Browsing the Bookshelf |
Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely
or Does It?
by
Debbie W. Wilson
Abraham Lincoln said, "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if
you want to test a man's character, give him power."
David Limbaugh grades the character test for
the Clinton Justice Department under Janet Reno. The results aren't pretty!
In Absolute
Power: The Legacy of Corruption in the
Clinton-Reno Justice Department (Washington, DC:
Regnery Publishing, 2001, 385 pages, $27.95) David Limbaugh chronicles
the controversial decisions made by Janet Reno's Justice Department.
Limbaugh
starts with the Waco debacle. He gives
the background of the situation, describes the event and explains what the
Justice Department did that was illegal.
In this case, they used falsified documents that claimed the Davidians
possessed drugs to gain military aid.
During the Danforth investigation of the raid, the Justice Department
repeatedly delayed and obstructed Danforth's search for evidence.
Limbaugh
discusses the tobacco wars, the White House Travel Office firings and smearing
of Billy Dale, the attacks on Kenneth Starr and Linda Tripp, President
Clinton's repeated attempts to use presidential privilege to block
investigations, the president's sidetracking of the Senate's role in
confirming Bill Lann Lee, his allowing terrorists access to the White House and
the decision to return Elian Gonzalez to Communist Cuba.
The most
powerful section of the book chronicles the White House campaign scandals. They unfolded so quickly during the
administration that I found them hard to keep track of. Frequently, reporters and commentators had a
difficult time understanding the legal and political issues surrounding the
various illegal donations.
Limbaugh
explains and relates these to one another. He clarifies the Justice
Department's obstruction and cover up.
For instance, though FBI director Louis Freeh and Justice Department
Task Force chief Charles La Bella urged Attorney General Reno to appoint a
special prosecutor to investigate Al Gore's fund-raising, she refused. During her investigation, she did not allow officials
to question Al Gore's Buddhist Temple fund-raiser nor the President's
involvement with John Huang. Instead,
Reno granted special protection to higher-level officials in order to go after
lower ones.
David
Limbaugh, though a lawyer, offers ordinary readers with basic political
knowledge clear explanations of the legal violations of the Clinton-Reno
Justice Department. However, he goes
beyond this to explain the danger to our republic in the politicizing of the
Justice Department. Attacking Billy
Dale, Ken Starr and Linda Tripp sets the precedent of using the overwhelming
power of the government's legal arm to destroy any individual who speaks out
against a corrupt executive. In an
international dimension, the Justice Department's cover-up of the tie between
Clinton's illegal foreign fundraising and the
empowerment of the Chinese military with our nuclear weapons secrets endangers
every American because China considers us her greatest impediment to world
prominence.
Liberal
Harvard professor Lawrence Tribe perhaps sums up the Reno Justice Department
best when he writes of the seizure of little Elian: "Ms. Reno's decision
to take the law as well as the child into her own hands seems worse than a
political blunder. Even if well
intended, her decision strikes at the heart of constitutional government and
shakes the safeguards of liberty." (page 325)
Limbaugh
points out that the Clinton administration by politicizing the Justice
Department did indeed "shake...the safeguards of liberty."
For anyone
interested in law and politics, this book is worth reading.
Search this site |