TOC
Index

E-Stars, The Celestial Firecrackers

yet another modest hypothesis by

Joseph_Sixpack


uploaded: June 5, 2006
Abstract:  Hypothesis - Single Working Stars (still burning) 
whose mass creates an escape velocity in excess of the 
velocity of light, retain their radiation until their 
internal mass falls beneath the critical radiation retention 
value.


Well... let me announce firstly that you cannot see such a star. It is a black hole, albeit a tiny one on comparative scales. Norma cluster conceals for example, a 5x1016 or 50,000,000,000,000,000 solar mass object. Anyhow, back to our "little guy" black hole that is over 500 times the mass of our own star. When a star accrets more mass through some collision or other accretion process (what other processes are there?) and that added mass increases the gravitation of the star up to say some value short of creating an escape velocity of c what radiation (light) that does escape after that, does so at some humongous red- shifted value. To our astronomers, it may look like that the radiation is coming from the edge of the universe so gravitationally red- shifted it is. May these types of stars be confused with red giants? Or are they the red giants themselves? Joe doesn't know the answer to that one, that is astronomer stuff. Okay, back to our 'little star' that just got fatter. It is sitting there now, being drawn and putt-putting towards some other gravitational force when it gets clobbered by yet another putt-putting mass. Now the collected mass of all three masses is such, that it generates so much gravitation, that the combined escape velocities are added together (sort of) to create an escape velocity of something in excess of the velocity of light or c. So now you need to go faster than light to get off this little black hole. any takers? Our little star is still burning inside and giving off a lot of energy in the form of heat and light and still doing its sunspot dances although, now they are all contained with the event horizon of the little black hidden star. Well, 'little' if you call very roughly 500 times the size of our own star little. But... no one can see a thing from the outside. Because it doesn't look like it is there. Light from behind it gravitationally wraps around it and hides it sort of... Okay now our little putt-putt keeps burning and burning and using up its mass, converting it to light, losing about m tons of mass per second over the perhaps t millions of years. Inside, the retaining mass and its event horizon keeps getting littler and littler until finally it approaches mass escape velocity and event horizon values that is representative or under or corresponds to the values close to c (the speed of light). The retained radiation all during this time was closely held by the small black hole's gravitational field and was slowly increasing inversely, as the mass of the star kept decreasing down to a radiation release value of less than c escape velocity... The first light (radiation) to escape off this ever decreasing mass still burning star is extremely red-shifted. But once the escape velocity is below c, it is below c, and when that happens all the retained radiation is released at once. Ka-pow-ee! out it goes. All the retained energy and radiation and whatever else stars pour out blasts forth, like kids getting out of school for the summer. dismal er... distant astronomers who are doing their job and looking at stars that night see a bright flash in the sky above. Those on the under side of the planet see the same bright flash in the sky below. The ones on the back side are just out of luck. For myself i never get to see any of it as i am in training as a couch potato and watching the television commercials wondering if i should spend $3,000 for a high definition television to watch high definition commercials on. Now all this is/was from a single star and not a discussion of binary systems. The sigma mass of all the withheld radiation is not under high pressure containment so it doesn't produce an additive gravity sufficient to continue its containment when the main star goes below the c threshold for escape velocity. But what would happen if the additive gravity was large enough to bring the escape velocity up to the value or in excess of c? What would we have then? an interesting question. the reality of which however, at this uninvestigated time, remains in grave doubt. maybe... As the mass continually shrunk through burning it would finally amount to an almost pure black energy hole! i doubt if any of these really exist. but... don't count the cosmos out for not throwing curve balls. Okay, so now what is the net effect of this 'explosion' in space? Well, it looks like a nova sort of... But: consider the black hole mass plus the additive mass turned to various amounts of radiation: 502 main mass plus 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,..50..100..200, 400, 500, 550 and on and on of solar mass converted to radiation? We then get just bigger and bigger celestial firecrackers with no standard firecracker for sure occuring per given flash in the night sky. Detectable gravity waves? probably not as there is no new creation or destruction of mass that would alter gravity (warped spacetime) a lot of radiation? you bet! don't be anywhere near around one of these things when it goes off or you will be instant hickory smoked human. About our best bet for leftovers is a red giant type of celestial object. the now just below c escape velocity mass of the former black hole will let radiation escape. The nature of such drawn down energy i have to leave to the real scientists. is it drawn down all the way to the infrared level? radio? vhf? uhf? by me... Of course the star appears to be very far away due to its red shift but the escaping 'tired' radiation maybe erroneously leads us to think that given its distance this must be a very big and powerful system. But nothing could be further from the truth. It is just a close by little guy blowing its nose. Thus endeth this erudite discourse on Celestial Firecrackers and the lack of any standard candle contained therein. The only thing they have in common is the same critical mass amount to just release radiation. Their distance and how much radiation they release is up for grabs on an individual basis. This is not crab nebulae stuff, crab nebulae is a binary system i surmise, given the 30 cps signal coming therefrom. this system has been addressed in another chapter.
TOP
TOC
Index
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1