THIS HOME PAGE, ALTHOUGH ALSO DEDICATED TO SCIENTIFIC THEMES, MUST START WITH SECTIONS, WHICH ARE A REPORT AGAINST THE DISHONESTY, THE FRAUD, THE DISREGARD OF ANY LAW AND OF ANY HUMANITY THAT THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION E.S.O.* IS SUSTAINING SINCE THE 1995, IN NAME OF THE SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND OF THE ASTRONOMY, MOREOVER BY DEFENDING ITSELF ONLY BY FALSITIES NOTHING ELSE BUT FALSITIES BEFORE OF A TRIBUNAL (the Administrative Tribunal of the International Labour Organisation of Geneve), WHICH BY PRINCIPLE AND BY ITS STATUTE IS ONLY PAID BY THE ORGANISATION.
*ESO is an International Organisation for research in Astronomy sustained actually by the nine European Nations of Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom. [The United Kingdom joined the E.S.O. on 2002, so that this nation was not at all involved in the reported facts going back to the 1995. Nevertheless, it will be involved since now on, should it also try to sustain the attitude of the E.S.O. since the 1995 of covering and trying fully to shelve for the Public Opinion some regretful criminal facts, which unfortunately happened in the organisation on that time).
I
MUST INFORM THEREFORE THE WORLD-WIDE PUBLIC OPINION ON THESE UNPLEASANT SITUATIONS
BEFORE OF ANY OTHER ARGUMENT:
THESE
FACTS WILL PROVE INDISPUTABLY TO ANYBODY THE ACTUAL DRAMATIC SITUATION OF A
JUSTICE OF LABOUR FOR AN INTERNATIONAL STAFF MEMBER AND THAT, AT THE ACTUAL
POINT, MORAL INTEGRITY (IN MILLION DOLLARS CONTRACTS & PROCUREMENT) AND
SERVICE TO THE SCIENCE DO NOT PAY AT ALL, CONSIDERED THE TROUBLES THAT THE PERSON
SHALL SUFFER.
FOR
THAT I (Francesco Palma, the Author) WILL PRESENT EVIDENCE AND INVOLVE THE READER
IN THE QUESTIONS (e.g. Int.l Labour Rights, improvement of a concerned Justice,
Judge Antonio di Pietro politics, ethics and transparency, economics, anti-gravitation,
etc.), AS WELL AS A JOURNALIST COULD DO BY A NEWSPAPER IN AN OPEN AND FREE DEMOCRACY.
THE
READER SHALL UNDERSTAND IMMEDIATELY HOWEVER THAT in principle an Organisation,
as Institution in its own, has nothing to do with POSSIBLE FAILING INSIDERS,
WHO MAY DAMAGE ITS COMPLESSIVE NAME OR LET CALL IT AS A WHOLE PARTY IN JUDGMENT.
But,
by International Jurisprudence the Director General (DG) of an Organisation
can be only identified with the comprehensive name of the Organisation (and
vice-versa), as well as some managers acting on behalf of the Director General
may be. In such a way, there is no possibility in our colloquial information
and by presenting facts to make each time a distinction between Individuals
and Institutions.
NOW,
ANY CATEGORY OF PEOPLE HAS “BLACK SHEEP” AND THIS FACT REGRETFULLY DOES NOT
EXCLUDE THAT ALSO THE CLASS OF DIRECTORS GENERAL, MANAGERS OF AN INTERNATIONAL
ORGANISATION AND OF JUDGES OF A TRIBUNAL HAS OWN “BLACK SHEEP”.
WHO
ARE THE “BLACK SHEEP” or the FAILING PEOPLE, in my case? Surely they have a
name and are very well identifiable. If so, on end of this Foreword, look at
the Frequently
Asked Question (FAQ).
HERE,
THE READER SHALL CLEARLY UNDERSTAND THAT AN INSTITUTION ITSELF DAMAGES ITS IMAGE,
WHEN IT HOSTINATEDLY INSISTS TO MAINTAIN “BLACK SHEEP” AND WHEN IT PERSISTS
IN ITS PROVED ERRORS (Errare humanum est, sed perseverare diabolicum: To err
is humane, but to remain in the error is diabolical).
THIS
SITE THEREFORE DOES NOT INTEND TO BE ONLY A NEGATIVE PUBLIC REPORT AGAINST THE
ORGANISATION ESO AND THEIR SUPPORTERS, BUT INTENDS TO CONTRIBUTE POSITIVELY
NOT ONLY TO THE INTERESTS OF ALL STAFF MEMBERS BUT ALSO TO THE GOOD NAME OF
THE ASTRONOMY AND OF THE ORGANISATIONS RECALLED HEREBY, SINCE THEY HAVE A UNIQUE
OCCASION TO RECONSIDER THE FACTS, TO REGAIN IN IMAGE, BY PROVING WORLDWIDE THEIR
IMPLEMENTATION OF REMEDIES AND BY ALLOWING, ON THE END, REFORMATIONS OF THE
JUSTICE IN THE INTERESTS OF THE TRUTH, OF THE ASTRONOMY AND OF EVERYBODY.
BY
THIS UNDERSTANDING YOU MAY CONTINUE IN GOOD FAITH THE READING OF THESE PAGES,
TO RECEIVE INFORMATION OR TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ARGUMENTS.
THANK
YOU.
Francesco Palma, the Author