stop in our sun, scientists say the sun has increased its diameter an arc second. That is, it has lost some of it gravitation and expanded a bit as well as slowed down. Emitting less radiation, the earth gets a tad colder. When size and rotational velocities return to normal things heat up again. more later... maybe... i am sort of running out of gas on this subject.
TOP TOC Index
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1