Weishaupt: Bavarian Illuminated
United Matrons: UNICEF
Freedoms and Feminism
The Secrets of Gloria Steinem
Nazis and Homintern
War on the Poor
Murder Most Horrid: The Harris Murder
Nazi Genocidalists Live!
Legal is Moral: Relativism Strikes Back
Doorway to the Devil
Ideological War
Bible Warpers
Riding the Backs of the Blacks
Labour Heroes
Twist of Faith
Equal Rights
CEDAW
What Hitler Got Right
Feminist World Domination
Nazi Witches: Equal Rites
Driven to Murder
Our Only Freedom: Freedom to Kill
Little Venus
Gloria Steinem, Synarchist
Georg Simmel and Marija Gimbutas
Conclusion
Forget the freebies, it's based on hate of men and controlling them at all costs. It's fascistic. Rich men love feminism. Too bad it was Rush who first used the term "feminazi". It was accurate but devalued coming from a women firster like Rush.
-- Tom Smith, soc.men
Wherein I endeavour to show that feminism has long been a conspiracy of the elites to destroy the political body of the common man.

Feminism is the tools of the ruling elite. Look at the Pankhurst woman (I forget which one). She is credited with being a genius for gaining publicity and handling the media, but she exhibited this skill only in feminism's cause. When she turned her attentions from suffragism to anti-imperialism (the post-war asset stripping of Eritrea) she got nowhere, because she was no longer serving the interests of the elite.

WEISHAUPT: BAVARIAN ILLUMINATED

But the use of feminism by the elite goes back far further. As "Minos", one of the original Bavarian Illuminati says in a original Illuminati document:

We cannot improve the world without improving women, who have such a mighty influence on the men. But how shall we get hold of them? ... We must begin with grown girls ... It may immediately be a very pretty Society, under the management of Ptolemy's wife, but really under his management.
-- 'Minos' (an Illuminati pseudonym the owner of which has never been established
As quotes in "Proofs of a Conspiracy Against all the Religions and Governments of Europe" by Professor Robison, a sentimental feminism - as E Belfort Bax would put it - himself.

Minos planned to set up what he called a "Minerval School" amongst women, headed by one "Ptolemy Magus", probably another unidentified Illuminati pseudonym.

Weishaupt ("Spartacus", head of the Illuminati) obviously had a great understanding the female mind:

You must contrive pretty degrees, and dresses, and ornaments, and elegant and decent rituals. No man must be admitted. This will make them become more keen, and they will go much farther than if we were present, or than if they thought that we knew of their proceedings. Leave them to the scope of their own fancies, and they will soon invent mysteries which will put us to the blush, and create an enthusiasm which we can never equal. They will be our great apostles.
However Spartacus hesistated to enact this Grand Plan, because women don't have the patience and perseverance necessary and, more importantly, can't keep the mouthes shut. Also:
Nay there is a risk that they may take it into their heads to give things an opposite turn, and then, by voluptuous allurements, heightened by affected modesty and decency, which give them an irresistible empire over the best men, they may turn our Order upside down, and in their turn will lead the new one.
However it was still part of the road to power:
There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so; for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration.
Master psychlogist, that evildoer.

UNITED MATRONS: UNICEF

Don't read "Proofs of a Conspiracy Against all the Religions and Governments of Europe", though. The sentimental feminist attitude of large parts of it are sickening. I prefer Hitler's remarks about women in trousers. Read Mein Kampf. However, if you must read it (most of it is very educational about the method of world control) skip the last quarter or so.

The NWO is already here and national sovereignty in meaningless if your country is controlled by the elite.

I've never accepted that the UN is part of the conspiracy, as many conspiracy theorists think it is. Of course the Security Council is controlled by the five permaent members and whoever (the US) can bribe the other members. Similarly most of the executive bodies are CIA controlled and the peace keepers are generally bloodthirsty gun toting psychopaths, as the current peace keeping mission in the Congo (helping the government's reconquest of insufficeintly submissive provinces and elimination of troublemakers), but some UN aganecies have done some good things. Not the eradication of smallpox by the WHO, That was mostly caused by a decline in the effectiveness of the disease and a growth in immunity amongst the surviving populations of humans. Nonetheless UNICEF under Jim Grant tried to make the world a better place for children. However when Carol Bellamy took over UNICEF it became a very different organisation.

One website says:

Breastfeeding is known to be healthier and safer than bottle feeding, especially in low-income areas of the world where sanitation is poor. But the feminists charged the UNICEF breastfeeding program portrayed women "as the human equivalent of milking cows." So no more of "breast is best."

Bellamy advocated favoring girls over boys, a practice the United Nations euphemistically refers to as "positive discrimination." She pushed through her pet Go Girls! program, which ignored the fact that in some parts of the world, the schooling of boys lags behind girls.

At an April 3, 2003 press conference, a hyper-inflated Carol Bellamy issued this chauvinistic claim: "Women are the lifeline of these southern African communities. They put food on the table, and they're the ones that keep families going during such crises."

This statement was given in a speech about the impact of AIDs, reminds me of the old Pankhurst idea that VD is biological warfare by men against women (they held placards saying "Votes for Women, Chastity for Men"). (This is also indicative of the typical female love for sexual violence.)

This is the rationale behind so-called micro-loans, whereby feminist "charitable" organisations help to mire the third world in debt by giving very small loans, still a lot of money to a third worlder, the idea really behind this is to enslave the third wolrd and to give what little capital is available, and hence economic power, into the hands of women who will frivolously spend it instead of investing it in economically wise directions, in farming equipment and so on. They want to drive a wedge between the men and women of the third world and destroy the (patriarchal) structure of traditional third world societies. The same goes for divorce settlements in the first world.

UNICEF now supports abortion, not the survival of children, its old mandate.

All our work for development — from agriculture to health....must focus on the needs and priorities of women
-- Ms. Frechette Deputy Secretary-General of the United Nations
Why do women have longer lives? Poorer health care for men, less murder and death in war for women and the life-shortening effects of psychological impotence in such an unjust society. However, eunuchs, despite all this, live 13 years longer than other men, on the average.

When Blair first appointed a Minister of Children one of her (of course it was a woman) first actions was to defend mothers who abuse their children, saying they shouldn't be sent to jail, because of course, a child needs its mother. Even an abusive or neglectful one, apparently.

FREEDOMS AND FEMINISM

Don't expect feminists to respect free speech. I think it was Naomi Wolf who was interviewed by Ali G a few years ago for the television series Ali G in the USAiii, a comedy show featuring a spoof pretend black man, played by Sascha Baron Cohen (a Jew). Ali G made fun of the people he interviewed, most of whom were apparently quite well known in America, but all of them took it quite well, except for the feminist who tried to have him silenced. Always the way.

Look at the origin of alt.feminism and soc.men, both formed out of resistance to feminist censorship.

Feminism is ALWAYS the tool of Fascism.

As Henry Makow says:

I have discovered that before she became a feminist leader, Gloria Steinem worked for the CIA spying on Marxist students in Europe and disrupting their meetings. She became a media darling due to her CIA connections. MS Magazine, which she edited for many years was indirectly funded by the CIA.
Typical COINTELPRO tactics. Steinem, of course, tried to silence this information. Feminists hate our freedoms. Of speech, especially.

THE SECRETS OF GLORIA STEINEM

GLORIA IN EXCELSIS:

So, again, we have Gloria Steinem, associated with the Independent Research Service, a documented CIA domestic funding conduit. We have her making statements about the "fact" that the CIA is a liberal and far-sighted organization. And we have her attempts, through attorneys and major stockholders in Ms. [magazine], to attempt to suppress the information concerning her affiliation with Independent Research Service. In addition, she's 9-years-involved with one of the Nixon/Ford administration's Assistant Attorneys General (Stanley Pottinger), this one in charge of civil rights, whose name crops up in connection with a major arms smuggling scam. So, nothing conclusive, but very interesting indeed.
To be clear, the CIA is NOT pledged to the destruction of capitalism. As Mussolini said, fascism is corporatism.

Continuing to quote from Henry Makow:

Raised in an impoverished, dysfunctional family in Toledo Ohio, Steinem somehow managed to attend elite Smith College, Betty Friedan´s alma mater. After graduating in 1955, Steinem received a "Chester Bowles Student Fellowship" to study in India. Curiously, an Internet search reveals that this fellowship has no existence apart from Gloria Steinem. No one else has received it.
India of course is a centre of world occultism, close to Tibet of the "hidden masters". Chester Bowles was US Ambassador to India. Feminism was all about replacing left wing, marxist and anti-war movements with "liberalism", feminists and that sort of thing with no real understanding of justice or interest in pursueing it, interested only in their own power.

Makow:

In 1958, Steinem was recruited by CIA´s Cord Meyers to direct an "informal group of activists" called the "Independent Research Service."

[...]

Steinem, attended Communist-sponsored youth festivals in Europe, published a newspaper, reported on other participants, and helped to provoke riots.

Communist groups are often controlled by the CIA, tyrants get along well together, whether Capitalists or Communists ("state-capitalists" as Orwell called them).

Makow:

Ms. Magazine´s first publisher was Elizabeth Forsling Harris, a CIA-connected PR executive who planned John Kennedy´s Dallas motorcade route. Despite its anti establishment image, MS magazine attracted advertising from the crème of corporate America. It published ads for ITT at the same time as women political prisoners in Chile were being tortured by Pinochet, after a coup inspired by the US conglomerate and the CIA.
"women political prisoners", should be "female political prisoners", this is feminist grammar.

