Faith and the Media

Religion coverage increasing 




         Religion coverage increasing 



Why the dramatic increase in coverage of religion in mass media today? The answer may be SMERSH.

By Martin Marty for The Sightings Project, Oct. 20, 1998

Why the dramatic increase in coverage of religion in mass media? 

People of nostalgic bent who rue the passing of the Good Old Days have to invent a past in which religion once received its due--at least in the twentieth century. Yes, once upon a time metropolitan newspapers boasted a bloated Saturday religion page. But it did not take a cynic to notice that most coverage was keyed to advertising. As the churches that formerly advertised moved to the suburbs, it made ever less sense to run ads in metro papers. So the ad sections dwindled, as did the coverage. But today religion gets covered more than before. 

Again, why? One good answer is that religion has gone public more than before. In olden days, reading articles about a bake sale or a mortgage burning at the church next door had to be an acquired and then quickly lost taste. But today, religion is at the crossroads of so many spiritual paths that hard-boiled editors who used to disdain religion now are learning that they will miss some of the best stories and many of their best readers if they continue to ignore faith. People kill each other in the name of their religions and make prime time for doing so. People heal others in the scope of religious faith and sometimes make page one for doing so. So this answer amounts to "there's more of it around, so more gets covered"--and not just on the Saturday religion page.

Add to this the answer that there is more stimulus. Numbers of foundations--the Pew Charitable Trusts, in our case and several others-- support religious news on National Public Radio, promote religious education of reporters, set up this happy Public Religion Project, and the like. Journalism schools at Northwestern, Maryland, Colorado, and elsewhere help produce cohorts of ready-to-go religion reporters and columnists.

We keep on adding reasons for more coverage. These are days of conflict in religion--over authority, homosexuality, or whatever--and conflict makes good copy. There have been clerical scandals, and the press loves to expose these, again on page one.

As we clip hundreds of "sightings" per month for our Project, however, we have developed another hunch: the media are finding that religion makes news less often by being part of hard news and more often when covered as a feature category. That means featuring close-ups, often of ordinary people being heroic or saintly in the public world. As such, religion gets linked with the growing sections or programs on medicine, education, and science.

That linkage led the Washington Post some years ago to speak of this linkage as SMERSH, "Science, Medicine, Education, Religion and all that S--t," sneered one editor. Newsweek picked up on this in its October 12 issue, in which the editors pointed out that the old line between tabloids or yellow journalism and newspapers that manifested taste has been eroded. There are few close-to-the-heart themes as rich as religion in the SMERSH context. It's been discovered. Expect even more coverage.

The question now is whether, as the non-tabloid media discover religion and the religious promote their endeavors, they can avoid becoming overtly tabloid and trashy. A second question: can you think of a better place for religious activity in public to be located than in the company of SMERSH neighbors? That is a puzzler that might lead public relations people and reporters to magnify ordinary people rather than oversell celebrities and leaders and be truer to life, thanks to the extraordinary SMERSHites.

Sightings can be found at The Public Religion Project.

Return to top


Comments? Questions? E-mail: [email protected]

Last modified: 29 October 1999

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1