| Reaction Paper 4 | ||||||||||||
| One of the hardest tasks a teacher faces every day is that of "time management." High school classes last 55 minutes each and in that time there are "housekeeping" tasks that must be done. Then there are other tasks mandated by the district that also take time. It is not unusual for a class to begin 10 to 12 minutes into the period. If the lesson calls for students to use computers, and the classroom is not equipped with one for each student, time is spent moving to a lab. Finally, students must get settled in, receive instructions and then work on the task at hand. On any given day the computer can freeze, the internet can go down, or a host of other problems can arise causing a delay in the lesson plan which throws the plan for the next few days off. Sometimes a project that should only take a couple of days gets strung out into several more. Along with time management problems, teachers have other barriers to face when trying to integrated technology into their curriculum. According to Harvey Barnett, teachers face six barriers to effectively integrating technology into their curriculum: Leadership: lack of leadership is the single biggest barrier to the use of technology. Access: one or two computers or a weekly visit to a computer lab do not impact learning. Time: it takes time for teachers to review software and figure out how it fits with their instructional program. Cost: schools often provide only minimal funds to purchase software. Teachers may not be willing to spend their own money to purchase multiple copies of software. Training: Apple Classroom of Tomorrow research found that it takes training for teachers to move from "How do I turn it on?" to where they comfortably and routinely integrate technology into their classroom. Reform: technology makes its greatest impact when teachrs use project-based learning practices to engage students. (Barnett, 2001, p. 4) Thus all the problems, from the "time" problem to the reliability of the equipment seems to be a reasonable cause for any teacher to be cautious when asked to integrate technology into daily lesson plans. Finally, the use of technology in high schools in poor districts can be an exhausting, time consuming ordeal that leaves giant unanswered questions for the teacher regarding technology integration into daily lessons. The amount of energy needed for this task is not always in abundant supply for a teacher who has a student load of 180 + students daily. Carol Pope and Jeffrey Golub state in their article, Preparing Tomorrow's English Language Arts Teachers Today: Principles and Practices for Infusing Technology, that One of the critical lessons to learn as a teacher in a technologically rich environment is that we will never be completely caught up; we will never know everything. We will constantly learn with and from out students... the English language arts classroom will necessarily become learn ing- centered and learn er centered, with both teacher and student functioning in both roles (Pope & Golub, 2000, p. 5). High school teachers in all disciplines, not just English language arts, feel the time crunch as they move through the curriculum, prep students for standardized tests, and interact with peers, administrators, and parents. |
||||||||||||
| Click on the link to view page 5: reaction paper 5 |
||||||||||||
| Click on the link to view page 1: Oversold & Underused | ||||||||||||
| Click on the link to view page 3: reaction paper 3 | ||||||||||||
| Click on the link to view page 2: reaction paper 2 | ||||||||||||
| Click on the link to return to my index page: index | ||||||||||||
| Click on the link to view the evidence page: evidences | ||||||||||||