Response vs. 
Opening for Money
| ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ||||||||||||||
| | | | | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
• Red to play 
• Money Game Equities
• Volatility after each play
24/22 13/10
- 0.346
42.2% 10.7% 0.5% 57.8% 18.2% 0.9% CL: - 0.234 CF: - 0.346
24/21 13/11
- 0.365 ( -0.019)
42.0% 10.2% 0.4% 58.0% 17.8% 0.9% CL: - 0.241 CF: - 0.365
24/22 24/21
- 0.371 ( -0.025)
41.9% 9.8% 0.5% 58.1% 18.9% 0.7% CL: - 0.255 CF: - 0.371
13/10 13/11 (936 games)
- 0.423 ( -0.077)
40.8% 11.1% 0.5% 59.2% 18.3% 1.3% CL: - 0.264 CF: - 0.423
Full cubeful rollout, 1296 games, Play: 0-ply/expert, Cube: 2-ply/33%
24/22 13/10
0.150
24/21 13/11
0.138
24/22 24/21
0.116
13/10 13/11
0.126
I prefer splitting to the 22-point to the 21-point because it gives White less incentive to attack, and it gives Red less damage done
if White does attack. In addition, the builder on the 10-point is slightly better placed, since it can aim at the 4-point.
These factors make 24/22 13/10 worth the risk of White's 5-5.