Del n Earth

OPINION


 Salaud! Un cul!

Why is it that I am so polite and eloquent in English, yet <mon dieu> I make these asides in French? It has the little grey cells working overtime, yet I am unable to reach the conclusion, nes pas? The answer, she escapes me, but ne regret pas rein, I am on the case.

 

I would say, excuse my French, moi amis, but je m'en branle.

 


 

Lowest common denominator soft drink

 

Only Glaswegians would find amusement in a six foot tall thug budgie, high on stimulants, threatening an old woman. The bright plumage, tough guy waddle, substance misuse and violence, so reminiscent of Sauchiehall street. I fail to see what's so damn funny.
 


 Ricky Gervais; sick of himself.

 

That's the whole act of debasement, flitting between arrogance and insecurity. Giving everything of himself with self referential introspective of the cretin. I'm sick of the cretin, no matter how aware of his own weaknesses he is, I'm far too aware of them already.  The same formula of disparaging wit. The distasteful jokes told under the premise that he's an unpalatable person.

 

Update; series two of Extras catches up with the pseudo character just as he is becoming famous. We're not sick of you yet, even if you are.


Newspaper uses "quotations" just in case.

Need some extra emphasis? Not sure if something is of dubious legality, an unsubstantiated allegation perhaps?

The editors of the Metro again fail to understand what quotations marks actually mean.

"There's a bomb on board plane" read the headline, when actually they mean to say: There's a note on board the plane.

There appears to be no correlations between pieces of papers warning of bombs, and bombs themselves. In fact, if a terrorists was to plant a bomb on a plane.

Yet on page 5 of the same paper: We're innocent, insist freed tot death couple. Without any quotation marks whatsoever. Further down the same page: Hacker "could be sent to Guantanamo". No need for quotation marks there whatsoever, as the statement had already relinquished itself from controversy by use of the word "could".

De Menez "not guilty of rape" when, as the article explained: DNA conclusively proved innocence. What kind of inference does this to put on the facts?

[email protected]


Zombieversary (Easter) special message:

Archbishop warns congregation about taking fictional works too seriously. Was that the Da Vinci Code or the Bible?


Latest endorsed beauty products based on personal recommendations.

J-Lo markets magic beauty tissues. Simply wipe them between your bust, daily, to develop your cleavage by up to three whole cup sizes. It works- just look at my arse.


David vs. Goliath: divine belief combined with superior firepower: a winning combination.


Preying outsourced

"God direct, hello you're speaking to Brian." said the disembodied voice in an Indian accent.


Middle class alcoholics new year resolution

From now on I will only be drinking the finest eastern European beers meeting the Rheinheitsgebot law of 1516.

Ironically, the same laws which Budweiser: official beer of the German world cup in does not meet.


Parade leaders sign anti-sectarian pact.

Grand master of the Orange order, and the national organiser of Cairde Na hEireann have signed a (non legally binding with no actual power) pact in a pledge to a new zero tolerance approach to bigoted abuse. Although the exact small print of the agreement is not known, it is presumed that the leaders of the sects promise any further bigotry would be of the inherent, unspoken, non abusive kind of prejudice which makes the west of Scotland such a pleasant place to live.

In other news A. Hitler promises to control the small fascist element responsible for giving his organisation a bad name.


An insult to hard work, grit and determination: Instant fame, instant success.

If the contenders on "The Apprentice" are such capable people, why haven't they got their own companies, and have to resort to a "reality" show? Alan Sugar surprises everyone with his endorsement of "premium blondes",  yet the pathetic challenges reminiscent of the "Young Enterprise" scheme run at Scottish secondary schools. How exactly to you say "you're fired" to someone you've not actually hired?

Learn ballroom dancing in a month, instant music career- just add karaoke.


Government formalised in Iraq: Terrorism no longer our problem.

Blair attempts to negate responsibility from himself and the other beekeepers who have removed the old queen and replaced it which a new one. As the hive erupts into chaos...its easy to blame some of the bees for being bad and not respecting the new authority. Terrorists are expected to have the common decency of respecting democracy, and ethic factions just love being ruled by a government which contains strong elements of their fundamental opposites.


