Free Writing


//everything I write//

** After field trip **

In Writer's Stomach

SETTING: In Stomach of the writer, American food came in and met Korean food. Here is dialogue between them. ��A�� is American food and ��K�� is Korean food.

A: Hi, nice to meet you.

K: Same here. So, you are the new visitor whom I��ve heard of.

A: Yeah. I came here last week.

K: You know, you are the first visitor from outside, because we are all from same place, Korea. So I��m greatly interested in you who are different from me�� Well, what about you? And what do you think about this place? Is it satisfied with you?

A: Not so bad. One strange thing is that there is no diversity around here. It is my first time to experience such this monotony where the exact same species only exists.

K: It is so. You are in very peculiar style comparing to us.

A: However, you guys are not accustomed to accept different species at all. Thus, I sometimes feel I am a trouble-maker in here. Because you are all same, the place is just for you and definitely not for any different ones.

K: You are talking about the accident on the digestive road yesterday, right?

A: Yeah. My oil and salt hadn��t caused trouble in other places, so I didn��t know what to do. I feel sorry from the bottom of my heart, yet I want to make sure it wasn��t done deliberately.

K: I understand. I heard that your oil made the road slippery and your salt made blocks causing great traffic jams. Still, I know that you are full of them and cannot stop secreting.

A: That��s what I want to say. Yesterday, however, it was just a huge traffic accident and there is no settlement at all. So I think here is not appropriate for me at all.

K: It is true that such accident is an unprecedented one.

A: That��s it. It��s just my oil and salt are not fit in here. Besides, I heard someone had complained that I spread dirt around here especially in the food passage.

K: I��ve heard that, too. I think that��s also because of oil and salt.

A: I think so. Anyway, I will leave here tomorrow as I planned before. I didn��t want any delay as food in here wants. Maybe we can meet next time when the writer visit America again. Bye-

K: I hope there will be appropriate preparation for you when we meet later.

My Beautiful Goal

Stanford University has become my goal since the field trip. My school had scheduled valuable two weeks in America, called ��vision trip.�� Students visited a variety of famous universities and got ��vision�� for the future especially for the choice of the further studying after KMLA, my high school. Every universities I visited was admirable, however, there was a slight difference from each other, for example, the atmosphere, focused field, or general style. It is hard to say which one is either good or bad, yet I can certainly say I like Stanford University, and I like all the things of Stanford, which I was possible to know.

I went to the western America prior to the eastern. No one can deny that the weather is far better. It is calm with both a warm sunshine and a cool breeze. If one is cold, get outside and walk along; if one is hot, walk into the shadow of trees or buildings. And there is no problem about the weather at all. People seem to live with abundant latitude of mind and without any stress. The environment is appropriate for students to enjoy not only studying but also lives. I cannot stop me to love this atmosphere spreading all over the campus.

The campus! It��s also one of things catching my attention. All the buildings: classes, a cafeteria, and even the student center are beautiful enough to make me look around again and take a picture of them. In fact, almost every university I visited has a beautiful campus by a professional architecture. Still, their campuses have roads across the buildings or several markets between classes. Maybe, it��s just that because I am not appropriate, however, I got feeling of a sightseeing resort rather a school. On the other hand, Stanford University gives strong impression as a SCHOOL since there are only academic-purposed buildings.

The most attractive one is of course about an academic view. Stanford University provides well qualified engineering major, my interest. Moreover, Silicon Valley is the powerful resource to the engineering. At the information session, I heard that Silicon Valley gives topic for research to the students and support from financial aid to knowledge. The opportunity is beyond imagination! Furthermore, there is no engineering class in graduate school, which means engineering class in undergraduate is such compelling. After finishing this great engineering course, I can study another field in the graduate school, without limited knowledge about engineering. Another great thing is the small ratio between professors and students. Even one to one is possible when is needed. In KMLA, I sometimes find it hard to study advanced with one teacher and many friends. Yet, many students in one class are needed depending on the style of the subject. Therefore, the flexibility of the ration is one of the greatest characteristics of Stanford University, as I look at it.

There are many graduates from KMLA, attending Stanford University now. I had chance to meet with them and hear about valuable information, for instance, about a school life and admission. They all told me to do whatever I like but continuously. Admission office does not care about what I did but how I did. I must show passion within the things I will have done, and the possible way to show is the time I will invest. Many things with temporary interest cannot appeal anyone in the admission office.

Now, from this motif from vision trip, I am looking for the more strong preparation for my beautiful goal, the Stanford University. As recommended, I will study and do extra activities with passion and concentration. Since not requiring students to decide major until sophomore, the university wants well-balanced students. It��s a difficult point. I should have one specific field I can put all my enthusiasm into, and all the subjects with satisfactory knowledge at the same time. Beyond academy, I have to improve my vulnerable things such as a writing skill. Like this, I will set up schedule with details for myself, for my goal, and for my beautiful future.

I cannot forget the sentence said by the teacher in the information session. ��Be compelling not competitive.�� It cannot be emphasized enough. From now on, it is my own motto and I will be a competitive student.

** Literary Device**

For More Powerful Expression

In the passage of the right stuff, the outstanding pilot is introduced with many other corresponding stories. The story about �Pancho�s Fly Inn?is one of them, which the author is telling with diverse expressions for more efficiency. The author used variety of literary devices; for example parallel syntax, analogy, hyperbole, alliteration, and so on, as well as specific explanation and amiable description for more vivid scene to readers.

By using appropriate literary devices, as I look at it, the author might be able to get readers to be more interested in the passage. Usage of the same words or structure can make rhythms, giving chance to feel the following a flowing of story while understanding it. For instance; �tight white sweaters ad tight pants? everybody she didn�t like was an old bastard or a snofabitch. People she liked were old bastards and sonsabitches, too. In contrast to the flowing parallel syntax, hyperbole and clich?leave profound impression with emphasizing, because those expressions are distinguished from other words with plain expression, such as, she also shocked the pants off them with her vulcanized tongue. In addition, other literary devices like analogy, onomatopoeia, personification, and alliteration are used for enjoyment while reading the story about the completely unknown person whom readers haven�t ever met and are easy to get bored with. There are lots of such literary devices in the passage; so many hard miles on it, metaphor for wrinkles on forehead; screen doors kept banging, onomatopoeia; every eye in the place checked him out; personification; somelame goddamned mouseshit sheepherder form Shane; alliteration. Also, there are many interesting expressions such as �weatherbeaten?(metaphor), making astonishment that sort of expressions are possible, too.

With literary devices, the author unfolded the story by minute explanation for specific imagery. Therefore, it seems that readers are heard about the real story from somewhat frank person. The passage includes numerous specific information about all the full names, and exact times; for example, 1930-style, the old Mount Lowe, Thaddeus S. C. Lowe, Episcopal Church, the Rev. C. Rankin Barnes, etc. Moreover, modifiers, adjective and adverb, are various enough for readers to imagine a perfect and clear picture of what the author is saying without any difficulty. To explain even only one thing, the author also made unlimited caution and used several modifiers.

Furthermore, the tone of the passage is not only explanatory but also amiable and realistic, which also makes it easy to get the detailed picture of the story. The choice of the words by the author, in other words diction, is somewhat colloquial and natural. Hence, anyone can read it without any tension or discomfort.

While studying and finding out what the author used for the more powerful impression to readers, I was able to understand how hard to write. Just for one sentence, for one phrase, and even for a word, the author considerate over and over. Furthermore, I also realize how it is interesting to look for literary devices the author used. From now on, I will put my eyes carefully on these expressions far more than before. Maybe, I also can write the essays with suitable literary devices someday with this new habit.

** family background **

My Lovely Siblings

A question always remains; what would I be different if I do not have any siblings? What is the difference between the two who has siblings and who is the only children. My parents ask me sometimes whether I am satisfied with the fact that I have a sister and a brother. Although that question is always difficult for me to answer, it is definitely certain that I got great influence by my siblings. They have given me variety of valuable advantages.

I had been an only child since I was seven years old. As a young girl, I was somewhat stubborn and used to consider myself as the most important member in family without any blame from my parents. On second thought, my childhood around that time was more happily than any other time, though. However, I did not realize such happiness and envied other friends who have siblings. It seemed to have been exceedingly interesting to play with brothers or sisters. As a result, despite frail health of my mother, I teased for siblings. After all, parents decided to bare a child for me, hardly baring my continuous request. Since, my mother was not healthy enough, I had to be sent to grandparents and lived there for several months. After I came back, there was a extraordinarily cute baby, my sister. At that time, all I had around me was happiness and excitement. Afterwards, on the other hand, I barely could stand the unfamiliar situation that every concern was toward my sister. Consequently, I felt alienated and even thought "mother did not love me." Two years later, I did have a brother to meet the demand of grandparents who want a boy. As my siblings are similar in age, they squabbled with each other more often than sister and I, followed by my serious realization. I used to lock my drawers to forbid sister to touch my own things, and my sister did the same to brother two years later. However, in the perspective of the third person, it seemed to have been brought to a settlement so easily if she endured a little more. Therefore, I got to know how I had been foolish before. Having been familiar with the way to take a broad view of the world and to place myself in another place, I could understand siblings far better than before. That ability to understand others makes me become extremely mature during that period.

