2.4. The questions with the CERN
The CERN ((European
Centre of Nuclear Research of Geneva
www.cern.org) comes into the legal questions
Palma/ESO, simply because it was/is the Social Insurer of the ESO by means of
its Pension Fund, which is juridical identifiable only with the CERN.
The
CERN, as Organisation, should therefore not exist at all as counterpart of Mr.
Palma in all his legal disputes with the ESO. Nevertheless, due to the clarified
function of its Pension Fund, the CERN comes to be unfortunately involved in
all the matters of Labour’s Social Security System for Mr. Palma. Legally, there
was no legal possibility to keep the CERN safe from Complaints affecting the
Social Security System of the ESO, identifiable regrettably by the ESO Rules&Regulations
with the System of the CERN. Here is Mr. Palma’s Lawsuits also versus the CERN.
The
CERN therefore must be seen in all legal disputes Palma/ESO, as well as Mr.
Palma, as a victim of the breaches in Law made at ESO in matter of Labour and
of Social Security Policy, that is of the violations derived from the “criminal
facts” affecting the dishonest management of the ESO on 1995.
The
CERN will become furthermore also victim of an “Excess of Jurisdiction”, openly
made by the ILO Administrative Tribunal in breach of its Statute to defend the
ESO at any costs. In fact, in the first Judgement 1665 of 10.7.1996 case Palma/CERN,
the judges made (purposely?) a mix up of legal issues of the ESO “Termination
issues” in a case specifically concerning the CERN, which aspects neither the
CERN nor Mr. Palma called to be disputed in their entirety as inherent and decisively
pertinent to that process (e.g. Mr. Palma’s Termination and his Appeals thereof).
This
question will be more and more clear, as soon as we can report in their entirety
the judgements Palma/ESO, Palma/CERN in these pages.
It remains therefore the substantial fact for a reader to consider the image of the CERN, as well as a general image of the ESO, as Institution and in relation to its pure SCIENCE (look at the FOREWORD), as fully exempted from the indecent aspects, which may concern only few dishonest and delinquent high Directors of the ESO on 1995, who also provoked “the case Palma”.