Abstract:  This short paper's intuitive joseph_sixpackian 
hypothesis suggests that in a universe that allegedly has an 
acceleration of its expansion rate, Cosmic Background 
Radiation under such conditions quite possibly would be 
dopplered continuously down as the acceleration continued 
to, er,  ...accelerate.



                        Joe guesses

Consider standing at a fixed location (there is no such 
thing) listening to a clarinet player playing a single fixed 
frequency sound source accelerating ever faster away.  As 
the clarinet player keeps accelerating away, faster and 
faster, the single note from the clarinet the pitch 
(frequency) of the sound source keeps decreasing.

The same would be true say for a holder of a light of some 
fixed frequency.  The photons would appear to lose energy by 
decreasing in frequency and going to longer wavelength 
colors.

In fact, radiation of any frequency from sound to gamma rays 
would be subject to dopplering (apparent loss of energy).

Now, cosmic background radiation, sourced somewhere, and 
going somewhere else, (radiation is directive) and given an 
arbitrary fixed starting point (x,y,z,t) under an 
accelerating environment of ever changing distance would 
exhibit the standard dopplered phenomenon as the entire 
continuum moved away from p(x,y,z,t).

If 'no continuous doppleration' of cosmic background 
radiation cannot be measured or verified, does that mean, or 
bring with it, the hypothesis that there is no acceleration 
of the expansion of the universe?

If cosmic background radiation shows a continuous, albeit 
very slow accelerating energy shift downward to match the 
acceleration of the expansion of the cosmos, would that 
would tend to present the hypothesis that the universe's 
expansion is indeed accelerating.



                          The Universe+

If there is no doppler effect detectable for any Cosmic Background 
Radiation, then joe's intuitive hypothesis is that the cosmos is 
not accelerating in its expansion, but just unique objects in the 
cosmos are accelerating under gravitational influence of the super 
massive objects (invisible and at the edge of our cosmos) towards 
the super massive objects that was hypothesized in the intuitive 
Universe+ hypothesis for just simple accretion purposes.