SPECIAL REPORT
CONFRONTATION AMONG "NEIGHBORS"--
"CONFRONTING THE
HOLOCAUST IN POLAND"
A Conference at the U.S. Holocaust
Memorial Museum
By T. Ron Jasinski-Herbert
Washington, D.C.--A conference at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum in
Washington, D.C., on April 30, 2001, produced predictable, if not entirely
satisfactory, results, seeking a form of reconciliation between the Polish
and Jewish communities at all costs. As with similar such events, the
conference title, "Confronting the Holocaust in Poland," at least mildly
suggested the outcome. The "confrontation," weak as it may have been,
emanated from the allegations contained in the book "Sasiedzi"
["Neighbors"] by Jan T. Gross.
The audience was composed of many more Jews than
Poles, at a ratio estimated to be at least ten to one. Each speaker was
recognized with at least polite applause, but the loudest rewards were
bestowed upon anyone who clearly posited Polish perfidy in the Jedwabne
incident.
The general tenor of the discussion was that it would be cathartic for
Poland to admit its wrongdoing and beg forgiveness, thereby somehow
cleansing itself of national guilt for wrongs against the Jews.
Moderator for
the event was Stanley A. Blejwas (far left), Professor of History at
central Connecticut State University, who quit the Polish American
Congress after it voted (unanimously except for his abstention) to
retention of the cross near the Auschwitz concentration camp. Participants
in the panel, in the order of their presentations, were (l. to r.) Antony
Polonsky, the Albert Abramson Chair of Holocaust Studies at Brandeis
University; Jan T. Gross, "Sasiedzi" author and Professor of
Politics and European Studies at New York University; Piotr Wrobel,
Konstanty Reynert Chair of Polish Studies at Trinity College, University
of Toronto, Canada; Alexander B. Rossino, a scholar with the Center for
Advanced Holocaust Studies at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum; Pawel
Machcewicz, Director of the Research and Education Office, Institute of
National Remembrance, Warsaw, Poland; and Andrzej Paczkowski, Professor at
the Institute of Political Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw,
and Fellow of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars,
Washington, D.C.
Prof. Blejwas began the "conference" with the parable from the bible
about the Good Samaritan and its admonition to "love thy neighbor," an
obvious, though strained, attempt to make a connection with Gross' book.
It is unlikely the Gross had the parable in mind when he titled his
writing.
Antony Polonsky may have been the only true
scholar on the panel, utilizing facts instead of prejudice.
He has participated in numerous other discussions
regarding Polish-Jewish relations, including a more divided gathering last
year at the Yeshiva in New York, and always attempts to present a
documented, unbiased opinion. In this case, he not only
dared to challenge the view that Poles are anti-Semitic, but agreed with
Norman Davies that the Polish view of Jews not differ significantly from
that other Europeans. Moreover, he saw the position of
Jews in prewar Poland as that of other citizens, whose poverty was due to
being part of an underdeveloped country. Then, as they came to see
themselves as a separate ethnic group, their situation deteriorated by
reason of the depression, the impact of the rise of German Nazism and the
nationalistic division with the Polish government. Nevertheless, they were
not subject to specific or legal discrimination, even while such actions
were being taken in neighboring states.
In
contrast to Polonsky, Jan T. Gross, author of "Neighbors," is comfortable
using prejudice instead of facts. In a distortion
typical of his book, he stated that Jedwabne was the story of one half a
town murdering the other half, implying that the town's whole Polish
population was involved in the deed. Not to be undone by the actuality, he
then averred that the Holocaust is still absent from the curriculum of
Polish schools, so Poles remain ignorant of Jewish suffering during World
War II. This writer did not attend school in Poland, so he cannot attest
to the classroom experience, but he has seen and purchased many books in
Poland, even during the communist occupation, about the Holocaust and
Polish Jewry, indicating that there was no dearth of knowledge about those
events. He then made a pointed slam directed specifically at the President
of the Polish American Congress, saying that "it is anti-Semites, not
Jews, who give Poland a bad name." Naturally, that "dig" brought gleeful
applause from the audience.
