Have you ever made something that you knew could never be improved upon? This is what happened with the first helmet I ever made. The shape was just right, and I never managed to duplicate it to my satisfaction.

When the time came for me to make a helmet to wear to the 2000 AD re-enactment of the Battle of Hastings, on the battlefield itself, I knew I had to use this helmet.

But I'd made it when I knew almost nothing about mediaeval helmet construction. The framework was made (badly) from 3mm (1/8") thick steel strip, about 18mm (3/4") wide. and the nasal was crap. I had since learnt a lot; not least that helmet frames were made from metal which, at the most seemed to be 2mm thick, and usually 1.6mm (16ga).

So, what to do? I pulled the helmet to bits, copied the framework in 1.6mm steel, with a ridge in the centre, made a nice new nasal, and trashed the original framework. The helmet had many years of wear, and there were a few dents in the plates I couln't get rid of, but when I'd finished, the helmet was like a phoenix - reborn, but better and brighter.

I engraved the nasal by hand, with a design in the mid-11th century Ringericke style fashionable in England a little before Hastings (and which I personally really liked). It has wolves on the eyebrows, a face made of interlace at the top of the nasal, and the rest is a complex interlace based on actual Ringericke finds in England and Scandinavia.
There have been
visitors to this site
Anglo-Saxon Helmet
      
11th century AD
Back to Helmet Page
When I got to the UK, I found I got lots of compliments on the helmet - in fact one person said "At last! Someone's made some decent gear!" In my humble opinion, it was the best helmet at Hastings - but I could be biased. Certainly it was better than the helmets worn by either "King Harold" or "Duke William". So I was fairly pleased.
A close-up of the nasal.
Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1