Next: Scattering from a thin
Up: Theory.
Previous: Theory.
Contents
From Maxwell equations, we can derive the wave equation for a
transverse component of the electric field in the vacuum [14]:
![$\displaystyle \frac{\partial^2}{\partial t^2} E\left(\vec{x},z,t\right) = c^2 \...
...\left(\vec{x},z,t\right) + \nabla_{\vec{x}}^2 E\left(\vec{x},z,t\right) \right]$](img81.png) |
(3.1) |
where
is the Laplacian oeprator, with respect to
the horizontal coordinate
. Since we are working with a
laser, and we consider only elastic scattering, the only temporal
frequency involved is
:
 |
(3.2) |
where
is the wave vector. Eq. (3.1) becomes:
 |
(3.3) |
We define
as the Fourier transform of
with respect to
:
 |
(3.4) |
The solution is:
 |
(3.5) |
In order that this solution exists, a condition must be fulfilled:
 |
(3.6) |
This condition is alwais met if we consider only propagating waves.
The quantity
is closely related to the
intensity of the light crossing the plane
. Each
two-dimensional Fourier mode of amplitude
,
on a given
, and wavevector
is generated by a
three-dimensional plane wave of wavevector
,
where the only value of
is obtained by imposing that the
wavevector of any plane wave has length
:
 |
(3.7) |
Given the values of the two-dimensional Fourier modes
on a given
, we can evaluate
for each
and
, by using
Eq. (3.5) and
(3.7). Expressing it by its
three-dimensional Fourier transform:
![$\displaystyle E\left(\vec{q},k_z\right)=2\pi E_0\left(\vec{q}\right) \delta \left[ k_z - k_z\left(q\right) \right]$](img98.png) |
(3.8) |
Each three-dimensional component with amplitude
of the electric field represents a plane
wave travelling in a different direction.
We define
, the two-dimensional power
spectrum of
:
 |
(3.9) |
Light intensity, for each scattering direction, can be defined on the basis
of
:
![$\displaystyle \left< E\left(\vec{q},k_z\right) E^*\left(\vec{q}',k_z'\right) \r...
..._z'\right) \delta \left[k_z-k_z\left(q\right) \right] I\left(\vec{q},q_z\right)$](img102.png) |
(3.10) |
where
has been expressed in terms of the
transferred wavevector
. From
Eq. (3.7):
 |
(3.11) |
Substituting
of Eq.
(3.8) in
Eq. (3.10),
and comparing the result with Eq. (3.9),
we can relate the scattered intensity
to
the power spectrum of the field
:
 |
(3.12) |
From Eq. (3.12) we notice that
can be measured by evaluating
on any
.
If the sample is isotropic,
depends only on
:
 |
(3.13) |
In this case, Eq. (3.12) can be written in
terms on
and
:
![$\displaystyle I\left[Q\left(q\right)\right]=S_E\left(q\right)$](img111.png) |
(3.14) |
The geometrical meaning of Eq. (3.13)
is explained in Fig. 3.1. For
,
Eq. (3.13) can be approximated by
.
Moreover, if Rayleigh Gans approximation holds,
represents the power spectrum of the refraction index of the sample.
From these two considerations, we obtain the result that, for scattering
on small angles and under Rayleigh Gans condition, the
two dimensional correlation function of the electric field is proportional
to the correlation function of the light path through the sample.
Figure 3.1:
Relation between
and
. Geometrical interpretation of Eq.
(3.13)
 |
Figure 3.2:
Relation between
the coordinate
on a screen, in a far field experiment, and the
transferred wave vector
. Geometrical interpretation of Eq.
(3.15)
 |
Figure 3.3:
Relative error obtained neglecting the non linearity of the
ralation between the sample wave vector and the near field wave
vector. The graph is obtained from Eqs.
(3.13) and (3.15).
|
|
When performing a far field, small angle scattering measurement, the
scattered beams are focused on a screen. In suitable units, each point
of the screen has a coordinate
. For small values of the wave
vector,
approximates
, the transferred wavevector.
The exact relation is:
 |
(3.15) |
Equation (3.13) can be used to correct
the results of a Near Field Speckles measurement. Figures
3.1 and 3.2
show the geometrical meaning of equations
(3.13) and
(3.15). For small values of
, that is
,
the two
equations can be approximated with
; the error
due to this approximation is shown in Fig.
3.3: it's quite small, and
it can often be neglected.
Next: Scattering from a thin
Up: Theory.
Previous: Theory.
Contents
2003-01-09