Feminism is the system in power, a despotic system, therefore it is the duty of all socialists to overthrow it.

NAZIS AND HOMINTERN

To look at homosexuality for a moment, it is partly caused by societal stress, especially overcrowding, and partly by heavy metal poisoning. A stressed pregnant woman is more likely to bring a homosexual or other deviant into the world than a healthy and happy woman. Crowding in big cities causes stress. That's why there are so many more perverts than there used to be, along with the polution and the growth of processed foods made with soya (which causes homosexuality). Also phthalates, used in cosmetics, soak through the skin and cause feminisation of foetuses, leading to homosexuality and small penises.

Feminazi in a very accurate label. Not only are the feminists like Nazis (although this alone lays me open to Godwin's law, it is true), the feminists ARE Nazis. Their leaders work for the CIA, formed by Nazis from the SS. One of their intellectual leaders, Marija Gimbutas (no longer TF BUNDY) was educated by Nazi ethnologists and simply adopted the Aryan suprmacist myth of a Golden Age lost through interbreeding with sub-Aryan (Jewish) peoples for a more modern movement: feminism, withits own myth of a non-violent matriarchal "Golden" Age before those awful patriarchal "Kurgans" came and imposed Patriarchy. In an interesting display of cognitive dissonance the Kurgans are also held up as a race of ancient matriarchalists, as a handful of Kurgan cairns have been found with both women and weapons in them.

It all traces back to a common source. It's all one conspiracy. All about power.

WAR ON THE POOR

Glenn Sacks:

Though DiFillippo is apparently too busy applauding to notice, McLaughlin’s view of the case makes little sense. The father would rather spend two months in jail than pay $1,200? The father thinks it’s better to lose his job and two months or more of wages than pay the purge factor? This dad is either broke or he sure has a strange set of priorities.

Federal Office of Child Support Enforcement data shows it’s likely the former--two-thirds of those behind on child support nationwide earn poverty level wages; less than four percent of the national child support debt is owed by those earning $40,000 or more a year.

Shows who the enemies of feminism really are. Poor men.

I specifically like this bit of the article:

In DiFillippo’s other article, “Woman starts Web site to shame vanished dads,” she salutes activist Fadia Ward and her website www.sorryassbabydaddies.com. Ward excoriates dads and calls on her fellow sisters to publicly humiliate them, saying “our men have got to get it together…the only way to do that is to take their manhood away." Certainly there are fathers who do not come through for their children. Yet Ward, who at age 27 has had four children by four different fathers, eschews any personal fault for her own situation, claiming that none of her four births were intended.
The fathers, I suppose, intended all four conceptions and births. That, at least, seems the implied argument. Not her responsibility, always the responsibility of the father, even though she has the right to an abortion and he doesn't, she therefore gets to choose for both of them whether there is any responsibility to take. The only logical pro-choice argument is to bring in Choice For Men. The typical feminist argument against this is that the difference in choice, the choice gap if you like, is an inevitable biological fact, that a man cannot choose whether ana bortion is to take place because it doesn't effect his body (although it may subject his body to 18 years of forced labour and payments based on potential income with no concordant rights) but if choice is a biological fact, surely so is responsibility and the biological facts that impart choices must impel the responsibilities that go along with that.

Sacks:

The home page of Ward’s website depicts an African-American father shouting “get outta here with all that” as his two little children cry at his feet, begging for his affection, and the children’s mother cries and holds out a baby to him. This is a terrible distortion of the lives of divorced or separated dads, many of whom struggle to remain a part of their children’s lives.
Racism and sexism (against men) together, as the belong.

MURDER MOST HORRID

Take the case of David and Clara Harris. David Harris had an affair, as indeed did Clara Harris. The big difference is that Clara Harria used his affair as an excuse to kill her husband. And the media, of course, pandered to her. WorldNetDaily, right wing web rag, had an article: "Free Clara Harris". She was a woman with a history of commiting domestic violence, proven to have premeditated the murder, who had repeatedly run over a man who had commited no crime beyond seeking solace in the arms of a collegue from a violent partner while the man's daughter (her step-daughter) screamed "please don't kill my daddy" from the back seat.

As Glenn Sacks says:

It goes without saying that were the genders reversed few would be talking about infidelity as a justification for murder. Imagine a woman trapped in a loveless marriage with a jealous, potentially violent husband whom she believes may be cheating on her. She stays in the marriage because she fears she could be separated from her children should they divorce, and finds understanding, companionship and passion in a relationship with a coworker. Her husband finds out about the affair and goes on a violent, jealous rampage, slaughtering her in front of her daughter as the daughter begs him not to kill her mother.
Mia Magness, for the PROSECUTION(!) said:
For heaven's sakes, the man is cheating on you, you do what every other woman in this county does. Take him to the cleaners. Take his house, take his car, take his kids, take his respect in the community, and you can make him wish he were dead
As said at www.fathers.ca/clara_harris1.html:
Bacha exposed little known information collected by Blue Moon Investigations which indicated that Clara murdered David not out of jealousy but because he "had something on her," and that the murder of David may not have been the first one Clara was involved in.
There was a lot of blaming the victim going on.

Is that Schiavo woman had been a man, she would never have been given any coverage. She was a braindead woman being allowed to die. If she'd really been alive she would have eaten and drank herself, surely easy enough for somenone capable of talking, as Schiavo's mad parents said she was. Even so her husband was demonised, despite only doing what any sane man would do.

I don't suopport euthanasia, you understand, this wasn't euthanasia, this was a woman who was already dead, nothing more than a waste of electricity, a lump of meat.

NAZI GENOCIDALISTS LIVE!

Nor do I support abortion.

As Agent Wolverine Says: (Underground Nazi Invasion of the United States Part 14)

Why is it that a person can get a life sentence if he beats a new-born child to death; yet if that same child is only partially born and it is dismembered while it's head is still in the vaginal passage -- it is merely 'partial birth abortion' and the doctor who performs the 'operation' is hailed as a hero by Faminazis like Sanger who scream raging curses at PRO- LIFERS because they are against women's 'rights' while at the same time being VERY CAREFUL not to expose their TRUE reasons for advocating abortion
We could add: why is it that if a man causes a miscarriage he's tried for murder, but if a woman commits murder she's hailed as a hero by the feminists?

Agent Wolverine (Part 47):

Dr. H.G. Whittington unconsciously betrayed the Holocaust-abortion connection when he wrote that "The [abortion] counselor must help the applicant [for abortion] face a painful existential dilemma: whether to kill one nascent human being in order to enhance the quality of life of another person ... Society legalizes abortion to enhance the quality of human life." Just as the Nazis exterminated the Jews to enhance their 'quality of human life' and Lebensraum .
Agent Wolverine (Part 46):
H.L. Mencken, another leading American eugenicist, urged that "A resolute attack be made on the fecundity of all the males on the lowest rung of the social ladder."
Only Males, of course. This shows their true aim, for the most efficient way to limit reproduction is to sterilise females, not males. So, obviously, sterilisation wasn't the only thing they were interested in.

Agent Wolverine (Part 49):

Reichsfuhrer Adolf Hitler strongly agreed with this assessment, actually incorporating Bormann's language;

"The Slavs are to work for us. Insofar as we don't need them they may die. Therefore compulsory vaccination and education are super- fluous. The fertility of the Slavs is undesirable. They may use contra- ceptives or practice abortion -- the more the better.

"In view of the large families of the native population, it could only suit us if girls and women there had as many abortions as possible. Active trade in contraceptives ought to be actually encouraged in the Eastern territories, as we could not possibly have the slightest interest in increasing the non-Germanic population."

Continuing:
A short April 27, 1942 statement by Berlin population and demographics expert Professor Heinrich Wetzel (repro- duced below in its entirety) summarized the entire Nazi population control program regardless of location. Notice carefully the striking similarities this program has to the one that has been implemented in the United States by pro-abortion groups.

"Every propaganda means, especially the press, radio and movies, as well as pamphlets, booklets, and lectures, must be used to instill in the Russian population the idea that it is harmful to have several children. We must emphasize the expenses that children cause, the good things that people could have had with the money spent on them. We could also hint at the dangerous effect of childbearing on a woman's health.

"Paralleling such propaganda, a large-scale campaign would be launched in favor of contraceptive devices. A contraceptive industry must be established. Neither the circulation and sale of contraceptives nor abortions must be prosecuted.

"It will even be necessary to open special institutions for abortion, and to train midwives and nurses for this purpose. The population will practice abortion all the more willingly if these institutions are competently operated. The doctors must be able to help out, in case there is any question of this being a breach of their professional ethics. Voluntary sterilization must also be recommended by propaganda."

By this time, the Nazis recognized that personal and professional consciences were often deeply troubled by the practice of widespread and easily- available abortion. Heinrich Himmler soothed these troubled consciences by issuing a decree in March of 1943 that is remarkably similar to those promulgated by our own American Medical Association; "The Russian physicians or the Russian Medical Association, which must not be informed of this order, are to be told in individual cases that the pregnancy is being interrupted for reasons of social distress."