Moreover I learned how to reconcile them efficiently due to their excessively frequent quarrels. Always seeing them falling in conflict, there is no one but I who had to make peace when parents were out. It was difficult for the elementary student to convince them not to fight, as they could not understand well what I was taking about. Extremely annoying, I often scolded terribly or even cried myself to make them quiet. However, after a while I slowly got wisdom to solve that problem. Since thy were young, the easiest way was proposing better conditions, for example, candies, ice creams, or pretty pens which they desired to have. However, the older they became, the more the situation was hard to solve with such materials. Later, therefore, I had to convince them not by temporary satisfaction but by reasonable explanation. They understood better at that time if I unfolded in detail either calmly or angrily, according to the situation. After many trial and error, I learned by myself how to control them properly in every different circumference. It is applied in my other life in society as well because there are lots of different kinds of conflict among people. As a result, I am rarely embarrassed whenever experiencing the discord, rather instantly try to arbitrate due to my childhood with siblings.

In addition, I could abruptly enhance ability to concentrate in clamorous place. When I had to study, it was appropriate time for siblings to play actively since I am much older than them. Frequently they came home with their friends after school, and played hide-and-seek. Then, one of their friends hid under my desk when I was studying for a test. I had to concentrate on my work in such a place. In those days, I was really tired and annoying with my situation, yet now it comes to me as a huge advantage as I can focus on studying whether it is silent or not. Because I have no trouble studying in any clamorous place, such as the classroom at break-time, encouraging me to catch up the classes although I slept much more than others. As a result, now I appreciate the far difference of age between my siblings and I.

Most of all, I certainly assured love of my parents as I understand that all they do has rational reasons and there's no better way by observing with siblings. Sometimes, there are variable dissension between parents and children. However, as seeing similar discord of others, my siblings and parents, I am able to consider it objectively and appreciate parents. Furthermore, even though siblings are young, causing parents exhausted, my parents are taking care of me all the time; always leaving food for me when I was late, coming to pick me up at night, trying to have conversation about my school life everyday. It is impossible to thank enough for their love and concern.

Having lived with two siblings for eight years, now I am able to understand others, to reconcile , to concentrate, and to realize how much parents love me. Moreover, I could get such enormous fortes because I have TWO siblings, especially ability to reconcile and concentrate. Therefore, I assume my siblings as one of the greatest fortune in my life.

** Letter **

To My Parents

12. 24. 2003. Wed
Hyun Seong Eun �� �� ��

To parents

Christmas is coming. Did you finish preparation for the Christmas? Here, I can feel that festival is around due to many ornaments in cafeteria and elevators. Christmas carol is ringing as the bell for wakening students. Seniors�� examination ends on Christmas Eve, and many events follow. There will be the dance party and many graduated seniors�� coming from outside. I am looking forward to all of these things. However, I also miss the Christmas tree at home. It��s first time to spend my Christmas time living apart from home. It��s first time to spend Christmas time living apart from you.

I really want to go home whenever I miss delicious food at home or it is too cold to walk around. Especially before going to bed, I want to see all of my family. Since January is the winter vacation, I will go home on 31st, December. Although I am eager to go home, you don��t need to worry as I find it difficult to be accustomed here. It takes far less time to be familiar with room-mates and many other friends and seniors than those in previous schools because we live together and confront often. I can counsel lots of agonies with them and find peace. On the other hand, different from seniors who know all of each other well, I find it difficult to know every 9th wave student since there are 150 friends. I wish I were 8th wave sometimes. In KMLA, the relationship between seniors and us are good for me to feel comfortable like family, having no problem due to home-sick. However, here the schedule is changed too often to catch up sometimes. The time and place of classes are changed every time. I have to concern and concentrate on informing all the time. Anyway, I have to adjust myself in here, sleeping less, not missing every changed schedule, time- control to find sphere time for cleaning or laundry. Another good news; I cannot be in better shape than now. However, it is cold enough for me to bring more warm clothing for later winter after vacation. If student is sick in here, it is terrible to live through. I will put my best effort to take care of myself to be healthy.

There are many teachers teaching each subject. They are professional in their field, and I can ask any questions in break time. In addition, my advisor teacher is Mr. Williams who teach me English. I learn science, math, and English writing for the SAT2 test. In other subjects, I learn not for specific test, but for studying; Geography for understanding general information around the world, History for each presentation about ones interest in history, Korean for abundant vocabulary through Chinese letters, PE for skiing, and Music for Kayagum. As seeing them, I am spending busy time for learning all of this during the classes.

After class and eating dinner, there is self-study time. I usually review what I have learned that day. In most cases, science subjects and some complicated homework take much time. Because textbooks arrived after the classes starts, I have to catch up the progress of classwork in textbooks nowadays. It is busy enough to do all of them. Still, I try hard to make more time for English, especially vocabulary, my weakness, however it is hard. Before, I can use 7th and 8th period, self-study time, for reviewing, however, now I have to ask some questions to teachers at that time as the work becomes hard to understand.

About school regulations, I have violated EOP twice and had EOP lunch. I tried to keep EOP, yet whenever I was excited, I completely forgot about it. However, I enjoy EOP lunch as conversation between teachers is far better than I have thought before. Now, 9th wave students got also caught and went to student court by violating cleaning, curfew, or computer regulation. However, I have not violated such important regulations and gone to the student court. I wish I will not be there for three years later also.

Big news, I will go field trip on April next year to America. I need visa but you don��t need to concern because teachers will make it in bulk. However, I have to look for specific information about eight colleges I will visit. I formed a group who will go with me and we will collect information together. I don��t know exact detailed itinerary yet, however, teacher said he would give me sooner or later. When I get the program, I will tell you more minutely.

I need something to get for classes after vacation. For Gum do, I have to send 350,000 won to teacher for equipment. Furthermore, I need powder of resin for kayagum. I will prepare all of these things during vacation. Also, I need more books to read which many teachers recommended. I planned such things for the vacation to prepare for improvement in myself next semester. Therefore, I am looking forward to vacation. Also I am dying to go home to see all of you. I always love you so much.

December 24th. 2003 Wednesday
Sincerely, Seong Eun

** editing practice **

Why Socialists Don;t Believe in Fun

by. George Orwell

< original essay by George Orwell >

The thought of Christmas raises almost automatically the thought of Charles Dickens, and for two very good reasons. To begin with, Dickens is one of the few English writers who have actually written about Christmas. Christmas is the most popular of English festivals, and yet it has produced astonishingly little literature. There are the carols, mostly medieval in origin; there is a tiny handful of poems by Robert Bridges, T.S. Eliot, and some others, and there is Dickens; but there is very little else. Secondly, Dickens is remarkable, indeed almost unique, among modern writers in being able to give a convincing picture of happiness.

Dickens dealt successfully with Christmas twice in a chapter of The Pickwick Papers and in A Christmas Carol. The latter story was read to Lenin on his deathbed and according to his wife, he found its 'bourgeois sentimentality' completely intolerable. Now in a sense Lenin was right: but if he had been in better health he would perhaps have noticed that the story has interesting sociological implications. To begin with, however thick Dickens may lay on the paint, however disgusting the 'pathos' of Tiny Tim may be, the Cratchit family give the impression of enjoying themselves. They sound happy as, for instance, the citizens of William Morris's News From Nowhere don't sound happy. Moreover and Dickens's understanding of this is one of the secrets of his power their happiness derives mainly from contrast. They are in high spirits because for once in a way they have enough to eat. The wolf is at the door, but he is wagging his tail. The steam of the Christmas pudding drifts across a background of pawnshops and sweated labour, and in a double sense the ghost of Scrooge stands beside the dinner table. Bob Cratchit even wants to drink to Scrooge's health, which Mrs Cratchit rightly refuses. The Cratchits are able to enjoy Christmas precisely because it only comes once a year. Their happiness is convincing just because Christmas only comes once a year. Their happiness is convincing just because it is described as incomplete.

All efforts to describe permanent happiness, on the other hand, have been failures. Utopias (incidentally the coined word Utopia doesn't mean 'a good place', it means merely a 'non-existent place') have been common in literature of the past three or four hundred years but the 'favourable' ones are invariably unappetising, and usually lacking in vitality as well.

By far the best known modern Utopias are those of H.G. Wells. Wells's vision of the future is almost fully expressed in two books written in the early Twenties, The Dream and Men Like Gods. Here you have a picture of the world as Wells would like to see it or thinks he would like to see it. It is a world whose keynotes are enlightened hedonism and scientific curiosity. All the evils and miseries we now suffer from have vanished. Ignorance, war, poverty, dirt, disease, frustration, hunger, fear, overwork, superstition all vanished. So expressed, it is impossible to deny that that is the kind of world we all hope for. We all want to abolish the things Wells wants to abolish. But is there anyone who actually wants to live in a Wellsian Utopia? On the contrary, not to live in a world like that, not to wake up in a hygenic garden suburb infested by naked schoolmarms, has actually become a conscious political motive. A book like Brave New World is an expression of the actual fear that modern man feels of the rationalised hedonistic society which it is within his power to create. A Catholic writer said recently that Utopias are now technically feasible and that in consequence how to avoid Utopia had become a serious problem. We cannot write this off as merely a silly remark. For one of the sources of the Fascist movement is the desire to avoid a too -rational and too-comfortable world.

All 'favourable' Utopias seem to be alike in postulating perfection while being unable to suggest happiness. News From Nowhere is a sort of goody-goody version of the Wellsian Utopia. Everyone is kindly and reasonable, all the upholstery comes from Liberty's, but the impression left behind is of a sort of watery melancholy. But it is more impressive that Jonathan Swift, one of the greatest imaginative writers who have ever lived, is no more successful in constructing a 'favourable' Utopia than the others.