Why I'm glad Scotland are crap at football.

If you think you're sick of hearing about 1966...just imagine the situation if Scotland ever won the world cup?
If the number of repeats of Archie Gemmel's goal are anything to go by...or the media coverage when any Scots happen to vaguely excel at any bizarre sport - suddenly the whole country seems to be a fan. Oh yes, I've been following woman's curling for a while now, along with round the world yachting. Tennis? Sure, the public will watch, but only if someone from the same rough geographic area is playing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The irony of some Scots talking about the "auld enemy" whilst wearing an Argentinean football tops...contrasted with some English fans taking credit as if
they had anything remotely to do with the result. Forget glory hunting, forget shadenfraude. Shut up and watch the match.

Watch the first minister demonstrate his political ineptitude by thinking that it's a vote winner to show anti-English sentiment.


Sudden and mysterious death of Al Zarcarwi sparks fearsome leadership election battle.

The New Al Qaeda Party of the 3rd way aims to continue what Sheikh Abu Musab began with a main campaign message of "jihad, jihad, jihad".

The Jihadists and Greens Alliance had a main policy of  "Death to the west, and save the giant panda"

Stark raving loony Ayatola's party promised the start of constructive dialog and suspension of all violence and received a grand total of four votes from the worldwide brotherhood and lost their deposit.

The right leaning candidate Abu Hamza al-Muhajir eventually won through to become the replacement leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq with his promise of "Tough on infidels, tough on the causes of infidels". Ministerial perks include a variety of safe houses (one slightly damaged).


The dangers of being a young hoodlum in Glasgow

A large number of the criminal underclass are they themselves subjected to crime each day, and it seems that the public and police are unwilling to help.

The next time a victim of crime approaches you having lost their wallet; and more importantly; their bus/train fare required to get home. Please help. Take them to the nearest police station and insist that they report the loss/theft, then ensure the lost souls get home by escorting them to the nearest station and ensuring they get on that train to Gourock.

Be a good Samaritan- they'll thank you for it!!!


Alternative found for rapid, effective verruca removal

Bazooka gel? No. Landmine ointment.


The only Bikini diet with guaranteed weight loss is the one which involves eating nothing but bikinis.


Arab world "surprised" to see soldiers assault stone throwing teenagers.

Is anything about the reaction of British soldiers a surprise to anyone? Why let an understanding of natural retribution, cause and effect, get in the way when there's an opportunity to take umbrage. Those from the Middle East should be surprised... surprised that the soldiers hadn't shot the stone throwing teenagers - it is the norm for the region.


For all the fast-food environmentalists…

 

Pennies from your purchase go towards an industry which makes McDonalds look saintly. Supporting an industry which sells a product which is inherently dangerous; in moderation or otherwise. An industry which opposes measures to protect the health of non consumers. An industry which denies its product is linked to cancer, refuses victims compensation, continues advertising and brand management aimed at anyone who’ll buy; be they in developed or undeveloped countries, educated, uneducated, rich, poor, young, old. So if you think you're just harming yourself with a product, consider the multi-billion dollar monster you're sponsoring.

LATEST HEADLINES

Front page news: Foreign "prisoner" captured.

Is it appropriate to refer to someone, who has already served their time, as a prisoner? Do we still believe in the notion of redemption, rehabilitation or indeed prison as an effective treatment for criminal behaviour, or are we to consider that anyone with a record is, and forever will be, a prisoner? The headline of free tabloid "The Metro"

On the bottom of page four was the slightly more worrying news of the 659 outstanding arrest warrants. Over six hundred violent suspects on the run, charged with murders, assaults and weapons carrying offenses. Why didn't this make the front page? Are we to be more concerned and outraged at the solitary Latvian?

Native criminals have the right to be on our streets prosing the risk that we consider them still to pose (even after our ever so effective "treatment" by detention at her majesty's pleasure). Punished twice. What happened to case by case judgements? Tony Blair's blanket statement "Every foreign national arrested will be deported".

