The Lego Standard Model
of
Particle Physics
TOC
Index
Last update:
April 15, 2006 fixed a logic error...ahem...
April 10, 2006 added 'close encounters'
April 01, 2006 added periodic chart of particles
March 31, 2006 minor corrections
Abstract: The Lego Theory of Particle Physics raises the
Hypothesis that all matter is composed of only one
fundamental particle. This particle is called... uhh...
hmmm... Well, let's call it the "Legotrino" for now.
This legotrino particle is sort of like a single lego that
can be snapped into a couple of different ways and from
there more combinations can be developed yielding different
particles.
It is probably polar for example, and cubifiable under
immense pressures doing a lot of its snapable forms possibly
there. Under different gravitational conditions its
snapability would vary slightly perhaps giving different
other particle geometry.
So now we have to go beyond and beneath the SNOT standard
model and.. and uh.. regroup from there. to see if any of
these ideas are capable of maintaining any viability.
ummm... how do you get different generated fields from a
lego set? joe is intrigued by the concept, he just doesn't
know what he can do with it...
A message from our sponsor
The Legotrino! Give your kid a legotrino set for Christmas!
Let him build his own universes!
Give him a 'take charge' attitude!
Let him design his own particles!
Create anti-gravity systems!
Teach him fundamental creation 101!
Included free for this promotion are the 'fun on the school
bus' or the 'fun in the church' set. (your choice of one)
Warning:
These sets all contains small parts. Not suitable for small
children and fundamentalist clergy who want to chew on fundamental
legotrinos. May cause choking or aggravated bible thumping.
(batteries not included)
Lucifer Industries, Inc.
a division of Red Hot Thermonuclear Industries, Inc.
Motto: 'Let us burn you cleanly!'
A Periodic Chart of Particles!
Abstract: Being imperiously presumptive, joe tries to put
together a series of particles built up from the proffered
legotrino in an effort to catalog all the snot particles of
decades ago, genuflecting in front of the Quark and Hadron
and even tipping the hat to the Higgs Boson, all the while
maintaining that the whole shebang is just like the bigger
periodic chart of protons, neutrons and electrons. Only in
this case it is the photon, neutrino, and the electrino.
Now, can it be done?
How many particles in our periodic chart of particles can
our imaginative theory of primary legotrinos construct?
or explain? or create? or discover?
The issue of whether the single lego particle approach is
even valid within the context of reality, of course, goes
without saying. This is tinkertoy theoretical particle
physics here, based on daydreaming, but there should be
enough ancient data floating around at CERN and other places
to support a cursatory examination of the prospective
validity of the effort.
Of course, i don't know how much of a boost the original
periodic chart got when it started out in someones mind.
Is the earth still flat in particle physics land?
Assuming a quantum particle, what do two of them stuck
together make? Three? Four? Five? Six? and so forth.
And to make matters even worse, say we stick two quantum
particles together. What is emmitted therefrom upon their
joining forces? A yet smaller resonance/particle? But i
thought we at the bottom of our particle toy box? Just how
little does little get?
Close Encounters
Let us consider the single theoretical 'legotrino' for a
second. What we have here is a resonant furball of quantum
smallness. Inside the volume of the resonance a foam exists
that is 'pulsating' or resonating if you prefer. Joe really
doesn't know what is going on inside the quantum bit of
mass, but something is, otherwise it wouldn't be mass.
The playtoy called pufferballs would be a pretty good
candidate for a model of quantum resonance. The tiny spikes
would represent the path of something or other that is
flying along inside the quantum mass at a certain unfolded
velocity according to a certain temperature.
Now the back and forth 'resonance' of a single particle we
can analogize to a musical note. So it is humming along at
some diameter d, bouncing back and forth at some frequency
f.
a valve opens
All of a sudden, (very sudden as a matter of fact) another
pufferball happens by, and is attracted to the developed
polar nature of the pufferball particle and zonks to it.
And with the zonking a small amount of voltage (mass) is
released to accommodate the new twosome.
So now we have two pufferballs are polarly stuck together
but the resonant path length has doubled, or almost doubled,
so now our musical note has dropped in frequency because the
path has doubled but the temperature (energy level) remains
the same. The resonant frequency has halved or almost so
because it is traveling almost twice the distance now.
A third pufferball (legotrino) happens by and now there are
three stuck together. path lenghtens again, now we have a
'times three' situation and resonant f drops appropriately
BUT
Every time the legotrino's link up we have to subtract the
minus interlocking distance from the diameters of the
legotrinos.
Further, wrap, self knotting, and self linking, might occur.
That is, the legotrinos might be loose enough linked so that
they could bend back and attach themselves to the front of
the chain. So we could have pentalegotrinos,
sexalegotrinos, heptalegotrinos, and so on...
In fact, perhaps, even long stringy chains of legotrinos
could develop somewhat like 'carbon chains' and even
structures of a particle nature similar to those constructed
by the massively upscaled carbon atoms. There is just no
way to tell how the little dust particles will clod up
Now, if all this wasn't goofy enough, the strings of
'massless' legotrino could conceivable form to many light
years long end to end. weird... Consider, a universe of
threads.
From here on up, it is anyone's guess as to how things form
or link up. Or if the legotrino concept fails, and the
quark concept stands, then perhaps a pentaquark, hexaquark,
heptaquark might exist as well as the fundamental quark
structures of some type or another.
Personally, i think quark energies are too high. i would
look for connecting or linking mass objects around the 1 to
3 mv range as the current candidate for the solitary quantum
particle if it in fact, even exists.
But even my own guesswork indicates a never ending path to
smallness in particles (see below). Perhaps the new
colliders will shower us with some real tinies.
But
What about the electrino squirt-a-way that escaped when we
joined the legotrinos together? voltage anyone?
Close Encounters Sci-Fi time
So anyhow the humongous mothership be-bop was trying to
communicate to airhead mankind the fundamental particle
properties by using musical resonances to establish resonant
realities.
Alas, most thought it was just a song.
In mankind's defense however, it may turn out yet that there
are only three notes of different colors plus some other
maybe garbage.
time for joe's nap
TOP
TOC
Index