| Pending Proposals: [ Pending Passed Failed TSL Violation Expired ] { Top } |
48. "evil potato" [Pending]
Submitted by: PsychicNathan |
Submitted on: 2003-06-08 16:57:00
Will Automatically Expire on: 2003-06-15 16:57:00
|
Create in the posession of another player the following potato:
The possessor of THE POTATO OF DOOM!! may only give THE POTATO OF DOOM!! to
another entity if THE POTATO OF DOOM!! has not been given to said possessor
within 24 hours prior to the attempt.
When message #1000 is posted to the list, destroy THE POTATO OF DOOM!! and its
current possessor.
Whenever someone posts a message that contains a string that matches "THE POTATO
OF DOOM!!" but differs in case and/or punctuation, if that person has at least 1
Coin, transfer 1 Coin from that player's possession to the Bank.
Destroy this proposal. |
|
Votes FOR: Craig,PsychicNathan
Votes AGAINST: bd,Dr Ducker
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Josh
|
| |
49. "wubble wubble 2: revenge of the jiggling saw" [Pending]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-06-09 17:48:00
Will Automatically Expire on: 2003-06-16 17:48:00
|
Create a Hot Potato named the Potato of Wubble in the posession of a random player. Its description shall be as follows:
Whenever any player gives this Hot Potato to any other player, e must use the dice server to determine whether it activates. It shall have a twenty percent chance of doing so. If this Hot Potato activates while in the posession of a player who has any Coins, then one Coin belonging to the player who posesses it is transferred to the previous posessor. If the new posessor still has any Coins, one Coin belonging to the player who posesses this Hot Potato is transferred to a random player. If this Hot Potato activates while in the posession of a player with no Coins, it shall have no effect.
Destroy this proposal. |
|
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Josh,PsychicNathan
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Dr Ducker
|
| |
50. "fix past judgements" [Pending]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-06-15 01:44:00
Will Automatically Expire on: 2003-06-22 01:44:00
|
To correct what seems to be a typo in rule 13 (I don't remember how it got there for sure), we should destroy rules 13 and 13.1 and create a new rule 13 in PAST JUDGEMENTS with the text:
Whenever a decision on a Call For Judgement is not appealed within two weeks, and the Call For Judgment is judged true, the text of the Call For Judgement shall be added to the ruleset in the group headed PAST JUDGEMENTS. Its number must be higher than that of any rule already in the ruleset. Also, the judge of the CFJ may choose to amend the comment for the group. |
|
Votes FOR: Dr Ducker
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: bd,Craig,Josh,PsychicNathan
|
| |
| Passed Proposals: [ Pending Passed Failed TSL Violation Expired ] { Top } |
2. untitled [Passed]
Submitted by: bd |
Submitted on: 2003-04-10 21:35:00
Expired on: 2003-04-17 21:35:00
DESTROYED
|
Destroy 7.3
Create:
7.3 When a player deregisters, one of eir points is destroyed, and all eir points and things
are distributed randomly between all other players. |
+1 Therm |
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Dr Ducker,Josh,unlin_e
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Cassie
|
| |
7. Registration Proposal: "Let There be Josh" [Passed]
Submitted by: Josh |
Submitted on: 2003-04-11 00:34:00
Expired on: 2003-04-18 00:34:00
DESTROYED
|
(a) Delete rule 9.1.
(b) Create a new rule 9.1, which reads:
"Rules, players, proposals, offices, points, and kudoses are Things."
(c) Create one kudos, which belongs to Josh Millard.
|
There may be a CJF on who owns this proposal?
Can't Fail (unless it isn't a valid proposal)
Josh is now a Player.
+ 1 Therm
+ 1 Kudos in Josh Millard's possession |
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Dr Ducker
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Cassie,unlin_e
|
| |
8. untitled [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-11 20:49:00
Expired on: 2003-04-18 20:49:00
DESTROYED
|
Rule 0.3 is destroyed and replaced with
"0.3 To ensure that random selections occur without fraud, [email protected] shall be used whenever anything random is called for." |
+ 1 Therm |
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,unlin_e
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Cassie,Dr Ducker,Josh
|
| |
10. "Spring Cleaning" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-11 21:59:00
Expired on: 2003-04-18 21:59:00
DESTROYED
|
| All non-pending proposals are destroyed. |
+ 10 Therms
- 10 Proposals
+ 1 point in Craig's possession
|
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,unlin_e
Votes AGAINST: Dr Ducker
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Cassie,Josh
|
| |
15. "transfers" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-22 02:56:00
Expired on: 2003-04-23 07:27:00
DESTROYED
|
Add a rule 6.8 in the group headed CHANGING THE GAMESTATE reading "Any player may give any Thing e posesses to any other player by stating eir intent to do so on the official mailing list."
If Ian Kelly's registration proposal has passed, destroy Ian Kelly. Just kidding. Instead, if it has passed, destroy rule 20.