Why don't we export all our dangerous criminals to the Falkland islands. Since the people there are so keen on being British they won't mind coming back to the mainland. I would hasten a guess that the number of high profile British nationals arrested overseas for serious crimes is far greater than the number of foreign offenders here. It seems that we're experts in exporting paedophiles to the far east.

True patriots find the chance of being attacked by someone foreign to be unacceptable.

What sympathy and shame the public felt when the pretty exchange student was killed while staying in this fair isle. Consider public opinion of foreign countries' justice systems when they attempt to prosecute accused paedophiles/baby shakers/drug smugglers/ murderers from this country.

Why is the ineffectiveness of the justice system in preventing re-offending only a serious issue when it's foreigners who may be re-offending? Why do nationals have a natural right to pose an identical risk?

Why would it be better to return a dangerous criminal to a country where monitoring and policing may be even less effective than it is here? Patriotism, protectionism, whatever it's called, it's nothing more than geographically specific racism. We give a damn about a foreign offender posing a risk to OUR children, when they could be safely deported to pose a danger to someone else's. This human cost is the same, and the overriding issue of rehabilitation failure escapes the argument. We don't have a problem accepting skilled workers; doctors and nurses from foreign countries; no matter what the effect of depriving those countries has.

The Saudi government has stated that any incident involving at foreign national is the total responsibility of that person, for if they didn't choose to be there, the incident wouldn't have occurred.


Orangytan in court over monkey business.


 

<Court dramatisation>

Judge: Now, he's the king of the swingers,
Oh, the Scottish MSP
He had a pop and couldn't stop
and that's what's bothering me
He wants be a man, club
And stroll right into town
And be just like the other men
He's just monkeyin' around!

 

Chorus(the jury)
Oh ooo, don't wanna be like you oo
don't wanna walk like you, talk like you, too

 

Update: with the release of a videotaped admission, now this cheeky monkey expects the general public not to believe their ears (or indeed their common sense) in a see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil type situation.  To quote the eloquent Mr Sheridan  'c*nts'.


"IT WASN'T MY FAULT!

 

Is it healthy to allow victims to totally negate personal responsibility?


By drinking a person exposes themselves to misfortunes as far ranging as being run over, getting liver disease, being involved in violent crime, road traffic accidents, and not least doing something regrettably stupid. These are the known risks that we expose ourselves to when we indulge. As a smoker exposes themselves to cancer, though possible to get cancer without smoking, it wouldn't be incorrect to suggest that personal irresponsibility in lifestyle choice was a contributory factor.
 

Someone exercising their right to free expression by wearing a "Fight me" t-shirt could naturally expect to run into occasional trouble, regarding behaviour, I personally discovered that an unguarded comment can lead to being assaulted. One could very well blame drink from impairing my judgment, society for influencing me to take a drink, but ultimately I did decide to drink and did decide to unwisely exercise my right to free speech!

It's a logical fallacy to suggest that a girl not taking personal responsibility for her safety somehow negates the guilt of the criminal. In the case of rape, the phrase "she asked for it" is inaccurate, but it would be reasonable to say she could have considered the motivation of some men and acted in a more careful manner. It's not about liberation, nor adopting the primitive idea that "men can't help themselves". Tarring all things masculine with one brush, then adopting an unrealistic personal attitude. It's evident that bad people do exist, violent crime and rape statistics highlight this. We all agree on the human right to free expression. However, the simplistic assumptions of those defending and encouraging risky behaviour may seem very liberal and popular to certain demographics, but is irresponsible as we don't live in the

consequence free world of their imagination.

Historical development of traditional modes of behaviour perhaps reflecting of this; perhaps fathers more aware of the tendencies of certain men. There's a happy medium between Taliban sanctioned burkes (designed to cocoon women in a protective environment apparently) and the cleavage, legs, bottom and belly exposing outfits worthy of prostitutes. It's not good enough to think what ideally should be the case: deal with the actuality. It should be well known that flirting or sexual inferences can be miss-read...and that an unambiguous attitude may be as a effective protection as mace. Sexual liberation is a double edge sword as at present he law cannot make up for a lack of personal care. It becomes impossible to protect both a person who was too drunk to give informed consent, and to protect the other party responsible for estimating if the person was sufficiently able to consent or not.