Describing himself as the "troublemaker in the crowd," Piotr Wrobel
expressed dissatisfaction with the methodology employed by Gross, whereby
witness testimony substitutes for documentary evidence. He reminded the
panel that the testimony of Shmul Wasserstejn, upon which Gross heavily
relied, was considered as relatively unimportant by the Jewish Institute
in Poland in its 1966 text regarding the Jedwabne incident. Unfortunately,
Prof. Wrobel was not as vociferous a "troublemaker" as might have turned
the discussion more decidedly toward factuality.
Mr. Rossino, a younger man interested in truth who was
obviously lost among this grouping, attempted to demonstrate the
overbearing influence of the SS, and even the German Army, in the Jedwabne
area at the time of the murders. The Germans, he
explained, believed the Bolsheviks to be aided by Jews and were anxious to
incite ethnic tensions. Instigating pogroms was an SS responsibility and
information was collected in areas where anti-Semitism might be infused
due to the Jewish involvement in the communist occupation. Rossino
concluded that "It was the SS which struck the match and lit the fuse,"
but this clear indication of German underpinnings for the Jedwabne
incident was ignored by both the other panelists and the audience. Not
surprisingly, although he had presented more factually substantiated
information in a shorter time than anyone else on the stage, the speaker
received only a smattering of applause.
Pawel Machcewicz
of the Institute of National Remembrance said the discussion of Jedwabne
was "the most important public debate in Poland in 1989." As Wrobel, he
found fault with the methodology, saying one should be critical of
eyewitness sources. Perhaps the least favorably disposed toward Gross of
the panelists, he stated that the author ignored the role of the Germans
and failed to appreciate the impact of Jewish collaboration with the Reds,
citing revenge as a part of the interplay. He concluding by saying that
the book was a start toward discovering the truth and would undoubtedly
require amendment. Nevertheless, he fell short of withholding judgment
until his own Institute's investigation had been completed.
The final speaker was Andrzej Paczkowski, who delivered a rather
esoteric description of the various views held by Polish analysts. His
primary point was that the communist regime was destructive to a
realization of the true past, thereby leaving the door open to acceptance
of the Gross perspective of Poles as victimizers.
Pre-chosen
"commentators" were then called from the audience to deliver their
observations, which can be summarized here in relatively few words.
Professor Engels suggested that the degree of planning evident in the
Jedwabne incident indicated to him that there was substantial German
involvement. Mr. Abe Brumberg was most clearly distinguished by labeling
everything with which he disagreed as "idiotic," a scholarly approach,
indeed. The final observer's remarks came from a Timothy Snyder, whose
credentials were not given, but who was a Polish American. He praised the
coverage of Jedwabne in Polish papers as far beyond anything seen in
American papers and revealed that Poles were well informed about the
issue.
Discussions at the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum do not generally
allow for questions from the floor in matters involving Polish-Jewish
relations, the powers that be apparently fearing what the public may say
or ask. Written questions were collected and sorted by Professor Blejwas,
those few chosen for use being so bland as to be unworthy of exposition
here. Nevertheless, the question period gave Machcewicz the chance to say
that the Institute of Remembrance was looking into more alleged Polish
anti-Semitic activities, Polonsky the opportunity to speculate on a
different Jewish life in Poland had the May 3rd Constitution survived, and
Gross the pleasure of denying that the death penalty for assisting Jews
was no excuse for Polish failures.
Finally, Polonsky came to the fore again by refusing the suggestion
that the death camps were placed in Poland because of some pre-disposition
toward anti-Semitism on the part of the Poles. Instead, he explained, the
camps were constructed on Polish soil because that is where the greatest
number of Jews were to be found and because Auschwitz was the hub of the
German rail system. In a fitting, though somewhat amazing finale, Polonsky
stated that what happened in Lithuania, Romania, Ukraine and Belarus was
more sinister and on a far larger scale than anything that happened at
Jedwabne. The scholar among the group had placed the issue in a more
proper perspective.
Original
back to the english home page