As the pieces of this puzzle come better into view for those who have grasped the immeasurably insane acts of these grand schemes, it pays to think back.
Late this evening I asked myself: Who was the Attorney General in the State of New York when the WTC Towers were blown up by the Bush Administration as a ploy to get the country into full swing for their Crusade for Middle Eastern Oil, when it was planned, plotted, conceived and accomplished in their now infamous New American Century machinations?
Eliot Spitzer was Attorney General of the State of New York when 9-11 happened.
Fuck you, Eliot Spitzer. You should hang for going along with this just to promote your corrupt career. Who do you think you are? God?
So what was Spitzer doing during this, the most treasonous act in American history? He was busy. He was busy chasing small potatoes, and collecting French-fry fines, seemingly unconcerned with the criminal conspiracy that led to and followed the events of 9-11. And, the New York and national press were busy writing about all the wondrous things Mr. Spitzer was accomplishing.
Since that time Mr. Spitzer has parlayed his political opportunism into the Governor's Office for New York State too. New York is apparently the fool me twice state.
Arson is a common crime in the United States. It's a common crime because insurance companies generally profit from the crime of arson.
Because arson is profitable for insurance companies, they don't encourage state fire marshals or insurance investigators to be very diligent in their work. And they aren't, generally, because that's their job. You might be surprised to find that almost every arsonist that ends up being prosecuted wasn't an arsonist with any idea of collecting insurance money. Those guys are easy to catch. It's the arsonists who burn their own insured property to the ground that are seemingly impossible to apprehend. Let me explain why.
This will be an education in American economics for all of you. But this isn't your average fool-Libertarian economics. This is how economics really works in our corrupt progress-at-all-costs oriented country.
Economics in the U.S. is war with all the rules of war, which means, for the uninitiated here, there are no rules.
One has only to look at how insurance companies make money in order to understand how and why for-profit arson is such a widespread and rarely prosecuted crime in our society. Progressives at some point got legislation passed in virtually every state that set the amount of money insurance companies could charge for their property insurance policies. But insurance regulations offer moneymaking opportunities too. In the case of property insurance, allowable profit equals a percentage over and above the costs of any given insurance company, a percentage set by state regulations.
This progressive legislation limits insurance companies to making a percentage in profit over and above their costs year in and year out.
This would of course include the costs paying out claims on policies where the building was burned down, or blown up, but only if the arsonist or the bombers aren't prosecuted for their often-murderous crimes. If an insured someone were to be prosecuted, there would be no pay-out, and hence, there would be no profit either. So, it is quite rare to see prosecutions in for-profit arson.
I actually had a guy come to work for me almost twenty years ago who also worked as an insurance claim adjuster. He explained most of this to me. We discussed a case in which I knew an arsonist had burned his house down for the insurance money. It took him two tries to get his house to catch fire. The first attempt, when he poured gasoline in his cellar and threw a match in through the bulkhead door just blew him on his ass and singed his eyebrows with the flash, and, then his effort just made a lot of smoke. The fire went out, having never had a chance to get going.
But the second try worked well though, and, this time it actually provided the fire department with something to do on their second trip out that night. It was a nice clean total-loss claim.
This is why arson for-profit is rarely prosecuted. And this is also why insurance companies as well as municipalities profit from the crime of arson. If the arsonist were prosecuted, there would be no insurance pay-out, which would keep down the costs for insurance companies, and thus limit the amount they could charge their customers in the following years.
Municipalities profit from arson, because if there is no insurance claim pay-out, then the building won't get rebuilt, and they suffer a loss in property taxes.
Arson is also a quick means to achieve urban renewal. In fact, it is a preferred means, as arson is the quickest and most cost-effective means to achieve urban renewal. There are no evictions, there is most often a vastly reduced cost of demolition, and there's a pile of insurance money to achieve the ends of the scurrilous urban renewers.
Now, Eliot Spitzer, if you look him up on Wikipedia, you'll find he's a really quick learner, a fast study, and an extremely aggressive fellow. Mr. Spitzer knows which side of the cookie the frosting is on too. You don't get to be Attorney General of the State of New York, or, Governor of the State of New York without having a certain amount of savvy about how to get along in the city that greed and corruption built.
Eliot Spitzer plays the game very well.
As Attorney General Eliot Spitzer had full power at the time of 9-11 to subpoena witnesses and documents pertaining to investigations of fraud or illegal activity. But he couldn't find his way out of the back room where the fate of victims of 9-11 was decided, because this was of course an inside job and a win-win-win for everyone but the clueless victims of 9-11 and the general public who'll pay for the billions in insurance claims paid out.
In part it seems too obvious why 9-11 is something of a run of the mill unprosecuted case of for-profit arson.