If Ian Kelly's registration proposal has failed, destroy this proposal. |
+1R
-1PR
--------
+0 things
+1 Therm
Passage due to all eligible players voting. |
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,unlin_e
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN: Dr Ducker,Josh
Votes UNCAST:
|
| |
14. "the stenotype take 3" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-19 00:22:00
Expired on: 2003-04-24 20:30:00
DESTROYED
|
Rule 10.3 is repealed and replaced with a new rule 10.3 reading as follows:
10.3 The Speaker shall be in charge of tabulating votes and making any random decisions that the rules do not ask another player to make.
Rule 10.5 is created in the group OFFICES, reading:
There is an office known as the Stenotype, whose posessor, the Stenographer, is responsible for tracking all past judgements and for assigning Judges and Appelate Justices.
Rule 11.2 is repealed and replaced with the a new rule 11.2 reading:
When a Call For Judgement is issued, the Stenographer shall randomly choose a player, who shall be known as the Judge.
This proposal is destroyed.
the stenotype take 2 is destroyed.
A random player is named Stenographer. |
-1R (10.3)
+1R (10.3)
+1R (10.5)
-1R (11.2)
+1R (11.2)
-1PR (this)
-1PR (steno take2)
+1O (stenotype)
-------------
-2R
+3R
-2PR
+1O
-----------
+0 things
+4 Therms
Indirect Effects:
Craig gets a Point under rule 2.1 |
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Josh,unlin_e
Votes AGAINST: Dr Ducker
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST:
|
| |
19. "hot potatoes" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-27 18:26:00
Expired on: 2003-04-28 19:03:00
DESTROYED
|
The text "hot potatoes, " will be inserted before the word "and" in rule 9.1 and the resulting string will be known as NEWTEXT for the purposes of this proposal, so that we don't have to worry about other additions.
Rule 9.1 will be repealed, and a new rule 9.1 whose text is NEWTEXT will be created.
A group will be created with the heading POTATOES.
A rule 15.0 will be created in that group with the text "Each Hot Potato must have its own unique name, and it must also have a description of when its effect occurs and what that effect is."
The comment for POTATOES will be as follows:
"The intent of these rules is that hot potatoes will be created which in some way harm their posessors, so that players will frantically give them to one another as the appointed time draws near."
This proposal is destroyed. |
|
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Dr Ducker,Josh,unlin_e
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST:
|
| |
16. "eco nomic stimulus package" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-22 03:18:00
Expired on: 2003-04-29 01:19:00
|
Destroy rule 9.1
Create a new rule 9.1 under the heading THINGS with the text:
Rules, players, proposals, offices, coins, points, kudos, and The Bank are things.
Destroy rule 9.7
Create a new rule 9.7 under the heading THINGS with the text:
Any Thing which is not a player, Rule, or The Bank, must be possessed by a player or The Bank.
Create a new rule 15.0 under the heading THINGS with the text:
When the first proposal, after the creation of this rule, becomes expired, then at that time, The Bank will be created, 1,000,000,000 coins will be created in the possession of The Bank, and this rule will then be destroyed.
The comment for the section THINGS will have the following text added to the end of it:
Coins are intended to be a currency, and The Bank is a Thing which posesses all Coins not in the posession of a player.
Destroy rule 14.2
For each point in existence, create a Coin in the posession of the same player. Destroy all points.
For each kudos in existence, create a Coin in the posession of the same player. Destroy all kudoses.
Create a new rule 15.1 under the heading THERMODYNOMIC with the text:
This rule serves no purpose.
Destroy rule 15.1
Why? Because we can. Let's do the happy-dance. Gosh, you can really tell I'm up too late causing economic activity. Imagine what Alan Greenspan goes through.
Destroy rule 7.3
Create a new rule 7.3 under the heading DEREGISTRATION with the text:
When a player deregisters, one of eir Coins is destroyed, and all eir things are distributed randomly between all other players.
Destroy rule 1.3
Create a new rule 1.3 under the heading FIRST SACRED LAW with the text:
Whenever a player Registers and the number of Therms exceeds the number of players by at least five, all players recieve a Coin and the number of Therms is set to zero.
Destroy rule 2.1
Create a new rule 2.1 under the heading SECOND SACRED LAW with the text:
Any player who submits a proposal that would destroy at least three Things recieves a Coin if that proposal passes.
Players are hereby reminded that the above two changes alter the Three Sacred Laws. Thus, NO votes are vetoes and ABSTAIN votes are like normal NO votes. It is therefore important to vote, and since these are minor changes players are asked to ABSTAIN rather than vetoing the proposal unless they see some gaping flaw that was missed in earlier discussion. Of course, this paragraph has no force, but it is here as a reminder. |
Votes AGAINST will automatically fail this proposal.