The earlier parts of Gulliver's Travels are probably the most devastating attack on human society that has ever been written. Every word of them is relevant today; in places they contain quite detailed prophecies of the political horrors of our own time. Where Swift fails, however, is in trying to describe a race of beings whom he admires. In the last part, in contrast with disgusting Yahoos, we are shown the noble Houyhnhnms, intelligent horses who are free from human failings. Now these horses, for all their high character and unfailing common sense, are remarkably dreary creatures. Like the inhabitants of various other Utopias, they are chiefly concerned with avoiding fuss. They live uneventful, subdued, 'reasonable' lives, free not only from quarrels, disorder or insecurity of any kind, but also from 'passion', including physical love. They choose their mates on eugenic principles, avoid excesses of affection, and appear somewhat glad to die when their time comes. In the earlier parts of the book Swift has shown where man's folly and scoundrelism lead him: but take away the folly and scoundrelism, and all you are left with, apparently, is a tepid sort of existence, hardly worth leading.

Attempts at describing a definitely other-worldly happiness have been no more successful. Heaven is as great a flop as Utopia though Hell occupies a respectable place in literature, and has often been described most minutely and convincingly.

It is a commonplace that the Christian Heaven, as usually portrayed, would attract nobody. Almost all Christian writers dealing with Heaven either say frankly that it is indescribable or conjure up a vague picture of gold, precious stones, and the endless singing of hymns. This has, it is true, inspired some of the best poems in the world: Thy walls are of chalcedony, Thy bulwarks diamonds square, Thy gates are of right orient pearl Exceeding rich and rare! But what it could not do was to describe a condition in which the ordinary human being actively wanted to be. Many a revivalist minister, many a Jesuit priest (see, for instance, the terrific sermon in James Joyce's Portrait of the Artist) has frightened his congregation almost out of their skins with his word-pictures of Hell. But as soon as it comes to Heaven, there is a prompt falling-back on words like 'ecstasy' and 'bliss', with little attempt to say what they consist in. Perhaps the most vital bit of writing on this subject is the famous passage in which Tertullian explains that one of the chief joys of Heaven is watching the tortures of the damned.

The pagan versions of Paradise are little better, if at all. One has the feeling it is always twilight in the Elysian fields. Olympus, where the gods lived, with their nectar and ambrosia, and their nymphs and Hebes, the 'immortal tarts' as D.H. Lawrence called them, might be a bit more homelike than the Christian Heaven, but you would not want to spend a long time there. As for the Muslim Paradise, with its 77 houris per man, all presumably clamouring for attention at the same moment, it is just a nightmare. Nor are the spiritualists, though constantly assuring us that 'all is bright and beautiful', able to describe any next-world activity which a thinking person would find endurable, let alone attractive.

It is the same with attempted descriptions of perfect happiness which are neither Utopian nor other-worldly, but merely sensual. They always give an impression of emptiness or vulgarity, or both. At the beginning of La Pucelle Voltaire describes the life of Charles IX with his mistress, Agnes Sorel. They were 'always happy', he says. And what did their happiness consist in? An endless round of feasting, drinking, hunting and love-making. Who would not sicken of such an existence after a few weeks? Rabelais describes the fortunate spirits who have a good time in the next world to console them for having had a bad time in this one. They sing a song which can be roughly translated: 'To leap, to dance, to play tricks, to drink the wine both white and red, and to do nothing all day long except count gold crowns' how boring it sounds, after all! The emptiness of the whole notion of an everlasting 'good time' is shown up in Breughel's picture The Land of the Sluggard, where the three great lumps of fat lie asleep, head to head, with the boiled eggs and roast legs of pork coming up to be eaten of their own accord.

It would seem that human beings are not able to describe, nor perhaps to imagine, happiness except in terms of contrast. That is why the conception of Heaven or Utopia varies from age to age. In pre-industrial society Heaven was described as a place of endless rest, and as being paved with gold, because the experience of the average human being was overwork and poverty. The houris of the Muslim Paradise reflected a polygamous society where most of the women disappeared into the harems of the rich. But these pictures of 'eternal bliss' always failed because as the bliss became eternal (eternity being thought of as endless time), the contrast ceased to operate. Some of the conventions embedded in our literature first arose from physical conditions which have now ceased to exist. The cult of spring is an example. In the Middle Ages spring did not primarily mean swallows and wild flowers. It meant green vegetables, milk and fresh meat after several months of living on salt pork in smoky windowless huts. The spring songs were gay Do nothing but eat and make good cheer, And thank Heaven for the merry year When flesh is cheap and females dear, And lusty lads roam here and there So merrily, And ever among so merrily! because there was something to be so gay about. The winter was over, that was the great thing. Christmas itself, a pre-Christian festival, probably started because there had to be an occasional outburst of overeating and drinking to make a break in the unbearable northern winter.

The inability of mankind to imagine happiness except in the form of relief, either from effort or pain, presents Socialists with a serious problem. Dickens can describe a poverty-stricken family tucking into a roast goose, and can make them appear happy; on the other hand, the inhabitants of perfect universes seem to have no spontaneous gaiety and are usually somewhat repulsive into the bargain. But clearly we are not aiming at the kind of world Dickens described, nor, probably, at any world he was capable of imagining. The Socialist objective is not a society where everything comes right in the end, because kind old gentlemen give away turkeys. What are we aiming at, if not a society in which 'charity' would be unnecessary? We want a world where Scrooge, with his dividends, and Tiny Tim, with his tuberculous leg, would both be unthinkable. But does that mean we are aiming at some painless, effortless Utopia? At the risk of saying something which the editors of Tribune may not endorse, I suggest that the real objective of Socialism is not happiness. Happiness hitherto has been a by-product, and for all we know it may always remain so. The real objective of Socialism is human brotherhood. This is widely felt to be the case, though it is not usually said, or not said loudly enough. Men use up their lives in heart-breaking political struggles, or get themselves killed in civil wars, or tortured in the secret prisons of the Gestapo, not in order to establish some central-heated, air-conditioned, strip-lighted Paradise, but because they want a world in which human beings love one another instead of swindling and murdering one another. And they want that world as a first step. Where they go from there is not so certain, and the attempt to foresee it in detail merely confuses the issue.

Socialist thought has to deal in prediction, but only in broad terms. One often has to aim at objectives which one can only very dimly see. At this moment, for instance, the world is at war and wants peace. Yet the world has no experience of peace, and never has had, unless the Noble Savage once existed. The world wants something which it is dimly aware could exist, but cannot accurately define. This Christmas Day, thousands of men will be bleeding to death in the Russian snows, or drowning in icy waters, or blowing one another to pieces on swampy islands of the Pacific; homeless children will be scrabbling for food among the wreckage of German cities. To make that kind of thing impossible is a good objective. But to say in detail what a peaceful world would be like is a different matter.

Nearly all creators of Utopia have resembled the man who has toothache, and therefore thinks happiness consists in not having toothache. They wanted to produce a perfect society by an endless continuation of something that had only been valuable because it was temporary. The wider course would be to say that there are certain lines along which humanity must move, the grand strategy is mapped out, but detailed prophecy is not our business. Whoever tries to imagine perfection simply reveals his own emptiness. This is the case even with a great writer like Swift, who can flay a bishop or a politician so neatly, but who, when he tries to create a superman, merely leaves one with the impression the very last he can have intended that the stinking Yahoos had in them more possibility of development than the enlightened Houyhnhnms.

< Edited by myself for all possiilites from organization to vocabulary>

Utopias do not necessarily mean ��a good place��, but a ��non-existent place��. Utopias are expressed in many different kinds of literary forms promoting a variety of ideas, placing forward different benefits and sharing different values and motives. However, there are some side effects and drawbacks that contradict to the original definition of Utopias. Therefore, Utopias cannot be defined. In the case of socialists, however, their main objective is not to achieve happiness or Utopia, but to support human brotherhood instead. This is a more efficient way to maintain a balanced society.

By far the best known modern Utopias are those of H. G. Wells. Wells��s vision of the future is almost fully expressed in two books written in the early twenties, The Dream and Men Like Gods. Here you have a picture of the world as Wells would like to see or thinks he would like to see. It is a world whose keynotes are enlightened hedonism and scientific curiosity. All the evils and miseries we now suffer from have vanished. Ignorance, war, poverty, dirt, disease, frustration, hunger, fear, overwork, and superstition all vanished. So expressed, it is impossible to deny that that is the kind of world we all hope for. We all want to abolish the things Wells wants to abolish. But is there anyone who actually wants to live in a Wellsian Utopia? Wellsian Utopias possess a sense of superficiality having shallow meaning; leaving almost zero imprintment. On the contrary, not to live in a world like that, and not to wake up in a hygenic garden suburb infested by naked schoolmarms, has actually become a conscious political motive. A book like Brave New World is an expression of the actual fear that modern man feels of the rationalised hedonistic society which it is within his power to create. A Catholic writer said recently that Utopias are now technically feasible and, in consequence, how to avoid Utopia had become a serious problem. We cannot write this off as merely a silly remark. One of the sources of the Fascist movement is the desire to avoid a too-rational and too-comfortable world.

All ��favourable�� Utopias seem to be alike in postulating perfection while being unable to suggest happiness. News From Nowhere is more of a positive outlook of the Wellsian Utopia. Everyone is kindly and reasonable, all the upholstery comes from Liberty��s, but the impression left behind is of a sort of watery melancholy. But it is more impressive that Jonathan Swift, one of the greatest imaginative writers who have ever lived, is no more successful in constructing a ��favourable�� Utopia than the others.

