Claremont Resort Expansion Home Page


165 New Rooms and a 3 Level Parking Facility


5 to 10 Years of Construction


During the April 26th. meeting at the Claremont, Ted Axe, the Claremont's general manager, admitted he wanted to add 165 new rooms, possibly including timeshares and a 3 level parking facility. This is a 60% increase in the number of guest rooms, adding 3 rooms for every five they have now. At the May 26th. meeting, Axe said he was considering condominiums, not timeshares. Condominiums are residences, not guest rooms. [Previously, the Claremont said it wanted only 90 rooms (see April website).]

Axe said construction would take place over the next 5 to 10 years. Axe said he is looking at maximum development of 22 acres and maximum profits for KSL, which owns the Claremont. Axe said there would be minimal impact on traffic, views, and the neighborhood.

Two Phase Construction

The Claremont's management is hoping to expand the hotel in two phases. The initial phase has begun with 16 million dollars worth of renovations to the main building and a 1.5 million dollar seismic retrofit. Over the summer, the main entrance on Tunnel Rd. will get an entrance monument and median strip. In October the Spa will be moved closer to the proposed 90 rooms. This will also increase the amount of space alloted to the Club. Both the Spa and Club will double in size.

Next would be the 90 room wing built into the hillside. A parking deck would be put where a tennis court is now on the Domingo side (near Peet's), with a new tennis court on top of it. This would be two stories high. During the second phase, a campus-like area with 75 large suites or condominiums would be built. Another pool might be added, according to Axe. Berkeley neighbors say the pool would be covered under the permanent noise injunction they won several years ago. More levels of parking topped with tennis courts would replace the current tennis courts, until all 6 tennis courts would be above a three story parking facility. The Claremont would now have 400 parking spaces. With valet parking, they could park 1500 cars.

At some point, according to Axe, they may put an entrance on Claremont Ave. (there's already an unused curb cut) with a deceleration lane for cars to stack up. Parking places on Claremont Ave. would be eliminated, although anyone who wants to pay what the Claremont charges could park in the new parking garage.

To give a better idea of when all this could take place, we have developed an unofficial timeline based on information from the Claremont and KSL.

In July, Ted Axe indicated to members of an informal neighborhood group that the expansion may be done as many small projects rather than the 2 phase construction he presented at previous public meetings. He continues to emphasize that nothing is official.

Update

The Claremont has been very much in the news this week. On August 11, KTVU featured the Claremont expansion on its noon news. According to KTVU, members of the Club at the Claremont are against the expansion, especially the loss of green areas, and increased congestion and air pollution from the added parking.

The Chronicle did a story on brush clearing and a story on the expansion [see "Claremont Resort Neighbors Clip Clearing program," by Debra Levi Holtz, SF Chronicle, 08/09/00 and "Growing Pains", Debra Levi Holtz, SF Chronicle, 08/11/00]. The Claremont is now saying the new guest wing would be 86 rooms rather than 90, and that it wants to put in 75 time share villas, rather than condominiums. Both KTVU and the "Growing Pains article mentioned pines and ivy, but not the native oaks growing in the area where the guest room wing would go. Native oaks are protected by law. Even if the Claremont has scaled back the project to spare the oaks, construction can damage the roots and kill the trees. For more on oaks, see article.

Environmental Impact Report

This is the most important part of the expansion project. Before any new construction, the Claremont must prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). This will be started sometime after Labor Day, according to Axe. After it is submitted to the City of Oakland, there will be a public comment period, after which permits may be granted. The whole EIR process may take as little as 4 to 6 months.

This spring and summer is a crucial time for public involvement. The EIR must detail the new construction's effect on the environment. For example, every tree that is removed affects the microclimate, air quality, and wildlife habitat. The Claremont plans to remove a mature grove of pines [ Update: this writer saw approximately 24 very large, mixed conifers, 2 smaller pines with a sickly appearance, and 2 oaks in the area to be developed.], a native oak and a landscape area for its 90 room addition. The arbor area will become a third swimming pool. Axe said the trees would be replaced, (including the mature trees destroyed last summer)but saplings have a different effect on the environment than mature trees.

Earthmovers will be brought in to carve up the hillside below the Terrace Bar. The 90 room wing is planned for the hillside below the hotel and would be connected by elevators. The EIR should detail how this will affect the stability of the hillside and the homes above it.

Earthmovers will also excavate the land under the Claremont's 6 tennis courts. The Claremont proposes a 3 level parking facility beneath new tennis courts, increasing its total number of parking spaces to 400. With valet parking included at no extra charge, the Claremont could have 1500 cars parked at once. This would be a major environmental change and seriously affect our air quality.



Brush Clearing at the Claremont

On Fri., Aug. 4, the Claremont began removing overgrown ivy and brush from the land along the path to Alvarado Rd., behind the Hotel. This followed the annual cleanup of the land along the path (a water easement owned by EBMUD) and the Alvarado Pl. side of the property between the fence and the street, performed as usual by the East Bay Conservation Corp. The brush removal was ordered by the Oakland Fire Dept.

On Tues., Aug. 8, Fire Marshall Camille Rodgers, Ted Axe, and contractor Arthur Young spoke to neighbors about the brush removal. Rodgers said the fire dept. had tried to get the Claremont to abate the hazardous conditions for several years without success. She said Axe was more cooperative than the previous management. She explained why brush and deadwood must be cleared in the fire zone.