The Nazis also introduced gas chambers and ovens because they were concerned about the effect shooting many unarmed Jews would have on the SS men.
"Any excuse will serve a tyrant." -- Aesop.
From Cosmic Conflict Volume Two (CRIM-RAM) by Branton:
Greg Keath, in his article 'Abortion is not a Civil Right', which appeared in the Sept. 27, 1989 issue of the WALL STREET JOURNAL, stated: "...many blacks wonder whether black civil rights and abortion fit so neatly together (For every three black babies born, two are aborted. 43 percent of all abortions in the United States are performed on black women. From figures supplied by the federal government and the Alan Guttmacher Institute, Richard D. Glasow of National Right to Life has estimated that some 400,000 black pregnancies are aborted each year). Black pregnancies have historically been the target of SOCIAL ENGINEERS such as Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood. Sanger was convinced that blacks, Jews, Eastern Europeans, and other non-Aryan groups were detracting from the creative intellect and social potential of America, and she wanted those groups' numbers REDUCED..." (see her first book, PIVOT OF CIVILIZATION)
Agent Wolverine again (Part 2):
Pro-abortion activist-leader and 'Planned Parenthood' founder Margaret Sanger betrays her own devotion to the Globalist genocidal policies and insensitivity to women's rights, especially NON-ARYAN women's rights -- not to mention the constitutional rights to 'life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness' on the part of untold millions of children -- in the following words from her first book 'PIVOT OF CIVILIZATION'. In reference to free MATERNITY care for the poor she states: "Instead of DECREASING and aiming to ELIMINATE THE STOCKS that are most detrimental to the future of the race and the world it tends to render them to a menacing degree dominant." And in reference to her 'Negro Project' of the late 1930's, which aimed at recruiting black ministers, physicians and political leaders for the purpose of encouraging birth control and sterilization in the black community, Sanger wrote: "...We do not want word to go out that WE WANT TO EXTERMINATE THE NEGRO POPULATION, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members."]
LEGAL IS MORAL: RELATIVISM STRIKES BACK

Some Nazi and abortionist quotes from Agent Wolverine's Underground Nazi Invasion fo the United States Part 48:

"The courts tell us that this is a legal matter it is all quite legal."
-- Nuremberg defendant Walter E. Schmidt
"I just go by what the court says. I only do what's legal."
-- Abortionist M. Jackson, New York City.
"The physician is merely an instrument, as in the case of an officer who receives an order."
-- Dr. Karl Brandt, Nuremberg Doctor Trial, 1947.
"The physician is only the instrument of her decision."
-- Abortionist Bernard Nathanson, 1974.
"What good does it do to humanity to maintain artificially and rear the thousands of cripples, deaf-mutes, and idiots? Is it not better and more rational to cut off from the first this unavoidable misery which their poor lives will bring to themselves and their families?"
-- Dr. Ernst Haeckel, medical and biological scientist, 1904.<
"Most birth defects are not discovered until birth. If a child were not declared alive until three days after birth, the doctor could allow the child to die if the parents so choose and save a lot of misery and suffering. I believe this view is the only rational, compassionate attitude to have."
-- Nobel laureate Dr. James D. Watson, 1973
"The destruction of Jews is analogous to removing a gangrenous appendix from a diseased body."
-- Nazi doctor Fritz Klein
"Abortion is precisely equivalent to operating on an appendix or removing a gangrenous bowel."
-- Dr. Alan Guttmacher, Planned Parenthood

I hope I need not go on. These are not just people of similar ideologies, remember, this is no conincidence, the feminists ARE the descendatns of Nazism, through Gimbutas, through Planned Parenthood and through the CIA.

As Agent Wolverine says:

Physicians -- not black-clad Schutzstaffel thugs -- developed the philosophy and methodology of the Nazi Holocaust. Almost all of the leading German, British, and American eugenicists admired by the leaders of the Third Reich were doctors.
DOORWAY TO THE DEVIL

Let's bring theology into this:

The truth is, the feminist movement is neither modern nor social in its origin. At its roots are ancient, highly religious elements that are rarely, if ever, mentioned.
From
the Jeremiah Project website:
At the 1998 ReImagining conference women were encouraged to express the divine reality that is locked deep within their identities by sharing their stories. Special emphasis was placed on telling stories of abuse, defilement, and repression, the kinds of stories that evoke what conference leader Rita Nakashima Brock, called "holy outrage."

[...]

Who are they really? Goddesses who have been forced into amnesia by primitive white men trying to keep them from their true potential. Feminism is in fact a spiritual movement based partly on reawakening of "goddess consciousness," and its real goal is matriarchy, not equality.

[...]

The ultimate symbol of the patriarchy is a male God - the Father. In response, feminists at the National Council of Churches pushed through a unisex version of the Bible in which God is "our father and mother in heaven." and Jesus Christ is not the "Son of God," but the "child of God." The St. Hilda Community (an offshoot of the Church of England's Movement for the Ordination of Women) are not rewriting Christian creeds, but replacing them with stuff such as, "We believe in the presence of God in the world. She is our mother, source of deep wisdom ... she is our lover and is allowed to touch our pain ... she is our friend who stands alongside us." They have rewritten the Lords Prayer (depatriarchalised as "Prayer of Jesus") which reads in part, "Beloved, our Father and Mother in whom is heaven, hallowed by your name, followed by your royal way ..."

[...]

In her book Changing of the Gods, Naomi Goldenberg predicted that the continued feminist presence in religion would force a redefinition - one that would alter the very essence of Judeo-Christian belief. Goldenberg writes:

Undoubtedly, many followers of new faiths will still cling to old labels. But a merely semantic veneer of tradition ought not to hide the fact that very nontraditional faith will be practiced ... The feminist movement in Western culture is engaged in the slow execution of Christ and Yahweh. Yet very few of the women and men now working for sexual equality within Christianity and Judaism realize the extent of their heresy.

And:
The 1971 Declaration of Feminism states, "All of history must be rewritten in terms of the oppression of women. We must go back to ancient female religions like witchcraft."
As I recently saw a feminist post on the usenet: You can't rewrite history. That is, you can't rewrite it to the truth after they've converted it into a load of lies.

Feminism is the tool of satan to mislead the world. Women have always been, as Tertullian said, the doorway of the devil, easily led astray.

http://www.jeremiahproject.com/prophecy/feminist4.html:

"Sophia, Creator God, let your milk and honey flow. Sophia, Creator god, shower us with your love...Our sweet Sophia, we are women in your image. With nectar between our thighs, we invite a lover, we birth a child; with our warm body fluids, we remind the world of its pleasure and sensations..."

Thus went the prayer offered up in their pagan service along with replacing the bread and wine of the Lord's Supper with bread, milk and honey.

I like milk as much as the next man, but this is insane. This is supposed to be a Christian gathering!
Delores Williams, theology professor at New York's Union Theological Seminary, told the gathering: "I don't think we need a theory of atonement at all...Atonement has to do so much with death...I don't think we need folks hanging on crosses and blood dripping and weird stuff... We just need to listen to the god within."
This is a THEOLOGY professor. What sort of theology professor at a Chrisitan Conference describes the crucifixion as "blood dripping and weird stuff"? Don't get me started on the re-imagining rubbish, with the lesbianism and dancing naked on pews.
Various feminists proclaim that women are 'under siege', that a monstrous social bias against them, if not a virtual war, is going on, that women have little respect or power (Steinem, Faludi, Tavris, etc.) Yet the notion of the American woman as a powerless "victim" is one of the most absurd notions ever foisted upon anyone. American women live, on average, seven years longer than men. They control 86 % of all personal wealth [PARADE Magazine, May 27, 1990], and make up 55% of current college graduates. Women cast 54% of the votes in Presidential elections, so they can hardly claim to be left out of the political decision-making process! They win almost automatically in child custody disputes. Women suffer only 6% of the work-related fatalities (the other 94% are suffered by men). Women are the victim of only about 35% of violent crimes, and only about 25% of all murders, yet because of our society's exaggerated concern and respect for them, special legislation has been passed to punish "violence against women" as if it were a more heinous crime than "violence against men". (Feminists claim to want "equality", and this is an example of what "equality" means to them, i.e., preferential treatment to address their concerns). Two out of every three dollars spent on health care is spent on women, and even if you don't count pregnancy-related care, women still receive more medical care than men - yet feminists still holler that womens health is being "neglected", and far too many of us credulously believe them. Of the 25 worst jobs, as ranked by the Jobs Related Almanac based on a combination of salary, stress, security, and physical demands, 24 of them are predominantly, if not almost entirely, male, which might explain why men commit over 80% of all suicides. (Most of these statistics come from The Myth of Male Power by Warren Farrell.)
It is impossible to escape feminism.

IDEOLOGICAL WAR

From PInc (Politically Incorrect):

Nicholas Davidson aptly describes feminism as "the gender ideology of our society". It is everywhere - in politics, the law, the schools, the universities, the churches, the business world and the family. It is thus important to understand what this ideology is about and what it aims to achieve. Modern feminists like to argue that there is no one feminism, but from a perusal of the major feminist writers until the late decade of this century it is clear that there is a common core and a coherence to modern feminism that makes it an ideology, and its advocates ideologues.
Such has it always been. The old feminists of the past, Hoff-Summers' equity feminists, Bax's sentimental feminists were every bit as bad as the feminists of the present days, with their VD conspiracy theories, sexist placards and terrorist attacks (the suffragettes blew up Lloyd George's house).

And let's have none of these claims that feminism is not monolithic can't be generalised about. It is not only as monolithic as any other movement, the use of a single name indicating a common identity, it is a far more rigid and united ideology than most. The name itself is objectionable, "feminism", "womanism", but those who abandon the name when this is pointed out are worse, hoping only to abjure criticism to another day. They are all based on anti-male hatred, or, at the very least, on concentrating solely on the interests of women.