The earlier parts of Gulliver��s Travels are probably the most devastating attack on human society that has ever been written. Every word of them is relevant today; in places they contain quite detailed prophecies of the political horrors of our own time. Where Swift fails, however, is in trying to describe a race of beings whom he admires. In the last part, in contrast with disgusting Yahoos, we are shown the noble Houyhnhnms, intelligent horses who are free from human failings. Now these horses, for all their high characters and unfailing common sense, are remarkably dreary creatures. Like the inhabitants of various other Utopias, they are chiefly concerned with avoiding fuss. They live uneventful, subdued, and reasonable lives, free not only from quarrels, disorder or insecurity of any kind, but also from ��passion��, including physical love. They choose their mates on eugenic principles, avoid excesses of affection, and appear somewhat glad to die when their time comes. In the earlier parts of the book Swift has shown the significants of folly and scoundrelism. Without the two factors, you end up with a tepid sort of existence, hardly worth continuing.

The result Utopias in these literatures are not likely what we have wanted, because the desirable Utopias and happiness come from contrast, which can not exist in Utopias. For example, we feel happy around Christmas since it only comes once in a year. The thought of Christmas raises the thought of Charles Dickens almost automatically, for two very good reasons. To begin with, Dickens is one of the few English writers who have actually written about Christmas. Christmas is the most popular of all English festivals, yet little literature has been produced about it. There are the carols, mostly medieval in origin; there is a tiny handful of poems by Robert Bridges, T.S. Eliot, and Dickens. Secondly, Dickens is remarkable, indeed almost unique, among modern writers in being able to give a convincing picture of happiness.

Dickens dealt successfully with Christmas twice in a chapter of The Pickwick Papers and in A Christmas Carol. The latter story was read to Lenin on his deathbed and according to his wife, he found its ��bourgeois sentimentality�� completely intolerable. Now in a sense Lenin was right, but if he had been in better health he would perhaps have noticed that the story has interesting sociological implications. To begin with, however thick Dickens may lay on the paint, however disgusting the ��pathos�� of Tiny Tim may be, the Cratchit family give the impression of enjoying themselves. They sound happy in contrast to the citizens of William Morris��s News From Nowhere. Moreover, Dickens��s understanding of this is one of the secrets of his power that explains the fact that their happiness derives mainly from contrast. They are in high spirits because for once in a way they have enough to eat. The wolf is at the door, but he is wagging his tail. The steam of the Christmas pudding drifts across a background of pawnshops and sweated labour, and simultaneously the ghost of Scrooge stands beside the Crachit dinner table. Bob Cratchit even wants to drink to Scrooge��s health, which Mrs Cratchit rightly refuses. The Cratchits are able to enjoy Christmas precisely because it only comes once a year. Their happiness is convincing just because Christmas only comes once a year. Their happiness is convincing just because it is described as incomplete.

Therefore, it would seem that human beings are not able to describe, nor perhaps to imagine, happiness except in terms of contrast. That is why the conception of Heaven or Utopia varies from age to age. In pre-industrial society Heaven was described as a place of endless rest, and as being paved with gold, because the experience of the average human being was overwork and poverty. The houris of the Muslim Paradise reflected a polygamous society where most of the women disappeared into the harems of the rich. But these pictures of ��eternal bliss�� always failed because as the bliss became eternal (eternity being thought of as endless time), the contrast ceased to operate. Some of the conventions embedded in our literature first arose from physical conditions which have now ceased to exist. The cult of spring is an example. In the Middle Ages spring did not primarily mean swallows and wild flowers. It meant green vegetables, milk and fresh meat after several months of living on salt pork in smoky windowless huts. The spring songs were gay Do nothing but eat and make good cheer, And thank Heaven for the merry year When flesh is cheap and females dear, And lusty lads roam here and there so merrily, And ever among so merrily! because there was something to be so gay about. The winter was over, that was the great thing. Christmas itself, a pre-Christian festival, probably started because there had to be an occasional outburst of overeating and drinking to make a break in the unbearable northern winter.

All efforts to describe permanent happiness, have been failures neither. Literature about Utopias have made frquent entries to the world of arts from the past three or four hundred years with a wrong definition. Literature written about ��favourable�� Utopias so far lack in vitality and are invariably unappetising because they lack the significant contrast.

Many people can assume that Utopias are similar with the heaven. Almost all Christian writers dealing with Heaven either say frankly that it is indescribable or conjure up a vague picture of gold, precious stones, and the endless singing of hymns. This has, it is true, inspired some of the best poems in the world:
Thy walls are of chalcedony,
Thy bulwarks diamonds square,
Thy gates are of right orient pearl
Exceeding rich and rare!

But what it could not do was to describe a condition in which the ordinary human being actively wanted to be. Many a revivalist minister, many a Jesuit priest (see, for instance, the terrific sermon in James Joyce��s Portrait of the Artist) has frightened his congregation almost out of their skins with his word-pictures of Hell. But as soon as it comes to Heaven, there is a prompt falling-back on words like ��ecstasy�� and ��bliss��, with little attempt to say what they consist in. Perhaps the most vital bit of writing on this subject is the famous passage in which Tertullian explains that one of the chief joys of Heaven is watching the tortures of the doomed.

The pagan versions of Paradise are little better, if at all. One has the feeling it is always twilight in the Elysian fields. Olympus, where the gods lived, with their nectar and ambrosia, and their nymphs and Hebes, the ��immortal tarts�� as D. H. Lawrence called them, might be a bit more homelike than the Christian Heaven, but you would not want to spend a long time there. As for the Muslim Paradise, with its 77 houris per man, all presumably clamouring for attention at the same moment, it is just a nightmare. Nor are the spiritualists, though constantly assuring us that ��all is bright and beautiful��, able to describe any next-world activity which a thinking person would find endurable, let alone attractive.

It is the same with attempted descriptions of perfect happiness which are neither Utopian nor other-worldly, but merely sensual. They always give an impression of emptiness or vulgarity, or both. At the beginning of La Pucelle Voltaire describes the life of Charles IX with his mistress, Agnes Sorel. They were ��always happy��, he says. And what did their happiness consist in? An endless round of feasting, drinking, hunting and love-making. Who would not sicken of such an existence after a few weeks? Rabelais describes the fortunate spirits who have a good time in the next world to console them for having had a bad time in this one. They sing a song which can be roughly translated: ��To leap, to dance, to play tricks, to drink the wine both white and red, and to do nothing all day long except count gold crowns�� how boring it sounds, after all! The emptiness of the whole notion of an everlasting ��good time�� is shown up in Breughel��s picture The Land of the Sluggard, where the three great lumps of fat lie asleep, head to head, with the boiled eggs and roast legs of pork coming up to be eaten of their own accord.

As a result, happiness and ideal society cannot appear without deficiency. Nearly all creators of Utopia have resembled the man who has a toothache, and therefore thinks happiness consists in not having a toothache. They wanted to produce a perfect society by continuing an endless cycle; replacing substitutes with temporary values. The wider course would be to say that there are certain lines along which humanity must move, the grand strategy is mapped out, but detailed prophecy is not our business. Whoever tries to imagine perfection simply reveals his own emptiness. This is the case even with a great writer like Swift, who can flay a bishop or a politician so neatly, but who, when he tries to create a superman, merely leaves one with the impression the very last he can have intended that the stinking Yahoos had in them more possibility of development than the enlightened Houyhnhnms.

The inability of mankind to imagine happiness except in the form of relief, either from effort or pain, presents Socialists with a serious problem. Dickens can describe a poverty-stricken family tucking into a roast goose, and can make them appear happy; on the other hand, the inhabitants of perfect universes seem to have no spontaneous gaiety and are usually somewhat repulsive into the bargain. But clearly we are not aiming at the kind of world Dickens described, nor, probably, at any world he was capable of imagining. The Socialist objective is not a society where everything comes right in the end, because kind old gentlemen give away turkeys. What are we aiming at, if not a society in which ��charity�� would be unnecessary? We want a world where Scrooge, with his dividends, and Tiny Tim, with his tuberculous leg, would both be unthinkable. But does that mean we are aiming at some painless, effortless Utopia? At the risk of saying something which the editors of Tribune may not endorse, I suggest that the real objective of Socialism is not happiness. Happiness hitherto has been a by-product, and for all we know it may always remain so. The real objective of Socialism is human brotherhood. This is widely felt to be the case, though it is not usually said, or not said loudly enough. Men use up their lives in heart-breaking political struggles, or get themselves killed in civil wars, or tortured in the secret prisons of the Gestapo, not in order to establish some central-heated, air-conditioned, strip-lighted Paradise, but because they want a world in which human beings love one another instead of swindling and murdering one another. And they want that world as a first step. Where they go from there is not so certain, and the attempt to foresee it in detail merely confuses the issue.

The socialist thought, on the other hand, has to deal with problems with such uncertain prediction for ideal world. One often has to aim at objectives which one can only see very dimly. At this moment, for instance, the world is at war and wants peace. Yet the world has no experience of peace, and never has had, unless the Noble Savage once existed. The world wants something which is dimly aware could exist, but cannot accurately define. By this time, the socialists�� beliefs of brotherhood carries out a more ideal society than such a vague objective of Utopias and happiness. Therefore, we must invent a new way to construct a society with favorable conditions and upright human motives by promoting human brotherhood.