Neighbors were upset that the parking lot was no longer screened from view. Ivy has been completely removed from portions of the fence, giving pedestrians and neighboring homes an unobstructed view of the parking lot. Neighbors complained of the increased noise from the parking lot, glare from the sun on cars, microclimate degradation, and aesthetics. One pointed out that Cecile Brunner roses, part of the original gardens, were in the path of destruction. Some rose bushes appear to have been cut. One neighbor also called the Chronicle, which ran an article the next day ["Claremont Resort Neighbors Clip Clearing program," by Debra Levi Holtz, SF Chronicle, 08/09/00.]

Axe said he was willing to work with the neighbors on their concerns. He said he is willing to put a temporary "green screen" on bare portions of the fence. He reached a compromise with neighbors on the spot, regarding the amount of greenery removed.

Heirloom Roses Spared

Rodgers, Axe, Young and a couple of neighbors toured the land slated to be cleared. Rodgers pointed out things that absolutely had to be removed (dead shrubs, "fire ladders"*, overgrown ivy, etc.) and plants that could stay. She said the ivy would grow back more quickly than one would expect. Young agreed to be very careful with the roses, some of which apparently had been cut. A neighbor told him to "take tender loving care" of the shrubs to be spared, and he agreed to have his crew clear sensitive areas by hand.

What does this have to do with the Claremont Expansion?

The brush-clearing began without warning. The City does not require the neighbors to be notified, therefore no one bothered to notify the neighbors. With a courtesy notice and some communication beforehand, the neighborhood would not have reacted so negatively to something which is being done to protect our lives and property. Some neighbors expressed increased mistrust of the Claremont, especially regarding its future plans.

Ted Axe was hired for two reasons**. One was to develop the Claremont's public areas and grounds. When his hiring was announced, KSL sad it wanted to change its public areas and grounds, including the replanting of some of the original landscape features. [See "New owners take an Axe to venerable Claremont Resort"bizjournals.com, 8/31/98]

The sudden desire to cooperate with the fire dept., after years of stonewalling by current and previous management, confirms this. KSL has been very upfront about its plans for the Claremont. They want to maximize development and profit. A previously unattractive area, littered with beer bottles and tires, will be landscaped into a lovely garden. Neighbors will have something nice to look at on their way to Peet's. This might soften opposition to removing the gardens and grove of trees which currently stand in the way of the proposed 90 room wing.


UPDATE


On Oct. 18th. an alert neighbor met a member of the Claremont's management team and Camille Rodgers walking the Claremont grounds, discussing what still needed to be cut in the woods bordering Alvarado Pl. There will be more brush clearing and cutting done in that area in order to comply with the Oakland Fire Dept. Last time, everyone was taken by surprise by the brush clearing. We suggest you contact the Claremont if you need specific details.

*A "fire ladder" is a low-hanging branch or a vine which fire can use to climb up into the trees. Ivy climbing a support wire, up a utility pole, and over a tree branch is a fire ladder. There are several of these fire ladders on the Claremont grounds.

**The second reason Axe was hired? His previous job was with Grenelefe Golf and Tennis Resort, in Orlando, Florida. Grenelefe features condominiums, which KSL wants to build at the Claremont. For more on the Claremont and golf, see article on KSL's privatization of Oakland's municipal golf course.



Berkeley City Manager to Monitor Claremont Expansion

On July 11, 2000, the Berkeley City Council passed Councilmember Polly Armstrong's request that the city manager monitor and review any documents submitted by the Claremont regarding its expansion plans. This was a consent item and passed without discussion. Click here for the text of the item, as emailed by Polly Armstrong's office.


What You Can D o

First, study the situation yourself. Contact a neighborhood organization, listed in Contacts. If you have questions or concerns, go to our contacts list, or e mail us. If you have an opinion on the matter, write a letter to the editor and again, use our contacts list to contact the Claremont and your local elected officials. You can express your opinion, ask questions, and give information through our Yahoo! Club.

Berkeley residents have expressed great frustration, as the Claremont is officially in Oakland. Polly Armstrong has been very receptive and helpful to her constituents. You can contact her and/or your neighborhood's city councilmember. Both Berkeley and Oakland residents can contact Alameda County Supervisor Keith Carson, who attended Jane Brunner's May 6th. meeting. Berkeley Mayor Shirley Dean also attended the meeting. Berkeley and Oakland residents can attend Jane Brunner's open meetings in North Oakland. Everyone is free to speak and to ask questions at the open meetings. Both Berkeley and Oakland residents can read the EIR, comment on it, and challenge it if necessary.


Articles

Timeline
Berkeley City Manager to Monitor Claremont Expansion
Claremont Expansion Discussed at CENA Meeting
Recent Expansions
Lake Chabot Golf Course and the Claremont
Who Put the K in Klaremont?"
Ca. Native Oaks

Community Networking

Contacts
Yahoo! Claremont Expansion Club
Message Board
Please Sign Our Guestbook
View Guestbook

View Our Old Guestbook

Archives

April Website
May Website
June Website
July Website

Sept. Website



Notice

This website is a volunteer effort and intended as a public service. Every effort is made to provide accurate information. We encourage you to check facts and figures with the Claremont, KSL, KKR and your local government officials. Any opinions expressed in the message board, guest book, Yahoo! Club, or articles, are not necessarily those of the website owner. Please ask permission before distributing the site and always include this disclaimer. For printer-ready (long) version of this website, click here. Nothing on this website is intended to defame any individual or corporation.


This page was last updated on October 18, 2000.

email webmistress



Hosted by www.Geocities.ws

1