R=Rules
P=Points
K=Kudos
C=Coins
p=# of Points
k=# of Kudos
c=# of Coins
-1R (9.1)
+1R (9.1)
-1R (9.7)
+1R (9.7)
+1R (15.0)
-1R (14.2)
+pC
-pP
+kC
-kK
+1R (15.1)
-1R (15.1)
-1R (7.3)
+1R (7.3)
-1R (TSL1.3)
+1R (TSL1.3)
-1R (TSL2.1)
+1R (TSL2.1)
---------------
-7R
+7R
+(p+k)C
-pP
-kK
----------
+0 things
+7+(p+k) Therms
Indirect Effects:
Craig gets a coin under rule 2.1 |
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Josh,unlin_e
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN: Dr Ducker
Votes UNCAST:
|
| |
17. "minor ensp fix" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-22 12:23:00
Expired on: 2003-04-29 01:19:00
|
If the proposal 'Eco Nomic Stimulus Package' has passed, destroy rule 9.1 and create a new rule 9.1 with the text:
Rules, players, proposals, offices, coins, and The Bank are things. |
-1R
+1R
________
+0 things
+1 Therm |
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Josh,unlin_e
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN: Dr Ducker
Votes UNCAST:
|
| |
21. "cash flow take 2" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-27 19:38:00
Expired on: 2003-04-29 17:28:00
DESTROYED
|
| A hot potato shall be created, called the Potato of Cash Flow. Its description shall be "Whenever the Potato of Cash Flow has gone two full weeks without causing any Things to be redistributed, the Potato of Cash Flow and each Coin belonging to its posessor will be given to a random player." The Potato of Cash Flow shall begin in the posession of a random player. This proposal shall be destroyed. |
|
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Josh,unlin_e
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN: Dr Ducker
Votes UNCAST:
|
| |
18. "free trade" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-24 22:36:00
Expired on: 2003-05-01 22:36:00
DESTROYED
|
A rule 0.5 will be created, reading "There are no restrictions on players entering the Nomic Market."
ThermodyNomic will officially ask to be recognized as a participant by the Nomic Market.
This proposal shall be destroyed. |
+1 Rule
-1 Proposal
------------
+0 Total
+1 Therm
|
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Dr Ducker,Josh
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: unlin_e
|
| |
23. "agreement" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-29 00:36:00
Expired on: 2003-05-06 00:36:00
DESTROYED
|
A hot potato shall be created in the posession of a random player. It shall be known as the Potato of Contrarianism. Its description shall be as follows:
Whenever a proposal is submitted, the posessor of this hot potato shall vote AGAINST it if it would not alter the Three Sacred Laws, and shall ABSTAIN if it would. If multiple hot potatoes try to determine that player's vote, which one succeeds will be random.
This proposal shall be destroyed. |
-1 Proposal
------------
-1 Things
+1 Therm
------------
Note: 'hot potatoes' are undefined within the rules at the time of this proposals passage, therefore unable to be created |
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Josh
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN: Dr Ducker
Votes UNCAST: unlin_e
|
| |
24. "contrarianism" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-29 00:36:00
Expired on: 2003-05-06 00:36:00
DESTROYED
|
A hot potato shall be created in the posession of a random player. It shall be known as the Potato of Agreement. Its description shall be as follows:
Whenever a proposal is submitted, the posessor of this hot potato shall vote FOR it. If multiple hot potatoes try to determine that player's vote, which one succeeds will be random.
This proposal shall be destroyed. |
-1 Proposal
----------
-1 Things
+1 Therm
----------
Note: 'hot potatoes' are undefined within the rules at the time of this proposals passage, therefore unable to be created |
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Josh
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN: Dr Ducker
Votes UNCAST: unlin_e
|
| |
26. "number conflict go bye-bye now" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-29 03:20:00
Expired on: 2003-05-06 03:20:00
|
conflict go bye-bye now"
The rule 15.0 created by the proposal 'eco nomic stimulus package' will be given the number 15.01 so as not to conflict with the rule 15.00 created by 'hot potatoes'. |
Does not accomplish it's purpose. In fact it's a Do-Nothing. |
Votes FOR: bd,Craig
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN: Dr Ducker
Votes UNCAST: Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
27. "fixing everything" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-29 21:35:00
Expired on: 2003-05-06 21:35:00
DESTROYED
|
Rule 15.0 is repealed and replaced with a new rule 15.0 reading
"Each Hot Potato must have its own unique name, and it must also have a description of when its effect occurs and what that effect is."
This will be in the group POTATOES.
Now we are positive as to what rule 15.0 is.
Rule 16.0 will be created, reading
"When a proposal is passed, this rule is destroyed and 1,000,000 Coins are created in the posession of the Bank."
Rule 9.1 will be destroyed and replaced with a new rule 9.1 reading
"Players, rules, offices, proposals, Coins, and hot potatoes are all Things.", unless any proposal has altered it since this proposal was created. If one has, then the provision of that proposal that alters rule 9.1 occurs again immediately following the passage of this proposal.
The comment for the group THINGS is amended by adding the text
"Players proposing changes to rule 9.1 should use clever string manipulation techniques so as not to interfere with each others' proposals."
This proposal shall be destroyed. |
|
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Dr Ducker
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
28. untitled [Passed]
Submitted by: bd |
Submitted on: 2003-04-30 01:45:00
Expired on: 2003-05-07 01:45:00
DESTROYED
|
A hot potato shall be created, called the Potato of Displacement. Its description shall be "Every time Yahoo automatically posts the ruleset, another randomly selected potato will be given to the holder of this potato, and this potato will be given to the prior holder."
