The properties of TIME as a field

If TIME is a field, what do we know about it already?

by joseph_sixpack

TOC
Index
Abstract:  An earlier chapter put forth a hypothesis that 
postulated that TIME is just a simple field, with standard 
common field properties.  Moreover, it is a frequency or 
resonant induced field generated by the same generating mass 
that effectively warps spacetime (gravity).
(pardon my english)

So Time, Gravity, Magnetism, Radiation are all balled up 
into a single causitive tentative theory which we maintain 
that all basic phenomena (Time, Gravity, Magnetism, 
Radiation (superdirt) are all generated (caused) by 
causitive (pardon the redundancy) very, very, high waveforms 
(frequencies).  So we examine and create more hypotheses 
concerning that imaginative hypothesis as if it were a fact.


Every little bit helps So lets begin at the beginning. UNDER THIS THEORY: Each piece of mass or contained energy (your choice) however small, generates all the currently known and unknown fields. These fields are all additive. Therefore there must be a polar element within their reality. So it may be proper to talk about a "quantum" fields, TIME and others, which of course, would be the smallest possible fields that could be produced by the aforesaid quantum mass, sort of like quantum warped spacetime (gravity) or quantum magnetism, or quantum anything else. Restated again, TIME fields, like Gravity or any other generated field can be considered to be additive. The more mass, the more field, whether it is Time, Gravity, Magnetism or any other fields that we are currently ignorant of...
Time Dilation can be externally additive. That is, the warped spacetime field generated by the "Great Attractor" that dilates TIME, can affect and be added to the warped spacetime field generated by our own local solar system, the milky way, which diltates TIME, which can be added to the warped spacetime field created by our own solar system's major domo, our sun, which dilates TIME. Which can be added to the warped spacetime field created by our own planet, earth, which dilates TIME. And so on down the line all the way down to the smallest quantum tinys, which dilates TIME... So there is a lot of dilations goin' on. Admittedly, much of it doesn't add up to much.
Whoa, Whoa, Whoa, Great Dilation...! The further we go away from the source dilating mass of course, the less TIME dilation there is, because it is a field, so TIME speeds up... That is, TIME dilation decreases. Obviously, the next question is just how fast does the tick- tock tick under zero gravitation. good question. Despite the fact that any correct answer to the question may be totally irrelevant for humanity, a pretty good guessimate can still be made due to the nature of the dilation curve. Theoretical Cosmologists concentrate on questions irrelevant to humanity. It is a pleasant distraction while waiting for Godot.
Doppler who? Now, with respect to sound, depending on which way we zoom, we can increase or decrease the rate of pressure differentials that come across our eardrums. Probably the same would be true for sound in water if we could muster up enough speed. In the night sky, we have built an entire astronomical science on redshift - blueshift doppler stuff. All frequencies would offer the same doppler phenomenon if traveled directly, or near directly to and from the source mass. So, TIME frequencies (resonance) would offer the same doppler phenomenon, if traveled directly, or near directly to and from the source. Our own finding that the cosmos is "accelerating" in its expansion may be just the result of TIME field dilation variance as we get further and further away from the sources of all the different masses that are responsible for the current clock rate of TIME and it sigma dilation. The red- shift may be.. er... illusionary. Said again, An interesting, possible accelerated doppler effect with respect to TIME might be measured with respect to TIME if we could zoom to and fro from a source mass. Something is wrinkling up the magic carpet of TIME and i suspect that it is a substantially massless polar underlayer of some sort or another that is conveying the reality. Perhaps this is the missing dark energy and missing dark matter of the universe.
Bad News from the Badlands The problem with a mass accelerating towards a TIME dilating source is that: As the source mass TIME dilator gets closer and closer, TIME dilates more and more (duh). Now earlier we deduced that the event horizon of super- massive and hypermassive black holes extends far out past the hard mass core that is doing the warping; so the dopus galaxy hippy-hops right inside the event horizon without a clue. And as we know, time dilation is not linear.
One last gasp...anti-up With respect to these theoretical fields, the question may be asked, "Are there anti-fields involved in reality?", that is magnetism has it repulsive elements, gravity may have its field opposites, there is anti-this and anti-that... So we come to the question, does the generation of TIME, or perhaps then, just its alteration by mass (dilation) put into existence, an anti-time event? How would the wrinkle in the magic carpet go? What would be the characteristics of an anti-field of our proposed hypothetical TIME field?