A while ago the Republic of Nigeria planned to execute a woman who had commited adultery, I am against the death penalty but this was fully in accordance with the laws of their land, but they didn't execute her. Men are executed for the same crime, and in Nigeria men are executed in very large numbers, but the international community care to complain only when it is a woman who is being punished in accordance with the law.

Even fairy tales can't escape feminist spinning: http://www.pursam.org/teemings/issue04/dreamland.html Feminists, of course, are only too familiar with fairy tales.

BIBLE WARPERS

Dr. Frank Logsdon, Committee Member, New American Standard Version (Bible):

"I must under God denounce every attachment to the New American Standard Version. I'm afraid I'm in trouble with the Lord...We laid the groundwork; I wrote the format; I helped interview some of the translators; I sat with the translator; I wrote the preface. When you see the preface to the New American Standard, those are my words...it's wrong, it's terribly wrong; it's frightfully wrong...I'm in trouble;...I can no longer ignore these criticisms I am hearing and I can't refute them. The deletions are absolutely frightening...there are so many. The finest leaders that we have today haven't gone into it [new versions of Hort and Wescott's corrupted Greek text] just as I hadn't gone into it... that's how easily one can be deceived...Are we so naive that we do not suspect Satanic deception in all of this?"
The feminists and their homosexual ideological allies are destroying our literature and our spirituality because it help them destroy our minds. The homosexual perverts are an integral part of feminist strategy. So, inadvertantly are what the council calls BME, black and minority ethnics. How many times have we heard the laughably inaccurate description "white male dominated society"? It is used exclusively be feminists who wish to ride the backs of the blacks to power. Even since the abolitionists feminists have been using black issues to take power. It's a bit more difficult with other ethnicities, especially Muslims, as they tend to have beliefs not entirely in accordance with the feminist agenda. Just the other day I was reading about a remote tribe in the Chaco desert of Paraguay. Some missionaries were trying to convert them and then the feminists turned up and chased the missionaries away with their moral relativism, supporting the natives traditions or witchcraft, infanticide and extermination of the old and weak, which had all largely been stopped by the missionaries. Of course, the feminists went home at the first sign of malaria. The missionaries had been the natives' only source of medical treatment. Now only one Christian nurse supplies healthcare to an area several times the size of Belgium. Most native simply go to the witch-doctors, but the witch-doctors know better and go to the modern medical knowledge. See also Carrie Chapman Catt.

The Chairman of the New Internation Version of the Old Testament Translation Committee, Dr. Marten H Woudstra, was a homosexual. Virginia Mollenkott was also a screaming lesbite.

Look at blacktown.net, they're BMEs, Black Minority Ethnics, which is the currently politically correct term, who oppose feminism, as any sane and well informed man should.

RIDING THE BACKS OF THE BLACKS

It's all like COINTELPRO. Keep black organisations, and poor organisations like unions, from coalescing, from gaining respectability, from recruiting new members. Look how most black people live. Penned into council estates, sink estates and tower blocks with organised crime, street gangs and heroin. Fatherlessness is paticularly high amongst blacks, because blacks were seen as dangerous by the elites and were targeted by feminism. Who are the deadbeat dads? The poor, who don't pay because they can't afford to pay and can't afford solicitors to defend them.

blacktown.net:

We have given Black women over 25 years to rule and be in charge. We have given them the "red carpet treatment", to do things their way. The Black family is now over 50% female headed. And the proof is the popular 1990s term: "female headed households". This popular term proves that women are in charge and that Feminists got what they wanted. But the problem is that it doesn't work. Over 70% of the Black men in jail are from female headed homes!!! Black girls are forming street gangs and going to jail at an increasing rate. And they also come from the now infamous, female headed household
They make out women are the backbone of the black family, women are the bane of the black family! In Africa feminist organisations, charities, the UN, etc., all give so-called microloans SOLELY TO WOMEN, on the basis that women are more responsible spenders and will spend for the good of their families, while men will just spend it on booze, but this is really done because they know women will waste the money and get their families into further debt buying frilly dresses and posh hats.

And:

1970s FEMINISM BECAME POPULAR BECAUSE OF CORPORATE SPONSORSHIP, EPITOMIZED BY THE VIRGINIA SLIMS CIGARETTE BILLBOARDS, POSTERS, AND MAGAZINE ADVERTISEMENTS!!!!

The following ads prove beyond a shadow of a doubt what we have been saying.

Now, all the critics, cynics, and nay sayers of blacktown.net will have to shut their mouths. Thus, henceforth, blacktown.net does not plan on debating whether Women's Liberation was a conspiracy or not. We have presented mountains of obvious evidence and now rest our case!!! COURT DISMISSED!!!!

blacktown.net again:
Every black social revolution was started and lead by blackmen. From Marcus Garvey; To Elijah Muhammad; To Malcolm X; To Martin Luther King Jr.; To the militant Black Panthers!!! But what is stopping blackwomen from launching the next major black revolution??? NOT A DAMN THING!!!
Feminism fosters injustice. Must as they love their "women and children" attitudes, they don't care at all about children. Look
here.

The BBC's Panorama, 6/10/97, reported a case of a TWELVE year old boy being forcibly raped by a nineteen year old woman who then threw him from a railway bridge to shut him up. Luckily he survived, but despite admitting to rape and attempted murder she was charged only with indecent assault and spent not a single say in jail. This was for FORCIBLE as well as statutory rape, and attempted murder. Suspended sentence.

That's feminist justice.

On the other hand, all a woman has to do is make an accusation to get a man put in jail, with no possible comeback for false accusations. Indeed, the government's criminal compensations agency PAYS women to make false accusations of crime. Even if the man is found not guilty despite the presumption of guilt, having somehow done the impossible and proved consent was given, his name will still have been dragged through the mud and his accuser will still go scot-free. The accusor's name will not even be given out in the press, unlike that of the accused.

blacktown.net know what's what. The role of woman is as slave master for the slave owners, the capitalists, bankers, financiers and anti-democratic elitists.

"I've never heard such crap! That isn't a conspiracy! That is the world. It is the way things are done. And quite rightly so."
-- Denis Healey
And that's what we've got to stop if we ever want democracy.

blacktown.net:

IT'S NOW TIME TO GIVE THE CRAZY, LESBIAN, FEMINIST WITCHES A TASTE OF THEIR OWN WITCH'S BREW STEW!!

Feminism has run its course and served no significant purpose. We are indeed at the end of the Feminist era, yet Black men are afraid of making the declaration that Feminism has been a evil conspiracy just as bad as the 1960's COINTEL program of F.B.I. Director Jay Edgar Hoover, or any other documented conspiracy against Blacks.

Black men must learn how NOT to be like Adam of the Bible, or the Scarecrow from the Wizard of Oz, or Darren from the TV show Bewitched, or Sampson from the bible, or President Bill Clitoris. All of these men were victims of Witchcraft!!!

And:
IT IS LITERALLY THE OLDEST TRICK IN THE BOOK TO USE A WOMAN TO DESTROY A MAN, THE SAME WAY EVE WAS USED BY THE DEVIL TO DESTROY AND DISGRACE ADAM!!!
As Tertullian said, woman is the doorway to the devil, each of them is an Eve.

Here's a basic and half-hearted interpretation of feminist rape law.

LABOUR HEROES

There have been two prospective Labour MPs who have been heroes, but have never been known, for they took a stand against injustice and power. I do not know their name, but they took the leadership to the European courts before the 1997 election and won, ending the Labour practice of women-only shortlists. However, Labour won that election, with a record number of female MPs, so called Blair's Babes. Labour changed the law, so now women-only shortlists are only too legal. Weep for what Blair has done to our legal system!

The number of female MPs has since gone down. Women-only shortlists were never to increase the number of female MPs, but to increase the control of consituency parties by Party HQ, so Blair could parachute his cronies into safe seats.

That's what happened in Blaenau Gwent when Peter Law opposed the plans of cntral government by standing, and winning as an independant, despite being denounced as a misogynist by the national press. A victory for localism. Even a brain tumour, conveniently arriving at almost the right time to knock him out of the election, didn't stop him wiping the floor with Labour in one of the firmest Labour seats in the country. He's dead now. Killed, no doubt, by MI6 and their cancer-inducing rays or drugs.

This is exactly how Nazi German started. We hear a lot about peak oil. We've had our peak democracy. It's all been downhill since 1948, when government caved in to the private sugar monopoly and its cartoon sugar man. And in America Peak Deomcracy was reached with the feminist coup on the CRA.

I once heard ont he radio of a pamphlet in a clinic for women who have had miscarriages. Remember, it said, that it's not only you (the mother) who has lost a child. It's your mother and mother-in-law too. No mention of the father, who's the only other who has lost a child, of course.

TWIST OF FAITH

A book on the web called Twist of Faith says:

You probably wouldn't expect to find goddesses in a conservative farming community in North Dakota. I didn't. But one day when visiting my husband's rural hometown, a neighbor told us that a new bookstore had just opened in the parsonage of the old Lutheran Church. "You should go see it," she urged.

I agreed, so I drove to a stately white church, walked to the parsonage next door, and rang the bell. The pastor's wife opened the door and led me into a large room she had changed into a bookstore, leaving me to browse. Scanning the shelves along the walls, I noticed familiar authors such as Lynn Andrews who freely blends witchcraft with Native American rituals, New Age self- empowerment, and other occult traditions to form her own spirituality.

Among the multicultural books in the children's section, one caught my attention. Called Many Faces of the Great Goddess, it was a " coloring book for all ages." Page after page sported voluptuous drawings of famed goddesses. Nude, bare-breasted, pregnant, or draped in serpents, they would surely open the minds of young artists to the lure of "sacred" sex and ancient myths.

