Active Galactic Nuclei

Yet another hypothesis about

Quasars, Pulsars and Milli-pulsars

Abstract:                               
This hypothesis states that the emissions from ALL Active 
Galactic Nuclei are from binary or higher systems of mass 
with the emissions exclusively sourced at the zero gravity 
port of the emitting binary or higher mass systems.

The hypothesis further implies that Quasars, Pulsars, and 
Millipulsars are all the result of emissions from an open 
zero gravity port generated by an ALMOST equal binary system 
and NOT by any SINGLE spinning mass.

In short, active galactic nuclei, whether quasars, pulsars, 
or millipulsars, are always 'close in mass' binary or higher 
emitting systems.

The 'close in mass' is a requirement to bend or offset the 
emissions out the zero gravity port from the binary to 
obtain the requisite periodic signal.



                   a single neutron star

It is conceivable naturally, that a collapsed 'neutron' 
star, spinning furiously rapid upon an axis will open up a 
polar 'hole' thru centrifugal force that may offer an zero 
gravity opportunity for radiation to escape from the mass.  
However that hole may not be sufficiently offset to effect a 
bend in emmissions to offer 'period' radiation broadcasting 
effect.  Contraiwise however if there is a defect in the
symmetry of the hole which would bend the ejectiva.

Therefore, binary explanation of emissions is a bit more 
plausible to a joe.  

The discovery of the actual realities regarding the source 
of emissions of all frequencies from infrared to radio to 
visible to x-ray to gamma may have to wait a while until we 
can get up close and poke around with a stick to see what is 
actually occuring.

Meanwhile keep your spaceship earth out of the path of 
emissions from these nasties during your travels among the 
cosmos.  There is only so much the ozone layer can do and 
cooked brains don't help flight cognition.  Just look at any 
politician's brains and see what happens to them when they 
get too cozy with dark radiation.  Or my own brains, as far 
as that goes...



             Where goest thou young pentalope?

The emissions from the binary may be disaccreted (fancy word 
for 'escape') immediately or may be retained depending upon 
the geometry of the port which is controlled by the mass 
differences between the orbiting masses.  The bigger the 
differences, the more curvature to the wok.  Enough 
curvature interdicts radiation from escaping.  Minor 
differences simply splay the ejectiva off to one side 
creating a pulsing effect signal for anything in the path.

This brings up the possibility of quasar or pulsar signals 
becoming weaker or ceasing altogether if during rotation one 
of the bodies happens to accret sufficent mass to alter wok 
warpage.

Natually, mass leakage out the zero gravitational port will 
eventually slow the orbit period down if mass isn't 
maintained through accretion and orbit periods don't 
increase due to the conservation of angular momentum.

i maintain that this is the effect shown in spiral galaxies 
as the two elements of the binary exhaust mass with an ever
lessening x, y vector distribution.  

It is a nasty math problem well beyond joe's expertise of
adding and subtracting but i have seen it discussed in
some astronomy magazines of late. 

And as stated elsewhere, if the black hole binary drops 
through the required mass to withhold radiation, then any 
residual orbiting radiation that has not yet made it out the 
zero gravity port will be released all at once.  Sort of ala 
Crab Nebulae circa 1054 or something.  1987a is another 
possible example.  



                          More yet

Further, this hypothesis necessarily postulates the 
theoretical existence of binary black hole systems in space 
that have a VERY HIGH amount of retained radiation.  These 
black binary 'energy' holes in space have two components.



                    The parameter thing

The amount of emitting or even retained radiation of course 
varies with the original internal conditions of the binary 
system.

Each system is probably completely different in contained 
radiation, mass size, orbit speed and other parameters.

               Enter left, The Event Horizon

In addition, these binary systems with their very short 
orbit periods (of quasars, pulsars, and millipulsars) 
combined with their individual irregular mass will oscillate 
spacetime warpage locally because of the rotation of the 
event horizons and generate periods of clocklike radiation 
propagation as well AS LONG AS the rotating event horizon 
diameters don't overlap and snatch the emissions from 
propagating.



     Say something Soft and Mushy about Event Horizons

Let me state a little about Event Horizons in binaries of 
any mass.

