After the First World War, the flamethrower was quickly discarded, since
most armies considered it to have been a specialized device for the peculiar
conditions obtaining in the trench warfare in Flanders. It reappeared in Italian
hands in the Abyssinian campaign of 1935, when a tank-mounted flamethrower was
employed, and also in small numbers in the Spanish Civil War, in both man-pack and
tank-mounted versions.
|
|
During the Second
World War, the German army used flamethrowers in the Polish campaign and also in
the advance into France and Belgium in 1940, particularly against the Belgian
forts such as Eben Emael. After this, they saw little use since they did not fit
in with the tactics of open war. The British Army, on the other hand, began
development later in the war with the intention of using flame during assault
operations against the coast of Europe. |
|
Italian soldiers with a
man-pack flamethrower |
|
|
Much British work was
done in 1940 on developing devices; flame guns for Home Guard use, flame traps,
and flamethrowers shooting flame into the sky to attack troop-carrying aircraft
during their landing runs were all developed to varying degrees of efficiency.
More serious work went into the development of tank-mounted flame throwers, the
Crocodile and Wasp being the principal models, and were used to good effect in
north-west Europe in 1944-45. A manpack model, known as the 'Ack Pack' was
produced, though this was largely intended for operations in the Far East,
particularly against Japanese pillboxes and bunkers where the defenders were
willing to fight to the death. |
|
The harness for the
'Ack
Pack' - No 5 Mk 1 Flamethrower
|
The Ack Pack consisted
of a ring-shaped container, similar to a lifebuoy, carrying 18 litres (4 Imp
gal) of fuel; in the centre of the ring was a spherical gas container holding
gas at 140.6 kg/sq cm (2000 lb/sq in) pressure. From the bottom of the fuel tank
a hose ran to a nozzle unit which had two pistol grips and a firing trigger.
Around the nozzle was a revolving cylinder with ten chambers, each holding a
special ignition cartridge. On pressing the trigger, a valve released fuel under
pressure, and an ignition cartridge was fired, igniting the fuel which then gave
a jet to about 36 m (120 ft) range.
|
|
In 1940, the US Army
began developing a manpack thrower, which was standardized in late 1941. The
first combat use in American hands was on Guadalcanal in January 1943, when the
2nd Marine and 25th Infantry Divisions used them to deal with Japanese
pillboxes. Later operations were to have varied results, some successful and
others disastrous. This was due to equipment malfunctioning; much of which was
caused by the rapid effects of heat and damp experienced in the Pacific.
Difficulty arose over the fuel, and it was not until rigorous maintenance was
insisted upon and a new fuel, based on napalm, was adopted, that flamethrower
operations began to succeed.
|
|
A
heavy pump flamethrower
demonstration in 1944 Europe
|
|
Generally speaking,
records tend to show that the flamethrower is a mixed blessing. To obtain
results it demands a high state of specialized training, not only for the
thrower operator but of his supporting squad, and this training is difficult to
arrange when other, more basic, skills appear to be more vital. Since flame is
only used occasionally, the tendency is for the trained team to be dispersed and
used in other tasks when things are slack. When flame is suddenly needed, the
trained squad is absent and an inexperienced team is hurriedly assembled. They
usually fail, the failure is blamed on the flame device, which takes another
drop of esteem. It was noticeable that where trained flame operators were in
frequent use, as with the US Marines and infantry in the Pacific and the British
79th Armored Division in north-west Europe, flame gave excellent results and
commanders were willing to employ it. Where commanders were not used to it, they
tended to shy away; there were several instances in Europe in 1945 where it
might have been used to good effect but where conventional weapons were used
instead
|
|