Why is it ridiculous, inappropriate, un-pc or sexist to consider someone's attitude or attire can increase the likelihood of being treated in a certain way in a socio-sexual context?  Is it not sensible to consider the situation and  make an informed judgment not to dress, or present oneself in a way that may attract an undesired response? Just as someone would be daft walking into an Celtic bar wearing a rangers strip.


A lack of pragmatism in neo-feminist views  "I'm wearing these crippling heels for myself" is the wearer's deep reasoning that allows an aloof attitude to be adopted when the desired attention turns into undesired leering. A well documented effect; appearance effects everything from bullying to job interviews; of course it shouldn't make a difference in an ideal world....but we don't live in an ideal world.

 

The laws of this country are designed to prevent people taking sexual advantage of others, either by force or exploiting impaired judgement. This philosophy is applied with laws to protect the young and mental patients not able to fully understand. Impaired consent is no consent at all. Would it be incorrect to suppose by this logic, that there is very little difference between rape and sleeping with a drunk?

 

Can a person be responsible for deciding if someone else's judgement is impaired? What about when their own judgement is impaired by the very same substance?


Problems pals perpetuation principle.

 

Background ingredients for fucked up friend.

 Issues, be they irreconcilable personal/sociological problem(s), or poor self awareness, motivation and self discipline. Their easy going lifestyle is maintained by having a low standard of personal and group expectation. What may appear as tolerance and forgiveness doesn’t actually constitute as such, as the bar is set lower. I.e. what you may see as unforgivable, they see as totally acceptable behavior. Thus their social grouping is dictated. In fact, in this kind of scenario, kudos may actually be gained from being more anti-social or dysfunctional; and thus the unwitting swan among the ducklings may face ridicule for a lack of self deprecation, a low idiot tolerance, and may also have his own successes played down and ignored. Your attempts to help aren’t fully appreciated, your advice ignored. Fraternizing regularly with such damaged goods and you’ll soon meet their misfit mates. In next to no time, is it possible to find that you’ve got a whole bunch of fucked up friends.

 

Supposing you meet some normal friends in a business or pleasure situation, you may have forgotten what normal expectations are. Your confidence shattered by unappreciative mates, you feel buoyed by the compliments of new acquaintances. Through the conversation the topic of your anomalous acquaintances arises and you end up trying desperately to draw something positive from the experience. You fail to find a summation or interesting fact that doesn’t insult them, and in the process, degrade yourself. Your new mates are suspicious…do you always talk ill of people? What kind of friends do you have, and why? You subconsciously act to impress as you try to escape the old crowd, but your loyalty is torn and your behavior smacks of desperation.

 

Presuming the stage one audition has been passed and you are invited to socialize…here’s the dilemma; don’t bring other friends, and look like you’ve got no friends. Do bring your abnormal associates, and you’re at risk of get rejected by your new found normal mates if he (or she) acts screwy. Worst case scenario: your crazy comrade hijacks your new social group and paints a less than flattering picture of you. So much for turning the new leaf.

 

In conclusion; it becomes clear that even having a messed up mate can be enough to make one act in a messed up manner. Soon you realize that the ‘normal’ mates are just as messed up as those you were tying to escape More worryingly still, with some further examination you may even reach the ultimate conclusion that you are the one who is the most fucked up of all. Time required to do this: 8 months.


Football club chairman has deep difficulty in understanding term "sectarianism"

An initial decision by UEFA had cleared the club of singing bigoted songs with the logic: this is a regional problem inherent in the club. After being forced to reexamine their own code of conduct they withdrew the original ruling.

