Stability Thresholds for Protons & Certain Particles
Some possible theoretical hypotheses
by Joseph_Sixpack
TOC
Index
Abstract: The primary particles of the cosmos have a, er...
a 'mass coagulation accretion threshold' that which, once
reached, offer a unique and substantial permanent stability.
That threshold is called or is known as: the proton.
All the universe is composed of gazillions and gazillions of
bodies of protons. Protons plus an electron makes a
neutron. Protons and neutrons make up larger bodies of
stuff know as elements. Elements make up all the stuff,
including us.
If it is not stable in proton or neutron format, it won't
exist for very long. Sometimes is just goes back to plain
old radiation again.
The universe appears to be chock full of protons. Moreover,
all these protons, along with a bunch of electrons and
neutrons plus a lot of other rubbish appear to be the first
mass of composite energy thingys that have reached a certain
threshold of 'energy' that will sustain itself in the
environment of the cosmos.
If we collide and bust up a proton or take a few chunks out
of it, it all goes to pieces every which way. It is like
tapping a very fragile glass bowl. Bang on a proton, break
off a chunk, and poof! away it goes.
Threshold events are somewhat common in the cosmos.
The sun won't light up and 'burn' until it reaches a certain
mass.
Black holes won't exist until a certain mass is reached.
There appear to be thresholds for electric current flow.
Magnetic gizmos probably appear to work in the same way.
Ice temperatures for melting and freezing.
All different, but functionally operative.
And so, with our particle tinkertoy set, we can make a
proton with enough stuff, but after we reach final threshold
not much else can be added, or will be accepted.
Any additional accretions just keep flying off into far
away, leaving us with just our mass stable proton. Repeat
this a gazillion, gazillion times and you end up with a
cosmos.
a limit, is a limit, is a limit.
Now the question eventually arises, just what makes up a
proton and just what makes up a particle. And just how
many particles are there? personally, i can't count that
high.
And a related question arises: Why does mass stop accreting
at the 'proton level or if you prefer, the neutron level?
Well, the answer obviously is that at that point of mass,
either a proton or a neutron, ALL polar accreting events are
ah... permanently closed off.
Now a question is: Why does the proton stop at the plus
stage and wait for an electron to finish off.
Everything is supposed to be self-sealing.
All the particles have a chair and there are no more empty
chairs.
The particle becomes 'noble', so to speak, with respect to
other particles, by eliminating all attractive forces within
the particles that now form and match up to form a proton.
But heat (energy) is moving everything around so all the
particles get their chance to form into protons.
Pretty soon, you gots lots and lots of protons matching up
with some electrons to make neutrons to form all the various
elements.
Another question arises: Are protons all built the same?
That is, are they composed of exactly all the same type of
particles? How can we figure that one out?
Does the particle variance within protons and neutrons
support the isotope formation phenomenon?
Does the particle variance within protons and neutrons
support the neutron decay phenomenon?
Anyhow, thought i would just throw out that little dreamt up
potential puzzle. All this stuff is way beyond a joe to
prove or disprove.
Now about the Higgs... under the legotrino concept, higgs of
course would just be a subassembly of a proton that just
comes apart when the proton is crashed into. It just
vanishes into its fog of component parts (waveforms).
That would mean that there is no Higgs, just a Higgs space
allotment for the subassembly.
Anyhow, because of the 'mass coagulation accretion
threshold' of the proton, that threshold explains why
protons are not three inches in diameter. Whatever is
there, is all that can be there, and that is why protons are
so tiny and not so big.
With that, i believe i will take my leave... unless
something else comes up :-) for yet another chapter.
Oops! One more thought...
The Helium 3 isotope, as well, in fact, as mentioned above,
all isotopes may owe their existence to the as yet joseph-
sixpack theoretical particle composition variation
hypothesis for protons.
So the establishment of just what particle variations within
the proton would lead to stable isotopes, namely Helium 3,
this understanding, if valid, might lead to a method of
manufacturing Helium 3 by inducing the particle variation
within the proton by bombardment of ah... say for example,
the same energies that creates all the Helium 3 on the moon
for instance.
Just a thought...
Anyhow a nice supply of Helium 3, manufactured by mankind,
might come in handy for ummm... whatever helium 3 is or can
be used for...
TOP
TOC
Index