EXCERPTS FROM THE

WWF - LIVING PLANET REPORT - 2002

Foreword

At the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, world leaders committed themselves to the goal of sustainable development. The term sustainable development has since entered into everyday language, and yet it remains an elusive concept. Indeed, it is now used by governments, industry, and non-governmental organizations to mean almost anything they want it to mean. However, in truth, it is a very simple idea. Before the Rio Summit, WWF, along with our partner organizations IUCN The World Conservation Union and UNEP, published Caring for the Earth a report subtitled "A strategy for sustainable living". We defined sustainable development as "improving the quality of human life while living within the carrying capacity of supporting ecosystems", and this definition remains as valid today as it was then.

The years after Rio have seen improvements in the quality of life for people in many parts of the world, yet we continue to exact an unacceptable price from the Earth 's ecosystems at the same time. The past decade has witnessed fires on an unprecedented scale in the tropical forests of Brazil and Indonesia, coral bleaching that has left vast areas of reef in the Caribbean, Indian, and Pacific Oceans as ghosts of their former selves, the collapse of commercially valuable fish stocks in the Atlantic,the ecological devastation of the Black Sea, the Aral Sea, and Lake Chad, and the continual loss of precious wetland and freshwater ecosystems around the world.

What has this to do with sustainable development? We live on a bountiful planet, but not a limitless one. The Earth has a limited capacity to yield its renewable resources. Provided that this capacity is not diminished, the Earth will continue to provide food, materials,energy,and freshwater each year,in perpetuity,for the benefit of all humanity.

Ensuring access to basic resources and improving the health and livelihoods of the world's poorest people cannot be tackled separately from maintaining the integrity of natural ecosystems. We rely on the living biosphere to provide food, materials, water, and, importantly,to absorb carbon dioxide. By continuing to abuse the biosphere, and through the inequitable sharing of the Earth's resources, we undermine the chances of eradicating poverty, and put the whole of humanity under the threat of global climate change.

This report is about measuring human pressure on the Earth,and how that pressure is distributed among countries and regions. The Living Planet Index is a measure of the state of natural ecosystems, according to the abundance of animal species they support, while the ecological footprint compares countries' consumption of natural resources with the Earth 's biological capacity to regenerate them. These two measures do not take into account all of the conditions necessary to achieve sustainable development. But unless we recognize the ecological limits of the biosphere, we cannot claim to be sustainable.

Dr Claude Martin
Director General, WWF International



THE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT

The ecological footprint compares renewable natural resource consumption with nature's biologically productive capacity. A country's footprint is the total area required to produce the food and fibres that country consumes, sustain its energy consumption,and give space for its infrastructure. People consume resources from all over the world, so their footprint can be thought of as he sum of these areas, wherever they are on the planet.

The global ecological footprint covered 13.7 billion hectares in 1999, or 2.3 global hectares per person (a global hectare is 1 hectare of average biological productivity). This demand on nature can be compared with the Earth's productive capacity. About 11.4 billion hectares, slightly less than a quarter of the Earth's surface, are biologically productive, harbouring the bulk of the planet's biomass production. The remaining three-quarters, including deserts, ice caps, and deep oceans, support comparatively low concentrations of bioproductivity. The productive quarter of the biosphere corresponded to an average 1.9 global hectares per person in 1999. Therefore human consumption of natural resources that year overshot the Earth's biological capacity by about 20 per cent.

The global ecological footprint changes with population size, average consumption per person, and the kinds of production systems, or technologies, in use. The Earth's biological capacity changes with the size of the biologically productive area, and its average productivity per hectare. Hence changes in population, consumption, and technology can narrow or widen the gap between humanity's footprint and the available biological capacity. It is apparent that, since the 1980s, humanity has been running an ecological deficit with the Earth.



ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT AND HUMAN WELFARE

Based on the UN, IPCC, and FAO reference scenarios, which assume slowed population growth, steady economic development, and more resource-efficient technologies, the world's ecological footprint will continue to grow between 2000 and 2050 from a level 20 per cent above the Earth's biological capacity to a level between 80 and 120 per cent above it. In these scenarios, 9 billion people in 2050 would require between 1.8 and 2.2 Earth-sized planets in order to sustain their consumption of crops, meat, fish, and wood, and to hold CO2 levels constant in the atmosphere. For this projection to become reality, the limited capacity of global ecosystems must prove capable of supporting the additional load. The ecological footprint projection, however, merely documents the demands of human consumption in comparison with the biologically productive capacity of the planet; it does not imply whether such a future is possible.




DOWNLOAD THE ENTIRE LIVING PLANET 2002 REPORT
(Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader - See below)

CHOICE OF DOWNLOADS

DOWNLOAD NOW

DOWNLOAD NOW (Another source)

ADOBE ACROBAT READER




FAIR USE NOTICE. This webpage contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.




TOP   BACK   HOME


Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1