(Preliminary, May 16, 2002 by Dennis Kennedy) Note that this is confidential and proprietary information, owned in completion by Dennis Kennedy. Note also that this is the first public appearance of this information - so far, I've only explained this concept to "my wife in our kitchen - ha ha." Also note that more information about me can be found at ( http://www.advsrv.com/dkflyer ). (I can be reached by email at [email protected].) Complete Computer Control (3C) Programming Motion Control ('hard' real-time) Data Analysis ('hard' real-time) Parallel Processing / Multi-Threading / Multi-Processor / Multi-Process / Multi-Computer (redundant, automatic). Workflow and Process Analysis, Optimization Inter-process, Inter-device (event) control. Management Encryption X-10 General Capabilities Web Interface Database (direct connect) Program (Note that this source code is missing.)
'PIC' Evaluation Comparisons:
June 2, 2002
PIC w/ 3C did for industry exactly what the tractor did for farming.
This current evaluation only makes a simple and direct comparison with a known product.
In 1998, Secant sold their middleware database source code (approx. 10,000,000 characters) for $10,000,000.00 per copy (one-user).
As a temporary and conservative evaluation, PIC's assessed value is $25,000,000.00.
I did some additional calculations:
I'm going to offer a simple discusion on 'Practical Intelligence Computing'. I am only going to describe it in its' most simplistic terms, merely to give just a small idea of its' capabilities, but enough to provide at least an overview of them as well. Note that this is only intended to give a minor amount of additional information in my proprietary program in a way that still protects my intellectual property. It's only intention to be informative, not degrading. But, it's time to begin on this program again, too.
I wrote the 'PIC' program for manufacturing. It is a program that is capable of running a machine without any human intervention. The program runs the machine. Through various feedback mechanisms, it is capable of determining where it is at the moment in real-time - not merely as programmed. As a result, it is capable of compensation 'on-the-fly'. In other words and more simply stated, it is capable of in-process analysis and compensation in order to insure that any compenent is made according to tolerance.
The program comes with multiple definition files, which it also continues in compensation. In other words and more simply stated, the program can automatically determine optimized methods for various different types of materials. The 'same' component can be run in one type of material and then a completely different type of material and automatically determine the optimum speeds, feeds, etc. for that different type of material. As the program continues to progress, it also continually optimizes these definition files for future use.
As this is viewed from the standpoint of only one machine, these same principles then also apply to any other machine that is being run by this program. In other words, even the machinery themselves are definition files, which are also optimized on the fly. The information gathered from any previous optimization now applies to these other optimizations, meaning that the program not only 'learns' from 'experience', but then applies what it has 'learned' to any new area that it is used.
Consequently, just the opposite is also true. Not only is the program capable of using tools to make a component on any machine, but it is also capable of using any machine to sharpen a tool. The principles are the same, but merely the opposite. Based on such areas as Management Resource Planning as well as multiple feedbacks and previous optimization methods, the program determines when a tool would need to be replaced. As I stated, not only does it use anticipated methods based on projections, but these multiple feedbacks to constantly determine and once again 'on-the-fly' as to the current state and in real-time mode. For a very simplistic example, if the projections based on all definition files state that the tool should last 20 uses, but the feedback determines that it needs replaced in only the 15th (and even if it is still in the middle of being used), the program automatically changes them at puts that tool to be sharpened. In the event of something more serious (such as tool breakage), the program automatically takes corrective measures.
Every program on every machine not only uses multiple methods for feedback, but every program is also tied in with another program, reporting back on its' own progress and optimizations. In this parent program to the child, there is then greater analysis that is performed in also a real-time mode, but without the constraints of actually controlling the physical activies (such as the motors, etc.). The parent program maintain full communication with the child program allowing for instantaneous changes to be made at any time. Then, as the child is constantly reporting to the parent, it is also reporting its' current position allowing this analysis to be performed at computer speeds, but allowing any viewing to be done at human speeds. (You can actually watch the machine run, in video mode, in virtual mode and all in real-time.)
As I'd already stated, as the program actually runs more than only a machine, as the tool wears, it is then automatically removed from the machine and another then takes its' place. That tool is then moved to another machine where it is sharpened and re-inspected for size so that it is then made available for use, again. However, that tool would not necessarily be used even again on that same machine. As this program is completely interlinked, any other machine in the system now has access to that tool as needed. This means that multiple machines are tied in together through this same program. Other machines that are also involved include such things as the movement of material, feeding more material into the machinery, etc. Basically, the entire facility is actually just one big parent-child relationship of a single computer.