And:
"Sophia, Creator God, let your milk and honey flow. . . . Shower us with your love . . . ." chanted more than 2000 women gathered at the 1993 Re-Imagining Conference in Minnesota. "We celebrate sensual life you give us. . . . We celebrate our bodiliness. . . . the sensations of pleasure, our oneness with earth and water," continued one of the leaders. Representing main-line denomination, the women had come from the Presbyterian Church USA (about 400), the United Methodist Church (about 400), the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (313), the United Church of Christ (144), and Baptist, Episcopal, Church of the Brethren churches about (150). About 230 were Roman Catholics. To most of these worshippers, Sophia symbolized inner wisdom and "the feminine image of the Divine." Playful, permissive, and sensuous, she has "become the latest rage among progressive church women."

[...]

A worldwide sisterhood of angry, militant feminists is rising to power. The United Nations World Conference on Women in Beijing gave a glimpse of its influence. It left its leaders with marching orders designed to revolutionize our schools, homes, churches and culture. If the feminist movement gains what it demands, no one will escape its global influence. American Christians will face the kind of hatred that drove persecuted masses to our borders, but there would be no place to hide outside of Christ.

The international women's treaty effectively creates a one world state, any state stupid enough to disobey orders will be bullied into like by the World Bank and the UN.

God doesn't want feminists dancing naked on pews.

Twist of Faith:

"Not surprisingly, Sophia seemed to reserve a special blessing for lesbian love." observed Kathy Kersten,
Prositution could be easily defeated, as could all crime. A bit of democracy does wonders for the eliminations of crime. industrial democracy severely lengthens life spans. The Barcelona worker's patrols during the Spanish civil war ended prostitution totally, it only came back when the communists destroyed their anarchist allies, eliminated the worker's patrols and put a traditional police force back in place instead.

EQUAL RiGHTS

Look at these survival figure for the Titanic:

First-Class Women: 97 percent
First-Class Men: 34 percent
Second-Class Women: 84 percent
Second-Class Men: 8 percent
Third-Class Women: 55 percent
Third-Class Men: 12 percent
More third class women survived than first class men, as you can see. So much for sexism there. So much for the third class being locked bleow decks.
There are no feminists when the lifeboats are lowered.
-- Per's MANifesto
Mothers tend to kill boys more than they kill girls. Mothers do the majority of child abuse. Natural fathers commit only 2% of child abuse. Men are 96% of on-the-job deaths. No one complains about that sexism. Improper defence of the saftey and rights of poor men doesn't get headlines. Not does men being pressured into dangerous jobs, often the only jobs available or the only jobs well paid enough to support a family.

http://www.backlash.com/content/gender/votemale/raj.html:

women don't call their political action committee the National Organization for Gender Equality; they said that it was just FOR WOMEN - and I, for one, believe them.
Possibly the only time I believe a feminist, but so do I.

http://www.socmen.org/per/manifesto/april96.html#ovaries:

It is rare -- perhaps nonexistent -- for a man to be acquitted of criminal wrongdoing on the grounds that his wife controlled his thoughts. But Christina Hays joins the list of women acquitted or never charged because of their gender. Add her name to the list of women who have claimed the PMS Defense, post-partum depression, "battered wife syndrome," and other defenses that appeal to the concept of uniquely feminine mental defects or shortcomings.
Mad feminist insanity of the Gimbutas/Nazi Ahnenerbe ilk was once accepted truth in the less scientific sciences, like archaeology.

http://www.debunker.com/texts/goddess_rem.html:

"As a matter of fact, when Dames published those words in 1976, they were about seven years out of date. In 1968 and 1969 two prehistorians directed criticisms at this whole edifice of accepted scholarly belief which brought it all down for ever. One was Peter Ucko, in his monograph Anthropomorphic Figurines of Predynastic Egypt and Neolithic Crete .... Professor Ucko reminded readers that a large minority of Neolithic figurines were male or asexual, that few if any statuettes had signs of majesty or supernatural power, and that few of them had accentuated sexual characteristics (the 'pubic triangles' on many of them could be loincloths). He warned against glib interpretations of the gestures portrayed upon figures; thus, early Egyptian figurines of women holding their breasts had been taken as 'obviously' significant of maternity or fertility, but the Pyramid Texts had revealed that in Egypt this was the female sign of grief.... all over the globe clay models very similar to those of the Neolithic are made as children's dolls. Just as in the modern West, most are intended for girls and are themselves female. Another widespread use of such figures is in sympathetic magic ... there was absolutely no need to interpret them everywhere as the same female or male deity.
"The second attack was made by Andrew Fleming, in an article in the periodical World Archaeology uncompromisingly entitled 'The Myth of the Mother Goddess.' He pointed out the simple fact that there was absolutely no proof that spirals, circles, and dots were symbols for eyes, that eyes, faces, and genderless figures were symbols of a female or that female figures were symbols of a goddess. This blew to pieces the accepted chain of goddess-related imagery from Anatolia round the coasts to Scandinavia. He was helped by the revolution in the carbon-dating process, which disproved the associated belief that megalithic architecture had traveled from the Levant with the cult of the Great Mother...
CEDAW

Look at the oppressive role the UN and its controllers/organs, the US and World Bank, play in the CEDAW, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women.

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/JohnLeo/2002/06/24/un_womens_right_treaty_should_be_ignored:

Some 167 nations have signed the treaty, many with no intention of observing it. But the CEDAW ferociously monitors every nation's compliance. It has a few enforcement mechanisms and plans more. The idea is that someday, nations may not be able to resist
There's the feared one-world government.
The committee enforcing CEDAW criticized Belarus for reintroducing Mother's Day ("a sex-role stereotype") and strongly urged Armenia to combat the image of "the noble role of mother." It complained that voters in Ireland seem to reflect Catholic values and warned Libya that the Quran can only be followed within "permissible" limits set by CEDAW. Feminists will decide what religions may teach.

CEDAW busybodies are always eager to intrude. Recently they leaned on Denmark for not providing data on whether Danish fathers are doing their share of chores around the house.

The world-government, keeping an eye on you and telling you what you can do. What you can believe. Composing their propaganda.
One of the CEDAW committee's techniques is to use broad language, which is then tightened and given a radical interpretation after signatories have accepted it. CEDAW did not announce that women's "right to free choice of profession and employment" would turn out to mean (as the committee now says) that prostitution must be decriminalized around the world.
As is actually happening in many places. More powerful countries like Britain and America will be able to hold out against the pressure for a bit longer, but traditional poor countries like Libya or Bolivia will have no more chance against CEDAW than they had against the World Bank neoliberal agenda.
The World Bank now seems primed to serve as an enforcer for CEDAW. One World Bank document is titled "Integrating Gender into the World's Bank's Work: a Strategy for Action." The feminists talk about the World Bank's "accountability mechanisms." Translation: No CEDAW compliance, no loan.
The Gnomes of Zurich have won. Democracy is dead, the world is run by the banks and for the banks.
Worse, CEDAW backers intend to use the new International Criminal Court as an enforcement tool. Patrick Fagan of the Heritage Foundation, who follows CEDAW closely, predicts that the CEDAW committee will bring an ICC case against Catholic hospitals to break the hospitals' refusal to perform abortions. Language setting up the court is so vague that radical prosecutors and judges might be able to jail clerics who refuse to perform same-sex marriages or who decline to ordain women.

The lesson here is that small groups of dedicated bureaucrats, out of the public eye, can make rules affecting the domestic affairs of countries that would be difficult or impossible to achieve democratically. The trick is to create "customary international law" out of marginal views, constantly repeated on the world stage. Rita Joseph, an Australian human rights specialist, says: "The basic plan is ingeniously simple. The idea is to couch the feminist agenda in language of human rights" and then assert the ascendancy of human rights over the sovereign rights of nations.

www.townhall.com/columnists/DavidLimbaugh/2002/09/21/cedaw_means_cede_law :
Consider these actions by the 23-member CEDAW "enforcement" committee. In 1998, the committee requested information from Mexico "on whether homosexuality is penalized in the criminal code." In 1999, it recommended to Kyrgyzstan that "lesbianism be reconceptualized as a sexual orientation and that penalties for its practice be abolished." This year it told Trinidad and Tobago to "consider a revision of any laws which provide punishment for sexual relations between women in order to eliminate this discrimination against women."

The treaty's advocates insist it is neutral on abortion. Yet the Committee has repeatedly insinuated itself in the internal decisions of nations, tirelessly championing "abortion rights." In 1998, the Committee chastised Mexico for "the lack of access for women in all states to easy and swift abortion."

Still, I'm sure it's all for the best. If you can't trust feminists, who can you trust?

Feminists, after all are loving and caring, are they not?

http://www.fathersforlife.org/male_conspiracy.htm

For millennia, probably since the invention of walking, men have happily pledged their fidelity to the most closely guarded of secrets. As part of a world-wide conspiracy, one whose sole aim is the absolute and never-ending subordination of the entire female gender, every male on the planet, every one, has promised to serve the cause faithfully and to promote its masculine interests. But I must be the first to break with the planetary tradition. I am a kind of Messiah for the New Age, and hence expect to be reviled and scorned for the tidings I bring. I must be the first for a couple of reasons.

Well, the first is not so much a justifying reason, as an excusing condition. It's just that a few women, mainly sociologists, are on the verge of figuring this out for themselves. The least I can do for the brotherhood, if I am to betray it so monstrously, is to prevent a woman from making the most important discovery of the last 1.5 million years.