Destroy this proposal. |
|
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Josh
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN: Dr Ducker
Votes UNCAST: unlin_e
|
| |
29. untitled [Passed]
Submitted by: bd |
Submitted on: 2003-04-30 01:49:00
Expired on: 2003-05-07 01:49:00
DESTROYED
|
Create a rule:
5.9. If a player votes on a Proposal, and has already voted, eir previous vote is nullified an instant before the new vote becomes legal.
Destroy this proposal. |
|
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Dr Ducker
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
32. "Call For Judgement Player Deficiency" [Passed]
Submitted by: Dr Ducker |
Submitted on: 2003-05-01 18:30:00
Expired on: 2003-05-08 18:30:00
DESTROYED
|
Create a rule 11.01 under the group JUDGEMENT, which reads:
"A Call For Judgement may only be submitted by a Player."
Destroy this proposal. |
+1 Rule
-1 Proposal
----------
+0 Things
+1 Therm |
Votes FOR: bd,Dr Ducker
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN: Craig
Votes UNCAST: Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
33. Registration Proposal: untitled [Passed]
Submitted by: Ian |
Submitted on: 2003-05-01 19:48:00
Expired on: 2003-05-08 19:48:00
DESTROYED
|
Destroy rule 11.0 and replace it with a new rule 11.0 with the text "Any person may post a message containing a clearly labelled Call For Judgement."
Create two coins in the possession of random players.
Destroy this proposal. |
-1 Rule
+1 Rule
+2 Coins
-1 Proposal
-------------
+1 Thing
+2 Therms
+1 Player |
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,unlin_e
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Dr Ducker,Josh
|
| |
34. reassigning Judges, v. 2 [Passed]
Submitted by: Dr Ducker |
Submitted on: 2003-05-12 00:29:00
Expired on: 2003-05-12 02:45:00
DESTROYED
|
Create a rule 11.7 within the JUDGEMENT group which reads:
"A Judge who has deregistered before ey have communicated eir Judgement, will be
replaced with another player randomly selected, by the Stenographer, from
amongst those players who have not yet been directly involved with the Call For
Judgement, unless there are no such players remaining, in which case the next
player to register will be assigned."
Create a rule 12.6 within the APPEALS group which reads:
"An Appellate Justice who has deregistered before ey have communicated eir
Judgement, will be replaced with another player randomly selected, by the
Stenographer, from amongst those players who have not yet been directly involved
with the Call For Judgement, unless there are no such players remaining, in
which case the next player to register will be assigned."
Destroy Rule (4 pi).
Create a rule 12.566 within the APPEALS group which reads:
"The decision of the majority of Appellate Justices shall be binding, and not
subject to appeal.
Append the text "Judges who are no longer able to carry out eir duties, due to
deregistration, will be relieved of such duties." to the Comment of the
JUDGEMENT group.
Append the text "Appellate Justices who are no longer able to carry out eir
duties, due to deregistration, will be relieved of such duties." to the Comment
of the APPEALS group.
Destroy the proposal "reassigning Judges".
Destroy this proposal. |
|
Votes FOR: Craig,Dr Ducker,Josh,unlin_e
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST:
|
| |
35. "salaries" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-05-13 15:20:00
Expired on: 2003-05-20 15:20:00
|
Create a rule in the group OFFICES whose number is higher than any other in that group but lower than the number of the next highest numbered rule. (Note that since between any two real numbers have between them an infinite number of other real numbers, all such are equivalent for our purposes.) The rule shall have the following text:
Whenever any proposal is passed, the Bank will give one Coin to the person who submitted the proposal and one Coin to the Speaker.
Create another rule in the group OFFICES whose number is higher than any other in that group but lower than the number of the next highest numbered rule. The rule shall have the text:
Whenever a CFJ is judged and not appealed within a week, the Bank will give one Coin to the Judge and one Coin to the Stenographer.
Create another rule in the group OFFICES whose number is higher than any other in that group but lower than the number of the next highest numbered rule. The rule shall have the text:
Whenever a decision is reached on the appeal of a CFJ, the Bank will give one Coin to each of the Appelate Justices who returned judgements and one Coin to the Stenographer.
Destroy three Coins belonging to Craig. |
|
Votes FOR: Craig,Dr Ducker
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
40. Registration Proposal: untitled (registration #2) [Passed]
Submitted by: PsychicNathan |
Submitted on: 2003-05-24 06:10:00
Expired on: 2003-05-31 06:10:00
DESTROYED
|
Create the following three rules:
5.91 A Proposal may request a Support of Coins be established for said
proposal, and if destroying said Coins as an action of said proposal would allow
said proposal to become pending, then the destruction of all Coins assigned to
said proposal's Support of Coins is considered an action of said proposal, and
thus said proposal becomes pending.
5.92 Any player may assign any number of Coins which said player possesses to
be considered part of a proposal's Support of Coins.
