TOC
Index
Edits: June 19, 2006
Edits: June 10, 2006
Posted: June 8, 2006
Odds 'n Ends
and other disgusting realizations
in the life of
Joseph_Sixpack
Abstract: This chapter amounts to nothing more than a bunch of
disconnected disgusting and somewhat disgruntled random notes and
thoughts file.
In re: The Universe+ chapter.
Well, for father's day 2006 my wife got me a spiffy new
picture book of images from the Hubble Telescope.
The book is called, "The Universe - Images from the Hubble
Telescope" by Leo Marriott. ISBN: 0-7858-2044-2 Cost $30.
It has a 2004 copyright on it but i had never seen it before
a month ago at our local bookstore, Borders in Torrance, CA.
i recommend everybody get a copy to use as a coffee table
(yes, it is that big!) just put it on some bricks with a
vase of flowers on the top. This is definitely a joe
sixpack book.
It is probably, from my point of view, the worse book i have
ever gawked at. But worse only in the sense that one of my
very favorite joe sixpack hypotheses got wacked and wacked
pretty hard concerning the formation of spiral galaxies.
Other than that is is a great, extremely well printed book
from China. If it had been printed in America it would have
cost a king's ransom.
Towards the back it has a picture of M100. Now M100 is a VERY
large galaxy and in this book it doesn't look like it came to be
by a closing of two binary black holes. There are two binaries
involved all right, but the distribution of the matter that is far
out, is all wrong for my favorite hypothesis i think... well,
maybe i am sort of right, but it sure doesn't look like it to
me...
Take a look at the picture and see if you can figure out how
the galaxie called m100 came into being and where it is
going. notice the two very dark areas? notice the bright
center? what's going on? Is the bright center the two
binaries or is the two dark areas the two binaries and the
bright center just a zero gravity emission. no? probably
too wide for that. Zero gravity ports are really pretty
thin.
Restating...
Let me put it this way, the picture says, "joseph_sixpack,
you and your closing black hole redistribution of matter
ideas are wetter than a cat in a watering trough".
i spent the rest of the day and into the week, sulking and
grumping about a perfect picture from Hubble that destroyed
my favorite theory.
It is too fundamental of an idea from joe to be dismissed as
simply wrong. This picture shows fundamental defects in the
intuitive reasoning and indicts the deduction processes of
joe. no one likes to be THAT wrong... :-(
Can anybody bail me out on this formation? Need a better idea...
Did the massive gravitation of the closing binaries just
gravitationally suck up all the dust and dirt from the
surrounding area?
Did it start pouring off the dust from the large closing
black holes way ahead of time as they accelerated towards
one another keeping in mind that both were still in
radiation retention mode?
Now we know that what we are seeing is n,nnn,nnn,nnn light years
old. What is the condition and configuation of m100 today?
Kilroy was here
Pickup up yet another $28 book on cosmology from Borders a
couple of weeks ago on sale for $4. Inventory reduction.
Origins - Fourteen Billion Years of Cosmic Evolution.
(a major NOVA special on PBS
Authors were: Neil DeGrasse Tyson and Donald GoldSmith.
Great Book... i am still looking for the accompanying DVD.
BUT
on page 127 of Origins, we read excerpted:
"In 1692, Sir Isaac Newton writing to Richard Bentley the
master of Trinity College at Cambridge University...
...so as to make an infinite number of great masses,
scattered at great distances from one to anther throughtout
all that infinite space..."
Well, if you read the whole thing of Isaac's Newton's
letter, this is most of MY Universe Plus hypothesis...
albeit, mine being ONLY 314 years later than his, (acually
about 310 years) or maybe even longer if Newton had sat on
his knowledge for a decade or so before writing.
Doing cosmology on pure thought and common intuition is, to
put it mildly, hazardous for a joseph_sixpack to say the
least.
And now for something completely different
What was it exactly that was made flesh?
In my humble opinion
Civilizations began to build and march up country when they
began to write. Prior to that, it can be assumed that wall
paintings and oral tradition was the most effective means of
transmitting information from one generation to another.