"up to our knees in fenian blood, surrender or you'll die"

Club Chairman David Murray is appealing against the decision, but why? Does he feel that the song is appropriate, and not bigoted, or out of keeping with the spirit of the game? Does he feel that Rangers do not deserve to be punished for this behaviour? Does he feel that neither are the fans are the responsibility of the club, nor do they have a duty to the club?

Whatever the reasoning, it appears to be condoning of the song "Billy boys" which continues to be sung at Rangers games at home, and abroad.


Unsubstantiated "substantial" terror threat risk announced.
 
Enlighten us, trusted keepers of the peace; John Reid announced the very reassuring facts: "We've caught some people, but there still might be some more bad people out there. Better stay scared just in case."

If the details of the threat are known, then presumably the security forces are able to deal with it, so it's no longer a threat. It follows that the only actual threat is the unknown one which you can’t deal with. Does attempting to quantify that unquantifiable risk to those with a poor perception of risk help to allay fear, or cause it to thrive?
 
In this culture the authorities refer to information gathered as ”intelligence" even after it is proven false! Intelligence is factual and truthful; there is no such thing as false intelligence, knowledge is either intelligent or it is false.

Does a mistake damage the anti-terror cause? How many arrests of terrorists have there been? The fertiliser bombers...teenagers with computer files on how to make bombs, the shoe bomber, British suspects released from Guantanamo due to lack of evidence...If the secret services are stopping so many attacks...why have they made so few arrests? In possession of material which could be used as explosive, without a plan to use it; where the main prosecution witness is a plea bargainer provided by the CIA.  If you think this constitutes a plot, I suggest you keep to the fiction section.

Either: there just aren't that many people plotting to do anything (as evident by only a single attack on the UK by fundamentalists- compared that to N.Irish terrorism!)
Or: the intelligence services aren't doing their jobs properly.

Ah. these bombers are wily creatures, even when we raid them; they are so smart and dangerous they've hidden all the evidence.

You should still be scared...but we're doing our best. Behind the scenes, preventing terror by not arresting anyone, but shooting a couple of suspects. Look at the extreme measures we have to take to keep you safe...just use your intelligence and imagine what horrors would occur if we didn't?

Quick; make the vague estimation of terrorist threat level public, so that the public know all about what they have no control over. Yes, that'll reduce public anxiety.

Government approved posters to induce a combined sense of terror and national pride.


Stupid analogy of the week.

"Giving heroin addicts heroin is the same as giving gambling addicts money, or giving alcoholics a
drink"
Alistair Ramsay, former head of the Scotland against Drugs on the Clinical trial of a treatment to medicate heroin addicts with clinical morphine.

One would think a man in his position would realise the failures of attempting to treat heroin addiction with either a "cold turkey" or methadone substitution. Surely knowing this, one would think he'd lend his support to any alternative treatment method; especially one already proven to have shown previous success in trials in Germany.

"We don't want to pay to fund addict's habits"
But don't we already pay for heroin addicts; either in the form of crime or medical assistance and associated human suffering? Ramsay's astounding ignorance of the dissimilarity of alcohol and heroin addictions underlines the inappropriateness of his previous appointment. A more suitable analogy would be the nicotine patches already given out on the NHS to wean smokers off cigarettes... but hey, that seems far too sensible.

IN THE NEWS

 Workmate officially "funny" but only sort of



Country warned against developing threatening alternative power sources.


This endeavour is a threat, and is damaging to the interests of the U.S.A. Unless these dangerous 'mentalists abandon their reckless pursuit of renewable energy, we will have no alternative but to take alternative action, in the form of a tactical carpet bombing/pre-emptive nuclear strike, for the good of ourselves and mankind.

Proliferation of the technology to other 'mentalist countries, along with W.E.C (ways of energy conservation)



Wheelchair manufacturer selects inappropriate brand name.


"Quickie".



Can a undemocratic Government instated by foreign power give legitimacy to the foreign troops present?


If the initial invasion of Iraq is of dubious legality. How can an artificially imposed regime give legitimacy to the foreign troops there?