The EVENT HORIZONS of binary black holes in rapid mutual 
orbit naturally follow the mass of the associated black 
hole.  That means that spacetime warpage and therefore 
surrounding gravity will vary in strength around or away 
from the orbiting masses as the event horizons make their 
orbit.
                  
That is, if the binary system is moving in space at one 
million miles per hour tracing out the generated corkscrew 
pattern then any point moving along with it will be subject 
to an oscillation in the strength of the gravity as each 
event horizon from its source mass swings around closer to 
the travel along gravitational point from which measurmebts 
are being taken.  So, for example, if you were near, your 
weight would oscillate from 150 to 250 pounds per 
revolution.  A binary millipulsar would give your bathroom 
scale the fits. 

Naturally, different gravitational strengths or values will 
be generated and graph out differently if the binary system 
with its accompanying warped spacetime luggage is 
approaching or receding.

Well, all that was really said is that the gravitational 
needle around orbiting binaries will go all over the place.



            Oscillating Warped Spacetime of the
            Event Horizon of binary black holes

Let's restate that yet again:
The event horizons generated by each mass goes 'round and 
'round with each mass. That makes sense, doesn't it.

Because of the binary reality of the radiation retaining, or 
even non-radiation retaining binary systems, gravity 
(spacetime warpage) and therefore, the event horizon, can 
come and go and appear to have the effect of varying in size 
and strength.

            Let's see if this makes more sense

The gravitational strength or value from any single 
measuring point depending upon its ever changing 
gravitational value beneath the measurement location under 
which the masses are spinning along with their respective 
event horizons, which alters the escape velocity...
Na... that ain't going to do it. totally incomprehensible.

The obiting albeit, passing event horizon, appears to 
increase and decrease in size as it naturally follows the 
orbit of the binary sytem.

That means that the event horizon is capable of high speed 
orbiting movement following the masses below that are 
related to the orbit periods of the binary system which may 
be very high...  Ugh!  this is getting worse and worse...
let's get off trying to explain this for a while.  sigh...



Explain:                  Millipulsars

Millipulsars are binaries that probably (hopefully) are 
somewhat small.  Their light retention status is up for 
grabs.  If they are very high albit somewhat unequal mass, 
oh say greater than 483 solar masses and are emitting out a 
zero gravity port...  hmmm...   zzzzz.

Let's try again:
Millipulsar size is up to a very high density BINARY masses 
and some even with radiation retaining status with an 
unimaginable orbit period in the thousandth of a second 
range.  now consider two objects say 57 miles in diameter 
and some distance apart with an orbit period of 1/1000 of a 
second!  sheesh!  this stuff is getting to be totally 
unbelievable...  

Well lets assume that the zero gravity port has, due to the 
smaller diameters, opened up to allow radiation and maybe 
some primary mass to escape out the now zero gravity PLANE 
so that we have sort of a 3600 searchlight effect 
with respect to emmissions.

The actual binary orbit period then is found by taking the 
pulses/period and dividing by two.  So a 1000 pulse/second 
pulsar is orbiting at a mere 500 times per second.
well... don't get in its way...

Oops! wait a minute.  It is only MY opinion that 
millipulsars are binary systems, and not a single rotating 
object.  The binary hypothesis solves one problem but just 
makes the fast orbit period even more unimaginable.

For example, imagine something X miles in diameter orbiting 
another X +/- mile diameter something, in N/1000 of a second 
as some close distance D.  whew!  

This is one area where i am really tempted to keep thinking 
about another solution to the millipulsar source.



              Weighing a fish next to binaries

With respect to the gravitational field of a quasar, pulsar, 
or millipulsar, either visible or radiation retaining, or 
evaporating, for example, we would expect enormous 
'jittering' of the gravitational field as the movement of 
the masses would alter the effective gravity with its 
continuous rapid movement

           What happens when spacetime oscillates

Binary millipulsars would have to orbit so fast, in fact 
that the concept seems almost inconceivable given the masses 
involved.

