Domestic violence laws
Nineteen percent dealt with domestic violence as a dyadic phenomenon (in which both parties could be both victim and perpetrator. domestic violence laws School violence. ) Of the total, a surprisingly large number, 50 (44%) were review or opinion articles that cited the work of others but did not present new data or research. Often, a single new study presenting empirical data, such as the most recent National Family Violence Survey, would generate several review articles, none of which offered any new data. Many would be offered in defense of a particular ideological viewpoint that had been wounded by the empirical data; i. domestic violence laws Gangs violence. e. , yes, woman against man violence is more common than we had supposed, but this all must be due to retaliation for earlier victimization of the women, etc. Of papers in the psychology literature, 92 (81%) presented new research or data. domestic violence laws Domestic violence graphs. Forty three (47%) of these were concerned only with the man as perpetrator and woman as victim paradigm and did not in any way mention or consider other types of domestic violence among adults. Two studies (2%) were concerned with woman as perpetrator and man as victim paradigm. Twenty five (27%) were concerned with both man on woman and woman on man violence. Man on man violence in gay domestic relationships were mentioned in only one study (1%). Woman on woman violence also merited one study. Twenty studies (22%) examined domestic violence as a dyadic phenomenon in which both the man and the woman could simultaneously be both victim and perpetrator. When combined with studies that examined both man on woman and woman on man violence, those studies that examined both sides of the coin in domestic violence outnumbered those that examined only the woman-as-victim/ man-as-perpetrator paradigm in this sample of the psychological literature. Twenty one papers (19% of the total) were reviews or opinion papers that did not present new data. Of these, 9 (43%) examined the man on woman paradigm exclusive of all other forms of domestic violence among adults. One review examined woman on man violence. Four reviews examined both woman on man and man on woman violence (19%). No reviews considered either female or male gay domestic violence. Four reviews examined domestic violence as a dyadic phenomenon (19%). Of the total of 114 papers, only 3 (2%) professed to be from a feminist perspective. All of the feminist papers were reviews. None of the papers reviewed could be said to be of a political advocacy nature, although political advocacy and its possible detrimental effects on the study of domestic violence was discussed in some reviews. In summary, the further one gets away from the sociology/women's studies axis, the more accurate and scientific the picture of domestic violence becomes.
Domestic violence laws
Learn || Crime-library || Domestic-violence-hotline || Crime-library