The programs that are used for this analysis are some of the best programs every designed or written. Math equations that are unavailable are used in this program for the various analysis routines. However, as this proceeds on, even the parent program has two-way communication with a a parent of its' own. That parent then provides additional capabilities. Some of these capabilities within multiple parents provide for greater human intervention (such as the ability to check the progress of a running machine in real-time mode). Others perform additional functionality, such as accounting, financial, scheduling, Management Resource Planning, etc. and everything is accomplished throughout the entire program in 'clock-ticks' (computer speeds). Other programs provide for additional capabilities, such as the ability to read a picture into the program and generate machine movement from that picture, or to take engineering drawings and do exactly the same, then schedule that productivity in through resource planning.
There are requirements for each component to be produced, and a simplistic example would be any material that would be necessary to produce a part. Another definition file that is continually optimized is the history of vendors, especially in terms of delivery, to insure that all materials are available and without delay as they are needed within the M.R.P. schedule. Obviously, financial analysis is significant in this program too, with the ability to select from any vendor based on their entire definition portfolio. At the same time, if a vendor is consistently 'two weeks late' on their deliveries, this adjustment is automatically taken into consideration when creating a schedule for future events. Once again, the quality of process controls that are also implemented into this program are only the best.
It is not possible for anyone to duplicate this program based on this simplistic writeup. However, as it is easy to see, once the program is created and error-free on such things as disposable materials, the same program would be capable of operating on a human heart through a needle, without even having to stop the heart from beating.
Obviously, as the program uses multiple definition files for the various machines, the program does not care at all what the machine is or what function that machine performs. Whether that machine is a tool machine for cutting steel, a machine for performing heart surgery of a machine capable of firing a weapon is completely irrelevent. As I'd stated for years, this program used by the military would make the computer in the move 'wargames' appear as a toy in comparison. The capabilities of this program for performing analysis and compensation 'on-the-fly' far outweigh anything that has ever been designed or for that matter, even considered.
In a very simplistic example, take that the program would be firing a small pistol at a fly on the wall in some distance. By using definition files, the program would 'know' that it is firing a pistol and the type of projectile that it contains. Using various other information such as wind velocities, the program is capable of compensating for the direction needed to aim that pistol in order to shoot that fly off of a wall. If the projectile misses, the program is capable of analyzing the miss and compensating for the next attempt, then updating the optimization routine so that there would be greater accuracy in the future. (The process of optimization ultimately results in that there is never a miss.) Then, as another type of weapon such as a cannon is used for shooting another fly on the wall, as that weapon has its' own projectile with its' own definition files, it is automatically capable of sharing the information that was obtained from the pistol towards improving its' own accuracy.
Of course, this is with 'dumb' weaponry and the use of 'smart technology' only means that even the initial launch of any projectile as being accurate with 'dumb' would be more on target. As this program is capable of running virtually without any human intervention, this would also mean that a group of perhaps 20 or less people (even remotely) could easily 'appear' to be a group of 4000 weapons or more - at least 20 times larger, but there is no top-end limitation. In actuality, the program is capable of a completely unmanned military. 'PIC' even had built into it the ability for 'virtual travel', a concept better described at a later date. Obviously, one of the greatest advantages of this program is in the optimization methods that constantly improve upon themselves, creating a computer-generated model from historical events, providing pinpoint accuracy in every detail, including the ability for coordination, real-time requirements, inter-operability, movements, etc. The principles of running a machine, operating on a human heart or running an umanned military from this program are all the same.
Remember that this is only a mini-description of a program that I completed six years ago. Even the concept has not been considered and from this writeup, any attempt to do so is not only illegal, but would undoubtedly result in exactly the same as been true for decades - and that is that any attempt at a reproduction would result in a program that is less than one percent of the capabilites of 'Practical Intelligence Computing'. As you view the web page on UniDos, you will notice that from the screens from back in 1991, that now the entire industry is using similar types of user interfaces. Yet, if you were to view the entire scope of that entire design, you would also see that less than one-percent of that program is currently in use today - thirteen years later. That program is also still state-of-the-art by today's standards and that design was completed and implemented as I said - thirteen years ago.
