Shall we see the crap they're putting up for news this week. Stand by because it is typically liberal bull guano. They even try to besmirch the greatest president in my lifetime. Who's that Eye, Who's that? Bill Clinton? (Super hurl) Bill Clinton was not a president under any terms. I am of course speaking of Ronald Wilson Reagan. Too bad he ain't here to laugh at them. He always did.
These Republicans are a bunch of lazy
bast***s
I have said many times, the media paints the Democrats as either the smartest, or the best educated or the hardest working. How do they paint the Republicans? Let's have a looksee.
Bush on track to become the
vacation president; By JULIE MASON;
Copyright 2007 Houston Chronicle
Washington Bureau; August 9, 2007
One thing you need to realize about the mainstream media, they recycle the same stories by changing the names and dates only. Stay with me on this now, you will see what I mean.
President Bush tries to set an
example for Americans whenever he can, in
terms of physical fitness, faith, optimism and
a certain overall moral rectitude. He also sets
an excellent example on taking
vacation.
This stuff really makes you want to throw your lunch.
On Thursday, Bush left for a
weekend in Kennebunkport, Maine, and his
family's summer compound, Walker's Point.
On Monday, he heads to his Crawford
retreat, where he has spent all or part
of 418 days of his presidency, according to
Mark Knoller, a CBS News White House
correspondent and meticulous record-
keeper.
Ever wonder why these stories make it to light? Purely to engrain in the minds of the populace that Bush is lazy. Not only Bush, but all Republications are lazy.
At a White House press
conference
Thursday, Bush appeared to be already
inhabiting his vacation mode, shedding
the businesslike, sometimes grim demeanor
he's had of late to louch against the
podium and be avuncular.
You never hear about all the times Billie-bob would enter the Oval Office all sweaty wearing his jogging attire to attend a meeting. (Psst, Bush gets up early to jog and enters the oval office appropriately dressed.)
The presidential vacation-time
record holder is the late Ronald Reagan, who
tallied 436 days in his two terms. At
418 days, and with 17 months to go in his
presidency, Bush is going to beat that
easily.
I would like to see how they classify vacation time for Bush versus the classifications used for Billie-bob and Jimah Carter. I believe you would see double standard accounting at the max.
Even so, this year's August
vacation
for Bush is a contrast to previous years such
as 2005, when he dragged out
vacation in Texas to five weeks. That was also
the year Bush remained on vacation
immediately after Hurricane Katrina hit.
Not only does he take the time off, but he d-r-a-g-s them out. And because he was responsible for the hurricane that hit New Orleans, he slept in while he ordered the levees demolished.
Bush, on his 10th visit to
Kennebunkport as president (according to
Knoller), is scheduled for lunch Saturday
with French President Nicolas Sarkozy.
Indeed, on the issue of vacation, at least,
Bush is much like a pleasure-seeking
Frenchman. According to Expedia.com,
French workers get about 39 days off a year
and generally take all but one.
Ever stop to think why Billie-bob supposedly spent so much time in DC? Spell it M-O-N-I-C-A. You want to hole up with Hillary for a month? NO THANKS. I guess Billie-bob was smarter than I give him credit for.
Economics 101 (or for liberals 1 + 1 = ?)
Ever notice that the mass-media totally has no idea of economics. You would think that they would have some economic or business consultant on the staff to run economic stories by in order to check it for validity. No such chance, they are not concerned about being valid, but pushing their own agenda.
Toy recall sparks alarm over
'Made
in China,' but U.S. firms share blame By Tim
Johnson and Kevin G. Hall,
McClatchy Newspapers; AP/Yahoonews.com;
Aug 16, 2007
Evil corporations are the root cause of all our misery.
This week's product recall by toy
titan Mattel Inc. is the latest black eye for
the "Made in China" label, but experts
here and abroad believe that U.S.
manufacturers and importers share
the blame by putting relentless pressure on
Chinese suppliers to deliver lower prices
to American consumers.
I read this drivel and have to chuckle. Well, more than chuckle, more like hysterical laughter.
"Everybody is pushing, pushing,
pushing for lower and lower prices. The
vendors are squeezed to the point
where they aren't making a profit anymore.
So they are looking to cut corners," said
Peter Dean , a former U.S. toy company
executive who now teaches at Hong
Kong Polytechnic University .
I trust all of you see the fallacy of this.
The squeeze on China's
manufacturers, led by big retail names like
Wal-Mart and Target , means low prices
and low inflation for U.S. consumers. But
perversely, it may now be giving an
incentive for Chinese manufacturers to cut
corners or outright cheat.
Do I need to go any further with this crapola?
But if that's the reality for selling
into the U.S. market, here's the reality for
China's factories, which now produce nearly
80 percent of the world's toys. They operate
in an environment of lax regulation,
dirt-cheap labor and intense competition. And
they understand that there's little
direct U.S. regulation of product-safety
standards. The U.S. Consumer Product Safety
Commission relies almost entirely on
the toy industry's ability to police itself.
Ok, ok, that's enough. I think you get the idea. Need I really point out the total stupidity of these two mental midgets writing this article? They don't understand two things. Capitalism and Chicoms. On the one hand they hate captalism, and on the other hand they love socialism (and the Chicoms). The story now fits the mould. They can blame corporations while still embrace their socialist friends.
First of all, toys have regulations and US corporations get sued if they blink incorrectly. Trial lawyers cannot wait for the next class action lawsuits. They put the blame on corporate America and greedy consumers (who want to save their money). This is classic captalism in its best form. Problem is you can't trust the Chicoms (who can trust a communist anyway?). Toy companies submit product standards to the Chicom factories, they have to. They don't need a multi-hundred-million dollar class action judgment against them. They simply look for the best price. The capitalistic market will find it for them. BUT, unknownst to them, the Chicoms who want the business, subverted the product safety standards. It's not a matter of US corporate squeeze it's a matter of Chicom sleaze that's the problem. Chicoms are greedy too, except they are deceptive.
So the next time you liberals buy a Barbie doll or a GI Joe (that'll be the damn day), don't stick it in your mouth . You never know where those toys were before you placed them in your mouth. Better stick to what you know best before you place things in your mouth, like condoms... one of your flagship issues.
Grant's Blog is an original
commentary by Grant Freerks. Copyright (c)2007
Grant Freerks.
