Yet Another Theory Concerning

Spiral Galaxy Formation

via the mechanism of

Continued Gravitational Contraction

added edits: July 10, 2006
first posted: July 07, 2006
TOC
Index
Abstract:  This chapter offers a hypothesis that Spiral and 
Barred Galactic Formation may occur under a single hypermass 
concept due to gravitational contraction and not require a 
binary closure or directly as gradual mass accretion as was 
previously offered as a hypothesis as stated in earlier 
Joseph_Sixpack hypotheses...     sigh...


The Year is 1939... And Joseph_Sixpack is 2.5 years old. And a young pair of physicists/mathematicians by the name of J. R. Oppenheimer and H. Snyder at the University of California, Berkeley, California publish a paper in Volume 56, September edition of the Physical Review. The paper is entitled, "On Continued Gravitational Contraction". Germany is bumping and grinding in Europe and Japan has a hair up its ass and is grumping about resources. Italy is fence sitting and China and Russia are our dear friends. America is just starting to come out from its "Great Depression" by going to massive WPA programs. The government is under heavy socialist influence. The newest style 1939 V-8 Ford 2-door Coupe was a hot topic with kids and Ford is pissed at the Unions.
While all the above is going on, the 1939 paper, in its abstract, starts out by saying: "When all thermonuclear sources of energy are exhausted a sufficiently heavy star will collapse. Unless fission due to rotation, the radiation of mass, or the blowing off of mass by radiation, reduce the star's mass to the order of that of the sun, this contraction will continue indefinitely..." The paper goes on to produce an abundance of incomprehensible chicken scratching to a joseph_sixpack, but the idea was planted. Is it possible for a galaxy to form in a similar way? So let's consider: We have a supermassive black hole that contains enough mass to create a spiral galaxy and which is rotating at some rate due to the accretion of matter that had been earlier surrounding it. For some reason it decides to collapse due to some approach in solar mass value or the exhaustion of internal fuels to support its internal fusions process. Voila! The contraction of mass commences! Inwards, everything goes! the supermass starts to speed up in revolutions in compliance to the concepts of angular momentum conservation theories. Now, offsetting the contraction (collapse) is an ever increasing amount of centrifugal force countering the collapse of the mass at the equatorial regions. The supermass due to the centrifugal forces may start to split up after taking on a somewhat weak donut shape and creating a presumably temporary zero gravity hole dead center. As if shot from guns, out go massive amounts of radiation and plasma particles, from the newly created zero gravity port, creating a jet of radiation and plasma that you definitely don't want to stand in front of. The light stuff gets slung out from the periphery first, being subject to the most centrifugal forces. Its X-Y vectors are the strongest with the chunks of matter with ever lessening X-Y vectors being issued as the hypersphere spins up under its collapse and continues its redistribution of mass. The progressive collapse from the polar centers of the black hole containing the least centrifugal force, flatten down with the mass offset from the polar centers being subject to an ever increasing centrifugal forces. the entire hypersphere flattens like a pancake between the gravitational forces of collapse and the resulting centrifugal distributions of mass.
Is the "Big Bang" a distribution of the same ilk? It would seem not as the big bang mass would have self distributed itself under the same earlier mass conditions and never would have gotten to the required mass status the big bang distribution would imply. However if the earlier distribution theories are not within the bounds of reality, then at what point, if any, would this phenomenon of gravitational contraction occur again, if ever? Is it a continuous threshold event? Or does it require mass of the 'big bang' proportions?
Glow worm Assuming a gravitational contraction on just a galactic scale, where would the distribution of visible and invisible radiation occur or be at it maximum during redistribution?
Re-Accretion? Okay, now that we have three conflicting, or slightly conflicting, theories of spiral galaxy formation: 1.) The first is the binary black hole whiz-bye bang sling mass all over the place distribution with ever lessening x-y distribution vectors. 2.) The second is the single black hole sitting in the center being still and slurping all the mass all up gravitationally until it reaches some point idea. 3.) The third is the Gravitational contraction concept swiped from a 1939 paper by some then young kids named Oppenheimer and Snyder. okay... now... that we have our spiral galaxy in place and distributed all over the place, can we argue that now, once the dust has settled, that an initially slow process of re- accretion would start to occur and the distributed mass slowly start to re-sphericalize itself? To answer that question i suspect that we would or could have to look at as many pictures of galaxies that are available from our telescopes and detectors of all types to see what shapes are available to get some sort of handle to see just what is going on under different mass and different time conditions. This implies another look at red-shifting to see if current expansion is 'really' going on... i mean, if the stars within a galaxy are accelerating in their expansion from one another, the galaxy sure as heck isn't going to re-accret any time soon. If the galaxies are accelerating in their rate of expansion from one another, the big bang isn't going to re-accret anytime soon either if the expansion is a fact. So. what now? Well, that leaves us with three fates with regard to termination. One, is to just hit a smaller black hole within our own galaxy of which i suspect there are many. Two, to be reabsorbed into the center of our own galaxy if the whole galaxy is drawing mass into its center positioned black hole. Three, to get picked off by the Norma cluster by being within our galaxy as it and 48 others are drawn gravitationally towards it. This does not exhaust all the possible scenarios for doomsday by a long shot but it is enough to make one look askance at the night sky and suspiciously look for groups of mysteriously moving stars... In sum, it appears that we have to look back in time to make our guesses and toss a coin to see which reality the heavenly dispensates says are going to be the rules. Reality appears to be created by vote sometimes...
TOP
TOC
Index
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1