Subject: ........... Re: Open letter to Joseph (was re: Cat and Tom Show)
Newsgroups: ... alt.pagan, alt.magick, soc.culture.haiti
Message ID: ... <s%[email protected]>
Date: ................ 2002-05-17 18:20:25 PST
Original Copy: ... Click here
Now, in Stereo!
Hi, Tammy. I decided that if you could put your manipulative little post
in two different threads, then I could do the same with my rebuttal.Tammy, shut up.
I had suspected that the behavior I had seen out of Craig and Stephanie was a reflection of you, and now I know it was.
Your spokesperson accused me of misrepresenting yours, and the House's position. Point by point, I have gone into the House's own site, and shown that this is not the case. Your response? You lie about what was said before, and cover your own worthless, pseudo-clerical (ahem!).
Lying seems to be your style. As the reader can easily see by visiting
http://chipagan.freewebsites.com/Netjer/Netjer-idiocy.html
your story, as it currently stands, has one huge and glaring hole in it. The "Netjer and Geometry" thread, which I had created the gateway post back to, WASN'T AN ARGUMENT. Nor did any argument take place during it. The only thing that the reader was directed back to, aside from the old, argument-free thread, were two new posts I put up, showing the reader where to go to find a Scientific American article which I had promised to locate. Where is the "trolling" in that?
John then responded by getting a few of his friends together, to bitterly complain about how I had archived some of his non-embarassing posts on the Geometry thread on my site, just to embarass and attack him. One small problem with that argument, aside from the fact that there was nothing in that thread for him to be embarassed by. The file on my site linked to, did nothing more than link back into your own archives. It's sole reason for existence was the fact that urls on your webboard are unbelievably long, even by the standards of other webboards, and routing traffic this way allowed me to use cut and paste, instead of having to enter that huge url by hand. This, Stephanie Cass declared to be a personal attack, with you, now, seconding that unbelievable position.
Incredible. If I am accused of writing a post in order to attack John, and I should fail to deny this, then I am guilty of attacking John, because I am admitting it. If, on the other hand, I post a denial, then I'm still guilty in your group's topsy-turvy little world, because a rebuttal to an accusation is defined to be a form of personal attack. In other words, once the accusation is made, conviction in your little court is automatic, no matter what the accused may say on his own behalf. There's an expression for that kind of system, Tammy. It's called a Kangaroo court. Where is the justice in that, oh mighty carrier of the kingly ka of Heru?
As for your affected humility, your own comically absurd trip to Egypt to be coronated the successor to the pharoahs should serve as sufficient rebuttal, "your highness", but your own site serves even better. By your own clergy, you are called "Her holiness", "Her" or "She" invariably being capitalized when you are written of. I assure the reader that this is a title that is not bestowed upon all who visit your group, as, again, he can see for himself merely by visiting your boards. A wise choice indeed, as the results would prove most strange. "That will be $5.97, your holiness, and thank you for shopping at Sam's" "Um, sorry, your holiness, but I think that you owe me another quarter in change." "Oops, sorry about that your holiness". But then, strange is your middle name, now.
Only now. I am willing to believe that there was once a very sensible, and very decent woman named Tamara Siuda, who founded a group out of a genuine desire to serve God. I see her, sometimes, in some of your earlier writings. But she made the mistake of accepting exaggerated honors, and that isn't healthy. Your people cite your essays as if they were holy scripture, the mere quotation of which would be enough to trump all counter-argument. And why not? I have not once, ever seen you object to being treated as if you were the voice of God, Himself, and your own mythology encourages this. When you speak of Heru's presence being within you, how do you expect the shemsu you get to react? And when you accept this absurd adultation as if it were your due, what has become of your sense of reality, and what will?
Delusions are living things, and they will fight to survive. Your own rewriting of the recent historical record shows as much. The embarassing truth is that you aren't even a very good "king", much less a god. A good king would have recognized opportunism when she saw it; you only go into denial. Look at the man who has managed to manipulate your system, your clergy, and yourself. John.
http://chipagan.freewebsites.com/Netjer/kheru.html
This man is no Rhoades scholar, and he's not especially slick. If he can manipulate the House, who can't?
I could discuss your poor hospitality. I was on your board by your own personal invitation, one which you renewed after I left. To stand up for one's guests is the first duty of hospitality; when Kheru can threaten me by way of your own messaging system, in response to my refusal to believe in such absurdities as ancient Egyptian electrification and him hearing the voice of the goddess Sekhmet telling him to look through his girlfriend's e-mail, and your House has no objection to this, what has become of hospitality? I would ask, what has become of sanity, but look at who I'd be asking - the woman who thinks that she is a god or the next best thing.
I could discuss the way in which the House first suggests that I have misrepresented your position, and its, and after I have documented, point by point, that I have done nothing of the sort, even after you grant each point which you have been cornered into, neither you nor the House retracts this charge. How could you have known what was going o? The letter that Craig Schaefer responded to, was sent to you! It went right to your personal e-mail account at
[email protected]
the very account which you wrote to me from, when you asked me to drop by in the first place. I'd ask you "who do you think that you're fooling", but I have the uneasy feeling that your name would appear on the list.
Like I said, I'm perfectly willing to believe that there used to be a decent and reasonable woman named Tamara Siuda, but hubris always has its price. Your sense of reality was lost somewhere along this royal road you have layed out for yourself, stolen from you my your adoring crowd, and when your now treasured illusions are threatened, your integrity becomes the next thing to be lost. I wish I could have met Tamara Siuda. I'll bet she was worth knowing. But she's dead and gone, now, replaced by this Hekatawy I person who she gradually became, and the last thing I need to waste my time on, is the company of yet another megalomaniac.
.............................................. Joseph
.............................................. http://chipagan.freewebsites.com/
Your post has been left below, unedited.
| Note : We've deleted the quoted material below; you've already seen it. |
Click here to return to the previous page.