TOC
Index

Will Global Warming raise

global worldwide ambient temperatures to

136 degrees fahrenheit?

Abstract:  Hypothesis:  Global warming may result in ambient 
temperatures to go to 136 degrees Fahrenheit in many areas, 
extincting all heat sensitive unadaptable life within 3 or 4 
breeding periods (maybe about 75 years or less depending 
upon the breeding life of the mammal).

At those temperatures, (about 50 degrees centigrade), 
temperature re-equilibrium from the equator to the poles 
could induce hurricanes with 480 mile per hour winds.

This isn't entirely bad news as it would create another form 
of transportation.  By simply flying a strong kite with at 
least 500 lb. line, all you would have to do is hold on for 
dear life and you are off to the land of oz.

When we were kids a 20 mile per hour in the Van Nuys, 
California March winds made us hold on to our "Cloud Buster" 
kites with both hands.  Often the string broke or the Cloud 
Buster kite folded up in two.

Either one would increase our penance at Saturday Confession 
as we would exclaim, "dear me, my new kite's string appears 
to have broken; and it appears that i have lost my kite.";   
hopefully, out of earshot of the all-seeing and omniscient 
nuns which, was generally not possible.  

Ocean water temperature changes could reacclimatize vast 
portions of the earth with different local and general 
weather (temperature equilibrium) patterns.

But make no mistake, this whole thing is just a big guessing 
game by Joseph_Sixpack at this point.  i suspect very few 
people really have a handle on the subject.


