The Declaw Hall of Shame
Write A Letter!


Want to write a letter to the clinics listed on this site?
Feel free to copy the below letter, and e-mail or snail mail it!


Home      Eastern US      Central US      Western US      Canada      Dishonorable Mentions      Off The List


Dear

I have visited your clinic's web site, and I am writing to express my dismay at the way your site promotes feline onychectomy.  It is unconscionable for a veterinarian to advertise or otherwise promote this barbaric procedure.
 
It is ethically indefensible to force a cat to suffer multiple amputations for owner convenience, when there is no medical benefit to the cat.  Declawing is banned or illegal in the UK, New Zealand, Australia, and most of Europe.  The U.S. and Canada are two of the few developed countries left that allow this inhumane practice, something for which every practicing veterinarian in North America should be deeply ashamed.  It is my belief that declawing should be banned in North America, and I strongly urge you to discontinue the practice altogether and to state on your web site and in your other marketing materials that you do not perform declaws. 

You have, at the very least, an ethical and moral obligation to give your clients and prospective clients a full disclosure about the procedure and its implications and after-effects, so that they may make an informed choice about onychectomy.

You have an ethical obligation to educate your clients about the reasons why cats need their claws.  For example:

You have an ethical obligation to describe the procedure to your clients so that they will be able to fully grasp its implications.  For example, using the phrase "removal of the claw at the distal phalanx" is not acceptable, because most people don't understand exactly what a "distal phalanx" is.  Your web site should describe declawing as exactly what it is, in plain English:  "The amputation of the cat's toes at the first joint."  Anything less is potentially misleading, if not downright dishonest.

You have an ethical obligation to fully disclose any and all potential side effects and long-term after-effects of the procedure.  For example: 

Finally, you have an ethical obligation to educate your clients about alternatives to declawing, such as scratching posts, regular nail trimming, and even "Soft Paws", and to strongly encourage them to choose these alternatives rather than proceeding with the onychectomy.

Your clients trust you to do what is best for their pets and they trust you to fully inform them about the risks and implications of any medical or surgical procedure.  It is therefore your responsibility and duty to educate people, and do so with the benefit of the cat in mind, not the convenience of owners or your own pocketbook.  You have a obligation to first do no harm, and that includes educating your clients so that they will choose humane alternatives rather than an excruciatingly painful surgery which is inflicted on the cat solely for owner convenience.

What I would like to see on your web site is an article that:

There is a growing movement of people in North America who firmly believe that declawing is nothing more than animal abuse, who boycott veterinarians who perform the procedure, and who will encourage others to boycott them as well.  I urge you to bear this in mind and to have the courage to take a leadership role among your peers in abandoning, or at least discouraging, this barbaric practice.

Sincerely,


Home      Eastern US      Central US      Western US      Canada      Dishonorable Mentions      Off The List


Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1