The Visitor AW: =Ancient Wife DA: =Dr. David Advocate JS: =Joseph_Sixpack AW: (offstage) Dear, There is someone at the door, get the door, please. JS: (to himself) Geez! that woman is a pest! Right in the middle of... (out loud) Yes Dear. (going to the door) Well! Look who's here! Long time no see! Welcome! How have you been Dave? AW: (offstage) Who is it dear? JS: It's Dr. David Advocate. AW: Oh, how nice, tell him hello for me. DA: Good afternoon Joe. Sorry to stop by unannounced, was in the area, thought you wouldn't mind a small short hello visit. JS: No. Not at all. Good to see you again sir. DA: So! What have you been up to these days? JS: Been trying to figure out TIME. DA: TIME? That sounds formidable. What have you got so far. JS: Glad you asked. I figured out that time is just another field generated by mass, like gravity or magnetism. DA: (slowly) Just another field. Well. hmmmm... Don't know Joe. Time as a field?... So it gets stronger as you get closer and closer? And weaker and weaker as you get further and further away from the source mass? JS: Yes! And, it dilates more and more as you get closer and closer and dilates less and less as you get further and further away DA: Well... let's keep going further and further away until the field is almost non-existent or approaches zero in strength. What happens to the tick-tock rate? Does it just fade away with the absence of field strength? Does TIME just vanish? JS: oh... i never thought of that... oh-oh... sigh... hmmmm... shit! $%!@#$!it. Well, how about this: When you start to travel into a timeless void everything slows down to creep time and your biological processes slow down to whatever TIME is available. The inertia of the ship keeps the ship going forward to your destination until you reach the other side of the void and TIME begins to gradually start and make itself felt again, and your bodily processes gradually start up. Sort of an involuntary suspended animation allowing space travel across vast distances... DA: I don't know whether bodily processes can gradually restart all by themselves. JS: Yeeeah... well neither do i. Maybe you know someone who can have someone kick the ideas around? DA: What about your earlier hypothesis that the cosmos was filled with hugh black holes which were responsible for the distribution of mass in the universe? Your alleged voids then wouldn't be voids at all but just extended event horizons of source black holes. better not sail into those, right? JS: For sure. hmmmm, i guess TIME would never stop under those conditions then... you would always be under some sort of huge gravitational mass influence that was creating TIME. Boy, using this theoretical intuitive daydreaming stuff to track down reality is harder than it looks. DA: Well. A field is a field is a field. So TIME would have to have all the properties of a field, wouldn't it? So it would vanish at some point. What do you think of that peculiarity? JS: (weakly) yah... (slowly shaking his head) Before i forget, my honorable wife says to tell you hello. she's... DA: (sympathetically) Thank her, and tell her hello back. JS: Jeez... oh well, back to the drawing board... DA: Doing anything else? JS: no... beginning to think i should find another hobby... DA: Well, keep working on TIME; something will come up. JS: yeah... well... Say... TIME could be carried by an aether or could be the aether itself. Why would or should it dilate under conditions of heavy mass unless it was subject to the effects of mass itself? The TIME field, if it exists, therefore, must must have some sort of manipulatable field properties since it does dilate... hmmm... Maybe the aether itself is somewhat residually energetic and wrinkled up and dilated?... DA: There! See! You are already off and running after another hypothesis! Good form, old chap! Keep up the hobby. Good to keep the mind active and all that. Well. Sorry to cause problems. Perhaps it is best if I dash off. Sorry to interrupt. Must run. Call me if you need me. Give your wife my best regards. JS: Will do. DA: I'll uh... just let myself out. JS: (Turning to return to the front room.) AW: Ask the good doctor if he can come over for dinner on the twentieth? JS: (turning) Dave! Wife wants you over for dinner on the 20th? (no response) (sticking his head out the door) Where did he go?... Geez! He just closed the door behind him a second ago. (shouting up to wife) He has left already dear... Damn that guy vanished fast. AW: Oh shoot! darn! He is such a nice gentleman too. Perhaps if you see him again, you'll remember to ask him again. I think I found him a nice girl. JS: (to himself) oh God... He's going to love that...

Notes How up? Don't know. Can't even guess. more unknowns than equations. doppler effect? a blue shifting andromeda? accelerating great attractor closing rate as time dilates more. undetectable accelerating approach of local group into or towards great attractor? so we may not have 3 billion years left at all. how would distant objects appear that were under much less dilation? what would distant objects appear that were under much more dilation? with an ever slowing tick tock... antifield properties of emf, radiation, gravity, time?
TOP
TOC
Index
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1