[...]

The first world-wide congress convened in the Falkland Islands about 30,000 BC, and has met there annually ever since (the exact date is unknown, since records were not maintained until about 3,500 BC, when the movement invented writing as we now know it). This is why Britain sent half its navy to rescue the Falklands; more than a few sheep were at stake. The Admirals and Generals, all of them men (who very cleverly brainwashed Margaret Thatcher into doing their dirty work for them), knew that the planetary male privilege was vulnerable.

I believe this to be satire.

At any rate, the real reason for the Falklands war was an underground alien base on South Georgia Island.

The Labour MP for the West Lancashire Constituency is having his seat stolen, according to Private Eye. A feminist conspiracy is seeking to remove Colin Pickthall to enforce a female-only shortlist for selection as a parliamentary candidate in that area, 18 months after Pickthall, the current MP, was democratically selected by constituency Party members. Halt these anti-democratic policies.

Halt also the all-female trains circling their globe on their inflexible iron tracks. Some are painted pink, some are covered in fluffy cushions, all are an abomination against the tax payer.

Some links.

Israeli anti-feminist links too.

It's in Ottawa that the feminist law making has gone most insane. In that beknighted locale an act of domestic violence is any act of violence between a man and a woman with a sexual relationship, the presumption is for guilt and punishment (officially protection of the victim) is meted out by police and judges, not juries. It would be perfectly possible for a prositutute, who has a sexual relationship with her client, to phone the police and have him forcibly ejected from his own home in her favour, as they're in a sexual relationship, on nothing more than her word.

One of the current legal scandals is that over "salt poisoning", the absurd idea that it could be possible to force feed a child a significant part of their body weight in salt thereby killing them. Not possible. Even if it were possible to force feed a child large amounts of raw salt, such amount would still not appear in the blood stream, according to the testimony of many experts in the field (but not, unfortunately, the one called to testify in court). I speak, of course, of Ian and Angela Gay, locked up for killing their adopted child by salt poisoning, a rather more likely explanation being salt diabetes. I believe they were eventually freed from the Court of Appeal but they shouldn't have been convicted in the first place.

WHAT HITLER GOT RIGHT

The Nazis were very much sentimental feminists, as E Belfort Bax would say. Goerring specifically said that civilisation was based on women. However, Hitler wasn't as mental as people like to make out.

Mein-Kampf Volume 1 Chapter 2:

In hardly any German city could the social question have been studied better than in Vienna. But make no mistake. This 'studying' cannot be done from lofty heights. No one who has not been seized in the jaws of this murderous viper can know its poison fangs. Otherwise nothing results but superficial chatter and false sentimentality. Both are harmful. The former because it can never penetrate to the core of the problem, the latter because it passes it by. I do not know which is more terrible: inattention to social misery such as we see every day among the majority of those who have been favored by fortune or who have risen by their own efforts, or else the snobbish, or at times tactless and obtrusive, condescension of certain women of fashion in skirts or in trousers, who ' feel for the people.' In any event, these gentry sin far more than their minds, devoid of all instinct, are capable of realizing. Consequently, and much to their own amazement, the result of their social 'efforts' is always nil, frequently, in fact, an indignant rebuff, though this, of course, is passed off as a proof of the people's ingratitude.
It is these liberal attitudes, giving the poor crumbs from their own table that caused the working classes to found the Labour party in 1905 (formerly the Labour Representation Commitee).

FEMINISM WORLD DOMINATION

Don't be surprised by the micro-loans business and other feminist interventions in the third world. It is the business of the right wing to intervene where they have no right to be. Much as they have always liked trying to breed paranoia about the supposed world communist conspiracy it is they who have always been intervening in democratic developments of which they disapprove. See Jacobo Arbenz, Iran/Contra, Mossadegh, Russian Civil War (in which all of the major Western capitalist countries sent armies to help the whites), Spanish Civil War (in which the western powers refused to help the Republic, the Fascist powers armed the Fascists and the Americans supplied the fascists with oil).

Don't think the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (US) was a selfless act, either. It was a move to destroy Marxism and other genuinely threatening movements, to destroy the black groups, and the parachute the feminists into power on the backs of the blacks.

The Bible is quite clear that women must be in subjection to their husbands.

NAZI WITCHES: EQUAL RITES

Another link between the feminists and the SS is the common view they hold of the so-called prehistoric venus figurines, which were held by the feminists to be evidence of a pre-historic matriarchal and/or goddess worshipping civilisation which was displaced by invading patriarchal "Kurgans" (feminists also claim to have found Kurgan graves with armed women, making them the feminists pre-historic idyll, but consistency has never been a stron suit of feminists), as the Reichsfuhrer SS Heinrich Himmler held that the Aryans had conquered Europe from a race of big-bottomed Jew/Hottentots (fat is a feminist issue, you know), and idea he based on the so-called Venus figurines. The Women's Studies groups therefore take the role of the SS, especially of the Ahnenerbe, manufacturing evidence for female Baltic societies as the Ahnenerbe manuctured evidence for Hans Horbiger's deluded World Ice Theory and the ancient origins of the Master Race in Tibet.

Planned Parenthood, the continuation of the old Eugenics societies, is another like to the Nazis and to the modern world elite and their obsession with population control.

The idea behind Nazi eugenics, as with feminist eugenics (the abortionists target blacks, the poor and other unfit members of society) was to take us, the Master Race, back to a previous time, before we had been seduced into interbreeding with our inferiors, when we had weird magic powers, for the Master race had descended from heaven. So agree the feminists, that women had weird magical powers before the Kurgans came along.

Aryan giants with psychic powers being dragged down by Jewish interbreeding or goddess-worshipping matriarch dragged down by Kurgan conquest and the ensuing patriarchy, it's very much the same thing. Not surprising given the links between Nazism and the feminist movement, through Gimbutas and the CIA.

And, as the Ashtar and company contacted the Nazis through the Vril society and the mediums it employed so the feminists practice Baal-worship by burning the unborn on their unclean altars.

And what profession is, more than any other, more even than the media, infiltrated by feminism? Social work! The Nazis were paedophile and child-murderers, so it must be hilarious to them to see people being falsely accused and families being destroy by teachers and social workers EVEN AS their own successors in the CIA and Military Intelligence PsyOps, along with senior politicians and members of the Country and Western Establishment get away with it, scot-free. The false accusations also serve the purpose of making people doubtful of the truthful accusations, such as those against Michael Aquino.

It doesn't help that feminist groups make most of these false accusations, no doubt at the behest of their paymasters. Their's also lots of money to be made from lawsuits and the government compensation which pays women to make accusations of rape with no regard to their veracity.

Not only are aborted foetuses being used as a source of stem cells for beauty treatments but LIVE HUMAN CHILDREN are being kidnapped by doctors in the Ukraine and harvested for their brain and organ tissue to be liquidised and injected into the face of wrinkly Western women, according to the BBC (Radio 4's "Stem Cell Swindle II").

A single human foetus can sell for as much a £17,000 if it's determined to be a good source of stem cells. Expensive but medically dubious procedures are carried out with liquidised infant organs and foetuses.

Live, post-birth, children are being taking from women and hacked up to get at their juicy, stem-cell rich, bone marrow, their brains are being sucks out and their mangled corpses disposed of in mass graves.

As if it wasn't sick enough to put the foreskins of mutilated young boys into face cream, now whole children and entire embryos are being used in the same way, to facilitate the profiteering of a small group of Mengele-like fraudsters and to save the rich white woman from sagging jowls and unyouthful looking skin!

As the BBC says:

Healthy new-born babies may have been killed in Ukraine to feed a flourishing international trade in stem cells, evidence obtained by the BBC suggests.
The human rights group the Council for Europe agrees. But nothing is done!
The BBC has spoken to mothers from the city of Kharkiv who say they gave birth to healthy babies, only to have them taken by maternity staff.

In 2003 the authorities agreed to exhume around 30 bodies of foetuses and full-term babies from a cemetery used by maternity hospital number six.

One campaigner was allowed into the autopsy to gather video evidence. She has given that footage to the BBC and Council of Europe.

In its report, the Council describes a general culture of trafficking of children snatched at birth, and a wall of silence from hospital staff upwards over their fate.

For those who don't trust the BBC the Daily Mail agrees, as does this.

It's Molech all over again. It's the human sacrifices of Carthage. It's the giant stone (apparently it's actually made of plastic) owl George Bush worships at Bohemian Grove.

Only witches would voluntarily rub baby flesh on themselves, and indeed medieval witches made candles from the soft and tender flesh of infants, although the hand of glory had to be constructed from a criminal sentenced to death and executed (see the Ingoldby Legends, "The Hand of Glory"). It's no excuse, although it's true, that they're:

We are merely walking down the path that Mrs. Sanger carved for us.
--DR. ALAN GUTTMACHER, PRESIDENT OF PLANNED PARENTHOOD, 1962-74.
DRIVEN TO MURDER

Here is the suicide note of Marc LePine, written before he went and killed 14 female engineering students (there were, of course, accusations that he had been put on prozac and become the victim of a mind control experiment, but he could have just reached the end of his tether):

Please note that if I am committing suicide today 89/12/06 it is not for economic reasons (for I have waited until I exhausted all my financial means, even refusing jobs) but for political reasons. For I have decided to send Ad Patres the feminists who have ruined my life. It has been seven years that life does not bring me any joy and being totally blase, I have decided to put an end to those viragos.