Mr. Spitzer was at the time busy repairing the reputation of Wall Street with a few token prosecutions of some big-time swindling miscreants who should have done long terms, but whom were instead slapped on the wrist with relatively small fines, relative to the size of the swindles they and the cadre of their cohorts were involved in during the DOT.COM debacle.
Mr. Spitzer, I will quote from Wikipedia, "[...] pursued cases in both state and federal courts involving pollution, entertainment, technology, occupational safety and health and other fields in which New York plays a part in setting and maintaining national standards of conduct." And I'll translate that for you. He built an astute political career as a flowery crusader for public integrity, which was quite fruitful, because he already had the financial backing of NYC finest white collar swindlers.
This is the kind of guy Eliot Spitzer is. And again, I'll quote from Wikipedia:
"On December 22, 2005, John C. Whitehead [...] alleged that Spitzer said, "Mr. Whitehead, it's now a war between us and you've fired the first shot. I will be coming after you. You will pay the price. This is only the beginning and you will pay dearly for what you have done. You will wish you had never written that letter."
And, "The new governor is reported � by Fredric U. Dicker of the New York Post (01/31/2007) � to have berated the Republican minority leader in the Assembly, James Tedisco, telling him, "I am a fucking steamroller" who will, as Mr. Dicker paraphrased him, crush the Assembly and anyone else who stands in his way."
Everyone in Washington D.C., and just about everyone in New York State government knows exactly who, why and how 9-11 happened. It's just like in high school. Everyone knows. All the journalists know. All the cops know. All the Attorney Generals know. Everyone knows. It reinforces their own view of the heinous activity they're all involved in.
And this is nothing really all that new, except that you and I know now too.
The social mores of our wolf-and-sheep society are supposed to keep the common schmucks from pulling their own dirty tricks, but in a small time way everyone does the same thing to some degree. That's what passes for morality after the tooth-fairy aspect of it is thoroughly learned.
I'm reading American Epoch by Arthur S. Link and William B. Catton. I can't yet recommend it like I did the Wells book. Link was a Professor of History, as well as the double-dipping Director of the Woodrow Wilson Papers at Princeton. The book was originally published in 1955, but I am reading the 1966 revision.
One must remember about the following quote, Woodrow Wilson was a progressive, an academic, an intellectual and a pacifist, if not a pinko socialist. In any event, and without further ado, from American Epoch:
Who willed American participation [in World War I]? Radicals and socialists gave an answer in 1917 that was reiterated many times in the 1930's: The United States had been driven to war by businessmen, bankers, and munitions manufacturers. These enemies of the people had worked in devious ways to protect their profitable trade and enormous investments in an Allied victory. Moreover, this argument went on, Americans had been deceived by cunning propagandists into believing that the Allies were fighting for righteous objectives. The basic trouble, professors of international law added, was that the American government had not been truly neutral.
Obviously no such simple generalizations explain the complex causes for the decision for war in 1917. There is no evidence that bankers and businessmen affected that decision in any important way, and the effect of propaganda has been vastly overrated. In the final analysis it was Wilson, influenced by public opinion and his own conception of right and duty, who made the important decisions that shaped American policy. [...] pp. 190-191
I just want to make it clear for everyone here. The "good guys" in American politics, well... Today, they are in fact the bad guys. And were these author-historians, Link and Catton, alive today, they'd probably agree with me and point their fingers directly at the likes of Eliot Spitzer who not only could have stopped the war, he had a duty to investigate, subpoena and prosecute the obvious for-profit arsonists-bombers of 9-11 too.
And, he could have begun the moment someone tried to tell everyone about having found Mohamed Atta's passport in the street.
The finder was a person of interest in the case. I'm willing to bet no one can find him or her today.
These aggressive social-climbing politicians, like Governor Elliot Spitzer, Federal Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald and Senator Henry Waxman are all cut from the same vote-for-me cloth.
I just want to make it clear for everyone here. The "good guys" in American politics, well... Today, they are in fact the bad guys. And were these author-historians, Link and Catton, alive today, they'd probably still be publicly wondering what drags a country into war. That is how historians get published as they write the history of the winners who wage war.
It had to be Eliot Spitzer's decision that there was no reason whatsoever to ask a single question or to document anything about 9-11. In other words, Eliot Spitzer said, No investigations. Eliot Spitzer instead willfully played his deceiving part and helped send the country off into this war.
Neither vote-for-me politicians or publish-me historians have any morals. If they did, none of this would've happened.
And finally, I didn't write this as an attempt to drop these miscreants down a notch or to let loose others to do their own dirty deeds by some justification they might wrongly find here. I wrote it to unload my own conscience as a moral philosopher, and, it seemed like the right thing to do for the future and for Kevin Cosgrove.
Kevin is the caller in the YouTube-posted video 911 call from WTC 2 referred by to me by Michael Rivero's What Really Happened.
Don Robertson, The American Philosopher
--------------------------------------------------------