Now perhaps it is this gravitational (spacetime warpage 
jittering) that is the source of the signals from the 
quasar, pulsar and millipulsar.  Maybe those are the long 
lost 'gravitational waves' of rapidly oscillating spacetime 
wacking the carrying neutrino or photon population.

don't know...

This is one for the people with doctor degrees who know how 
to do long division.  They'll figure it out or dismiss the 
idea.



             Pulsars, Quasars and Millipulsars

As discussed above, current thinking is that these beepers 
are caused by a single spinning very dense neutron star.

I respectfully submit that the beeping is caused by dense 
star(s) or even black holes all right, but not by a single 
spinning neutron or black hole but a binary or higher high 
velocity orbiting neutron or black hole system.  

It is hard for me to understand how discret bursts can be 
generated and escape from a single rotating dense system, so 
i vote for the binary causation.

Theoretically, it might even be possible to establish that 
visible fast orbiting binaries of below black hole status, 
can generate radiation pulses through some sort of 
magnetoelectroradiohydrotypedynamic process.   (cough...)
(go wash out your mouth with soap for saying that joe.)

i vote for the simple zero gravity port with offset 
emmissions.



                      S-M-I-L-E   :-)
                  Verifying Binary Status

It may be possible to photograph and establish a binary 
status for pulsars, quasars and milli-pulsars by clocking 
the orbit period beeping, and then dividing by two to get 
the same revolution angle and then triggering a high speed 
1/1,000,000 of a second ccd camera to go off at any multiple 
of two within the timer counter from the Hubble II or Hubble 
I space station telescope.

The number of exposures to get enough photons to create a 
single picture at 1/1,000,000 of a second frozen in motion 
may be in the millions itself, as most of the binaries are 
allegedly very, very, far away, especially, the big boys.



                   Super Blaster Quasars

Very high output Quasars offer their own unique problems 
with respect to comprehension.

First, their red-shifted distance may be an error.

The red-shift may be caused by internal gravity thereby 
rendering the distance and therefore the output power of the 
quasar emissions in question.

Other elements in space, sodium & other ions may shift the 
transmission radiation down in power and by interdicting the 
transmission thruput and may offer the same 
misinterpretation of power.

In short, the massive quasar may be just a little 'close to 
c escape velocity' beeper that is pretty close to us in 
fact.

There are a lot of IF's and maybe's here, and to my 
knowledge, the issue hasn't been settled or put to rest yet.



So, in sum, we have the following possibilities, Quasars, 
Pulsars and Millipulsars are:

1  Single spinning neutron stars beeping out their offset 
magnetic north pole as they rotate on their normal north 
pole.  How you get beams of radiation out of a system like 
that is beyond me.

2.  Visible binary systems 'beating' against surrounding 
cosmic radiation sending forth compressed rings of 
radiation.  If the total binary mass is radiation retaining, 
then the binary just absorbs surrounding radiation mass 
instead of wacking it like a baseball.  Accretion of 
Radiation mass by a black hole or binary black hole, by the 
way, would seem to be well in excess of any evaporation of 
mass due to hairy processes or ideas.

3.  The leading contender, IN MY OPINION, is the dissimilar 
binary masses that bend the ejective over to the larger mass 
upon ejection and cause a wobble in the ejectiva creating a 
pulsating signal.  There would be no division by two under 
these conditions but photographing every two periods should 
still give a pretty good picture of what is doing what and 
when.

4.  Another possibility for some small emitters is the 
searchlight scenario in which the ejectiva escapes through a 
zero gravity PLANE instead of a port.  No contained 
radiation is likely under this scenario and the binary just 
'evaporates' continuously til poof!.

5.  Polar north and magnetic north beating against existing 
cosmotic radiation.   duh... is this really number 1. in 
disguise.

6.  One other possibility might exist and that is straight 
shot emissions being gravitationally beat as it passes a 
sidewinding rotating binary.  The gravitational effect would 
be to pull and release any passing ejective from other 
sources.

For sure there are other methods to warp ejectiva to cause a 
pulsating signal.  Those i leave to you dear reader.

       end of quasar, pulsar, milli-pulsar discussion

                                Last update:  March 22, 2006