There are industrial strength components within 'PIC' as it was intended for the hardest of real-time in every component. Comparing any other program currently available with the capabilities of 'PIC" would be the same as comparing a tricycle with a 747 Boeing airplane. It is my intention now to include a rewrite of the 'PIC' program (although the source code is 'missing', as they say, whatever you do the first time, you always do better the second.) as well as a rebuild of UniDos completely within the Defense Security for Manufacturing Program and the Security Program for Computing. Obviously, the capabilities of 'PIC' should now be slightly more recognized. The additional capabilities of some of my other programs should be as well, such as with parallel processing, multi-computer processing, etc.
Even more simply stated, 'PIC' was also designed that it could completely 'take over' the entire Internet. The encryption method that I designed for 'PIC' has never been able to be cracked since 1996 - even by all of my guru groups and hacker groups on the Internet from all around the world (I initiated a 'contest') - as it is a multi-dimensional method that is infinitely more sophisticated than anything currently in use today. The program is also designed to retrieve, analyze, encrypt and store any type of information, such as video, audio, date, etc. Every detail of the components that were included in 'PIC' were tested for especially speed, but for dependability, too. 'PIC' was designed to work at 'Nine-Nines' - no downtime, ever as the entire system is completely redundant and in real-time 'clock-tick' mode. Even further, as more equipment is added into the sytem, every piece actually becomes even more efficient than it was prior. As even multiple systems are combined, they not only enhance each of the other systems, but automatically begin to optimize based on mutual performances and redifinitions or in more simplistic terms, one implementation of 'PIC' can actually automatically and instantly 'learn' from another.
This program was completed and designated (by me) as part of the implementation of the defsec program back in 1998, with implementation scheduled to begin in 1999. Instead, I went and worked on National Missile Defense, first. There are other programs that are 'available' that would significantly enhance this programs immediate capabilities. As the program is object-oriented as well, each of these subcomponents can be made available for use for multiple purposes and at multiple levels for obviously a whole number of various uses. As you view some of my webpages that are on the Internet, you will notice some of the various components of 'PIC', such as the Control Chart Analysis ( http://www.advsrv.com/dkflyer/cca.htm ) or ( http://www.geocities.com/dkennedy4457/cca.htm ), used in conjuction with the other four components of Source Variation Analysis, Multiple Correlation, Multiple Property Optimization and Experimental Design Optimization. This is the souce code from the principals of William Demmings, commonly known as the process expert that won World War II. (After the war and for reasons better left for another time, he then installed these same processes in Japan.) But, if you notice in this simple example, just the CCA program completed in 1994 includes such components as the P, I, C, X and MR engineering concepts for data (including automated) action-analysis and is indeed just about as industrial a component as anyone can get. Then obviously, the program also used other areas already built in, such as MIL-Q-9858a, ISO-9001, Statistical Process Control (SPC), General Accounting Principles (GAP) - many more too numerous to mention, and inappropriate to mention in this context.
Even the simple M.R.P. program that I was supposed to design and program for N.A.S.A. in the second quarter of 1999 (simple in screen displays, yet extremely sophisticated in my web engine as the program 'did all of the work' for them) was part of the 'PIC' program where I pulled out the portion of that program. You can view this very simple example at ( http://www.advsrv.com/dkflyer/mrp.htm ) or ( http://www.geocities.com/dklfyer/mrp.htm ). As you view the 'Phases', you will note that a new phase was added by me - Phase 0 - which was the bulk of the program to create my web engine, using the principal of the 'Dual' MultiTier WebDB' and the expandability of the 'Web Database - Client / Server Architecture', all of which are my own concepts predating 1998, which also demonstrate the ability of 'PIC' to 'replicate' intelligently. Remember that the few example screen interfaces of M.R.P. that are shown were designed as a simple user-interfaces, yet were still even more sophisticated than what was needed five years ago in a mult-user project managemet program. Remember too that the goal of this multi-user project management program was to make the program do all of the work, not the users and that nothing existed at that time (or even now for that matter) that would suit this purpose. All calculations were done completely within the program as with M.R.P., everything (including employee time) is considered to be a resource.
The Defense Security Program should go forward if nothing else but for the rewrite of the most sophisticated program ever designed - 'Practical Intelligence Computing' - which you already should have had a copy as if you did, you would not be having so many problems. As I stated even over a year ago, there are several computer companies that I also think that would be worth trying to utilize. Some of these companies some 'unusual' programs that are 'unknown' that could be 'combined' to very quickly satisfy any requirements. I'm sure that I can design the 'combination' separately using these that are already well into development. Note that some of these programs are not advertised and although useful independently, are much more powerful combined. I have some additional facts that I'm sure that would be ' unbelievable' - but very easily attainable and very, very quickly, too.