** 10th grade 1st semester final term paper**

9-th wave critical reading list

Students at KMLA usually take ��Critical Reading�� tests twice a month during each semester. Recently, English faculty members selected books for students to read for next semester through plentiful controversies. At last, only literary classics were chosen for this semester for 9th-wave students, for example, A Tale of Two Cities or Things Fall Apart. Therefore, books, which are not literature, were voted off the Critical Reading List. Among them are Emerging Viruses by L. Horowitz, Siddharta by H. Hess, Shakyamuni Buddha by Niwano, and The Story of Philosophy by Will Durant. The first one is about the AIDS controversy - whether this virus is created by men or by nature. The others are about many different kinds of religions throughout the world. Apparently, most of them are neither novels nor literary classics; hence, they were taken off, because considered helpless or even harmful to students. From this issue, it is known that there may be diverse opinions about selecting books for Critical Reading tests: Should they be only from literary classics or from a diverse spectrum?

Some English teachers assert that only literary classics are needed in our Critical Reading Program. This point of view aims at helping our students gain entry into good universities after KMLA. For the AP Literature test, students are required to have approximately 700 hours of classes generally, while KMLA provides only 120 hours. Also, KMLA students already lack one year, due to difference between Korean and US curriculum in the education systems and students cannot read as well English literary classics as American students might. During the whole high-school years hear, reading even 100 books is difficult, here. Therefore, many students have taken the AP Literature test without reading enough books. Then, some of teachers say that students still lack time, even though students read all Critical Reading Books, which consists of all literary classics. Literary classics are useful not only for the AP Literature test but also for the application to universities. I was advised many times to take notes of good sentences or topics when reading books for the Critical Reading test. Because they are all famous works, citing from them will add great value to the essays we write in our college application and facts.

On the other hand, there are a variety of valuable books other than literary classics. To read only for the AP tests is a shortsighted behavior. People should read for knowledge and experience as well, rather than better scores in immediate future. Although there are many themes and topics in literary classics, many of ideas are limited because literature is either apocryphal or rearranged story. Knowledge or experience based totally on literature, therefore, cannot be perfect and inclusive. Thus, a diverse and broad spectrum of reading should be done during our school life. Students do not have enough time to sufficiently experience many various issues in the world, and many issues we really need to know before entering the society. Especially for the ��ivy field��, they should practice handling many different points of views, as they will confront many friends from different environments, and many colleagues having many different concepts.

How can students know there are theories that the AIDS virus might be man-made without reading this issue? There are no specific subjects in our school for studying, understanding, or evaluating, in depth, current events around the world. As portrayed in the book, entitled Emerging Viruses, there is more and more evidence suggesting the AIDS virus was created. In Part ?, especially in Chapter 17, the book provides abundant evidence that CIA in America intentionally made the virus. It had been believed that the viruses were due to monkeys and called ��jumped species��: monkeys to human, yet some real pictures show the origin of AIDS were from the laboratory. Because the ��man-made�� AIDS virus contracts common belief so shockingly that this jumped lab theory is considered conspiracy theory����the suggestion that AIDS is actually a man-made disease and the statement that the disease was meant to deliberately wipe out a certain segment of the population in an act of genocide,�� which the Wikimedia Foundation website defined. As more evidence comes out, however, it has become real conspiracies rather than a conspiracy theory which is ��difficult to support with evidence,�� expressed by the Wikimedia Foundation website again. AIDS is an important issue because this causes one of a few fatal and untreatable diseases. Then, this obviously becomes a big issue in the world while there is no other way to obtain knowledge about it except reading. I was also extremely shocked about this theory and more shocked that I have not known about this idea until now.

Religion or Ethical conflict is a difficult subject for students to understand because most classes do not cover the topic deeply, although this issue is very important in many subjects such as international studies, politics, and history. Even though, these issues are introduced in the newspaper or magazines often; I cannot understand the complexities and therefore tend to overlook them. I find difficulties in understanding the exact reason for the conflicts in the Middle East no matter how many times I read the articles. I could only guess from several newspaper articles that people there have different religions but lay claim to the same sacred ground; hence, they fight one another for keeping their claims. Also, there may be the problem related to the ownership of oil. However, the reason for problems seems too vague, and I often inquire about further specific information when I hear about the acts of terrors or military attacks there. But, to my disappointment, conflict in Middle East can be explained obviously only with more deeply explaining about every religion existing in the nearby Middle East Asia. We need much time to study about all religions. Yet, there is no subject called ��comparative religion�� in high school. There is a possibility that I will learn more on these topics through other subjects in Sophomore year or in Senior year. However, students will not get any pains by knowing or just tasting a little about it through some books such as Siddharta, Shakyamuni Buddha, or The Meaning of Koran. For example, in the introduction part in the book called Islamic Peril, there is an explanation about what brings the conflict and the terror in the Middle East. I could not have known the names of key books about religion like Islamic Peril, without the suggestion from the teacher. Unless teachers help, I will not know where the resources are or where I should start to research about comparative religion. The role of teachers is teaching not only about gained knowledge but also about the direction to search out information by oneself. Teachers can teach how to research through many other ways, but is there any problem if using the way of reading such books during the CRP(Critical Reading Program)?

All students are not going to take the AP Literature Test, thus, choosing literary classics for AP test is not logical at all, since every student in fact must take the Critical Reading Test. And for our college applications, there are also good sentences including valuable ideas or topics in non-literary classics. Besides, broader reading can lead students to think deeper and to write essays even better. Some teachers argue that it is dangerous for immature students to read about religious problems without our students having abundant background information. The truth is actually the reverse. Reading such books is part of our job toward acquiring abundant background information. Some teachers worry that students�� thinking will become biased, because of the influence from reading books about religion and such new theories. Here, also, the reverse is true. Students ought to read diverse kinds of books, so as not to be biased��by learning to understand all points of view, from every corner of the world.

The problem arises because of varied thought considering the purpose of the Critical Reading Program. Faculty members who object to the list from Mr. Johnson might be considering that the CRP is the opportunity to evaluate only English skills. This point of view is reasonable enough, because the score of the Critical Reading Test is included in the English score, on our report card. One teacher said, ��So, the word ��banned�� is misused because none of teachers would say that you must ��not�� read these books��just that they are not appropriate books for the CRP.�� Therefore, if students read what Mr. Johnson suggested, the score of the test should be included also in history, ethics, or philosophy; if supposing we could have such classes.

On the contrary, others can think that the purpose of the CRP is to allow a great chance to encounter extra knowledge from a varied range of books. Teachers should suggest books from every subject around us at least one time; as students are not yet interested in the important issues in each field; because the experiences of student are limited, despite their sufficient aptitude. Through reading a diverse spectrum of books, students are able to have profound knowledge. Suggested books will give potential to students as it enables to choose their majors from more subjects. In addition, English is not the subject to study just how to read and understand alphabets. English is not the subject of just studying how to find out themes or literary devices from passages. English is the study of learning how to use English. If students always read only literary classics, they will have difficulty in reading other sorts of books later. We study English to be able to understand and absorb thoroughly every kind of ideological forms written in English. Therefore, the score of tests on how to understand as well philosophical or religious books written in English should be added to our English score, without any objection.

In conclusion, CRP should cover as many different kinds of books as possible. Then, CRP will give students the opportunity to confront many other words that are not likely to be in literary texts and the ample background to solve various problems in the larger society. Next year, in addition to fine literature, I anticipate seeing religious, philosophical, scientific, or historical books as well on the CR list.

Works Cited

Eltahawy, Mona. ��The Wahhabi Threat to Islam.�� Washington Post 6 Jun. 2004 : B07.

Schmemann, Serge. ��Disrupting the Zero-Sum Game Between Palestinians and Israelis�� New York Times 4 May. 2004 : 28.

Leonard G, Horowitz. Emerging Viruses : AIDS & Ebola �C Nature, Accident or Intentional? Massachusetts : Tetrahedron, 1988.

Karim, Karim H. Islamic Peril : media and global violence. Montreal : Black Rose Books, 2000.

Author. AIDS conspiracy theories. 15 Jan. 2001. Wikimedia Foundation. 6 Jun. 2004

Author. Conspiracy theory. 15 Jan. 2001. Wikimedia Foundation. 6 Jun. 2004

** Ethic Group Presentation **

Korean Palace Food

My group �赵��, ������, �����, and me will start the presentation. We were interested in food culture in Korea and narrow down the point to the food in palace. Hence the topic of my group is '��������'. So we will introduce you the sorts of food, how to make and display it, and the comparison between Eastern food and Western. Then, first of all, I will focus especially on which specific kind of food the royalty had eaten.

Do you know how they got raw material to make food for kings and queens? Since they were the noblest people, all the principal products were taken in the palace from every corner of the country, individually. We called such material food as '����' in Korean. It is prepared for all royalty members like the king, queen, crown prince, princess, and even to former king and queen. The catalog of the goods was decided certainly by the king ���� and ����. There are two different kinds of ����. One is �輱 and the other one is õ��. �輱 is the catalog for monthly offered products. They were transported every first day in the month. From this list, we can presume the specific principal products(Ư�깰) from each city and also how they measured food at that time. Most of them were raw material like meat, fish, fruits, and vegetables, but, there was also some already cooked food such as ���� or ���.
On the other hand, õ�� is an offering of the seasonal goods. From this we can know which products we can harvest in which season.