5.93 Any Proposal which has not become pending within one week of its
submission is destroyed.
Destroy rule 5.8.
Create rule 5.8: No player may vote on a proposal which is not pending and does
not request Support.
Create rule 5.991 in the group PROPOSALS: "The person who submitted
a proposal may destroy that proposal, if there are not currently more FOR votes
than AGAINST votes on it, by announcing eir wish to do so on the mailing list."
Destroy a coin belonging to The Bank.
Destroy the first Registration Proposal of PsychicNathan. [ed. prop #36]
Destroy this proposal. [ed prop #40] |
Side Effects:
Coins for Everyone.
Therms set to zero.
1 Coin for PsychicNathan |
Votes FOR: Craig,Dr Ducker
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
42. Registration Proposal: a modest registration proposal [Passed]
Submitted by: PsychicNathan |
Submitted on: 2003-05-31 16:18:00
Expired on: 2003-06-02 19:58:00
DESTROYED
|
Create two coins, each in the possession of a randomly selected player.
Destroy this Proposal. |
Side Effects:
PsychicNathan becomes a player. |
Votes FOR: Craig,Dr Ducker,Josh,unlin_e
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST:
|
| |
41. Registration Proposal: untitled [Passed]
Submitted by: bd |
Submitted on: 2003-05-31 04:28:00
Expired on: 2003-06-04 02:03:00
|
Destroy rule 7.2
Create:
7.2 If a player has been a player for at least a week and e has not posted a message to the offical mailing list in the past week, e is deregistered.
Create a Coin in the possession of bd. |
|
Votes FOR: Craig,Dr Ducker,Josh,PsychicNathan,unlin_e
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST:
|
| |
43. "How to Win" [Passed]
Submitted by: PsychicNathan |
Submitted on: 2003-06-07 03:30:00
Expired on: 2003-06-14 03:30:00
DESTROYED
|
Create a new group of rules entitled "WINNING THE GAME", and containing rule 16:
"Whenever a player has 50 or more Coins, that player may claim a win, at which point that player wins the game."
Destroy this proposal. |
|
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,Josh,PsychicNathan
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Dr Ducker
|
| |
44. "limiting entropy" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-06-07 03:35:00
Expired on: 2003-06-14 03:35:00
DESTROYED
|
Rule 4.0 is repealed.
Now, let's see, what to do with that Thing I've now got the right to
create...
I know!
Craig receives one Coin.
Hmm...
Destroy this proposal.
Craig receives another Coin.
And, because I can:
Destroy one Coin belonging to Craig.
Craig receives another Coin. |
Side Effect: Craig gains a Coin |
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,PsychicNathan
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Dr Ducker,Josh
|
| |
46. "gone with the wins" [Passed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-06-07 04:13:00
Expired on: 2003-06-14 04:13:00
DESTROYED
|
If there is no group of rules headed WINNING THE GAME, then ignore this proposal. Otherwise:
Create a rule in the group OFFICES whose number is higher than the highest number of a rule in that group but lower than the lowest number of a rule not in that group whose number exceeds that of the highest number that is in the group. If you can understand that. It shall have the text:
There is an Office known as the Victory Cabbage, whose holder is called the Winner.
Destroy rule 16 and replace it with a new rule 16.0 with the following text:
Whenever a player has 50 or more Coins, that player may claim a win, at which point that player gains posession of the Victory Cabbage and all of eir Coins are randomly distributed among the set of all entities capable of owning Coins.
Destroy one Coin belonging to Craig.
Destroy this proposal. |
Side Effects: Craig gains a Coin |
Votes FOR: bd,Craig,PsychicNathan
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Dr Ducker,Josh
|
| |
| Failed Proposals: [ Pending Passed Failed TSL Violation Expired ] { Top } |
6. "Proposal Dr. Ducker::1" [Failed]
Submitted by: Dr Ducker |
Submitted on: 2003-04-10 23:18:00
Expired on: 2003-04-17 23:18:00
DESTROYED
|
Create a Rule:
5.9 When a rule is created, choose randomly between destroying one therm and destroying two therms.
Destroy this Proposal.
|
|
Votes FOR: Dr Ducker
Votes AGAINST: bd,unlin_e
Votes ABSTAIN: Craig
Votes UNCAST: Cassie
|
| |
12. "Online polls are fun" [Failed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-13 22:21:00
Expired on: 2003-04-20 22:21:00
|
Rule 5.6 is repealed and replaced with the following:
"5.6 When a proposal becomes pending, the speaker shall create a poll where players are to cast their votes." |
|
Votes FOR: Craig
Votes AGAINST: bd
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Cassie,Dr Ducker,Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
13. Registration Proposal: untitled [Failed]
Submitted by: Ian |
Submitted on: 2003-04-18 04:53:00
Expired on: 2003-04-25 04:53:00
|
For each expired proposal in existence, a rule is created with the text "If this proposal is destroyed by a proposal, a point shall be created in the possession of the player who possesses the proposal.", and with a number randomly chosen from the entire space of the real numbers not already associated with a rule. No, perhaps that's not in the spirit of 0.2. Let's just give them consecutive integers starting with 20.
