P. 5 of 18
[page 5] Capt. Meuler's Affidavit attached to it do not meet the five legal requirements of a lawful complaint for Probable Cause! And for it to be so it must answer the following five questions:
And the last two of these five were not set forth in the criminal complaint by law. And by these facts of the record my 6th Amendment Right to effective and competent counsel [see] Gideon vs. Wainwright, 83 s. ct. 792, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799 (1963 7th cir.), and United States vs. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 (1984), Murry vs. Carrie, 477 4.[8].478, 106 S.CT.2639 (1986). And this arraignment violated my 14th Amendment Right of due process of law; and the Equal Protection of Laws.
Issue # 4
Defective criminal complaint; court lack of personal jurisdiction; ineffective assistance of counsel.
If you read the criminal complaint and the information, you will see that they read almost word for word from the Wisconsin statutes book! in regards to the five counts. And they do not! establish probable cause, as too why I am being charged? And who says so?... Especially to count 4 and 5, "first degree murder."
[see] State vs. Williamson, 109 Wis. 2d 83 (Wis. App. 1982) where the court said "When the sufficiency of a criminal complaint is challenged, the alleged facts in the complaint must be sufficient to establish Probable Cause, not in a hypertechnical sense, but in a Continue to read...
P. 5 of 18
Go to p. 6 or Go back to p. 4 or Back to index