Now, you can guess how the quality of the palace food was high, based on the valuable principal products. The table for the kings is called �����, so maybe many students here will think ���� is all the food for kings, but that is not true. ���� is the word only for the rice.
There are three types of ����: �����, �ϼ���, and �������. ����� is a typical rice and ������� is ����� which you already know. But �ϼ��� is peculiar. It is not a rice made of red beans but the rice using water from boiled red-beans. There are also many other kinds of staple food, for example, �����, ��, ����, and ���� other than the rice.
In the palace, they make ����� by putting together already cooked meat and vegetable with a little fish or fried on. However, they did not use ������ for kings because it is too hot. Usually, ����� was eaten on the last day of the year while ���� was for the first day of the year. It means they eat all the food from last year and begin a new year happily.
Second, they made �� for the breakfast while typical people eat it when they are sick so cannot digest well. �� in palace consists of ����, Ÿ����, ��������, ��ȭ���� and so on which are ordinarily made of grains. Sometimes they used beef and ���� but not vegetables or fish.
They made ���� when there were a lot of visitors because it is easy to make. You see, you can make noodles in advance and when visitors come, just put soup and make the table. Buckwheat were preferly used rather than wheat in the palace. There are �屹, ��ĩ��, �������, ��ż���, �¸�, ����, ���̸�. ���� was also made of buckwheat, not of wheat, and there are �屹����, ��ġ����, ���Ƹ���, ��ġ���� and so on.

With the staple food, there are also soup, pot stews, and side dishes. Number one, the soup. Usually ���� was made using cows' �����Ӹ�, ����, �����, ������, for example, ������(������), ����, ��������, ������, ����, �ΰ���. There are other kinds of �� also, as you see here. ������; ����, ����ⱹ, �̿���, ����, ������, �����, �ʱ���, û����, �Ͼ���, ȣ�ڲ���, ������, ���屹; ��������, and �ñ�; ������, ���̳ñ�, �̿��ñ�.
For a pot stew, they used either ������ or salt and ������ for seasoning, yet infact, ������ is less preferred as in �����. And they used �κ�, ȣ��, ��, ���� to make it more appetizing. The pot stew required a cooking in a double boiler which means cooks did not boil it directly. There are �԰���, ���̰���, �����, ���̵�����ġ, ���κ���ġ, ��ȣ��������ġ, ��������ġ, ����ġ and ������ġ.
���� is delicious combination of meat and vegetable with an appropriate seasoning. It is impromptu cook, if not it is called ���� when it is cooked in advance. There are ���̸�, ��������, �κ�����.
They made �� by boiling either with the water or with the steam. With the water, �谥��, �貿��, ����, �������� were put on weak fire for a considerably long time Then the meat became soft. With the steam, however, mostly vegetables, fish, shrimp, and shellfish were used. There are ������, �η���, ������, ������, ������, �׼���, ����, ���߲�����, �켳��, ������, ������, ���ߴ���.
Vegetable was almost same with what common people ate at that time. And there are ����, called ������ in the palace, made of meat, fish, shellfish, and vegetable especially, ����, �ξ�, and �κ�. This was made somewhat spicy and sweat, differed from other food that always tried to be flat. The longer the ���� has to be stored, the more spicy the seasoning was done. There are ����������, ����������, and ��ȶ���, For the grilled food, there are several kinds; white-flesh fish; such as �ξ�, �뱸 and marine products as ��, ����, ����, and also used Dz����, ��ȣ��, ���� and so on. The way of cooking is same with common people's.
Using almost all possible food, they made ����. ���� can be divided by the seasoning; salt, �����, and ������. �豸��, ��������, ��������, �Ұ��� are typical food. There are ��������, �ʺ�ƴ�, ������, �߻���, ��ġ����, ���ձ���, and ��������.
There are also ȸ, ��, ����, ��, and ��. They are also similar with common people did. Therefore I will skip the details about them.

Now I expect you to get image of what kinds of food were eaten in the palace. Yet, to talk about the food, I cannot exclude holidays or festive days, cause we eat special food on those days. So did loyalties.
There is so-called ���� which is the food which they ate on the festive days once a month. With �ý� which is the seasonal food, we call them ������, which worth study further for tradition of food in Korea.
And there are four big festivals in the palace. ���� ź��, ����(����), ����(��������), ����. Common people also celebrated ������, �ܿ�, and �߼�, for the beginning of the new season, but, royalty just changed their clothes for coming seasons and did not consider them as important.

At last, I want to make sure several things now. One, there are both similarity and difference between royalty's food and plebeians' in the point of how to make it or when to eat it, and so on and so forth. During the presentation, I especially pointed out the difference between them and wished you to catch. Two, because there are a lot of food, it is hard to say one characteristic for all ��������. Still, its tendency to be flat is overall peculiarity of ��������. In other words, it avoids spicy and hot seasoning all the ways. Three, Well, in fact, this is also true for other kinds of food as well. But, still, they chose appropriate for season or happening at that time. Four, �������� consisted of highly chosen first-class food. All of them was from commoners who could not eat such a great food even once during their whole lifetime.
Thus, from the most valuable food throughout the country, the table for the family in the palace was the best of all. All should be perfect and number 1 from A to Z. It has both positive and negative effects. Because they had to make the table the best, the skill for making food could develop more and more. [You can see from the picture how the food is delicate and would be delicious also.] And the cook in the palace was so formal that information about �������� was well preserved.
On the other side, the more and more valuable and expensive the food became, the worse and worse the lives of typical people became, because they had to dedicate principal products as a tax. So the table in palace was from all the effort and sometimes suffering from the low class or middle class people. It is one way of exploitation by high class.
Now, there is no more king, queen or palace. No more high-class people and exploitation. Then, there only remains the advantage of �������� in a present society. Therefore, we should maintain and expand such merits to make this treasure more precious to later generation.
This is all about my presentation and next, ������ will tell you more about ��������.
Thank you.

** Book Report **

The Old Man and The Sea


by. Ernest Hemingway

I wrote the one-paragraph response after reading The Old Man and the Sea by Ernest Hemingway. I uploaded every writing including the first and second draft to see how I edit for development, later.

< First Draft >
The main character, the old man, is weak and old. Yet, he tries his best to catch fish but the result is just nothing. If the consequence is not corresponding to one��s anticipation or effort, one is easily frustrated and gives up everything he has done so far. I also experience difficulty for many times whenever the grades in the school are not fine although those grades are very trivial in my life. I have often thought of giving up or changing my plan for the future easily. The old man, however, continues to go to see and seek for fish, his job, which shows his strong will. Even though the situation is desperately hopeless, the present society needs people like the old man rather than myself. If everyone is capricious, who will take charge of hard work requiring long time and endurance? Therefore, readers may realize the potential strength in the weak old man against the relentless sea who does not give any fish to him: like strong firm man against the present society.

< Second Draft >
The main character, the old man, is weak and old. He tried his best to catch fish, but the result was just nothing. If the consequence does not correspond to one��s expectation or effort, one will be easily frustrated and will give up everything he has done so far. Even I, myself, have also frustrated for many times whenever I could not get the expected grades in school, which are very trivial in my life. Also, I have often thought of giving up or changing my future plan easily. The old man, however, continued his job seeking for fish, which showed his strong will. The old man, who can take charge of a long-term hard work requiring much endurance, would be more suitable for this current society rather than me. Therefore, I realized the potential strength inside the weak old man against the relentless sea, which does not give any fish to him, through the description of his appearance, which was full of old traces: deep wrinkles in the back of his neck, the brown blotches, and deep-creased scars.

< Final Draft >
The main character, the old man, is weak and old. He tried his best to catch fish, but the result was just nothing. If the consequence does not correspond to one��s expectation or effort, one will be easily frustrated and will give up everything he has done so far. Even I have also frustrated for many times whenever I could not get the expected grades in school, which are very trivial in my life. I have often thought of giving up or changing my future plan easily as well. The old man, however, continued his job seeking for fish, which showed his strong will. We can find the evidences through the appearance described, which was full of old traces-deep wrinkles in the back of his neck, the brown blotches, and deep-creased scars. I realized the potential strength inside the weak old man against the relentless sea, which does not give any fish to him. The old man, who can take charge of a long-term hard work requiring much endurance, is whom I should follow to live a more active life.

The Story of An Hour


by. Kate Chopin

I changed the subject for the second draft, because the title does not seem to be appropriate for the response. < First Draft >
What is the background for the title: ��The Story of an Hour��? From the title, at first, readers may anticipate the story would be something related to the time, an hour. Yet, this novel is not about an hour but about a woman who died because of a shock from enormous joy of freedom, despite the death of her husband. This shows how women felt toward their oppressed lives because in those days women were regarded as possessions of husbands. Therefore, the title does not seem to be selected well for this novel, as I see it. Instead, authors could have chosen more impressive title which can imply the theme in the story, for example, ��Free, free, free.�� Kate Chopin, however, had lived during the period when the right of women was not cared enough. Her major work, The Awakening, was also considered so shocking that she could not maintain her frank expression through her novels, especially the title which leads the first characteristic of the whole work. If she have lived later when women are freer, hence, she might choose another title for this work.

< Second Draft >
Every society looks for equality. In the past, slaveries were under the nobility; women were under men. There had been many vertical relationships among people in the world. In the present, however, most people think that everyone is equal, and that there should be no discrimination. To change such senses, many people put a great effort to inform the failure of vertical relationships.
Kate Chopin, the author of the story of an hour, is considered one of them, for she wanted women to be equally treated with men. In those days, however, there were few women who felt the necessary for changing the society to be freer. Kate Chopin had been raised by a widow, her mother; and she herself had to live as a widow also. That was what enables her to see how much their husbands oppressed women, since she had freedom to live for herself with an absence of her husband. Other women could not catch such unfairness which they were accustomed too much from the very beginning by their fathers, and later by their husbands.
Mrs. Mallard, the main character of this novel, also realized how she had been oppressed and how great it would be in the future where no restriction would exist at all. Thinking such future during just an hour, Mrs. Mallard felt enormous happiness and joy, which eventually lead her even to the death. Through Mrs. Mallard, Kate Chopin could show how much women want their freedom as equal as men.