I had already tried as a youth to enlist in the [Armed] Forces as an officer cadet, which would have allowed me to enter the arsenal and precede Lortie in a rampage. They refused me because of asociality. So I waited until this day to carry out all my projects. In between, I continued my studies in a haphazard way for they never really interested me, knowing in advance my fate. Which did not prevent me from obtaining very good marks despite not handing in my theory assignments and studying little before exams.

Even though the Mad Killer epithet will be attributed to me by the media, I consider myself a rational and erudite person that only the arrival of the Grim Reaper has forced to undertake extreme acts. For why persevere in existing if it is only to please the government? Being rather retrograde by nature (except for science), the feminists always have a talent for enraging me. They want to retain the advantages of being women (e.g. cheaper insurance, extended maternity leave preceded by a preventive leave) while trying to grab those of the men.

Thus, it is self-evident that if the Olympic Games removed the Men/Women distinction, there would be only be women in the graceful events. So the feminists are not fighting to remove that barrier. They are so opportunistic that they neglect to profit from the knowledge accumulated by men throughout the ages. They always try to misrepresent them every time they can. Thus, the other day, people were honoring the Canadian men and women who fought at the frontlines during the world wars. How does this sit with the fact that women were not authorized to go to the frontline at the time??? Will we hear of Caesar's female legions and female galley slaves who of course took up 50 per cent of history's ranks, although they never existed? A real Casus Belli. Sorry for this too brief letter.

OUR ONLY FREEDOM: FREEDOM TO KILL

As Henry Makow says:

A smoking gun! The elite doesn't want us to reproduce.

In 1970, Frederick Jaffe, the VP of Rockefeller-sponsored "Planned Parenthood" organization outlined how "social constraints" should be used to achieve "fertility control." ("Family Planning Perspectives" Oct.1970.)

These "constraints" included encouraging "increased homosexuality," altering "the image of the ideal family," and encouraging women to work outside the home.

If this failed, the agency recommended the placement of "fertility control agents in the water supply." We're not talking about unwanted pregnancies here.

We certainly aren't!
Betty Frieden, the "moderate" feminist founder, who hid the fact that she was a Communist activist, compared homemakers to concentration camp victims. Simone de Beauvoir, another Communist founder, said women must not be given a choice to be mothers and homemakers because they'll choose that option.
According to feminist Ellen Willis, feminism "is the cutting edge of a revolution in cultural and moral values...The objective of every feminist reform, from legal abortion...to child-care programs, is to undermine traditional family values." (The Nation, Nov. 14, 1981) What part of traditional family values do feminists object to? Love? Sacrifice? Devotion? Loyalty? Security? The preparation of a new generation for life?

THEY'RE NOT CALLED FEMINAZIS FOR NOTHING
Rockefeller financed the Nazis through I.G. Farben. He sponsored the American Eugenics Society that had close links to its Nazi counterpart.

Rockefeller financed Alfred Kinsey, the homosexual pederast whose "Kinsey Report" replaced married love with casual sex.

Rockefeller continues to finance "Women's Studies" which is a training ground for fascist zealots who spread their poison in society as "change agents." (See Daphne Patai, Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from the Strange World of Women's Studies.)

The elite is promoting homosexuality to bring about a fascist New World Order. Homosexuality is a developmental disorder characterized by a failure to bond with a member of the opposite sex. Lesbianism (feminism) which coerces women to be like men (and vice-versa) makes it difficult to achieve such a bond. As a result, millions of men and women have been defrauded of happiness and suffer the same symptoms as homosexuals, i.e. arrested development, and obsession with sex. LITTLE VENUS

I read a book called Martian Genesis once. It said humanity on earth was started by giant matriarchal martians. Chapter Nine is called "Worshipping the Goddess".

Since the discovery of the 'Venus of Willendorf', as this little artwork came to be called, scores more goddess figurines have come to light. The wide geographical scope is one indication of the goddess religion. One goddess figurine, discovered before the Willendorf Venus, is seldom mentioned in the standard texts of archaeology. It came from a well boring at Nampa, Idaho, in 1889. It was no more than an inch and a half long, a female figure that '...would do credit to the classical centres of art' according to G.F. Wright. This figurine has been dated to the Plio-Pleistocene era, which makes it about 2 millions years old. Not even the Ancient Egyptians believed their civilisation reached back to that time. But it acccords quite neatly with the idea that the earliest of our civilisationswas a transplant from the planet mars and raises a fascinating field of speculations.

To date, many of those tempted to discuss the sex of the face on Mars, have concluded it is male. The 'platform' surrounding the face itself is often taken as a headdress, of even military helmet. The 'diadem' which emerges on computer enhancement is seen as an indication that this is the face of a king.

Yet such conclusions may be no more than the projection of a male-oriented culture. If the face is in fact female - and the 'helmet' actually a styling of hair - then it becomes possible that Earth's ancient goddess religionliterally came down from the heavens.

-- Martian Genesis, Chapter Nine, Section Three

Madness. Nazi madness.

Here's a good debunkation of some of the feminist mythology.

Perhaps most seductively of all, the Goddess misrepresents her own history, claiming to be the heir of an unbroken line of covert pagans and druids who secretly preserved the Goddess' occult healing ways since remote antiquity despite Christian persecution. Davis convincingly traces the origin of the contemporary Goddess movement not to classical antiquity but to 19th-century French and German Romanticism. "Nothing about the Goddess myth correlates with what we know of the ancient civilizations which her devotees claim as their foremothers; everything, however, has clearly identifiable roots in the modern subcultures which began with Romanticism and the nineteenth-century occult revival." In Romanticism, "the supreme importance of feelings, and the purity of the primitive," were emphasized.

[Just like Nazism! - SM]

"The prized Romantic values of emotion, intuition, affinity with nature, and boundless love coincided with the qualities which traditional stereotypes had already assigned to women."

In his version of Faust, Goethe wrote of mysterious, otherwise-unknown beings called "The Mothers,"

[The Unknown Hitler by Wulf Schwartzwaller: "ancient, highly intelligent beings (similar to the 'Masters' of Theosophy or the White Brotherhood)" - SM]

whose power Mephistopheles acknowledged to be far greater than his own. Goethe concluded that work with his enigmatic and famous line, "The Eternal Feminine draws us on high." Works by utopian social reformers like the Count of Saint-Simon, Charles Fourier, Auguste Comte, Jules Michelet, Alphonse Constant, and others, enormously influential in their day, promoted a viewpoint Davis describes as "the Romantic idealization of women as spiritually pure channels of love, intuitively connected to nature." These utopians, who sought not merely to improve society but to create a literal paradise on earth, suggested that the key to re-establishing Eden lay in the redemptive powers of woman as messiah. Indeed, one French Saint-Simonist group proclaimed in 1832 the immanent appearance of a female messiah, and symbolically kept an empty chair for her to preside over their meetings . When she failed to appear in France, a vision showed her appearing in Constantinople in 1833, resulting in an expedition to search for her there; she was never found.

After the utopians' hopes for an earthly paradise were dashed by the failure of Europe's revolutions of 1848, Alphonse Constant took to dabbling in the Kabbalah, and began calling himself "Eliphas Lévi." He played a major role in the 19^th-century occult revival, while still promoting ideas of earthly salvation through the feminine. Direct lines from his writings and from his disciples can be drawn to subsequent Rosicrucianism,

[Rosicrucianism - Bulward Lytton - Karl Haushofer - Vrilism (the Luminous Lodge, later the Nazi Occult Bureau) - Nazism. - SM]

Theosophy, and most significantly the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn, which gave us Aleister Crowley, from whom it is only a short step (via Gerald B. Gardner) to the contemporary feminist neopagan practices of Miriam "Starhawk" Simos, Zsuzsanna Budapest, and Margot Adler.

GLORIA STEINEM: SYNARCHIST

See how the CIA have used feminism.

"I was never asked to report on other Americans or assess foreign nationals I had met." -- Gloria Steinem

The Red Stockings charge that this statement is an alarming lie. In a "Report on the Vienna Youth Festival" printed with Steinem's name on it as director of the Independent Research Service, there are 13 pages devoted exclusively to biographies, political affiliations, and even some superficial analyses of persons from all countries participating in the festival. Youths were monitored in much the same way at the 1962 World Youth Festival in Helsinki. In addition to the news and cultural events put on by the Independent Research Service, the Helsinki festival was marked by four nights of "spontaneous" rioting against the festival during which 40 people were arrested. It was reported by Newsweek in August 1962 that "Pravda, of course, blamed the disturbances on well-financed CIA and FBI agents."

(Interrupting briefly. Of course remember that Newsweek is published by Katherine Graham. We're going to be coming to her role in setting up Ms. [magazine] in just a minute.)

This is Gloria Steinem's background from the late 1950s and early 1960s. She functioned as a secret representative of the American government abroad. At least, she was representing certain American interests, and her activities in the Independent Research Service involved her inextricably with the U.S. domestic political intelligence network.

Another fact exhumed by the Red Stockings is the group's [Independent Research Service's] publication of a pamphlet in 1959 called, "A Review of Negro Segregation in the United States." Steinem's name is listed on the inside cover, this time as co-director of the Independent Research Service. The pamphlet focusses on the supposed advances made by black people in the U.S. For example: "Beyond the noisy clamor of those who would obstruct justice and fair play, no alert observer can be unaware of the concerted effort to rule out segregation from every aspect of American life." The reason some discrimination does still occur, according to the research group, is because "it is also self-perpetuating, in that the rejected group, through continued deprivation, is hardened in the very shortcomings, real or imaginary, that are given as the reasons for the discrimination in the first place."

