EthonlineS    Reflections + Reviews + Reports

 

  

 

 

 

 

Home

About Us

Archive

 

 

Article- 08

 

 

 

Efficient Quality Assurance Free From Politics

Wondirad Seifu, March 4, 2007, Addis Fortune

 

One of the most important discoveries of the last century is the concept of “quality”, an area where a lot had been done in managing it, and yet much remains to be done because establishing standards is dynamic. Not surprising, the quality movement has changed since then and reoriented the popular and traditional management under the concept of Total Quality Management (TQM).

 

Although TQM suffers lately in the politics of buzz-words, the good news is that it continues the endless journey, integrating the ISO-9000 quality management system, an internationally accepted standard for industrially processed goods. In the aftermath of the Second World War, various types of national and international infrastructures were established to spur the quality movement, including the emergence of standard qualification and accreditation bodies.

 

Ethiopia joined the club much latter: The Quality and Standard Authority of Ethiopia (QSAE) was established 35 years ago. It is good to learn the leaps and bounds move by the Authority has begun, with the ambition to kick-start a certification scheme for the ISO-9000.

 

Hopefully, it will not take us too long to witness the inauguration of its name that may be dubbed as “Quality and Standard Institute of Ethiopia”. As it appears now, the QSAE could probably be the only agency left in the world with its name qualified by the word “Authority”

 

To become an internationally recognized ISO-9000 certification agency, the Authority has to be equipped with an internationally accreditation body, which should meet the general criteria stipulated under EN-45012 or ISO/ICE guide 62 documents. This is what I would argue the Authority should aspire to get , with the help of a German-based accreditation body as it was reported in your newspaper headline,” First Ethiopian Certification to be Launched”, ( Volume 7 Number 354, February 11, 20078).

 

The effort by the Authority to join the world’s quality revolution is encouraging; nevertheless, I am not comfortable with the course of action it is taking in hosting a certification scheme for ISO- 9000.

 

Standard agencies are powerful instruments to enforce policy on quality in order to foster sustainable development. Their traditional role is advisory and facilitation, and not leadership in quality. This would require them to distant themselves from routine activities such as running laboratory testing, inspection, training and calibration of shops, as well as weighing scales.

 

Unfortunately, what the Authority in Ethiopia has been doing is not far from spending its recourses on activities better left to the private sector. Consequently, lack of imagination on the part of the Authority has crippled the potential for the emergence of a local industry in quality management and inspection, although several thousands of such firms have flourished in other parts of the world.

 

Hosting a certification scheme by the Authority as it was reported in your newspaper, I am afraid, is not different from what it has been doing for three decades. It is rather seen as a move to consolidate all routine activities or an attempt to create a monopoly platform in quality operations.

 

An agency that has been criticized for inefficiencies in delivering laboratory services, which is not even recognized by ISO-17025, is now seen aspiring to add the burden of certification scheme, with an internationally accredited status. It is an ambition whose success will depend on the Authority’s subsequent moves in clarifying some major issues.

 

Most important is the issue of independence: although the Authority is supposed to operate within the domain of both the public and private sectors, it is directly accountable to the Ministry of Trade and Industry. Proving to the public that its decision making process in the course of ensuring quality on its behalf is absent from political interference will remain a sticky point.

 

The issue of real or perceived conflicts of interest in certification and consultation services is what needs to be sorted out by the Authority. The sooner this occurs the better it will be. This is because many guidelines in quality management prohibit their marketing together by the same agency. As there are thousands of accreditation bodies in the world, so is there a good number those who work on certifications. Competition among these bodies is apparent, as manifested by their forming networks, with strict or loose codes of conducts. Why this is important is because the accreditation status has a lot to do with how the market is reacting to the certifying agency. When one views the recent agreement between the Quality and Standard Authority of Ethiopia and the German Association for Accreditation, it is obvious question the integrity and reputation of the latter, and the decision of the Authority to pick this particular Association.

 

Failure to address this issue has far dire consequences than if its impact remains limited to one federal agency. Quality is not confined to goods manufactured by the industrial sector; it also involves the service sector. Many of the federal agencies such as Ministry of Health, Education, Mining etc. run certification schemes, one way or the other. Are all these agencies accredited to conduct their certification services; by whom and under whose authority?

 

An accreditation process has been cascaded from top to bottom as depicted by a pyramid shape:  at the top is a recognition body, followed by accreditation agencies, and certification bodies that are certifying the private firms involved in inspection at the bottom of the pyramid.

 

In order for Ethiopia to establish a quality assurance system without prejudice or bias, it is very important and about time to restructure the Authority as a federal agency that gives national accreditation to the various federal and regional bodies that provide certification services. In order to make this accreditation process autonomous, thus credible, the private sector has to be brought onboard as obviously the public domain ought not to be ignored.

 

llllll

 

  Home

About Us

Archive