All expired proposals are destroyed.
Rule 6.8 is created in the group "CHANGING THE GAMESTATE", reading "Immediately after a proposal expires, it is destroyed; this destruction is not considered to be a direct effect of the proposal."
The number of Therms is set to forty-two. |
+eprR (3)
-eprPR (3)
+1R (6.8)
+1PL (Ian)
------------
+2 things
+epr Therms (3)
Indirect Effects:
Ian Kelly gets a Point under rule 2.1 .
All players recieve a point under rule 1.3 .
Therms set to 0 under rule 1.3 . |
Votes FOR:
Votes AGAINST: Dr Ducker
Votes ABSTAIN: Craig
Votes UNCAST: bd,Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
22. "further cleaning" [Failed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-28 23:04:00
Expired on: 2003-05-05 23:04:00
|
| All non-pending proposals are destroyed. |
- X props
+ X Therms
Side-effects:
Craig gains 1 Coin |
Votes FOR: Craig,Josh
Votes AGAINST: bd,Dr Ducker
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: unlin_e
|
| |
30. "reassigning Judges" [Failed]
Submitted by: Dr Ducker |
Submitted on: 2003-04-30 19:51:00
Expired on: 2003-05-07 19:51:00
DESTROYED
|
Create a rule 11.7 within the JUDGEMENT group which reads:
"A Judge who has deregistered before ey have communicated eir Judgement, will be replaced with another player randomly selected, by the Stenographer, from amongst those players who have not yet been directly involved with the Call For Judgement, unless there are no such players remaining, in which case the next player to register will be assigned."
Create a rule 12.6 within the APPEALS group which reads:
"An Appellate Justice who has deregistered before ey have communicated eir Judgement, will be replaced with another player randomly selected, by the Stenographer, from amongst those players who have not yet been directly involved with the Call For Judgement, unless there are no such players remaining, in which case the next player to register will be assigned."
Destroy Rule (4 pi).
Create a rule 12.56 within the APPEALS group which reads:
"The decision of the majority of Appellate Justices shall be binding, and not subject to appeal.
Append the text "Judges who are no longer able to carry out eir duties, due to deregistration, will be relieved of such duties." to the Comment of the JUDGEMENT group.
Append the text "Appellate Justices who are no longer able to carry out eir duties, due to deregistration, will be relieved of such duties." to the Comment of the APPEALS group.
Destroy two random Coins. |
|
Votes FOR: Dr Ducker
Votes AGAINST: bd,Craig,Josh
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: unlin_e
|
| |
31. "stop stealing my damn coins" [Failed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-30 21:57:00
Expired on: 2003-05-07 21:57:00
|
Destroy rule 5.2 and create a new rule 5.2 in its place reading:
A pending proposal is a proposal which obeys the Three Sacred Laws, has been submitted to the official mailing list, and has not expired, with the exception that a proposal which would destroy any Coins not belonging to its proposer does not become pending until it has the support of the player whose Coins would be destroyed.
Create a rule in the section PROPOSALS whose number fits the criteria listed below, with the text:
If a proposal expires that would result in the destruction of any Coins belonging to a player who has not voted FOR it, the proposal fails automatically.
The criteria are:
The number must be less than A.
The number must be higher than that of any rule in the group whose header is foo.
Of the numbers that fit the first two criteria, there must be no eligible numbers that require more digits to write in base ten than the number that is chosen.
Of the numbers that fit the first three criteria, the lowest one will be used.
For the rule created above, A is six and foo is PROPOSALS
Destroy one Coin belonging to Craig, munificent creator of this proposal.
Create a rule in the section THINGS with the same criteria but A=6 and foo=THINGS. It shall read:
No Coin may be destroyed by a proposal that does not have an affirmative vote from the owner of the Coin.
Destroy this proposal. |
|
Votes FOR: Craig
Votes AGAINST: bd,Dr Ducker,Josh
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: unlin_e
|
| |
36. Registration Proposal: untitled registration proposal from PsychicNathan [Failed]
Submitted by: PsychicNathan |
Submitted on: 2003-05-14 05:44:00
Expired on: 2003-05-20 21:14:00
DESTROYED
|
1. Create a Coin possesed by The Bank.
2. Destroy a Coin possessed by The Bank.
3. Restart from step 1 unless there are two more Therms than there are
players.
4. Create rule 5.901 in the group PROPOSALS: "Disregard rules 5.91,
5.92, and 5.93, unless rule 1.1 says 'No proposal may be passed if its
passage would directly increase the number of Things in the game,
unless it is explicitly permitted by rules in the group headed FIRST
SACRED LAW.'."
5. Create rule 5.91 in the group PROPOSALS: "Any player may Support a
pending proposal by stating the intent to Support that proposal and
giving any number of Coins to The Bank."
6. Create rule 5.92 in the group PROPOSALS: "When a proposal passes,
that proposal causes all Coins that were given to The Bank in
Support of that proposal to be destroyed."