The case: an army doctor jailed for 8 months for refusing to serve in the illegal war in Iraq. The judge claimed that it wasn't an illegal occupation as the Iraqi government had conveniently requested their presence.  If memory of history lessons serve me well... wasn't the official line from the French government installed by the Nazis also one of  welcoming to the brave "liberators"?



Spaz apologises for Woods reference.


"I lost my temper like a big grumpy tiger"



Darth Vader's guide to management


Chapters include:

1. How to command authority with your tone of voice
2. Techniques for inspiring fear and respect in your minions
3. Jedi mind tricks for effective delegation
4. Power dressing for business
5. Carrot or stick: when and when not to use the choke hold
6. Chains of command: coming to terms with working for the evil emperor....
7. Off shoring Death Star Construction
8. When to execute orders, when to execute staff
9. Presentations - Planet destruction for maximum audience impact
10. Nepotism - When to keep it in the family
 



David "chill" Blaine feeling wet and ignored in goldfish bowl for week.


"look away children- he's just doing it for attention"

 

Not escaping from chains is a trick anyone can perform.



Woman runs marathon despite absolutely nothing being wrong with her.


A complete lack of heartwarming struggle to overcome adversity. Why am I going to wait until I get cancer or become a double amputee? Climb mountains, swim with sharks, perhaps do an iron man triathlon- the first thing I'll be erasing from my to-do list following a loss of limbs.



Bush redirects cancer funding to scientists developing fire retardant star spangled banner.

 


Loans don't help you afford things; they help you to get things you can't afford.


Davina McCall's hidden talent: still hidden.



US Soldiers to be given special "Warrior training"

 

Which part of "Don't kill innocent women and children" don't you understand?

 

Ah...so you though the armed insurgents disguised themselves as unarmed pensioners and toddlers. Yes, these barbarians are very cunning.


MET office spokesperson apologises for "the hurt we may have caused"; by 250 officers storming a house and shooting an innocent person.

 

May have caused.


 

Supermarket encourages sensible drinking with 40 bottles of beer for the price of 20.

 

Emblazoned across the bottom of the television advert was the proud claim; but since when does selling over 3 gallons of beer in one special offer encourage moderation?



Exchange of pleasantries not very pleasant.

"morning" he said. It was the 423rd working day in a row which he'd uttered that line. "morning" I
said. Dammit. I'd Forgotten again. A cursory nod of the head would have sufficed; I've got to stop encouraging that bastard; else this exchange of trip will never end.
I really have nothing particular against that bastard; only that he ends up in my vicinity with
his cheerful indifference to the working day. "morning" is the only thing he ever says to me, unless you count the "good" mornings. I don't know the first thing about this prick, and I don't
want to know. "good morning" he said; on the day after my family were killed in a car crash, my
girlfriend dumped me and I discovered that lump in my testicle. Ok, so that didn't happen; but it could have. Is it a good morning? He doesn't know me. Good morning for him, maybe, perhaps he enjoys coming to this awful place. What an insufferable bastard.

 

I guess I'm just not a "morning" person.



Congratulations!!!

 

I understand the planet you live on has rotated an integer number of times about the
nearest star since you detached from your spawner. Well done!


Queen's rule remarkably unremarkable.


During the entirety of the queen's tenure; what exactly of note has she done that we didn't expect her to do? Did she ever say anything she wasn't supposed to, or wasn't prompted to? Did she ever express a personal opinion or give some insight into her feelings? Did she ever say or do anything, anything at all out of the ordinary in the last 60 years? No.

One mild gag - anus horibulus; Latin gutter jokes are British upper class wit at its best.

 

Nothing remarkable whatsoever from the figurehead of the nation. Not even a fart in public or word out of place. (I suppose that's Phil the Greek's job)

 

The only remarkable thing about the royals is that this undemocratic, classist, elitist, inbred reality show has gone on for as long as it has.

 

The only thing remarkable about the Queen's rule is that she is utterly, utterly unremarkable.

 

  © Copyright 2006, Del on earth

Opinions expressed here are not meant to be taken too seriously.

 

Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1