< Final Draft >
There had been many vertical relationships through history: white had made black slaves; and, the rich had exploited the poor. However, every society has looked for equality through combats like Civil War or French Revolution. I regard this story, ��The Story of an Hour��, as one of them to eliminate the discrimination between man and woman. Kate Chopin, the author of ��The Story of an Hour��, tried to inform the failure of vertical relationship through this story.
Kate Chopin had been raised by mother, grandmother, and great-grandmother. She had married Oscar Chopin, but her husband had died when she was only about 30 years old, so that she became a widow after her mother. That is her background she could be awakened earlier than other women, who were considered to be just the property of their husbands at that time. Typical women lost criticism about the unfairness which they were accustomed too much from the very beginning by their fathers, and later by their husbands. Yet, Kate Chopin could catch the failure more precisely, without any oppression neither from her father nor from her husband.
Mrs. Mallard, the main character of this novel, also realized how she had been suppressed and how great it would be in the future without any restriction. Even though it was just an hour, upcoming freedom had Mrs. Mallard feel enormous happiness and joy, which eventually lead her even to the death. Using such an extreme ending, Kate Chopin could show more impressively how much women want their freedom as equally as men.

Animal Farm
by. George Orwell

The title, Animal Farm, of the book written by George Orwell, is one that makes the book seem friendly and perhaps even light-hearted. It may remind readers of a beautiful countryside landscape, peaceful and full of many kinds of pretty animals. However, while the story is technically about an animal farm, the complex contents of the book may make the title seem misleading.

In this story, the animals can think, talk, and even organize a rebellion. They expatriate their landlord, Jones, and run the farm by themselves. The book could be sufficient simply as a tale about a group of animals on a farm. However, there is a far deeper layer to this book which exposes the dark reality of human nature since this book is the satire of the communist Soviet Union at that time. Orwell, who was a socialist, accurately criticized the danger of communism when a few people get power and use it for their own gain. Hence, some characters in the book stand for specific people of the Soviet Union. It is amazing how George Orwell is able to express so precisely his views on Communism through the animals because the story is exactly the same as the real life.

Napoleon, who represents Stalin, is characterized by greed and tyranny. From the very beginning of Animal Farm, he exhibits cruelty and selfishness. For example, he reserves all the apples and milk only for pigs, raises dogs secretly to enforce his authority, and even changes the commandments whenever he wants to break them so his actions are not illegal. However, he changes them so slightly that no animal can exactly remember that the commandments were changed at all. As he extorts more and more from other animals, the lives of the lower animals become more and more miserable. He is the main culprit among all the animals for destroying everyone's hope for the perfect Utopia.

Snowball is the opponent of Napoleon. While the two of them were always disagreeing about everything, one thing they both wanted was to take advantage of the lower animals. However, he was defeated by Napoleon due to Napoleon's cruel and enormous dogs. Although Napoleon says Snowball destroyed the windmill, this could be false. Napoleon could be wrongly accusing Snowball to make him seem like an enemy to the other animals.

Boxer, a prime example of the lower and less intelligent animals, always works extremely hard. However, he is too stupid to realize that Napoleon and the pigs are using him. Rather, he thinks Napoleon is always right, all the time. What makes the reader feel frustrated is that Boxer tries to solve all the problems created by the pigs by working harder and harder. However, Napoleon and the pigs sell him off to buy liquor when Boxer becomes old and useless. Moreover, the other animals do not realize what is happening and think that Boxer is going to the hospital for medical treatment.

However, what George Orwell pointed out in this story is not only the problem with communism, but also with capitalism. In capitalism as well as communism, there are many people like Napoleon, Snowball, or Squealer. For example, many people fight to gain power, rulers deceive lower people, and wealth is concentrated in minority. Therefore, I do not think capitalism or socialism is absolutely right and communism is perfectly wrong. Rather, as I see it, it is important and necessary to mix the advantages of them properly and wisely to overcome many problems in present society.

Cry, the Beloved Country


by. Alan Paton

All people are same despite skin color as well as age or sex distinction. However, there has been racial prejudice that the whites are better than colored races, since imperialism as I look at it. The world powers wanted the place where can provide abundant resources and markets due to rapid industrialization after the Industrial Revolution. Thus, they invaded numerous African and Asian countries and succeed in accumulating their wealth. In contrast, people in colonies had to be exploited and poor. The difference between the two races were getting bigger and enough for the whites to think they are more superior from the very beginning. Therefore, it became easy to discriminate colored races and infringe upon their human rights.

Against this circumstance in Africa, cry, the beloved country told about Absalmon's downfall, an African boy from countryside. Due to the over-planting and over-grazing, the beautiful farmland turned to be barren and hostile. The children, then, couldn't work in the farm anymore. With the news about the mine, youngers are gathered in the big city, like Johannesburg, for a job and payment. However, there are too many people, and the mine was primarily owned by the whites. As a result, the payment was miserable and labour was severe. After all, they found no way but crime to make a living in the city. Meanwhile, more and more people still flock to cities with visionary hope for better lives, and then more criminals. This vicious cycle spiraled downward and drove Absalmon to death at last. His story could represent lots of other people as well, who lived at that time so bitterly, probably even far worse than Absalmon.

The story is unfold through Kumalo's search for his son. While following after Absalmon's traces, harsh African lives in the big cities are disclosed frankly. It gives the most unbearable rage that the blacks can't ride a city bus. That's a complete publication that the whites and the blacks are certainly different. There are also much more other things that hinder the blacks to feel only a few satisfaction who compose almost all of the whols entire nation though.

At the last part, Absalmon realizes and reflects his fault. Thus, he is reconciled with his father, Kumalo. At that time, there is no cruelty or viciousness in him. It seems that he deviates owing to lack of wisdom and appropriate teachers or environment which can lead him to the upright way. It leads him to makes readers feel sympathetic with him. Therefore, there was earnest hope that Absalmon could get mercy and began his new life well during the reading. However, he was finally hanged, giving depressed mood. As preferring happy-ending, this plot makes feel sad and perhaps shed tears. However, it informs harsh racial discrimination effectively through showing that he was unable to get mercy by any possibility whether or not his fault was by intention.

At the same time, cry, the beloved country not only shows brutal real facts but also presents the solutions through Jarvis. Jarvis is a father of Arthur, who was killed by Absalmon. Moreover, Jarvis and Kumalo lives in the same village. However, they work together to develope their village and villagers. Using Jarvis' private property, villagers cooperate to make a dam and improve agricultural skill, followed by more fertile land and more harvest. The story is finished before results by their all endeavor. Yet, they can get strong hope for the better. Because they can see fruitful land and abundant lifestyle of the whites, and now the whites help them. The successful results do not become a reality even in actual condition yet. Still, cooperation of between the whites and the blacks can be the most proper way for people to pursuit, proposed by author, Alan Paton.

Through lamentable story, cry, the beloved country give not only deep impression but also important realization. Thus, it could be the worldwide best seller. Korea, my country, also has been a colony by Japan, during imperialism. So far, there are lots of remaining harmful vestiges of Japanese imperialism. However, through distorting textbooks, and improper remarks by high-ranking officials, Japanese says the Japanese annexation of Korea is reasonable and lawful. Therefore, I strongly wish the worldwide literature which can inform these real facts about Korea precisely, like the masterpiece, cry, the beloved country.

The Lord of the Flies


by. William Golding

In the first pages, this novel seemed to have been similar to 'Deux ans de Vacances(15�ҳ�ǥ����)' in beginning part: the boys, accident, and uninhabited island. However, the more I read, the more difference I can catch between the two novels. In 'Deux ans de Vacances', castaways organize themselves and live together properly. Through their life style on island, they show deep impression, the importance of cooperation, and interesting or amusement by a variety of adventures and lots of danger. On the other hand, 'the lord of the flies' is clearly far from this amusing literature, but makes readers have sincere self-reflection about the original nature of human beings.

Children in the book lived in ordered society in suitable manner before. However, without rules and regulations, they get to fall in chaos naturally. Not all, but most of them become seriously savage like the down men. Their savagery hit the climax by killing Piggy, one of children. Considering this murder and many other kinds of cruel behavior, there is the ethical view that human nature is evil in the background of the story. Therefore, Willian Golding may thought that human nature is wicked. For example, christianity, asserting original sin and human's evil nature, is one of important material with Simon, convincing author's view toward human nature firmly.

There are many other symbolical expression except christianity. 'Conch shell' gives right to announce in meeting. Therefore, it stands for order and rational democratic system. However, it becomes weaker and weaker as Jack and hunters ignore rules, and their savagery break the shell at last. Furthermore, 'the signal fire' is a unique hope for their rescue on island. However, like the conch shell, it is often out, since children don't care and fulfill their duty.

Ironically, they can go back to home by fire, not by a plan but by incendiarism for killing Ralph. Arson is also a brutal behavior by Jack and hunters, but it functions as a thoroughfare to the civilized world after all. What did the author want to tell readers through this scene? Even in the real world, evil instinct in human can turn to development which no one expected before. Therefore, William Golding probably desired to inform that the ability is exceedingly important to find the way to use human's wicked nature properly for the better. For instance, market economy in capitalistic countries is based on egoistic mind, but very efficient and useful. Thus, instead of denying or criticizing evil nature, we should make use of it and control suitably, which is much more sound way to live.