The young child was grabbed by the ears and told by its
mother, "listen you dumb shit! this is how it is...".
Later on, the child now older, grabbed his younger brother,
and depending upon what he understood from his mother, told
his younger brother, "Listen you dumb shit! this is how it
is...".
Later, the two of them listened to the older hunter-
gatherers and received more information that was necessary
to their survival. In addition, they were shown how to do
the things that they were told.
A lot of the time, the oral tradition was severely disrupted
by tribal wars, conflicts, disease, famine, plague and other
environmental niceties. The new generation, or what was
left of it, had to start from scratch all over again.
Some remembered some things, others remembered other things.
But the backbone of cultural effort, such as it was, was
ripped out, forgotten, the tiny social group came to
disarray.
Then there were pictures
The pictures on the walls helped some, if they were relevant
and there were a few bright people left to reinterpret them
when disorder came.
But one bright day, a bright monk said, don't eat that
bright stuff, it will make you sick, and drew a writing
picture of the hamburger and french fries smothered in
ketchup with chocolate ice cream.
Later, restaurant owners used the same pictures as menus,
but that is another story occuring thousands of years later,
just about the time money was invented.
Anyhow to make a long boring story short, writing was
invented somewhere, somehow and mankind was off and running.
It seemed that there were always those who were smart enough
to learn how to read the chicken scratch marks that their
parents and elders left.
Culture and its processes were now founded on writing.
Armies could be built upon the scratch writings of the
elders, weapons formed to hunt with, enemies dispatched.
To make a tedious subject mercifully short:
It was the word that was made flesh.
The music wasn't made flesh.
Music wasn't made flesh because it couldn't carry enough
easily understood information in its tunes.
Paintings ran a close second after the word, but there was
no way to convey the symbolism of the colors and forms
exactly or show enough sequential pictures to convey an
exact meaning.
A lot was lost in error prone interpretation.
So the word ended up doing almost the whole job.
upon its shoulders... the word carried civilization, culture
and the journey towards eternity or infinity if you are a
mathematician.
So today we have the Word and we stumble around on earth,
trying to make it flesh.
For myself, fat, corpulent, the opposite is true - the flesh
made word. i try to convince the present to think and
consider the invisible and unrepresented future. i create
little easter island statuettes but no one understands what
they see.
So i respectfully and humbly submit for your consideration,
that it is time for a few new Words to be made flesh from on
Most High, so that the future can have a viable planet to
live on, topsoil to grow food on, oceans to give fish, air
to breath and other miscellaneous necessary whatnot?
Not so tiny bubbles
(From the Christian Science Monitor)
(Thursday, June 22, 2006)
Near-Earth space is forever blowing bubbles - a surprising
find by a team of physicists using satellite data to study
the interaction of the Earth's magnetic field with the solar
wind - a flow of particles streaming from the sun.
The "bubbles" appear above the sunlit side of our planet
roughly between 50,000 and 75,000 miles away. There, vast
pockets of gas display a density about 1/10th the density of
the surrounding gas, but with temperatures from 100,000 to
10 million degrees C. The bubbles, perhaps 600 miles
across, last for 10 seconds, burst, and are replaced with
cooler gas from the solar wind.
initially the researchers, led by George Parks of the
University of California at Berkeley thought the bubbles
were flukes, evidence from flaky instruments. But when five
satellites - four from Europe and one from China - recorded
the unusual formations simulaneously, the team concluded
that the bubble explanation was correct. The results appear
in the current issue of the journal of Physics of Plasma.
In an attempt to understand the phenomena above, joe came up
with more weird ideas...
The Lamb effect
when these hi-energy, hi-mass particles (clumps of energy)
from the sun hit the earth's magnetic field, they 'come
apart' and release enormous amounts of their contained
energy. Often, it is presumed only, that the particles
often hit the/a magnetic field right on the surface, or near
the surface of the sun.
That certain types of hi-energy (temperature) mass can be
induced to release its contained energy is an interesting
proposition that doesn't need to be investigated other than
for possible spacecraft propulsion systems or possible
energy generating systems for desalinization or electricity
to run air conditioners in the new hot world.
TOP
TOC
Index