8.1. WHO ARE THE BLACK SHEEP OR THE FAILING PEOPLE IN THE CASE
PALMA?
The
BLACK
SHEEP
and failing people meant hereby are:
a)
RICCARDO
GIACCONI, who was the Director General at E.S.O. in the years 1994-1999:
Mr.
Riccardo Giacconi received recently (by the 8 October 2002) the Nobel Prize
for the Physics, but I “WANT” him, for trying to bring him personally and possibly
before of a Criminal Court of Justice.
In
fact, he may have great acknowledgements and also my respect for the science
he did. Nevertheless, should a Nobel Prize be also linked to the HUMANITY that
the person showed during his life of acting for the science, I don’t know really
what the result would be! I am still the living witness of his UTMOST INHUMANITY
AND DISREGARD OF ANY LAW: 40 Complaints at the I.L.O. Administrative Tribunal,
the “shelved” evidences on the ESO facts and the protection that the Administrative
Tribunal is giving to the ESO identifiable with Riccardo Giacconi (for favouring
by indecent adjustments and falsity his nomination to the Nobel?) should give
enough proof of the facts.
It is
sufficient just now to read all my latest correspondence
with the ITALIAN NATIONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE ORGANISATION
E.S.O.,
then “Who
is Francesco Palma”
and especially the section
2.1. above,
FOR BEING AWARE AND GETTING PROOF OF THIS SITUATION.
THE CONCERNED
FACTS I REPORT IN MY HOME PAGE WERE NEVER IMPUGNED AND COULD NEVER BE DISPUTED
DURING SEVEN YEARS IN THEIR TRUTH BY ANYBODY EITHER AT E.S.O., OR IN ASTRONOMY
OR EVEN BY THE GOVERNMENTAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE E.S.O.
NATURALLY
THERE COULD BE ALSO A LOT OF E.S.O. PEOPLE TO BE CALLED IN WITNESS, BUT PROVIDED
THAT THEY ALSO LIKE TO SHOW A LITTLE BIT COURAGE FOR THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY
AND FOR THE WORLDWIDE PUBLIC OPINION, BY TELLING THE TRUTH NOTHING ELSE BUT
THE TRUTH.
Shortly,
Mr. Riccardo Giacconi, Nobel Price for Physics 2002, may be certainly an excellent
scientist for having widened the common knowledge on very far radiating sources
in the universe, which may be already extinguished, considering the elapsed
million years. That is, Riccardo Giacconi improved surely the human experience
on something already dead or lifeless for the mankind’s practical interests
of continuing the human life and of developing better human relations for its
longer survival in the next centuries and in the universe.
But, surely, Riccardo Giacconi did not know what “mankind” and “Humanity” means: for me personally, he is certainly not at all a Human Being in the common sense of this word and not at all a “Heart of Lion”, knowing what he did at E.S.O. on 1995 and the cowardice, he showed and is showing since then in my case (I am really sorry for this report, but regretfully I cannot find some more gentle words to define this person by my feelings and by the truth nothing else but the truth: by other diction I would not be honest in my definitions hereby before of the worldwide Public Opinion).
E.S.O. may oppose that all people, at letters “b-e” above, do not
exist anymore, since their Contracts of Employment with E.S.O. were not renewed
and they don’t work anymore for the Organisation: this fact should be also an
evidence to the world-wide Public Opinion of an activity of the E.S.O. (Governing
Body) against assumed “Black Sheep” (or, the undoubtedly proved delinquent people
hereby).
As long as the Organisation does not provide a substantiated remedy
to its errors, it is like E.S.O. is still upholding failures, protecting “BLACK
SHEEP” and therefore it is not excused before of the WORLD WIDE OPINION.
An alternative, that I also proposed, could be that E.S.O. helps
and assists me to bring those people, when not working anymore or who do not
work anymore at E.S.O. and who remain uncovered by E.S.O. privilege and immunities,
before of a CRIMINAL COURT, i.e. an Int’l or National Penal Court of Justice. But
this seems unfeasible, under the actual rights to the Justice of an International
Staff Member. Here is also the need to review in whole JUSTICE ISSUES FOR ALL
STAFF MEMBERS WORLDWIDE.
At the I.L.O. ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL:
TO BE DEFINED, in consideration of the period
of grace granted to the TRIBUNAL to issue its last judgements. We reserve the
right to give a concerned report afterwards.
Here, in the FAQ SECTION, will follow the reader’s FAQ’s, to be
ordered possibly in chronological order (later on, if many, by arguments).