Nice thinking Dudley... Well, this is one hypothesis that i hope doesn't come to pass. BUT polar melting is even now releasing huge quantities of carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere. Much of this carbon dioxide is absorbed by the oceans and waters and plants of the earth and much of it is not. Global warming, if unbound, could create a thick cloud layer in response, generated off the oceans and wet areas of the earth. This cover could act as a buffer (temperature fence) hopefully against too high a temperature rise or we could argue that the increased cloud cover would act a barrier to the temperature dissipation events of earth surface temperatures.. You figure it out... The final dynamics and climatic events of global warming are totally beyond a joseph_sixpack. We will just have to wait and see. But move to a little higher ground if you are living under sea level now and stay away from high probability hurricane and chubasco areas unless you have webbed feet and/or an inflatable ducky.
The little train that couldn't China's new Tibetan railway has a small portion built over 270 miles of permafrost will be an unwelcome casualty of global warming as will be a lot of Alaska's infrastructure which is built over the then and now melting permafrost. Melting permafrost under the heavily pressured rail system is going to make for a wobbly ride to Tibet. The train might head off to India or Bhutan sans its rail support if the loopy bumper car ride gets goofy enough. A lot of permafrost melting is going on now as we speak. er... read, er... type.
Grow what? where? If ambient air temperatures do manage to reach an average of 136 degrees worldwide, food production and perhaps, even distribution for the remains of the population will have to occur in the cool of the underground or at night, as will the majority of human existence and their activities. Some computer modeling, i am told, suggests that food production within the old areas would no longer be adequate to feed earth's existing population due to the prospective climate changes, raising the specter of massive starvation of literally in the billions. That is with a "B". Accelerated topsoil erosion isn't going to make anybody any happier either.
Oh say can you breath? As a longshot, production of oxygen creating plankton in the surface temperature sensitive areas might come to an end with the surface temperatures of the water being simply too hot. And hot water doesn't sink, cold water does. The adaptability of the human race remains to be seen however, in this possible new "challenge" of adaptability upon a changing earth that is suggested, that it is a change of their own making. The situation hopefully may however reach some sort of equilibrium enabling the balance of the population to remain somewhat static in numbers. For how long the hot conditions would exist is anybody's guess.
Swift slimeys Certainly some cold blooded animals, now more active, and now more energetic, would become more populous and probably select in species that have developed external 'cooling fins' for the dissipation of the now substantial generated body heat. The slow snakes might not be so slow anymore. Bats, living in the cool of caves, coming out at night would find an increasing abundance of insects. That is, if the bats themselves could survive in the increased hostile heat environment. What effect the rising heat levels would have on the propagation of warm-blooded insects (yes, there are some) is anybody's guess. The equilibrium and dynamics of heat transfer to the poles (hurricanes & typhoons & chubascos) would of course be expected to change somewhat, if not a lot in strike areas and wind velocities.. Warming now is apparently beyond man's ability to reverse his mistakes. Once the polar regions started to melt, i am told, it was all over with. Melting Andean mountain glaciers have long sent out their sirens of concern, alas, with no one to listen except those who made it to the top and could discern, their surprising diminishment. It is too much to ask a thoughtless humanity to curtail the many thousands of aircraft flights daily that is alleged to contribute to the problem so heavily. Does the particulate drop the temperature or increase it? The science of the subject is way, way, way, beyond the abilities of a joseph_sixpack to perceive even a groping hypothesis concerning the subject. We will just have to wait and see. For sure, time will tell.
So... Okay, what did we end up with? In the first part of Joseph_Sixpack's Opus Dopus, the world is going to end because we are all thieves and idiots allowing the top soil to blow away and using up almost everything besides, that the future will need to survive. or The entire galaxy is going to end smushing into a black hole or any of the other cosmic nasty events that occur from time to time upon little tiny spheres that go 'round and 'round. or An egg frying good time from the next scenario this disaster forecaster which is global (really hot) warming 'cause we run our SUV's and airplanes too much for our own good. So kill the world for our own convenience. so You pays your money and takes your choice. personally, i think we ought to take a vote and come to an agreement on how we want the world and/or species to come to an end. or In the alternative, turn on the evening news to watch just what we are allowed by putrid central, (as distinguished from 'evil central') which is the current car chase or/and all the other mindless, pointless, moral-less, vapid happenings. Given our quick extinction hypothesis, perhaps the future has some hope after all, if the next batch of humanity has more brains than this batch. Our short eternity will tell. okay, that's it for the dark, dank, dirty, dopey, dismal, dingy, depressing, blab... so... to cheer myself up, i am going to take advantage of my current prejudgment status and go to the coffee shop for a nice tall hot Au Lait. And then to the ice cream parlor to consume a banana split AND a root beer float and enjoy the pretty sunsets at twilight. And then later, perhaps some fish tacos for dinner. so there. nightly news following... (come to think of it, all the food doesn't sound like a very healthy idea after all - maybe just a couple of tacos.) For those upon the earth who have been captured within God's Justice, i respectfully and humbly request that you pray for the removal of the stench surrounding my soul, i hate spending time in purgatory getting purged.
added March 2009 Well... Thermodynamics is not Joe's forte. After thinking about it for a while, it seems that another scenario might be the more probable one, at least in the early stages of global warming. As the surface of the earth heats up and the methane starts to boil (gassify) out of the ground and seas, equatorial & polar temperature readjustments will create much more evaporation of moisture from the seas, holding down any temperature elevation of severe consequence for a while. The occurring events will just be a LOT more 'rainstorms' all over the place. Maybe hurricanes and tornadoes too. BUT... what may as well occur could be best called 'hot spots'. These are like the small geographic areas of high pressure currently in place or existence that cause a 'hot spell' during the summer or Indian summer times. The hot spots are sort of like the currently dangerous hot spells in the cities during the summer when the temperature gets to hovering around the 90 to 100+ degree mark for a few days or weeks. Kids play around the fire hydrants and the vulnerable or old citizens in the small closed apartments and rooms start suffering from heat prostration. The only difference is that the global warming hi-pressure hot spots may be in excess of the old 100 degree mark and may be as high as the earlier 136 degree mark. These moving small areas of 'super-heat' may replace today's 'hot spells' that we now have with the exception that as these 'super- heat' hot spots move across the face of the earth, nothing will remain alive behind them. To model the concept and to get an idea of what it may be like on a modeling basis, take a pencil and with the erasure end, move it lightly across a small 12 inch students globe and consider its aftermath. This is as best as a joe can do explaining the possible new thermodynamics that await us in a global warming world. If correct, then it is a 'Everybody underground' time until the hot spot passes on. Sort of like hiding from a giant hurricane or tornado except the cellar is going to have to be a tad deeper to maintain its coolness. Further considerations for a disaster forecaster is the naughty prospect of crop damage due to global warming. Extreme weather, or too much rainfall, does not equal farming weather. Extremes in weather washes away topsoil, flattens corn, kills livestock, and does another one hundred things unknowable to a joe sixpack. Unknowable to a joe as well is whether there will be MORE and bigger hailstorms that will dent your new painted tin buggy or bonk you on the noggin. The temps upstairs are still going to be on the cold side, but what happens to the hail on the way down remains to be experienced with the 'new' heat engines patrolling the planet. we'll just have to wait and see what reality will hold for us as a thoughtless group of people, ignorant of the consequences of our mindless collective activities...
TOP
TOC
Index
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1