In other words, the oppression of blacks continues not because of white, ruling-class interests, but because black people actually have become inferior.

[...]

By 1967, the Independent Research Service was declared "largely inactive" by the New York Times. Steinem, however, was still a director in 1968 when Ramparts [magazine] broke another story. This time they disclosed that the CIA had plans of their own for another World Youth Festival to be held in Sofia, Bulgaria. A scandal involving some confidential letters implicating the CIA, which found their way into print before the festival, had the effect of curtailing the CIA's plans for youths in Sofia.

It was during the following year, 1969-70, that Gloria Steinem first began publicly identifying herself with the Women's Movement. Around this same time, Red Stocking researchers noted there was a change in the biographical information listed about Steinem in *Who's Who*. Reportedly, *Who's Who* sends data sheets to their subjects requesting them to furnish the details. The 1968 and '69 edition was the first issue ever mentioning Steinem, and at the time she was listed as "Director, educational foundation, Independent Research Service, Cambridge, Massachusetts/New York City, 1959-62. Now member Board of Directors, Washington." By the 1970 edition of *Who's Who*, this entry was shortened to "Director, educational foundation, 1959-60." No mention of her position in Washington on the Board of Directors appears, and she abbreviated her term of employment with the Independent Research Service to one year. The censored version appears in each successive edition of *Who's Who*.

There does seem to be an attempt on Steinem's part to mislead Ms. readers and conceal parts of her past. For instance, her bio-blurb in June 1973 Ms. is even vaguer: "Gloria Steinem has been a free-lance writer all her professional life. Ms. magazine is her first full-time, salaried job."

Her romantic history is also interesting: Do not forget that Gloria Steinem dated Henry Kissinger at one time. Kissinger is a big name in the Monarch mind control community. Perhaps that's how he got Steinem on side. I hear she was a looker in her younger days. Induce some easily controlled alters. Normal way of setting up spies. Perhaps she's just a victim in all this, albeit an evil one.
An interesting bit of information here concerning Gloria Steinem. And again: this on the occasion of her 50th birthday. This is from Newsweek, the issue of June 4th, 1984. There's an article on Gloria Steinem's 50th birthday. It's very short. It's entitled, "Steinem at 50: Gloria in Excelsis." (And I'm only going to read you one sentence of this article.)

"In previous incarnations, Steinem dated Mike Nichols, Rafer Johnson, and other notables. For the past nine years she has been romantically involved with Washington attorney Stanley Pottinger, a Republican and former Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights."

But he was Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights under the Nixon/Ford administration, from 1973 until 1977. You'll all recall what Nixon's Justice Department was like: both Mr. Kleindeist and John Mitchell were indicted -- Mitchell convicted and Kleindeist eventually... I don't know whether he was convicted and received a suspended sentence, or whether he eventually was acquitted. But half the Nixon Justice Department wound up being indicted on one charge or another, many of them acquitted, most in connection with the Watergate affair. They also presided over COINTELPRO and a number of other interesting things. Surely the Nixon administration has never been regarded as a great champion of civil rights. And a woman like Gloria Steinem, who is at least nominally aligned with a civil rights movement, the feminist movement... Well, her association, her 9-year romantic involvement with Mr. Pottinger, is really intriguing.

Now those of you who listen to Mae Brussell's "World Watcher" series will recall Mae referring very briefly to Mr. Pottinger's [alleged] involvement in an arms smuggling scam. (Research credit for the following article, again, goes to Mr. Ted Rubenstein.)

So much for the freedom loving feminist movement. As its opponents have long known ity is vitriolic in its opposition to freedom, so it's hardly surprising that it was set up by the people behind Pinochet have women raped with dogs in Chile, and Pottinger who covered up assassinations of Chilean dissidents on American soil.

Given that women have got where they are, in terms of the power of the feminist movement, by riding the blacks, it's hardly surprising Steinem was associated with Pottinger, who was part of the Martin Luther King assassination.

Feminism was originally created, in part, to advocate for prohibition, part of the long-term government/ruling-class conspiracy to use organised crime for covert ops.

SIMMEL AND GIMBUTAS: NAZI OCCULTISM LIVES ON THROUGH THE WOMEN'S MOVEMENT

Simmel was a Nazi philosopher of sorts who believed in the feminine nature of man being a desirable state, rather than the "iron cage" of rationality". Gimbutas was educated by a Nazi ehtnologist, before transforming the ariosophical doctrine into the feminist doctrine with which her name in associated, as noted elsewhere in these Files.

See the Theozoological cosmogeny of tLanz von Liebenfels:

In 1904, he published his book "Theozoologie" ("theozoology") in which he advocated sterilization of the sick and the "lower races" as well as forced labour for "castrated chandals", and glorified the "aryan race" as "Gottmenschen" ("god men"). Lanz justified his neognostic racial ideology by attempting to give it a biblical foundation; according to him, Eve, which he described as initially being divine, involved herself with a demon and gave birth to the "lower races" in the process. Furthermore, he claimed that this led to blonde women being attracted primarily to "dark men", something that only could be stopped by "racial demixing" so that the "aryan-christian master humans" could "once again rule the dark-skinned beastmen" and ultimately achieve "divinity". A copy of this book was sent to Swedish poet August Strindberg, from who Lanz received an enthusiastic reply in which he was described as a "prophetic voice".
CONCLUSION

I will conclude with the opening words of the Fraud of Feminism by E Belfort Bax:

THE following essay was published at the end of 1913 and is now reissued as originally written. Since the year before the World War the situation of woman has, of course, changed. Feminism in this and in some other countries has won well-nigh all its formal demands. Mr Asquith, who before the war declared he would have nothing to do with a House of Commons elected by a female vote, during the war, for no assignable reason, suddenly made a volte-face [about-face] and became a strong advocate of female franchise. The acquisition of the suffrage has as its result carried with it the right to all occupations and offices, as decreed by the "Sex-Disability Repeal Act," and so the pitch-forking of women into administrative posts proceeds galore. But the main contentions of The Fraud of Feminism have not been affected by the change in question. Though women have been conceded all the rights of men, their privileges as females have remained untouched, while the sentimental "pull" they have over men, and the favouritism shown them in the courts, civil and criminal, often in flagrant violation of elementary justice, continues as before. The result of their position on juries, as evinced in certain trials, has rather confirmed the remarks made in Chapter II. anent hysteria than otherwise. The sex-bias of men in favour of women and the love of the advanced woman towards her sex-self show no sign of abatement. Proposals to the effect that in the event of infanticide by a mother the putative father should be placed in the dock merely because he is a man are received with applause. The other day, at a court held in a fashionable town of the south coast, on a prostitute being brought up charged with soliciting, a female "justice," recently appointed, declaimed against the wickedness of punishing prostitutes for soliciting while men were never brought up charged with the offence. (Needless to say, there was the usual male fool to be found in the body of the court, who shouted: "Hear ! Hear !") Now is it conceivable, I ask, that anybody can be so infatuated with Feminism as not to see that a prostitute who solicits nightly in the exercise of her trade-- i.e . for the purpose of money-making--is in a different position from a man who, once in a way, may, urged by natural passion, make advances to a woman? Such a person must be unable to see distinctions in anything, one would think. Besides, it is not true that men, if charged with the annoyance or molestation of women, cannot be, and have not been, prosecuted for the offence. The lady "justice" in question would probably like to see a man paired with a prostitute in the dock every time the latter gave occasion for police action. Such is the Feminist notion of justice. There are a vast number of men who cultivate the pretence of having a contempt for, or a prejudice against, their own sex. The idea seems to be to pander to the sex-vanity of the "New Woman." Every popular writer caters for this prejudice. No one can have failed to notice the persistent journalistic and literary "stunt" by which the man is portrayed in the light of a miserable and abject living creature as a foil to the "noble animal" woman. There is scarcely a play, short story or novel the plot of which in any way admits of it where this now stale device is not dragged in in some form or shape. Even Shaw, with all his somewhat ostentatious flouting of convention, cannot resist the temptation of yielding to it in one or two of his plays--e.g. Catherine the Great. This sort of thing is not without its influence on the course of justice, as the daily papers still continue to show us. Times have not changed in this respect. The war, which has altered the face of things otherwise and in the matter of the social and political aspect of sex-relations, has been the occasion of revolutionary transformation in the shape of political sex-equality, has left female privilege, civil and criminal, as it was in 1913. There is no indication that the general public has a dawning sense that, to adapt the common metaphor, "What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander." Everywhere we hear the same old bogus grievances of the female sex trotted out as crying for remedy, but never the injustice of a man being compelled, whatever his economic position, to keep his wife, while a woman is under no corresponding obligation to keep her husband. No urgency is suggested for removing the anomaly that a husband is amenable for his wife's libels and slanders; none that a boy of fourteen is punishable for a sexual offence to which he has been incited by a girl of sixteen, who gets off scot-free; none that the obligation of a husband, whose wife wishes to bring an action for divorce against him, to furnish her with the money to fight him, should be abolished. On the other hand, every law, every judicial decision, every case in the courts, civil and criminal, that on the most superficial view can be exploited by the conventional Feminist claptrap to prove the wickedness of "man-made law" to woman, is gripped by the beak of the Feminist harpy to help build up her nest of lying sex-prejudice, whence she and her confraternity may sally forth and by their raids on male sentiment not merely help to buttress up existing female privilege, but wherever possible to increase the already one-sided injustice of the law and its administration towards men in the interest of the other sex.

Back to Index

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1