7. Create rule 5.93 in the group PROPOSALS: "When a proposal fails,
return each Coin given to The Bank in Support of that proposal to its
previous owner, unless that player has been destroyed, in which case
assign that Coin to a random player."
8. If there are fewer than three Coins owned by The Bank, transfer
ownership of a random Coin not owned by The Bank to The Bank and
repeat step 8.
9. Destroy three Coins owned by The Bank.
10. Destroy this proposal. |
|
Votes FOR: Craig
Votes AGAINST: Dr Ducker,unlin_e
Votes ABSTAIN: Josh
Votes UNCAST:
|
| |
37. "the wrath of the stenographer" [Failed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-05-15 21:55:00
Expired on: 2003-05-22 21:55:00
|
Create a Hot Potato called the Potato of Stenographic Wrath, whose
description reads:
No player who has posessed this Hot Potato in the past three days may submit
a Call For Judgement without the approval of the Stenographer. If e has not
done so during the past week, the Stenographer may cause posession of this
Hot Potato to be transferred. No player who has posessed this Hot Potato for
less than one full day may give it to any other player.
Destroy this proposal. |
|
Votes FOR:
Votes AGAINST: Craig
Votes ABSTAIN: Dr Ducker
Votes UNCAST: Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
38. "the wrath of the irs" [Failed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-05-15 21:55:00
Expired on: 2003-05-22 21:55:00
|
Create a Hot Potato called the Potato of Taxation, whose description reads:
Every three days, one Coin belonging to the posessor of this Potato is
transferred to the Bank.
Destroy this proposal. |
|
Votes FOR: Craig
Votes AGAINST: Dr Ducker
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
39. "wrath in a vague and general sense" [Failed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-05-15 21:55:00
Expired on: 2003-05-22 21:55:00
|
Create a Hot Potato called the Potato of Generally Ticked Off Players, whose
description reads:
All players are invited to irritate the heck out of the posessor of this proposal. Every week, the posessor of this potato may choose to declare one
player to be Supremely Aggravating.
Destroy this proposal. |
|
Votes FOR:
Votes AGAINST: Craig,Dr Ducker
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
47. "wubble wubble" [Failed]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-06-08 15:41:00
Expired on: 2003-06-15 15:41:00
DESTROYED
|
Create a Hot Potato named the Potato of Wubble Wubble in the posession of a
random player. Its description shall be as follows:
Whenever any player gives this Hot Potato to any other player, e must use
the dice server to determine whether it activates. It shall have a twenty
percent chance of doing so. If this Hot Potato activates, then one Coin
belonging to the player who posesses it is transferred to the previous
posessor and one Coin belonging to the player who posesses it is transferred
to a random player. If this Hot Potato activates while in the posession of a
player with fewer than two Coins, it shall have no effect.
Destroy this proposal. |
|
Votes FOR:
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: bd,Craig,Dr Ducker,Josh,PsychicNathan,unlin_e
|
| |
| TSL Violation Proposals: [ Pending Passed Failed TSL Violation Expired ] { Top } |
9. "The Stenotype" [TSL Violation]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-11 20:56:00
Will Automatically Expire on: 2003-04-11 20:56:00
DESTROYED
|
Rule 10.3 is repealed and replaced with a new rule 10.3 reading as follows:
10.3 The Speaker shall be in charge of tabulating votes and making any random decisions that the rules do not ask another player to make.
Rule 10.5 is created in the group OFFICES, reading:
There is an office known as the Stenotype, whose posessor, the Stenographer, is responsible for tracking all past judgements and for assigning Judges and Appelate Justices.
Rule 11.2 is repealed and replaced with the a new rule 11.2 reading:
When a Call For Judgement is issued, the Stenographer shall randomly choose a player, who shall be known as the Judge.
This proposal is destroyed.
A random player is named Stenographer. |
|
Votes FOR:
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: bd,Cassie,Craig,Dr Ducker,Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
1. "Proposal 1" [TSL Violation]
Submitted by: Cassie |
Submitted on: 2003-04-10 10:44:00
Will Automatically Expire on: 2003-04-17 10:44:00
DESTROYED
|
The follow rule be created:
10.5 An office exists known as the 'Proposal Officer'
The follow rule be created:
10.6 The job of the 'Proposal Officer' shall be to ensure proposals are correctly processed.
The follow rule be created:
10.7 If the position of 'Proposal Officer' is vacated, then it is the duty of the 'Speaker' to call an election.
The follow rule be created:
5.9 The owner of the proposal may process the proposal eyself.
The follow rule be created:
5.11 A proposal is processed when it has been submitted to the mailing list with a subject heading as follows 'Proposal X', where X is the next number following in chronological order from the number of the last proposal.
The following rule be deleted:
5.2 A pending proposal is a proposal which obeys the Three Sacred Laws, has been submitted to the official mailing list, and has not expired.
