3.5  Data Analysis

In the six years period of 1996 -2001 CWIN center for children at risk has registered and rehabilitated many children having various background to various places, who are referred from various places. 

Analysis of sources of children

²      Children were referred from different places to the center. In the six-year of period total 1415 children were registered in the center. Those children were referred from 20 different sources. The sources are CSC CCC/CCP CWIN Clinic, CWIN help line, Coming self, Maiti Nepal, Observation home Mumbai, Referred by people, Police, St.xavier’s social service center, street(rescue), carpet(rescue), Lion’s club, NASPEC, Sangrilla home, VDC, tempo conductor rescue, hotel boy rescue, DAO saptari, NYOF and VDC rautahat. Among them maximum number of children were referred from CWIN Socialization center(CSC). CSC is the main source of children till now. Until now CSC has referred 653 children to the center and Lion’s club, St.xavier’s social service center, sangrilla home, NYOF and VDC are the places from where 1,3,1,2&2 children were referred to the center respectively.

Analysis of background of children

²      Children who are registered in the center are not of same background. In 1415 children, who are registered from 33 different backgrounds. These backgrounds are: abandoned, beggar, brick kiln worker, carpet labor, domestic servant, hotel kanchha, lost, mechanics, orphan, porter, runaway, rag picking, sick, street vendor, tempo conductor, bus conductor, labor in bag factory, shepherd, cutting ice, stone carving, vehicle cleaner, shoe shiner, send from family, at risk, bread making, selling paper, wool spinning, come to see kathmandu, labor in biscuit factory, stone query labor, monk and mentally retarded. Among these 33 different backgrounds children having background of hotel kanchha is highest which is 233 and the lowest is shoe shiner which is only 1.

Analysis of place of rehabilitation

²      Among the children registered in the center 1169 children were further rehabilitated in different particulars. They are: family reunion, referral to skill training & job placement, referral to child care home, referral to CWIN ESP, referral to SOS ,referral to Apanga nawa jeevan Kendra. Among these  particulars maximum  children are family reunited. Due to the family reunion is the main target of the center where as other particulars some side-by-side if family reunion is not a worth. Hence 1051 children are reunited with  the family and only 1/1 children are referred the SOS & Apang Nawa Jeevan kendra. And the other comes in between.

3.6      STUDY RESULT

Before the study some objectives were made. The objectives were to know the source of children, place for rehabilitated and types of child laborers. At the end of the study the objective seem to be met. I.e. there were 20 different sources of children, children were rehabilitated in 6 different places and there were mainly 33 different types of children rehabilitated including child laborers as well as children at risk and children in difficult circumstances.

4.1      SUMMARY

In the six years of period cwin center for children at risk has registered 1415 children and  rehabilitated 1169 children. The enrolment of children in the center is not in regular trend i.e. it is neither increasing nor decreasing trend. In 1996 there are 179 children registered but in 1997 there are 171 children registered which is declining and in 1998 there are 241 children registered where as in 1999 total 242 children are registered, in 2000 total 304 children are registered which is increasing and in 2001 278 children are registered which  is declining . So the registration of children is not in regular trend.

In the 1169 number of rehabilitation of children 1051 children are reunited with the family and others are referred in different places.

There are 33 different backgrounds of children including child labor and children at risk or children in especially difficult circumstances.

4.2      CONCLUSION

This organization is doing very good program in the process of rehabilitation including family reunion and referring to many other process.

As the highest number of children are family reunited they are also re-admitted to the center mostly so it seems family reunion program is not so effective as most of children doesn't want to go home and are mostly interested in getting skill training. So I would like to suggest the organization to focus more in skill training rather than family reunion. Though family reunion cannot be denied