But, as I have been emailing about making this program available for defense now for over two years, not only should this have already been available, it will now be available within defsec. As I said, it is easily the most sophisticated program ever designed, never mind ever written. And once again, as I tested the speed of the program as well as its' analysis capabilities, it makes the computer in the movie 'Wargames' a mere toy in comparison, and could make the twenty-year-old concept of Star Wars a reality. It could also be used in aerospace in such places as N.A.S.A. or to stop any incoming asteroid or meteor. Because of its' versatility, it could enhance the analysis of air travel in real-time mode - the applications are actually endless as every usage is merely a module to be used on top of these objects. However, one of the areas that I was asked during my first year to consider when I was finished with National Missile Defense was in creating a system of objects that would be used as a base throughout. Obvsiously, I was also asked to do this based on yet one more advantageous component of 'PIC' and that is that it is a completely object-oriented system. And obviously, this design of a system of objects would also easily be accomplished from within defsec, too.
Excerpt from September 18, 2002 Practical Intelligence Computing As you know, I designed and programmed National Missile Defense. I was 'the only person in the whole country that they (Raytheon, SGI and consulting firms) could find and they searched hard for three years'. I also worked extensively teaching 'the kids' (the NMD team was filled with young adults) and explaining my concepts and designs to the team. The N.M.D. program is the top program ever written - well, except for 'PIC'. 'PIC' was easily a thousand times a better program than any before it was stolen. In fact, I had lost the computer during the move from Boston to Cleveland, which included 'PIC' and a ton of other source code, stolen either from Mass as we were loading or from Cleveland after we unloaded. I had copies of source code worth hundreds of millions of dollars, with data worth hundreds of millions of dollars more. The backup of 'PIC' was stolen with the computer. (I am going to officially report this as stolen to the local police now. Update: I could never report the theft.) I wrote 'Practical Intelligence Computer' or 'PIC' over the course of more than ten years. As a matter of fact, in August of 2000, I was told that I could get in a lot of trouble for even having 'PIC'. 'PIC' was considered to be THAT good. When I wrote 'PIC', it was to be a program that could run a '2000 man production facility with only 20 people'. This was not to take away jobs, but to replace the lost production of the last 20 years in the United States of America. For these last ten years that I had been working on 'PIC', there is also the military application potential that 'PIC' has. One pentium computer running 'PIC' is very powerful. I know that the fact that 'PIC' is missing has been 'discarded' as unimportant, but that 'practical intelligence' program can analyze and assign faster than any human team, with the absolute coldness of a computer and whoever programmed it. That program has been missing for almost a year now. That program can also make multiple groups of a 2000 man army units with only 20 people or less and more accurate than anything than anyone has to compare with today. This wasn't the intention for the design of 'PIC', but neither was it the intention for the other designs, either. 'PIC' could take over the whole Internet, could take over the computers of these businesses that are tied to the Internet, including communications - any business or government office. As I've already explained, it was designed to be self-replicating and event driven - it will position itself, then wait for an instruction to begin - and completely encrypted so that it remains undetected. It is much more powerful than the current program. The movie 'War Games' - that computer is a toy compared to 'PIC'. Considering that I was specifically brought in to be the expert on N.M.D. and that I have already written just such a program for intelligence computing, I would like to rewrite 'PIC' again right now. Furthermore, I already have a team of about 100 of the best programmers (gurus) in the country (they were helping me on the Central Repository for the Security Program). I could also lead the programming of 'virtual travel' and some of the other ideas that were declassified last May, that were then released in the newspaper - all concepts that were my ideas. I also have very many more ideas that I have never discussed with anybody, some of which are still ten years ahead of their time, and I would turn these ideas into reality. 'PIC' could also be used for its original concept of running factories. As the availability of replacement parts was also on the list from the news article (the only item that was not specifically computer related), and since the United States no longer has the capabilities from the past in providing these replacement parts, then in setting up multiple factories similarly to the former Yugo factory (from 'dirt' to product), 'PIC' could also be used as it was originally designed and provide everything that is needed. (I am sure that the unions would have no problem with this idea as these 'jobs' no longer exist in this country --- if they are not coming back. Furthermore, 'PIC' was designed to do for production what the tractor did for farming - not take jobs, but provide for different and better jobs, with more of everything for everyone. (Where would we be today without the tractor?) I am sure that this rewrite is a wise decision. |