The follow rule be created:
5.2 A pending proposal is a proposal which obeys the Three Sacred Laws, has been processed, and has not expired. |
|
Votes FOR:
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: bd,Cassie,Craig,Dr Ducker,unlin_e
|
| |
3. "Proposal 2" [TSL Violation]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-10 21:44:00
Will Automatically Expire on: 2003-04-17 21:44:00
DESTROYED
|
Rule 1.1 is to be deleted, and replaced with a new rule 1.1 reading "No proposal may be submitted whose passage would directly increase the number of Things in the game by more than one, unless it is explicitly permitted by rules in the group headed FIRST SACRED LAW."
Rule 1.2 is to be deleted, and replaced with a new rule 1.2 reading "A Registration Proposal may, if passed, increase the number of Things in the game."
A rule 1.0 is to be added, reading "The rules in the group headed FIRST SACRED LAW are in temporary hiatus and will not be in force until such time as this rule is repealed."
The comment on the FIRST SACRED LAW will be amended to read, "Without outside influence, the game cannot expand at a very high rate."
Rule 4.0 will be deleted, but players are advised to continue to use short rules in case of SSL damage. |
|
Votes FOR:
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: bd,Cassie,Craig,Dr Ducker,unlin_e
|
| |
4. "Proposal 3" [TSL Violation]
Submitted by: unlin_e |
Submitted on: 2003-04-10 22:16:00
Will Automatically Expire on: 2003-04-17 22:16:00
DESTROYED
|
CREATE Rule 5.9, "A therm is destroyed when a rule is created."
|
|
Votes FOR:
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: bd,Cassie,Craig,Dr Ducker,unlin_e
|
| |
5. "Proposal 3, Version 2" [TSL Violation]
Submitted by: unlin_e |
Submitted on: 2003-04-10 22:28:00
Will Automatically Expire on: 2003-04-17 22:28:00
DESTROYED
|
| CREATE Rule 5.9, "When a rule is created, choose randomly between destroying one therm and destroying two therms." |
|
Votes FOR:
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: bd,Cassie,Craig,Dr Ducker,unlin_e
|
| |
11. "the stenotype take 2" [TSL Violation]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-13 22:11:00
Will Automatically Expire on: 2003-04-20 22:11:00
DESTROYED
|
Rule 10.3 is repealed and replaced with a new rule 10.3 reading as follows:
10.3 The Speaker shall be in charge of tabulating votes and making any random decisions that the rules do not ask another player to make.
Rule 10.5 is created in the group OFFICES, reading:
There is an office known as the Stenotype, whose posessor, the Stenographer, is responsible for tracking all past judgements and for assigning Judges and Appelate Justices.
Rule 11.2 is repealed and replaced with the a new rule 11.2 reading:
When a Call For Judgement is issued, the Stenographer shall randomly choose a player, who shall be known as the Judge.
This proposal is destroyed.
Proposal 2 is destroyed.
A random player is named Stenographer. |
|
Votes FOR:
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: bd,Cassie,Craig,Dr Ducker,Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
| Expired Proposals: [ Pending Passed Failed TSL Violation Expired ] { Top } |
20. "cash flow" [Expired]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-27 19:03:00
Expired on: 2003-05-04 19:03:00
DESTROYED
|
| A hot potato shall be created, called the Potato of Cash Flow. Its description shall be "Every time Yahoo automatically posts the ruleset, each Coin belonging to the posessor of this hot potato will be given to a random player." The group owner, who is also the submitter of the proposal, promises not to change the frequency of such occurrences. The Potato of Cash Flow shall begin in the posession of a random player. |
|
Votes FOR: Craig
Votes AGAINST: bd
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: Dr Ducker,Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
25. "speed" [Expired]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-04-29 02:39:00
Expired on: 2003-05-06 02:39:00
DESTROYED
|
Rule 5.8 shall be repealed, and in its place an identical rule shall be created with the number 5.9.
A new rule 5.8 shall be created, reading "Whenever enough players have voted on a proposal that its outcome is guaranteed in the absence of any registrations occurring while it is Pending, and no registration proposals are Pending, the proposal expires." |
|
Votes FOR:
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: bd,Craig,Dr Ducker,Josh,unlin_e
|
| |
45. "wins don't end it" [Expired]
Submitted by: Craig |
Submitted on: 2003-06-07 03:58:00
Expired on: 2003-06-14 03:58:00
DESTROYED
|
If there is no group of rules headed WINNING THE GAME, then ignore this
proposal. Otherwise:
Create a rule in the group OFFICES whose number is higher than the highest
number of a rule in that group but lower than the lowest number of a rule
not in that group whose number exceeds that of the highest number that is in
the group. If you can understand that. It shall have the text:
There is an Office known as the Victory Cabbage, whose holder is called the
Winner.
Destroy rule 16 and replace it with a new rule 16.0 with the following text:
Whenever a player has 50 or more Coins, that player may claim a win, at
which point that player gains posession of the Victory Cabbage and all of
eir Coins are randomly distributed among the set of all entities capable of
owning Coins. |
|
Votes FOR:
Votes AGAINST:
Votes ABSTAIN:
Votes UNCAST: bd,Craig,Dr Ducker,Josh,PsychicNathan,unlin_e
|
| |