Many characters are as interesting as symbolic expression to think about. Ralph and Jack are both leaders, but their dispositions are completely opposite. Ralph helps youngers and tries to make advance, but Jack always takes preference of satisfying his instinctive desire and using youngers for it. In realities are there also two bisected ruling classes: Ralph & Jack. Moreover, it seems that there are more leaders like Jack than those like Ralph. Furthermore, common people including me can be compared to youngers who are led away by the instant atmosphere or eloquent speech. Hence, youngers' living in story gives depressed and uneasy feeling to readers who are mostly common people. Thus, it is required to grasp situation precisely and enhance judgement.

William Golding informed from human nature to several points in the real world by telling children's change to savagery during drifting on island. He was superior to choose subject matters, such as the ethical view about human's evil nature or leadership, and characters expressing many types of real people. It was remarkably enjoyable to search the hidden meaning of what appear in the story. Finally, many thanks go to the author because he brings some beneficial questions for me which is worth thinking in school days.

The Awakening


by. Kate Chopin

The question ��'who I am' has been an extremely difficult problem not only to youth but also to everyone. Every human being is distressed to think about it at least once in life. The answer for this question can be the perfect and desirably active reason to live one's life with great joy, hence, many people try to find it but few of them succeed. As an adolescent girl, I also joined this question but led to be in confusion and agony because it is too abstract for my age to catch up. As a result, I could not find the distinct answer yet.

However, if I cannot find the answer even after growing up, it will really depress me. As I look at it, most women in those days in the book including Edna usually fell in this kind of depressing situation due to their social status and prejudice. The main character of this book, Edna, seems to want her own character and enjoy her own life as pure 'Edna', neither as a mother of her children nor as a wife of her husband. Her surroundings, on the other hand, barely afford what her wants. At that time, women were popularly treated as submissive existence to men because men usually worked outside and domestic works were totally given to women. It was certainly hard for women to do well both at work and at home. Therefore, they began to concentrate their all mind to home, and loose their own colors as an individual and one member of a society. This makes Edna feel disillusioned, and even want to deviate from her position of a mother and a wife.

Therefore, she starts her work as a artist, lives apart from her family, and even falls in love with the another man, Robert. The plot, especially the last part, can shock greatly enough to provoke criticism among many readers because the author, Kate Chopin, wrote this conception without any blame to Edna. Through this attitude, however, Kate Chopin informed the 'awakening' of women much more effectively. She criticized the environment around Edna, which was true in the past, and stimulated women not to give up their own lives due to gender as women.

At the end, Edna suicide herself after a long anguish and mental conflict. The biggest reason is her children. Because Edna always takes care of her life, her sons are unconcerned. The biggest reason for readers is also the children who can't agree with Edna. She is surely under an obligation to look after her children since she is their mother wether she likes it or not. She definitely knows it, however at the same time she can hardly give up her own life represented as love with Robert. While I read this book, I extremely wondered how Edna and Kate Chopin would select between the two. Because both are not simple for her to give up, it is too difficult to guess which she would choose. After all, the last choice is the death, just getting away from her all life. This ending that none of them are chosen shows Kate Chopin did not or could not find the best solution for this quandary.

The equality of the sexes has been required for last few years, maybe after this book was published, and society has exceedingly changed. Therefore, if The Awakening were written in these days, I expect the end would be somewhat different. Because the right of women is rising more and more, many women enjoy their lives as well as men. Furthermore, the work at home is divided almost equally to husband and wife and many married couple work outside both. Kate Chopin displayed the strong hope for such desirable social structure through her work, The Awakening, Edna and many other women, powerful femininity as characters.

The Sun Also Rises


by. Ernest Hemingway

The title of this book, The Sun Also Rises, by Ernest Hemingway, gave me a good impression because of its hopeful meaning. It reminds me of a childhood memory of a festival in elementary school. All the students were divided into two teams and competed in a match, but my team lost. Because I was so young, I felt really depressed like my other classmates. Then, my homeroom teacher cheered us up by continually saying "The sun will also rise, tomorrow." That was the maxim of the day (our class learned one maxim a day from the teacher's book) and we felt better while we went home. It was always a happy and comforting memory for me to be reminded of. Therefore, initially, I had a pretty cheerful and optimistic attitude towards this book.

However, the background and plot of this story is quite opposite of what I had imagined. The story was based on the situations that many people faced after World War I. The characters who appear in the book seem to have lost their energy to pursue happiness and their desire to reach their goals. For example, because of the war, Jacob becomes infertile and Michael becomes bankrupt. Moreover, the mental stress they experience is evident when almost all the characters seem to be living just to kill the time. These examples show readers how devastating the war was to people's physical and mental well-beings.

Then Hemingway introduces Romero, a somewhat different character from the others. He seems to be the only one that enjoys and feels satisfied with his life. Hence, he makes a unique impression upon the readers. If the book were painted as a picture, it would seem that Romero would be the sole person painted colorfully against a background of dreary black and white. Even though his youth could be the reason why he was not negatively influenced by the war, he is an extremely desirable model since he shows powerful volition and positiveness about his job, surroundings, and life. Hemingway seemed to expose the hope for a better future through Romero, who shows abundant vitality, as well as the dark reality of the postwar days through characters such as Jacob and Brett. Therefore, the theme of this book is not only the ravaging effects of war but also the shed of hope that nevertheless seems to remain.

The Sun Also Rises is one of countless books whose purpose is to describe the pain and suffering war causes. These works seem to warn readers of the damage caused by war and plead with readers to make efforts to promote peace. It is dismal enough to think about the innocent people who died during the war and the loss their families felt. Furthermore, The Sun Also Rises lets readers know that those who die are not the only victims of war. The living sometimes seem to suffer more than the dead, because they have to deal with the consequences of the war. Thus, everyone, living or dead, is a victim of war. All people will agree that war is not the preferable way to solve this world's problems.

Almost eighty years after the book was written, the relevance of Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises is evident. There are lots of possibilities for the outbreak of war, for example, between Iraq and America, and also between North Korea and South Korea, where I live. The thought of war becomes more frightening after reading The Sun Also Rises; even if I had lived through the war, I could imagine myself weary like Jacob, Brett, Cohn, or Michael, defeated by the effects of the war. Through his remarkable ability to portray the stark reality of post-World War I, Hemingway has written a warning to future generations to consider the irreversible effects of war.

The Catcher in the Rye


by. Jerome David Salinger

In the novel, The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, the main character Holden Caulfield tells of his tumultuous teenage years with honesty and without any pretenses. The style of writing by Salinger to present Holden's story is unique as there are few works of literature that can claim to employ a similar style.

The style used by Salinger in The Catcher in the Rye allows the reader to relate to Holden much more intimately than protagonists of other novels because Holden seems to be speaking directly to the reader. For example, the novel begins with the following sentence: "If you really want to hear about it, the first thing you'll probably want to know is where I was born..." Furthermore, Holden's talk is not concentrated on solely one subject, but he talks about several things all at once, constantly switching from subject to subject. This characteristic makes Holden's speech more natural and creates an atmosphere that seems like the reader is listening to an old friend talking about his life at school and home. He is able to talk about both the good and bad aspects of his life without using exaggerations or understatements. Therefore, Holden's frankness and unpretentious dialogue makes his narrative realistic and allows readers to sympathize with him. Through this intimate unfolding of his story, he is really comfortable but very dry and cynical at the same time. Holden's attitude towards his surrounding world is very pessimistic, and he does not seem to care much about it at all. One main reason for his pessimism is the dishonesty and two-faced actions of the people around him. He sees acquaintances, friends, and even his parents act one way in a certain situation and act completely differently in another. As he becomes more and more fed up with the world, he becomes apathetic and fails to make any efforts to improve his grades or his behavior at school. Instead of countering his disillusionment with reflection and determination, he becomes victim to it and is consequently expelled from several high schools.

It is easy for the reader to sympathize with Holden, perhaps even to feel that Holden is an innocent victim of an unjust world. At the same time, however, the reader may feel that he or she cannot support Holden entirely because it seems like he is defeated by the world without any effort to overcome his problems. The issue that arises then is a question of instability. The reader perhaps has trouble trying to decide whether it is Holden who is unstable, or the world around him that is unstable. Therefore, an important theme in The Catcher in the Rye is this conflict between the individual and the modern society around him. Individuals and society mutually affect each other, and often the results of this relationship are undesirable. It is hard to decide which of the two is the source of the problem, whether individuals deteriorate the quality of society, or if society's collective woes negatively influence the innocent individual. It is not unlike the question of which came first, the chicken or the egg. Yet it seems that the answer is not simple, but that both society and the individual are responsible. Thus, Holden's difficulty in adjusting to his life seems to be brought on by the world around him and also by himself.

As I read the book, I wondered why J.D. Salinger chose a boy to be his main character. The reason why I wondered this is because adults have much more responsibility and stress than children. However, I realized that the adolescent Holden's ability to see the flaws of the real world and adult life is more effective than an adult telling of his own distraught life. Also, the difficulties of being a teenager and growing up are a major theme in the book that Salinger explores. While Holden is insightful and perceptive, he is at the same time immature and lacks a sense of responsibility. This combination makes Holden's character interesting and perhaps also frustrating for the reader.

In The Catcher in the Rye, Salinger is able to expose many issues in society through the simple yet ingenious form of one boy's narrative. Consequently, the story of Holden has received world-wide fame and Salinger has made his mark as an extraordinary writer of our time.

Links to other sites on the Web

home
Autumn 2004

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1