Flanc de rei
Interview
with Viktor Moskalenko:
I believe that this is a regulation problem that is due to clarify. It doesn't stand to reason that I could play and has not been able to make it to Magem or Comas…among others. But from my point of view there is in addition another type of problem like the system of opened game for all the players with license of the FCE that causes that it is a little interesting match referring to quality of game.
Do
you believe then, Viktor, that the Absolute Championship of Catalonia must have
another shape?
In
general all the opened matches without sections of elo use to be matches in
which you face during the first rounds players with a very important
difference of elo and that many of your opponents do not have interest in
playing with a GM. In my opinion the matches where competition by groups
exist are more interesting since the quality of game is greater and where
the luck of the matching is not a lottery as it happens in the open ones.
For example, in the last round, in the Absolute Championship of Catalonia,
players with 5,5 points matched with theoretically weak players, whereas
players with 6 points faced titleholders. If we add that some of us cannot
be classified for the Spanish Championship, then the luck in the matching is
determining so that you can obtain one of the four seats that give right to
classify itself for the Championship of Spain.
The
Absolute Catalan Championship has with no doubt a special reputation,
nevertheless only about twenty players had an elo greater than 2200 and only one
GM: Viktor Moskalenko. Do you think that the opened competition system has
influenced in the inscription of titleholders?
I
believe that the general opinion so much of titleholders as of players in
general is that new formulas in the competition system would be due to study.
Systems that combine the opened character of the match with the competition
by groups of elo, so that the quality of the game increases and so the
participation of the best players of the moment.
Another
one of the great discussions that have been held during the present time, has
been the new rate of game that has tried to impose the FIDE with the numerous
protests of the international federations. Viktor, you have recently played a
match of these characteristics. Do you think that this new rate of game of
40 plays in 75 minutes plus 15 minutes to finish and with an increase of
30 seconds by play helps the chess?
From my point of view it is an excessively fast rate for a quality chess. Maybe it can be useful in some open matches where costs want to be eliminated playing one game in the morning and another one in the evening. What is clear is that with this rate of game you cannot think enough in the key moments without hurrying of time for the rest of the game. With the aggravating that you do not have time nor of standing up to stretch the legs or for having a coffee or even for going to the toilette without fear to that those lost minutes are decisive for the outcome of the game. This rate of game in that you have a bit more than 2 minutes by play until the control, is halfway between the fast and the slow chess and it does not help the quality of the chess. On the other hand the implantation of the electronic clocks needed for this rate of game can give some problems at a technical level: for example, if the battery of the electronic clock is exhausted or if by confusion the clock wants to be stopped and another button is pressed losing all the information of the time.