|
The investigation department of the Armed forces, Secret Service, Treasury Department, and the FBI have established a single standard for the use of hypnosis known as the Federal Model (Adult, 1979). Federal guidelines impose specific conditions for determining when the technique may have potential as well as circumstances when it must not be used (Hibler, 1984). The Federal Model states that hypnosis may be useful in the following instances: (1) as a last resort after all traditional investigation methods of law enforcement have been used; (2) only with felony offenses; (3) a situation which suggests that further recall may be possible; and (4) there must be separate, indisputable elements with which to confirm the accuracy of hypnotic data. According to Federal Model, Hypnosis should not be used at all as a tool in the investigative process in the following instances: (1) flawed cases: an investigation in which there are forensic errors which will not be corrected by the use of hypnosis; (2) Known subjects cases: when knowledge that a subject has been identified may influence an opinion or conclusion and prejudice the witness with out the witness even realizing it; (3) credibility of interviewee in question: where doubts exists, polygraph examination is recommended; and |
|
|
|
(4) involuntary participation: interviews must not be coercive. The Federal Model for forensic hypnosis establishes careful supervision of cases and review for all requests to uses hypnosis. Final approval for actually using hypnosis is the responsibility of a senior agency official who is distant from the emotional demands of the investigation and the victims of the crime. The Federal Model endorse the use of a "team approach" wherein mental health practitioners are responsible for all elements of hypnosis induction and management, and specially trained investigators collaborate by developing information in the interviews (Adult, 1981). In addition, interviews are video recorded and follow an outline to define roles and the sequence of the process.
References: Adult, R. (1979). Hypnosis in Criminal Investigation. Springfield, IL. Adult, R. (1981). Hypnosis-- The FBI Team Approach. FBI Bulletin, Vol. 49: 5-8. Hibler, N. (1984). Forensic Hypnosis: To Hypnotize or Not to Hypnotize, that is the Question! American Journal of Criminal Hypnosis, Vol. 27: 52-57. By: TNT |
|
|
Copyright (c) 1986-2009. Joseph A. Ojeda, Ph.D. The author and publisher wish to make it known that the information expressed herein is the opinion of the author and not necessarily the "final word" on a given subject. Because health decisions always depend on the particular circumstances of each situation and the ability of the person involved, the author and publisher cannot be held liable for any loss as a result of the application, directly or indirectly, of any information contain in the books, website, e-mail or given through telephone consultation. This website publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering medical, psychological, legal, or other professional services. If other expert assistance or counseling is needed, the services of a competent professional should be sought. All rights reserved Worldwide. Designed and printed in the USA. No part of this website pages or books may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic to mechanical, including, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, or by any information storage and retrieval systems, without written permission from the publisher. J.A.O... TNT. |